149-181 2002 7 mapnet@ms22.hinet.net N [ ]2002/6/14; [ ]2002/6/27; [ ]2002/7/4
150 Harris 2000 122 Harris 2000 162
151 Harris 2000 348 Harris 2000 351 Harris 2000 448 David Riesman 1989 80
152 Harris 2000 156-158 (context effect) Harris 2000 101-104 (peer pressure) (like me)
153 (2001) N Don Tapscott 1998 31 Net Generation N Don Tapscott N N 13~18 N 1997
154 ( ) (cyberpeer) Kraut Patterson Kraut et.al., 1998 (social activity) N (cyberpeer) (cyberpeer) 1992
155 2002 ID 1 1 2002 No.8
156 ICQ 2 N BBS WWW ICQ Peer to Peer ( ) 2 2001 No.3
157 2002 ID 3 1996 BBS BBS 3 2001 No.3
158 1999 N 1998 (virtual relationship) 1995 (1998) BBS
159 MUD (2000) N (Corey 1991) 1996 ( ) BBS
160 Young(1997) 4 pub (Anderson 1999) 5 (Hyperlink) Bruce(1998) Hoffman and Novak 1996 6 (goal-directed) (experiential) 4 Young K.S.(1997). What makes the Internet addictive:potential explanations for pathological Internet use, ( http://www.netaddiction.com/addictive.html),2000/06/11 5 Anderson,K.E.(1999). Internet use among collage student: An exploratory study, (http://www.rpi.edu/~anderk4/research.html),2001/09/17 6 Novak, T. P.& D. L. Hoffman(1996). New metrics for new media: toward the development of web measurement standards, (http://www2000.ogsm.vanderbilt.edu /novak/web.standards /webstand.html),2000/09/17
161 (2001a) Young(1997) 7 (identity) (identity formation) (Anderson 1999) 8 Suler(1998) 9 7 Young K.S.(1997). What makes the Internet addictive: Potential explanations for pathological Internet use, (http://www.netaddiction.com/addictive.html), 2000/06/11 8 Anderson,K.E.(1999). Internet use among collage student: An exploratory study, (http://www.rpi.edu/~anderk4/research.html),2001/09/17 9 Suler, J(1998). Adolescent in Cyberspace, (http://www.rider.edu/users/suler/psycyber/adoles.html),2001/09/17
162 N (2001) (1) (2) ( ) N (socialization) (social beings) NetValue 10 15 24 10 NetValue 2001/01 15 24,FIND, (http://www.find.org.tw/0105/news/0105_news_disp.asp?news_id=1234),2001/08/17
163 1987 126 (Arnett 1995 Ferle & Edwards and Lee 2000) (self-socialization) (Arnett 1995) (Iso Ahola.S.E 1980) 2001b 30
164 (social comparison process) (Atwater 1992) ( 1994) Hartup(1979) (Elkind 1984) ( )
165 11 (groupness) Harris 2000 166-171 (self categorization) salience (cintrasting category) (comparable category) (Harris 2000 184) 11 (http://www.knsh.com.tw/magazine/01/040/4009.asp),2001/10/26
166 ( 1995 185-188) N (Neil Postman 1994 12) case 12 12 2002 No.8
167 ( ) Neil Postman 1994 32 (2001) ID
168 2001 2001 13 (subculture) 8 14 13 2002 No.8 14 (2001)
169 15 2001 N McKenna Bargh 2000 (self-defining identity) 15 Young (http://life.fhl.net/desert/980903/007.htm), 2001/10/26
170 (social anxiety) ICQ 2001 Barry Wellman 16 2001 16 2001 (http://iwebs.url.com.tw/main/html/south/289.shtml),2001/10/26
171 17 Harris 2000 448-449 Leader PK 17 2001 No.4
172 18 ID N (Mark Slouka) 19 18 2002 No.8 19 2001 (http://iwebs.url.com.tw/main/html/south/289.shtml),2001/10/26
173 50 50 50 20 21 24 (2001) 20 2001 No.6 21 Kubey 2002 2 76-83
174 2001b 46-47 (Uses and Gratification Theory) ( 1999) 1993 (1999) 2001
175 22 Sheizaf(1986) 112 ( 1998) (2001) BBS KKMan BBS (2000) (20.6%) (18.9%) (16.4%) (10.9%) ((9.9%)) (2001) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. (2001) 22
176 23 ( ) Sherry Turkle (1994 104) 23 2001
177 BBS 2001a Gene, Bammel (1996) Neil,Postman (1994) (1995) BBS (1999) (1996) BBS
178 (1998) (2001) 2001 6 28-29 (2001) (1997) (2001) 2001 2001.. (John Seely Brown) & (Paul Duguid) (2001). (Tapscott D.) (1998) N (2001) 11 79-100 (Cooley C. H.) (1992) 1993. (Judith Rich Harris) 2000 (1998) 6 (1998) (2002) (Wallace Patricia) (2001)
179 (2002) (1999) (2001) (2001) (2000) (2001-2002) TALKER NO.1-8 (2001a) (2001b) (1994) (2001) (1987) (2001) (1998) (2000) (1999) (1999) Arnett, Jeffrey Jensen (1995). Adolescents Uses of Media for Self-socialization, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24(5):
180 519-533 Bruce, Harry(1998). User Satisfaction with Information Seeking on the Internet, Journal of the American Society for Information Science,49 (6 ): 541-556. Corey, G.(1991).Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy (4thEd.) Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole. Dunphy, D.C.(1990). Peer Group Socialization, In R.E. Muuss(Ed.), Adolescent Behavior and Society. New York : McGraw-Hill Publishing Co. Elkind, D.(1984). All GroupUp and No Place to Go : Teenagers in Crisis. Massachutts : Addison-Wesley. Ferle, Carrie La, Steven M. Edwards and Wei-na Lee (2000). Teens Use of Traditional Media and the Internet, Journal of Advertising Research, 40 : 55-65 Iso-Ahola, S.E. 1980 The Social Psychology of Leisure and Recreation. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown Company Publishers. McKenna, Katelyn Y.A. and John A. Bargh (2000). Plan 9 from Cyberspace: The Implications of the Internet for Personality and Social Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4 (1):57-75 Ragheb, M. G.(1980). Interrelationships among Leisure Participation, Leisure Satisfaction, and Leisure Attitudes, Journal of Leisure Research, 12(2):138-149.
181 The Formation of Cyberpeer and its Impacts on Youth Socialization Yu-Lin Chen Institute of Sociology, Nan hua University Abstract Describes a study which aimed to the effect of the N generation s socialization from cyberpeer. The traditional view believes that the environment is the most important factor to influence the peers. Due to the geographical limit, teenagers force themselves to participate in some groups for adapting the external condition, such as, environment; moreover, to seek the acceptation of their peers for social requirement and safety. However, recently, the Internet becomes the new way to obtain information and socialize with people. It provides the demands of social activity and supporting from peers; therefore, the N generation indulges in the Internet. As a result, cyberpeer is produced. In virtue of the Internet diversification, less limitation and more choice, the cyberpeers can replace the traditional peers to supply the supportability. Conversion of socialization from traditional to the Internet is a huge change. In this newly socialization process, teenagers can learn not only earlier, but also can undergo a different socialized experience. In the past, the teenagers frequently learn and grow up in a protected, distinctive and separate campus culture. After leaving the school life, they need to proceed re-socialized to get into the real social environment properly. Unlike the traditional socialization, in the Internet ages, teenagers can interact and socialize with people through cyberpeer in the Internet. They can realize and experience the real society by imitating the role played on the Internet. Keywords Cyperpeer, Socialization, Virtual Community, Internet relationship
182