untitled - PDF Free Download

Investigation and Analysis of education performance of Primary and secondary school website take Nanjing City as example

- I

Abstract Abstract With the further development of education information, the construction of campus network has become an important education expenditure of primary and secondary schools at all levels. The development of campus network requires itself to heighten its operating efficiency so as to achieve higher cost-benefit ratio. This requirement mentioned is coincided with the core idea of performance technology precisely. In this paper, the author applies the theory of firm performance, the research findings of pedagogy and psychology into investigation and study. On the basis of analyzing the results of previous studies, the author also proposes the notion of campus network performance, namely, network education performance is displayed as the effective output at different levels in the realization process of the whole education group as well as the individual learners when achieving their own expectations. The quality of campus network performance not only reflects the efficient construction level of school education information, but also acts as a vital platform for improving school education achievements. Nanjing, the capital city of Jiangsu province, owning the advantages of education resources, is top-ranked in education information construction over the province. Campus network construction of primary and secondary schools in Nanjing are plunged into too much fund and are earlier built, cause many prominent contradictions in the course of its construction and management. Under this circumstance, the author takes a sample of six representative primary and secondary schools in Nanjing in the performance research of network. The author actually proceed the visit and survey on the aspect of planning position, property investment, setting up functions, service quality, management efficiency and operation of the campus network to carry out all aspects of the performance outputs. According to the actual survey data, as well as the feedback analysis from teachers and students in all campus network, the author finds the reasons for the gap between performance and achievement of education campus network, and proposes the strategy to improve the campus network performance from the educational point of view, thus campus network of primary and secondary schools can be sustained healthy development. The main reasons for the inefficiency of campus network education achievement are lacking of educational value to attract the attention of teachers and students, and campus network are out of touch with the school first-line teaching education campus network performance. It is known to all that primary and secondary school period is the crucial period for students to develop cognitive skills, also is an important stage to pave the way of the development of life as the cornerstone. In the whole research paper, the author tightly grasps the concept of education "people-oriented" and the idea of giving priority to efficiency performance. Keeping all-round development and self-expectations of students as an entry point, it aims at designing user-friendly campus network which is conformed to the cognition psychological features of elementary and middle school teachers and students,on the basis of resource platform, network teaching platform and interactive platform, from the aspect of campus design, function set, service management, feedback and the actual education demands II

Abstract of primary and secondary school teachers and students. This research tries to reflect the value of "people-oriented, gets rid of traditional education models in which it only emphasizes on the systematical and logic methodology of external interventions and neglect to build self-understanding process for primary and secondary school students, encourages the elementary and middle schools students to carry on educational value exploration research activity in the campus net under teacher's guidance. Campus network performance relay on the efficiency usage of campus network as well as self development of teachers and students, thereby acts as core evaluation criteria on campus network performance. Keywords: Primary and secondary school Campus Network Education Performance III

[1], 13 4% [2] [1]. [M]. :,2003:24. [2]. [J].,2002,(9). 3

1999 2001 20 70 Geis 1986 Performance technology is the process of selection. analysis.design. development. Implementation. and evaluation of programs to most cost-effectively influence human behavior and accomplishment [3] [4] Geis [3] 1986 [4]. [M]. :,1995:1993. 4

1992 Stolovich Keeps Harless 1995 An engineering approach to attaining desired accomplishment from human performers by determining gaps in performance and designing cost-effective and efficient interventions. [5], ( ) [5] Stolovich Keeps 1992 5

,, [5] [6]. [J].,2002,(5). 6

1995 harless Harless Harless Harless 7

[6] = + [6]. [J].,2004,(10). 8

[7] [7]. [J].,2003,(10). 10

1 2 3 1 2 3 11

2008 2 2-1 2002 1998 2000 2000 2003 2001 12

300, 60, 30 210 300, 290, 96.7% 36, 3 5 5 3 5 2008 13

[8] 3G 2-2 140 50 40 50 200 70 60 70 230 60 50 120 270 90 70 110 360 110 100 150 610 160 150 300 610 [8].. [M]. :,2003:345. 14

[ ] 75% 20% XICI 90% [9]. [J]..2002,(12). 15

2-3 1086 200 13 3 1426 240 15 6 725 150 8 7 1322 300 12 5 1764 320 17 2946 700 50 2-3 5 300 300 60 700 2003 2-4 3 8 1 5 10 2 6 15 2 6 10 2 6 12 1 8 20 3 3~5 1~2 1~2 16

1~2 2-5 1 85% 10% 7% 9 5 1 80% 11% 9% 9:1 78% 12% 10% 10 1 74% 14% 12% 10.5:1 70% 13% 17% 7:1 65% 15% 20% 6.5:1 2-6 5% 8% 10% 80% 82% 85% 15% 10% 5% 2-6 17

100% 2-7 50% 30% 10% 10% 45% 40% 15% 10% 20% 50% 20% 10% 2-8 55% 45% 40% 50% 55% 60% 80% 85% 90% 85% 90% 95% 2-7 18

5 2-9 2-9 2-10 19

5 2-11 2-11 2 3 20

BBS BBS BBS BBS BBS QQ,MSN 2-12 60% 20 20% 50% 35% 15% 50% 40% 10% 2-13 50% 20% 30% 60% 30% 10% 70% 20% 10% 2-12 WORD PPT 21

2-13 / / / 45 / / / 30 / / / 15 / / / 10 / / / 15 / / / 7 10 22

2-14 18 / 7 / 18 / 3~4 / 3 / 22 / 5~6 / 21 / 4 / 24 / 5 / 24/ / 4 / 5 / PPT 4 6 20~30 2-15 9 6% 15 4% 44 5% 30 5% 10 2% 18 5% 42 5% 28 8% 9 2% 16 6% 47 4% 26 8% 10 6% 18 8% 42 2% 26 4% 9 3% 17 4% 46% 26 3% 16 6% 30 2% 41 2% 12% 6 30% 23

6 1910 318.3 10 24

word ppt QQ QQ 25

[9] 5 50 [9]. [J]. ( ) 2003,(3). 26

76% 23% 300 80% IT 27

2000 2005 100 50 6 Charles M. Vest ocw MIT MIT [10] [10]. [J]. ( ) 2003,(3). 28

facebook FTP 20080405 2008 4 5 FTP GB GB 29

60% [11] SQL insert delete update " " [11]. [J]. ( ),2001,(4). 30

,,,, 31

2 0.1 0.2 120 /,,, [12] [12] David Reynolds. Studying School Effectiveness [M]. The Farmer Press 1985. 32

BBS 1 1 TFC 34

2 MRC 3 MC TOTAL COST(TC) TFC TVC T TC=TFC+TVC TVC=MRC+MC = *T 2 1 SV 2 WV 3 LSV 4 MV output valuation OV OV=SV+WV+LSW+MV f(x) f(x)=ov-tc. f(x)/t 35

50% : 37

[13],,,,,,,,,,,,,, [14], 1 Internet [13]. [J].,2003,(7). [14]. [J].,2004,(2). 38

1 2 PDF adobe reader 2 3 4 39

5 web CNNIC 1997 [15] [15]. [J].,2004,(7). 40

a) b) c) d [16] HTTP HTML [16]. [M].,1996. 41

Web [17] A B C D A B internet ASP.NET,JAVA,SQL SERVER [17]. [J].,1999,(6). 42

45 [18] [18]. [J].,2004,(9). 43

BBS SNS, 1 2 3 4 5 :, 6, 1:10:90, 100 10 90 44

( ) ( ), PV 1 1 2 3 2 45

3 web web 4 46

1,,, 20 70,,, [19],,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, :,, [19] M. 2005. 47

,,,, 2 5W1H 1 why 2 what 3 where 4 when 5 who 6 how [20] [20] Jon Taylor. Evaluating the Internet as a Medium for the Dissemination of Development Research. The International NGO Training and Research Centre,2001 48

18 18 2 2 51

[1]. [M]. :,1995:193. [2]. [J].,2002,(9). [3]. [M]. :,2003:24. [4]. [J].,2003,(10). [5]. [J].,2002,(5). [6]. [J].,2004,(10). [7].. [M]. :,2003:345. [8]. [J]..2002,(12). [9]. [J]. ( ) 2003,(3). [10],. [J]. ( ),2004,(6). [11]. [J]. ( ),2001,(4). [12] David Reynolds. Studying School Effectiveness [M]. The Farmer Press 1985. [13]. [J].,2003,(7). [14]. [J].,2004,(2). [15]. [J].,2004,(7). [16]. [M].,1996. [17]. [J].,1999,(6). [18]. [J].,2004,(9). [19] M. 2005. [20] Jon Taylor. Evaluating the Internet as a Medium for the Dissemination of Development Research. The International NGO Training and Research Centre,2001 [21] Nicolas - George, Dragulanescu. Website Quality Evaluations: Criteria and Tools. El2sevier Science Ltd, 2002 [22] Cockrell B. J.,Jayne. How Do I Find an Article? Insights from a Web Usability Study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2002 ;( 28) [23] Felix B Tan, Lai Lai Tung. Exploring Website Evaluation Criteria Using the Repertory Grid Technique: A Web Designers Perspective. Proceedings of the Second Annual Workshop on HCI Research in MIS, 2003 ;( 12) [24]. [J]. 2006 (3) 29-32 [25]. [J]. 2004 (11) 23-24 [26]. [J]. 2006 (3) 45-47 52

[27]. [J]. 2007 (1) 38-39 [28]. [J]. 2005 (3) 50-51 [29] [J]. 2006. 2 12-15 [30]. [J].,2001.(1)17-19 [31]. [J]., 2005.(11)18-19 [32]. [J].,2006.(5)45-46 53

1 08 8 14~18 2 08 06 15~17 54