untitled

Similar documents
股权结构对董事会结构的影响

二等奖(10名)

: : (1),,,,? (2),,,?,,? (3),,,,? (4),,?,,,,,, ( ),,,,, ( ),,,,, ;,,,,,,,,,, ;,,, (,2003),, (private benefits of control), Grossman and Hart (1988), (c

07D5.FIT\)

1 CAPM CAPM % % Wippern, aGebhardt Lee Swaminathan % 5.10% 4.18% 2 3 1Gebhardt Lee Swa

36-FM11.doc

( ) : ,,, 10 %,,, :,,,,, : (1) ; (2), ; (3), ; (4), ; (5) ( ), (2003),,,,,,, , 20,, ST,,,, :? ( ) 3 ( ) 77

754 Asian Company Handbooks Worldscope i. 10% ii. iii. iv. 10% % % % %

投资者保护:理论综述

IPO

3

场 的 跨 越 式 赶 超, 推 进 资 本 市 场 法 制 的 现 代 化 进 程, 必 经 之 途 是 通 过 法 律 移 植 来 实 现 制 度 的 改 良 与 进 化 然 而, 法 律 移 植 并 非 普 适 性 的 经 验 法 则, 不 能 为 资 本 市 场 根 深 蒂 固 的 顽 疾

- 2 -

Demsetz(1982) Bain ( ) : 4 6?? ( 2005) 2004~ (2000) : ; 7 ; ;? (Lenway and Rehbein1991) ( ) ( ) ( 2006) ( 2002) Bain(1956)

,, ( ) ( ) Farell (1957),, (2003) (1999) DEA DEA, 14 (2000) DEA , (2001) (2001) 5 (2002) DEA Malmquist, , (2003) (2003) DEA (2004) D

Microsoft Word - 第二章.doc

untitled

上证联合研究计划第三期课题报告

我國公營事業民營化前後績效變化之研究

Microsoft Word - 24-BF03.doc

? (3)?? (2004), , 6.84 ( ) ( ), 6,, 97, 16, (2004) 2003 :,,, :?,? 1? 2004~2007? ~2007, : PANEL A 2003 ;,, 2003, ;

: IPO, IPO,, IPO (Mok Hui, 1998 ;Chi Padgett,1999 ;Su Fleisher,1999 ;,2000 ;Chan,Wei Wang,2002 ; Tian, 2003 ;,2004), IPO, 129 % 949 %, IPO,,, IPO,, IP


2007 7,,, Faccio (2006) 47,,, Leuz Oberholzer2Gee (2006),,,,,,,,Fan Wong Zhang (2007a),,, Chen Li Su (2005),, ;, Fan Rui Zhao (2006) 23,,,,Fan Wong Zh

与林老师对话

i

2007 1,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ;,,,,,,,,,, ;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, (,1994),, (,1996),,,?,??,, 103

2006 1,,;,,,,,, (Denis and McConnell,2003), (2003),,,,,,, Tobin s Q, : (1) Tobin s Q (Lang and Stulz,1994), (,2002),,,,Tobin s Q ; (2) Tobin s Q ; (3)

INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS RESEARCH Julio Yook Shleifer 9 Sultz Williamson 10 Dyck Zingales 11 the largest minority shareholder Jones and Olken

Myers Majluf 1984 Lu Putnam R&D R&D R&D R&D

<4D F736F F D DB5DA32C6DA2DD6D0B4F3B9DCC0EDD1D0BEBF2DC4DACEC42D6F6B2DD2BBD0A32E646F63>

保荐制度、过度包装与IPO定价效率关系研究.doc

A

untitled

untitled

标题

C02.doc

Microsoft Word - A doc

Microsoft Word 专业学位培养方案.doc

- 2 - Russell Thaler unexpected dramatic P t =P t-1 + P t t P t-1 t-1 2 T.Russell and R.Thaler, The Relevance of Quasi-Rationality in Competitiv

第五章.doc

GOUTAI JUNAN SECURITIIES Value Strategies Fama French EMH Irrational Behavior Naive strategies Contrarian / B M B/P / E/P / D/P / C/P

Microsoft Word - 971管理學院工作報告2

目 錄 致 經 營 者 專 家 引 言 研 究 目 的 台 灣 銀 行 業 前 進 中 國 的 動 機 台 灣 銀 行 業 前 進 中 國 的 機 會 台 灣 銀 行 業 前 進 中 國 的 挑 戰 結 論 與 建 議 參 考 文 獻

中国科技论文在线

( 2011) Shirley and Walsh(2001) ( 2011; 2011; 2010) ( 2010; 2011; 2012)??? 2003 ; ( ) ( ) : ( )26.8%; 18

% 50% 72. 7% 80% M = Katharina Pistor John Armour

by market behavioral biases. In addition, behavioral biases should also be considered when discussing high-tech venturing process, especially fund-rai

Lech 1 2 Coffey and Jia Corporate Financial Performance CFP CSP CFP 9 Preston O Bannon 10 CSP CFP Margolis et al Sun abd

Microsoft PowerPoint - Fall2014PomotionXu.pptx

<B0EAA467A4CEA4BDA640AA76B27A4E6F2E31332E706466>

MEMO

untitled

的 黄 金 白 银, 所 以 成 立 了 全 世 界 第 一 家 国 营 企 业 东 印 度 公 司 ( 这 个 公 司 给 我 们 中 国 人 带 来 了 无 穷 的 噩 梦 ) 东 印 度 公 司 是 国 有 企 业, 是 以 炮 舰 为 前 导 以 盈 利 为 目 的 一 家 公 司 当 时

4 5 / /8/21 R.A. Posner 2

untitled

第二章.doc

过年:从传统到现代

World Bank World Bank 2000 Li Dong Torgler a 2010b 3 Huang 2002 GDP Blanchard Shleifer 2000 capture

ECONOMIST [ [ 2 Shleifer [ 3 [ 4 Megginson 2001 [ [ 6 [ 7 [ [ [ 10 [

untitled

:, ( Treisman, 2000), ( Fisman and Gatti, 2002), (Bruenett and Weder, 2003),( Glaeser and Saks, 2006),,,, ( Transparency International),2007 (Corrupti

: 11,( ), (Alchian Woodward,1987), (lock in) (,1995),,,,, (Fitzroy) (Mueller,1984),, (,1995) (1995),,, (AI,2001 ;,1996),,,, : (Hart Moore,1990),, (, 2


关键词:

<4D F736F F D20B5DAC8FDBDECB2A2B9BAC2DBCCB3C8D5B3CC2E646F63>

信用评级机构实施投资人付费模式探析

K. N. Chaudhuri Trade and Civilization in the Indian Ocean An Economic History from the Rise of Islam to 175

% 30% 1% U Zhou &Ruland 2006 Liu Jesen

经 济 与 管 理 耿 庆 峰 : 我 国 创 业 板 市 场 与 中 小 板 市 场 动 态 相 关 性 实 证 研 究 基 于 方 法 比 较 视 角 87 Copula 模 型 均 能 较 好 地 刻 画 金 融 市 场 间 的 动 态 关 系, 但 Copula 模 型 效 果 要 好 于

管 理 科 学 软 科 学 2013 年 6 月 第 27 卷 第 6 期 ( 总 第 162 期 ) 变 量 选 择 1 CAR i i CSP / 2 /

Microsoft Word - _Chinese version_ Land price index white paper docx

( ) % 1990~2004, , 15.40% 1990~ % 1994~ %( 1) 10%( 1) (1) 2005, ( ), GDP 95945,,,

Microsoft Word - Raymond _2011_ - Agglomeration Spillovers and Industry Policy _HKEJM_.doc

<4D F736F F D A67EABD720B14DC344325FA4A4B0EAA46AB3B0A7EBB8EAB867C0E7BBD9C3AAA4A7B0CFB0ECAE74B2A7ACE3A8732DB0F5A6E6A6A8AA47B3F8A769AED12E646F63>

Microsoft Word Local government organization and finance in China.doc


1

JOURNAL OF NANJING UNIVERSITY OF FINANCE AND ECONOMICS Wild t % 50% 15% % 19 17%

法律教育及培训常设委员会周年报告 2013

elections. In addition, the positive CARs exist during the full event date that indicates the election bull run do happen in Taiwan. When incumbent go

Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅱ Quasi rent Fetter Encyclopaedia of the Social Science ⅩⅢ

Hyman P. Minsky hedge - financed firm speculative - financed firm Ponzi firm Glass - Steagall Act of 1933 Banking Act of 193

Johnson 20 1 Ber- trand La Porta Lopez - de - Silanes Shleifer Claessens Djankov 1 Johnson See Simon JohnsonRafael La PortaFlore

% %

Kaminskiy VITAL 1 VITAL Silico Medicine Pathway Pharmaceuticals Aging Analytics VITAL VITAL VITAL Aging Analytics observer 2 VITAL VITAL VITAL VITAL V

M 2 ΠGDP (1996) M2ΠGDP (2000) (2000) (2001) (2001) (2001) (2002) (2002) (2002) (2003) (2001) (2005) (2005) (2006) (2004) M2ΠGDP ; M2ΠGDP ; M2ΠG

法律教育及培训常设委员会周年报告 2012

:, ;,, Li Zhou (2005), Huang(2002) 1978,, ( GDP, FDI ),, ( ) ( ),,, (,, ),,,,, (,,1999),,????? :,,,,80, 1982 ( ),, 65, 80, 1982,Shleifer (19

GCKX703.PS2

Microsoft Word - 1.doc

参考3

untitled

Microsoft Word - 中国对外直接投资(ODI)区位选择的决定因素:制度、税负和资源禀赋-经济研究.doc

引言

张肖飞.doc

多元化经营与企业价值.doc

,2011), FDI, ;(2) (FDI) (Shleifer & Vishny,1994), (Bou- bakrietal,2008),, ;(3) (,2004),, (, 2004;,2008;,2011), (,, 2008),, (,2015),,, (Djankov & Murre

<4D F736F F D20BDD7A4E5B6B0A455A555A658A8D6AAA95FA477A752B0A3A5BCB56FAAEDA4E5B3B E30372E30355F2E646F63>

Transcription:

RESEARCH REPORT

1

2

3

4

Black2001 Berle Means 1932 1997 1990 1997 2005 1

1932 Berle Means 2

European Corporate Institute European Corporate Governance Network 1997 50 43%34.5% 34.9% 9.9%8.6% 5.4% ClaessensDjankow Lang 9 2980 45% FaccioLang 13 5232 36.93% 44.29% Blass,Yafeh Yosha1998Valadares Leal, 2000Majumdar,1998Claessens Djankov, 1999 La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes, Shleifer Vishny LLSV1998199920002002 3

Public Benefit of Control Private Benefit of Control LLSV1997 1 2 3 4

Demsetz Lehn 511 McConnell Servaes1990 1000 U 40 Q 4050 Q Mehran1995 Q Pedersen Thomsen1999 12 435 Claessens Djankov 1999 19921993 ClassensDjankov Lang2000 8 1301 2003 5

1997 2000 Q 2001 6

1999 Q U 2003 U 2002 U 2001 20 2000 1999 484 2004 8 TCL MBO TCL 2005 7 29 9 2 7

1997 20002001 200120012003 20022004 8

2004 000070 32.7018.496.46 1.94 32.70 50 000798 25.50 24.75 24.75 2004 9

2004 12 31 10

21 1.57 5 0.60 11 0.82 0 0 58 4.33 5.00 52 3.88 20 2.40 26 1.94 42 5.02 57 4.25 24 2.87 36 2.69 65 7.77 91 6.79 36 4.30 40 2.99 59 7.05 84 6.27 490 58.54 784 58.51 54 6.45 80 5.97 837 100 1340 100 2 A () 301 35.96 22285.20 7773.36 3704.61 1223.50 112.24 1340 499 37.24 42412.80 18265.97 6791.93 1911.02 127.22 62.46 / 52.54 42.56 54.54 64.02 88.23 11

3 (%) (%) 6 4 0.48 0.48 5 3 0.36 0.84 4 15 1.79 2.63 3 20 2.39 5.02 2 30 3.58 8.60 1 149 17.80 26.40 0 616 73.60 100 837 100 42.686% 45.115 0.249 25.758 30.235 1 12

4 Tobin s Q Tobin s Q 42.686 45.115 2.428 0.231 0.249 0.019 25.758 30.189 4.431 41.700 45.020 0.000 0.201 0.226 0.000 24.700 31.490 0.000 6.140 9.090 0.000 0.006 0.008 0.000-38.680-38.680 0.000 85.000 85.000 44.730 0.723 0.723 0.332 84.600 84.600 86.620 16.500 16.588 6.193 0.138 0.143 0.049 27.042 26.761 11.683-0.921-1.025 10.895-0.141-0.498 11.685-1.075-1.064 11.567 0.163 0.034 3.202 0.708 0.539 3.361 0.013-0.171 3.294 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 13

i 0 1 1i 2 2i k ki i k= 1 m ROE = α + α X + α X + β Control + ε ROE X1 X 1 5 X 2 Controlk 10 9 α 1 α 2 14

5 Herfindahl 2 5 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 6 13 12 15

6-22.700*** -20.522*** -21.824*** -394.230** -380.456** -379.020** 0.064*** / / 0.602 / / / 9.234*** / / 67.679 / / / 0.023*** / 0.339 1.506*** 1.538*** 1.328*** -17.349-18.220-17.491 1.245*** 1.164*** 1.318*** 16.985* 16.836* 17.088* 0.010 0.012 0.008-0.075-0.076-0.079 2.244 2.329 2.059 39.192 38.802 38.221-0.247-0.087-0.505 19.568 20.032 17.417-2.550-2.555-2.533 13.606 13.545 13.916 0.964 0.966 1.002 9.534 8.864 10.862-1.680-1.665-1.728-26.783-27.102-26.985 0.279 0.419-0.003 20.876 21.202 18.762-1.492-1.451-1.540 21.783 21.689 21.827-1.888-1.897-1.897 25.288 25.160 24.947-1.339-1.179-1.724 21.661 21.645 18.991 / / / 11.025 10.472 11.491 / / / 3.106 2.201 5.235 R 2 0.102 0.117 0.084 0.009 0.009 0.009 R 2 0.088 0.103 0.070-0.002-0.002-0.003 F 7.226 8.399 5.805 0.784 0.779 0.771 Prob>F 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.697 0.702 0.712 ****** 15 10 10.064 1 29.234 1 30.023 1 16

41.506 1.538 1.328 1 5 A 5 :1 17

18

19

2004 Shleifer Wolfenzon2002 20

21

[17] Black, B. S.,2001: The Corporate Governance Behavior and Market Value of Russian Firms, 22

University of Pennsylvania Law Review 149, 121-145. [18] Blass, A., Yafeh, Y., and Yosha O, 1998, Corporate Governance in An Emerging Market: The Case of Israel, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 10, 79-89. [19] Claessens, S., S. Djankov, 1999, Ownership Concentration and Corporate Performance in the Czech Republic, CEPR Discussion Papers 2145. [20] Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. Lang, 2000, The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations, Journal of Financial Economics 58, 81-112. [21] Demsetz, H. and K. Lehn, 1985, The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences, Journal of Political Economy 93, 1155-1177. [22] Faccio, M. and L. H. P. Lang, 2002, The Ultimate Ownership of Western European Corporations, Journal of Financial Economics 65, 365-396. [23] La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Salines, A. Shleifer and R. W. Vishny, 1997, Legal Determinants of External Finance, Journal of Finance 53, 1131-1150. [24] La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Salines, A. Shleifer and R. W. Vishny, 1998, Law and Finance, Journal of Political Economy 106, 1113-1155. [25] La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer, 1999, Corporate Ownership Around the World, Journal of Finance 54, 471-517. [26] La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Salines, and A. Shleifer, 2000, Investor Protection and Corporate Governance, Journal of Financial Economics 58, 3-27. [27] La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Salines, A. Shleifer and R. W. Vishny, 2002, Investor Protection and Corporate Valuation, Journal of Finance, Vol. LVII, No.3,1147-1170. [28] Majumdar, S. K., 1998, Assessing Comparative Efficiency of the State Owned Mixed and Private Sectors in Indian Industry, Public Choice 96, 1 24. [29] McConnell, J., and H. Servaes, 1990, Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value, Journal of Financial Economics 27, 595-612. [30] Mehran, H. 1995, Executive Compensation Structure, Ownership, and Firm Performance, Journal of Financial Economics 38, 163-184. [31] Pedersen, T and S. Thomsen, 1999, The Causal Relationship between Insider Ownership, Owner Identity and Market Valuation among the Largest European Companies, Copenhagen Business School, Working Paper. [32] Shleifer, A. and D. Wolfenzon, 2002, Investor Protection and Equity Markets, Journal of Financial Economics 66, 3-27. [33] Valadares, S., Leal, R., 2000, Ownership and Control Structure of Brazilian Companies, Abante. 23