國立中山大學學位論文典藏.PDF

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "國立中山大學學位論文典藏.PDF"

乖雁麻
5 years ago
Views:

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 Talking Carnival An Action Research of Incorporating Talking Performance into Lower-Grade Learners Language Field. Abstract After the researcher listened to the voices of curriculum, texts and teachers, who found that language fields of mandarin in primary school was generally ignored the teaching of 'listen and speak'. And also, very few relevant researches can be found. Therefore, second grade pupils of primary school, taught by the researcher, were selected as the collective subjects of the study. Based on the example of Talking Carnival (the material complied by the researcher), to proceed with 21 sections of Listen and Talking Courses. Furthermore, via the mode of action research, to probe into the following three directions and degree actively is the main purpose of this research: 1. To probe into the relevant and essential factors of Listen and Talking Courses teaching design. 2. To interpret the process of curriculum implementation and reflective revision of Listen and Taking Courses. 3. To evaluate the study effect and restriction of Listen to and Taking Courses Relating to three study programs- Knock the Door Open the Door and Enter the Door, the researcher tracked and reflected on the teaching designcurriculum implementation and revision was all explained in the process of research. In addition, via all the qualitative data collection (observational records reflective journalspupils scrapbookspupils mood-diaryparents/pupils investigated questionnaires and etc.) to interpretanalyzeconclude and summarize. And, the result of study is found as follows: A: The part of teaching design: 1. Curriculum design adopted the naturalistic process. (Glatthorn, 1987). According to build up high-quality experiences of talking, synchronously, to proceed the choices of goalactivity and material. 2. In accordance with the teaching of listen and talking, to carry out goal management and analysis in order to conform to the principles of curriculum s vertical organization. 3. In the initial stage, it could be started by imitation. It could be revised, gradually; it can be built up to personal style. 4. The curriculum of Listen and Talking for lower grade pupils can be designed as game activities, which can fit in with the pupils development of body and mind. B: The part of curriculum implementation: 1. Examine teachers viewpoints: to establish a new relationship (as teacher and also as a friend). The efficiency of teaching at random is greater than the existing plan. 4

5 Had students to try making mistakes, then, to propose the possible solution. Five kinds of teaching concepts, such as interactive question-and-answer drilllittle stimulationgreat motivation and etc., was the way to promote the teaching efficiency of Listen and Talking. 2. Convey pupils viewpoints: the learning of initiative the function of game-teaching, the promotion of cooperative learning the production of scaffoldingthe display of multiple intelligences are all additional learning of the curriculum of Listen and Talking C: The part of the efficiency and restriction: 1. Implementing innovative curriculum of Talking Carnival, the ones that can really build and construct pupils concentrationmemoryimitationlasting sensitivitycomprehension. 2. Implementing innovative curriculum of Talking Carnival can really improve pupils speak ability and promote fluent speaking and steady demeanor. 3. Because of the restriction of curriculum materials and activity design, there is limited space of the development in the area of speaking response and the power of expression. Besides, the full text adopted the narration and based on 208 talking groups establishment as a main body, to link from initial conversation appearance performance seminar and spread. Due to this innovative way of writing, with any luck, it can offer a new life for this study. Key Words: Speaking Teaching, Listening Teaching, Curriculum Implementation, Action Research. 5

6 V.S

9 SWOT YERKES-DODSON LAW

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 Denzin & Lincoln2003 (representation) (meaning) Goodlad1979 ideal curriculum formal curriculum perceived curriculum operational curriculum experiential curriculum 2001p

14 Goffman

15 15 E

17 Tukey Tyler Joseph 11 8 p p.189~

19 19 200Pappas, Kiefer, Levstik p.584

21 knowing Laurel2003 Think Description

22 22

23 Whole language Audio-lingual Method

24 Whole language Goodman 21

25 p

27 27 23 Goodman Goodman Goodman 23 p.4

28 28 Goodman

29 Goodman

30 phonolgy syntax semantics pragmatics

31 p.6 27 p

32 (2003)

37 37 Jackso p.340 Fullan1988 curriculum implementation Fullan1988 curriculum adoption 1997 Connelly & Ben-Preretz1980 Fullan

38 (Fullan1988)

39 39

40 2.4 (Glatthorn,1987) 2.5 (Glatthorn,1987) 40

44 44

45 45

46 46 Lazear Gardner Lazear 2000

47 Rand 33 EvelandRogers Klepper EvelandRogers & Kleppe p Snyder 1992 Wolf (1990)

48 Jackson1968 Sieber Leacock

49 49

50 50

51 51 2.4

52 52

54 self-contained 1996

56 56

57 praxis-oriented research paradigm a multicultural subject

58 /index.html 58

60 ADHD 31 SWOT 3. SWOT Hi p

61 3.1 SWOT S strength W weakness ADHD O opportunity 2. T threat GreaTeach

63 63 VCD

67 3.4 67

68 (representation) Denzin & Lincoln2003 Lincoln Guba p LIVE 44 p

69 outside 45 p p p p

70 49 holism Joseph holism Denzin & Lincoln p p.11 70

71 Deparment of Health and Human Service HHS HHS 2003 Stake2000 Stake Jack& Norman 2003p p p

72 1996p (85) Goetz, J. P & LeCompe, M. D p a multicultural subject 72

73 73

74 74

75 75

76 76

77 77 54 Glatthorn, mail

78 p.51 78

79 p.21-25

81 critical friend p critical colleage Stenhouse1975 / / partner deviant 1998p

82 82 mail

85 85

86 86

88 88

89 89

91 91

92 92 powerpoin V.S p.45

93 p.237

94 94

95 p.230

96 96

97 97

99 4.4 99

100 100

101 Fogarty (Glatthorn,1987)

102

103 103

104 104 practice feedback Gagne, Yekovich &Yekovich 1998 Gagne, Yekovich &Yekovich p.206

105

106 1991 tranfer of training Cave1971 Carr Kemmis Carr Kemmis 1998p

107 education intention education intention p

108 108

109 109

Yerkes-Dodson Law U 4.5 optimal level of arousal 78 4.

110 Yerkes-Dodson Law U 4.5 optimal level of arousal Yerkes-Dodson Law 78 U Yerkes-Dodson Law 1998 Gagne, Yekovich &Yekovich p

111 111 SWOT 79 threat p.51

112 112 Gagne, Yekovich & Yekovich 1998

113 113 ending

114 1998 autonomous stage Gagne, Yekovich & Yekovich

115

116

117 117

118 118

119

120 120

121 121

122

123 123

124 p

125 p.74

126

127

128 128

129 90 Zeichner Liston1987 practical / theoretical reasons p

130 130

131 131

132 p.227

133

134

135 135

136

137

138

139

140 140

141

142 142

143 100 p

144

145

146

147 147

148 148

149 149

150 p.31-33

151 151

152 152

153

154 154

155 155

156 156 RyanConnell Deci 1985

157 157 Harter1981 competencies Corno & Rohrkemper1985

158

159

160

161 161 Gardner Gardner

162

163

164 164 Young

165 165 Zeichner Liston198 Zeichner Liston practical / theoretical reasons

166 passion 166

167

168 Stufflebean

169

170

171

172 172

173

174 174

175 175

176 176

177 177

178

179 179

180 180

181 181

182 182

183 183

184 184

185 185

186 186

187 187

188 188

189 189

190 190

191

192 192 trianguation crystallize

193 p k-12

194 Goodman, K p Gagne, E. D., Yekovich, C. W. & Yekovich, F. R p Pappas, C. C., Kiefer, B. Z.& Levstik, L. S p

195 p Altrichter, H., Posch, P. & Somekh, B Joseph, A. M Lazear, D

196 (1998) p Tyler, R.W

197 2003 Fraenkel, J. R. & Noman, E. W p.4-1~ P p (p.1~16) p p

198 p

199 199

200 200

附件1：

附件1：附件 1: 全国优秀教育硕士专业学位论文推荐表单位名称 : 西南大学论文题目填表日期 :2014 年 4 月 30 日数学小组合作学习的课堂管理攻硕期间及获得硕士学位后一年内获得与硕士学位论文有关的成果作者姓名论文答辩日期学科专