7 1 2007 10 ( ) China Econo mic Quarterly Vol17, No11 October, 2007 3, FDI,,,,,,, GDP 300, 2002 1 000, 2006 2 000,,,??????,,, 3, ; : 152,, :430079 ; E2mail :tuzhengge @163. com,, ; E2mail :xiaogeng @hku. hk ( :07BJ Y019) ( :20072030),
186 ( ) 7,,,,,,, (, 2005a), 1995, :??,,,,,,, Solow (1957), ;, Romer (1986), L ucas (1988),,, Farrell (1957), Nishinizu and Page (1982), ( TFP) Fare et al1 (1994) Kumar and Russell (2002),, At kin2 son and Cornwell (1994) At kinson and Primont (2002),, (2005a, 2005b, 2005c),,,
1 : 187 :, (2006), (2005), (2005), Kalirajan, Obwona and Zhao (1996) (2004), DEA2 Malmquist TFP, Zhuobao Wei (2002) 1993 1036 Wu (2000, 2003) (2004) 1978 2001 (2002),, 1992 1998 (2005, 2006a), 1995 2002 37,, (2006b), (2003) 1978 2000, 45 %,, Malmquist (DEA),,, 1995 2002
188 ( ) 7 38,, : (1),,, (2),, 1999 (3),, (4),, (5) 38,,, :, ; ; ;,,,,,, 1 K, 2 L, 2 K, 1 L 1, K L, 1 2,,,, ( ) :,,,
1 : 189,,,, Shepard (1970), SU R,,, ( x 3 ) ( ), 1, D EA (Data Envelop ment Analysis),,,,,,,, 2 Malmqusit, (D EA),, ( ) 3 1. L ( y, t), : D I ( y, x ; t) = max{ : ( x/ ) L ( y, t) }, (1), L ( y, t) t ( y g m + ) ( x g k + ) y, x D I ( y, x ; t) x, y, x L ( y, t), D I ( y, x ; t) 1 x L ( y, t), 1, L ( y, t), y, x L ( y, t) 1 Kumbhakar and Lovell (2000) 2 Coelli et al. (1998) 3 Kumbhakar and Lovell (2000)
190 ( ) 7 t S T 2., y, y w S T 4 : C T ( y, w) = min{ w x 3 : D I ( y, x ; t) 1, w > 0}, (2) x 3 L ( x, ) = w x + ( 1 - D I ( y, x ; t) ), w j = ( 9 D I ( y, x 3 ; t) / 9 x j ) 1 - D I ( y, x 3 ; t) = 0 9 D I ( y, x 3 ; t) / 9 x j D I ( y, x ; t) x j x j = x 3 j 1 - D I ( y, x 3 ; t) = 0, ;, x, = C T ( y, w), x 3 = ( x 3 1,, x 3 m ), 5 : (1), min ( L ( y, t) ) > min ( L ( y, t + 1) ) > 0, y, C T + 1 ( y t, w t ) < C T ( y t, w t ) ; (2) w a t w b t, C T ( y t, w a t ) C T ( y t, w b t ), ; ( 3), C T ( y t, w t ) = C T ( y t, w t ), > 0 ; (4) 9 C T ( y t, w t ) / 9 w j, t w t, (, ) ; (5), y a t y b t > 0, C T ( y a t, w t ) C T ( y b t, w t ) 3., S T, t : CE T ( y t, w t, x t ) = CT ( y t, w t ) C t = w x 3 ( y t, w t ), (3) w x A, 0 < C E T ( y t, w t, x t ) 1 ; C t = w x,, Farrell (1957) 4 Coelli et al. (1998), 160 166 5 Kumbhakar and Lovell (2000), 51 54 ' 1994-2009 China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House. All rights reserved. http://www.c
1 : 191 ( ), : CE T ( y t, w t, x t ) = w ( x ) 3 w x w w ( x ) = T E ( y t, x t S T ) A E ( y t, w t, x t S T ), (4), T E( y t, x t S T ) = = 1/ D I ( y t, x t ; t) A E( y t, w t, x t S T ) = C E( y t, x t, w t ) / T E( y t, x t S T ) 1,,, x 3 1 ( ),,,, 1. i ( i = 1,, N), t k x ( k 1), w ( k 1), m y ( m 1), S T, : ' 1994-2009 China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House. All rights reserved. http://www.c
192 ( ) 7 C T i ( y i, t, w i, t ) = min x 3 w i, t x 3 i, t, i, t, s. t. : - y i, t + Y t 0, x 3 i, t - X t 0, 0, w i, t > 0, (5), X t Y t t ( N k) ( N m) ; x 3 i, t ( k 1) ; = ( 1,, N ),,, N 6 i = 1 i, t = 1, ( Fare et al1, 1997), t + 1 S T + 1, t + 1 C T + 1 i ( y t + 1, w t + 1 ) (5), i? 2. Malmquist, ( t) S T, ( t + 1) w t + 1, y t + 1 : C T ( y t+1, w t+1 ) = min x 3 w t+1 x 3 t+1, t+1, s. t. : - y t+1 + Y t 0, x 3 t+1 - X t 0, 0, w t+1 > 0. (6), S T + 1 C T + 1 ( y t, w t ) C T + 1 ( y t, w t ) C T ( y t, w t ) C T + 1 ( y t + 1, w t + 1 ) C T ( y t + 1, w t + 1 ),, 3., S T + 1 ( w t + 1 ), ( y t ) : C T+1 ( y t, w t+1 ) = min x 3 w t+1 x 3 t+1, t+1, s. t. : - y t + Y t 0, x 3 t+1 - X t 0, 0, w t+1 > 0. (7) C T + 1 ( y t, w t + 1 ) C T + 1 ( y t + 1, w t + 1 ), C T ( y t, w t ) C T ( y t + 1, w t ), y
1 : 193, C T + 1 ( y t + 1, w t ) C T + 1 ( y t + 1, w t + 1 ), C T ( y t, w t ) C T ( y t, w t + 1 ), Malmquist (1953),, ( ) 1. : : C t+1 C t = CE T ( y t, x t, w t ) T+1 CE T+1 ( y t+1, x t+1, w t+1 ) C ( y t+1, w t+1 ). (8) C T ( y t, w t ) (8) :, 1 :,,,, ( 8) C T ( y t + 1, w t + 1 ) / C T ( y t + 1, w t + 1 ),, C t+1 C t = T E ( y t, x t S T ) T E ( y t+1, x t+1 S T+1 ) A E ( y t, w t, x t S A E ( y t+1, w t+1, x t+1 S T+1 ) T ) CT+1 ( y t+1, w t+1 ) C T ( y t+1, w t+1 ) CT ( y t+1, w t+1 ) C T ( y t, w t ). (9) (9) ;, ;,, (9) C T ( y t + 1, w t ), : ' 1994-2009 China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House. All rights reserved. http://www.c
194 ( ) 7 C t+1 C t = T E ( y t, x t S T ) T E ( y t+1, x t+1 S T+1 ) A E ( y t, w t, x t S A E ( y t+1, w t+1, x t+1 S T+1 ) CT+1 ( y t+1, w t+1 ) C T ( y t+1, w t+1 ) CT ( y t+1, w t+1 ) C T ( y t+1, w t ) T ) CT ( y t+1, w t ) C T ( y t, w t ). (10) (10), : 2. Fisher,, t, C T + 1 ( y t, w t ) C T ( y t, w t ), t + 1, C T + 1 ( y t + 1, w t + 1 ) C T ( y t + 1, w t + 1 ), Fisher (1922), Caves et al1 (1982) Fare et al1 (1994),, (11) C t+1 C t = T E ( y t, x t S T ) T E ( y t+1, x t+1 S T+1 ) A E ( y t, w t, x t S A E ( y t+1, w t+1, x t+1 S T+1 ) CT+1 ( y t+1, w t+1 ) C T ( y t+1, w t+1 ) CT+1 ( y t+1, w t+1 ) C T+1 ( y t+1, w t ) CT ( y t+1, w t ) C T ( y t, w t ) CT+1 ( y t, w t ) C T ( y t, w t ) CT ( y t, w t+1 ) C T ( y t, w t ) CT+1 ( y t+1, w t+1 ) C T+1 ( y t, w t+1 ) = TECH 3 A ECH 3 TP 3 PCH 3 SCCH. (11),, : C t+1 = ln C t+1 = - ln T E ( y t+1, x t+1 S T+1 ) C t T E ( y t, x t S T ) - ln A E ( y t+1, w t+1, x t+1 S T+1 ) A E ( y t, w t, x t S T ) - 1 2 ln C T ( y t+1, w t+1 ) C T+1 ( y t+1, w t+1 ) + 1 2 ln CT+1 ( y t, w t+1 ) C T+1 ( y t, w t ) + 1 2 ln CT ( y t+1, w t ) C T ( y t, w t ) + ln 1/ 2 1/ 2 1/ 2 C T ( y t, w t ) T ) C T+1 ( y t, w t ) + ln CT ( y t, w t+1 ) C T ( y t, w t ) + ln CT+1 ( y t+1, w t+1 ) C T+1 ( y t, w t+1 ) ' 1994-2009 China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House. All rights reserved. http://www.c
1 : 195 = - T E t+1 - A E t+1 - T P t+1 + P t+1 + SC t+1. (12) :, 3. (1), CSI = T E t + 1 + A E t + 1 + T P t + 1, CSI, ( ) ( ) ( ) CSI CSI, ;, (2),, cy ( y, w) = 9ln C( y, w) / 9ln y (11) : SC t+1 = 1 2 { (ln CT ( y t+1, w t+1 ) - ln C T ( y t, w t+1 ) ) + (ln C T+1 ( y t+1, w t+1 ) - ln C T+1 ( y t, w t+1 ) ) } y t+1 = y t + y 1 2 { (ln CT ( y t + y, w t+1 ) - ln C T ( y t, w t+1 ) ) + (ln C T+1 ( y t + y, w t+1 ) - ln C T+1 ( y t, w t+1 ) ) } = 1 2 { (ln CT ( y t + y, w t+1 ) - ln C T ( y t, w t+1 ) ) / ( y/ y t ) + (ln C T+1 ( y t + y, w t+1 ) - ln C T+1 ( y t, w t+1 ) ) / ( y/ y t ) } ( y/ y t ) 1 2 { cy ( y, w t+1 S T ) + cy ( y, w t+1 S T+1 ) } y t+1. (13),, t + 1 y t + 1 S C, g cy = S C / y t + 1 1,,,,,
196 ( ) 7,,,, ( ) 1995 2002, 22 000, 21 000, 177 086, 500, 12 %, 1617 %, 40 %, GDP 15 % 19 %,,, 1995 2002,,, 1990, (2006a) Matlab615 Panel data,, ( ) : ( ) :,,
1 : 197,,,,,,, ( av al ue) ( nv f i x a) ( l abor), ( pk, pl), 1 aval uep( RMB) 304 17. 51 18. 82 0. 14 130. 03 nv f i x ap( RMB) 304 44. 70 56. 90 0. 78 429. 77 labor( ) 304 0. 81 0. 85 0. 04 4. 18 pk 304 0. 22 0. 07 0. 07 0. 45 pl( / ) 304 12. 35 5. 12 4. 57 45. 23 :,, ( w ageb) ( pbonus) ( l w el f ) ( li nsur) : ( rf ee),,,,, ; ( currd),, ( pk, pl),, ( y ) ( k, l ),,,,,,,, 6 6
198 ( ) 7 ( ),,,, 61 3 %, 1996 2002 91 2 % 51 7 % 11 4 % 51 2 % 41 3 % 81 9 % 81 1 % : 71 2 % 61 4 % 91 6 % 151 4 % 111 9 % 201 4 % 211 9 %, 141 7 % 7 2 2, 1996, 1997,, 2002 1317,, 8 2, 1996 2002 ( 1716 %) ( 1512 %) ( 1315 %) ( 1313 %) ( 1219 %), 2911 % 2418 % 912 % 20 % 415 % 7, 8 (2005,2006a,2006b)
1 : 199, : 413 % 916 % 219 % 816 %, - 312 %,,, 014 % 1996 1999 : 516 % 415 % 6 % 213 %, 2000, 2000 2 % 2001 215 % 2002 411 %,,, 2002, 2119 %, 811 %, 411 %, 4 %,, 2 IND2 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 [ 41 ] 0. 092 0. 115 0. 129 0. 1 0. 174 0. 208 0. 24 0. 176 [ 45 ] 0. 272 0. 075 0. 396 0. 109 0. 300 0. 093-0. 06 0. 152 [ 44 ] - 0. 033 0. 085 0. 276 0. 184 0. 092 0. 145 0. 155 0. 135 [ 24 ] 0. 346 0. 055 0. 119 0. 009 0. 088 0. 235 0. 106 0. 133 [ 46 ] 0. 147 0. 232 0. 102 0. 082 0. 135 0. 011 0. 207 0. 129 0. 092 0. 057 0. 014 0. 052 0. 043 0. 089 0. 081 0. 063 [ 10 ] - 0. 129 0. 042 0. 016-0. 024-0. 115 0. 137 0. 015-0. 006 [ 36 ] 0. 042-0. 035-0. 046-0. 074 0. 025-0. 047 0. 029-0. 013 [ 09 ] - 0. 122 0. 053-0. 166 0. 076 0. 057-0. 066 0. 005-0. 017 [ 17 ] 0. 002-0. 007-0. 148-0. 043 0. 008-0. 024 0. 011-0. 025 [ 12 ] 0. 033-0. 014 0. 018-0. 213-0. 101-0. 142 0. 038-0. 048 : ( ), 1,,, (13), :
200 ( ) 7 SC = 1 2 ln CT ( y t+1, w t ) C T ( y t, w t ) + ln CT+1 ( y t+1, w t+1 ) C T+1 ( y t, w t+1 ). 2002, C T ( y t + 1, w t ) C T ( y t, w t ) C T + 1 ( y t + 1, w t ) C T + 1 ( y t, w t ), 2002 1996 2002 : 611 % 519 % 816 % 14 % 1111 % 1718 % 1914 %, 1311 %, 1417 % 1311 %, 20 % ;, 013 % 317 %, (13) : g cy = S C t + 1 / y t + 1, 3,, ( ) 01938, 1996 01984 2002 01907,,,,? 3 IND2 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 [ 41 ] 0. 988 0. 913 0. 833 0. 93 0. 924 0. 822 0. 868 0. 881 [ 37 ] 0. 959 0. 955 0. 925 0. 923 0. 945 0. 86 0. 839 0. 898 [ 30 ] 0. 84 0. 956 0. 961 0. 876 0. 914 0. 841 0. 932 0. 900 [ 27 ] 0. 904 0. 914 0. 9 0. 897 0. 919 0. 903 0. 902 0. 905 [ 45 ] 0. 986 0. 836 0. 712 0. 98 0. 934 0. 995 0. 903 0. 908 0. 984 0. 971 0. 959 0. 932 0. 946 0. 915 0. 907 0. 938 [ 06 ] 1. 01 1. 029 1. 032 0. 994 0. 961 0. 954 0. 936 0. 985 [ 09 ] 1. 086 0. 953 1. 065 0. 908 0. 958 1. 001 0. 985 0. 990 [ 36 ] 1. 307 0. 984 1. 02 0. 933 0. 949 0. 98 0. 886 0. 994 [ 25 ] 1. 045 1. 013 1. 024 0. 985 1. 091 0. 933 0. 939 1. 002 [ 12 ] 0. 998 1. 011 0. 973 1. 121 1. 007 1. 049 0. 992 1. 019 :
1 : 201 ( ),, : T P = 1 2 ln C T ( y t+1, w t+1 ) C T+1 ( y t+1, w t+1 ) + ln C T ( y t, w t ) C T+1 ( y t, w t )., t t + 1, W, t + 1 y t y,, 1996 2002 9 %, 2001 2002, 2013 % 2813 % 4 IND2 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 [ 41 ] - 0. 13 0. 093 0. 041-0. 074 0 0. 204 0. 284 0. 116 [ 45 ] - 0. 022 0. 089 0. 073-0. 043 0. 021 0. 204 0. 284 0. 111 [ 37 ] - 0. 11 0. 092 0. 051-0. 071-0. 001 0. 204 0. 284 0. 109 [ 16 ] - 0. 045 0. 089 0. 069-0. 056 0. 012 0. 204 0. 284 0. 102 [ 27 ] - 0. 13 0. 093 0. 044-0. 071-0. 001 0. 204 0. 284 0. 101-0. 11 0. 092 0. 046-0. 074-0. 004 0. 203 0. 283 0. 09 [ 09 ] - 0. 124 0. 093 0. 045-0. 075-0. 006 0. 203 0. 283 0. 069 [ 25 ] - 0. 108 0. 092 0. 05-0. 07 0. 002 0. 204 0. 284 0. 067 [ 07 ] - 0. 12 0. 092 0. 05-0. 078-0. 014 0. 203 0. 283 0. 065 [ 17 ] - 0. 161 0. 095 0. 022-0. 089-0. 016 0. 203 0. 283 0. 064 [ 12 ] - 0. 102 0. 093 0. 035-0. 083-0. 013 0. 203 0. 283 0. 05 :?,,,, W TO,, W TO,,,, W TO, :
202 ( ) 7,,,,,,,, 38,,,, W TO,,, 1995 1 000 2002 2 935, 1995 936 2002 2 495,, 1995 2002 1995 5 2002 1 302, 1 233 6 135,, 15 361 7 215, 4 008 2 138,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 1996 2002, GDP 8 %,,,,,,,,,
1 : 203, ( ),, (8), C E C : CE C = ln CE T ( y t, x t, w t ) CE T+1 ( y t+1, x t+1, w t+1 ).,,,,, 100 %,,, 1995 2002 38 0124,,,, 1 %, 1 % 5, 1996 2002 217 % 1996 2002, 2000,, 2001 2002 819 % 1219 % 5 IND2 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 [ 37 ] - 0. 052-0. 142 0. 021 0. 152 0. 088 0. 021 0. 056 0. 035 [ 42 ] 0. 064-0. 139 0. 168 0. 225 0. 17-0. 122-0. 148 0. 013 [ 23 ] 0. 241-0. 04 0. 055 0. 204 0. 025-0. 013-0. 185 0. 012 [ 34 ] 0. 067-0. 124 0. 042 0. 129 0. 15-0. 075-0. 071 0. 005 [ 16 ] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 022-0. 134-0. 034 0. 139 0. 091-0. 089-0. 129-0. 027 [ 10 ] 0. 062-0. 126-0. 104 0. 129-0. 268-0. 11-0. 154-0. 083 [ 18 ] 0. 206-0. 274-0. 026 0. 071 0. 111-0. 122-0. 387-0. 083 [ 44 ] - 0. 052-0. 149-0. 148 0. 027-0. 015-0. 22-0. 227-0. 121 [ 46 ] - 0. 021-0. 215-0. 046 0. 038-0. 133-0. 179-0. 312-0. 125 [ 25 ] - 0. 114-0. 233-0. 269-0. 016-0. 076-0. 11-0. 095-0. 131 :
204 ( ) 7,,,, : T E = ln T E ( y t+1, x t+1 S T+1 ) T E ( y t, x t S T )., 1 %, 1 %, 1996 2002 316 %, 2001 2002, 1216 % 1512 % 38 7, 5, 10 14 6 IND2 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 [ 19 ] 0. 434-0. 202-0. 2 0. 282 0. 127 0. 067-0. 188 0. 022 [ 37 ] 0. 033-0. 295 0. 012 0. 143 0. 133-0. 018 0. 013 0. 014 [ 13 ] 0. 211-0. 268-0. 104 0. 334 0. 144-0. 014-0. 161 0. 012 [ 42 ] 0. 114-0. 183 0. 177 0. 217 0. 197-0. 141-0. 19 0. 005 [ 34 ] 0. 141-0. 177 0. 041 0. 161 0. 154-0. 162-0. 044 0. 001 0. 064-0. 189-0. 031 0. 141 0. 119-0. 126-0. 152-0. 036 [ 25 ] 0. 196-0. 202-0. 304 0. 077 0. 003-0. 052-0. 026-0. 102 [ 22 ] 0. 117-0. 299-0. 096 0. 178 0. 053-0. 342-0. 166-0. 104 [ 10 ] 0. 206-0. 189-0. 085 0. 086-0. 393-0. 226-0. 164-0. 114 [ 44 ] 0. 261-0. 14-0. 171 0. 006-0. 006-0. 104-0. 197-0. 121 [ 46 ] 0. 147-0. 15-0. 099 0. 1-0. 126-0. 179-0. 375-0. 139 :,,,,,,,??
1 : 205 : A E = ln A E ( y t+1, w t+1, x t+1 S T+1 ) A E ( y t, w t, x t S T ). A E( ) 7,, 1996 2002 018 %,, 1996 412 %, 2001 2002 317 % 212 %,, 7 IND2 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 [ 22 ] - 0. 06 0. 098 0. 028 0. 008 0. 033 0. 165 0. 041 0. 054 [ 20 ] - 0. 063 0. 115 0. 033 0. 047 0 0. 051 0. 043 0. 036 [ 29 ] - 0. 047 0. 102-0. 008 0. 042-0. 049 0. 148-0. 006 0. 031 [ 10 ] - 0. 143 0. 063-0. 019 0. 042 0. 125 0. 116 0. 01 0. 03 [ 26 ] - 0. 094 0. 093 0. 006 0. 03-0. 009 0. 068 0. 052 0. 027-0. 042 0. 055-0. 003-0. 001-0. 028 0. 037 0. 022 0. 008 [ 18 ] - 0. 082 0. 014 0. 023-0. 107-0. 058-0. 008 0. 005-0. 029 [ 25 ] 0. 082-0. 031 0. 035-0. 093-0. 08-0. 059-0. 069-0. 029 [ 07 ] - 0. 09 0. 048-0. 044 0. 049-0. 035-0. 071-0. 106-0. 036 [ 24 ] - 0. 121-0. 004-0. 042-0. 143-0. 019-0. 037-0. 018-0. 051 [ 19 ] - 0. 124-0. 038-0. 051-0. 177-0. 086-0. 109-0. 012-0. 079 :,,,, ( ),, ;,,,,
206 ( ) 7 CSI, 1996 2002-9 % - 4 % 112 % 615 % 817 % 1114 % 1514 %, 1996 38, 27, 11 1999,,, 2002 38 34, 4 8 IND2 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 [ 37 ] - 0. 162-0. 05 0. 072 0. 081 0. 088 0. 224 0. 34 0. 144 [ 23 ] 0. 142 0. 052 0. 108 0. 136 0. 025 0. 19 0. 099 0. 112 [ 45 ] - 0. 125 0. 091 0. 47-0. 043-0. 052 0. 103 0. 18 0. 111 [ 42 ] - 0. 06-0. 046 0. 213 0. 151 0. 163 0. 082 0. 136 0. 105 [ 16 ] - 0. 045 0. 089 0. 069-0. 056 0. 012 0. 204 0. 284 0. 102-0. 09-0. 04 0. 012 0. 065 0. 087 0. 114 0. 154 0. 063 [ 10 ] - 0. 043-0. 034-0. 058 0. 055-0. 265 0. 094 0. 13-0. 012 [ 12 ] - 0. 031-0. 028 0. 018-0. 118-0. 077-0. 006 0. 073-0. 024 [ 44 ] - 0. 107-0. 059-0. 087-0. 042-0. 015-0. 016 0. 056-0. 028 [ 46 ] - 0. 05-0. 126 0. 026-0. 021-0. 127 0. 025-0. 028-0. 041 [ 25 ] - 0. 222-0. 141-0. 219-0. 085-0. 075 0. 093 0. 189-0. 064 (CSI 0) 27 28 22 13 7 5 4 (CSI > 0) 11 10 16 25 31 33 34 : 1999 8 1996 2002 Malmquist (D EA),,, 1995 2002 38, : (1), 1996 2002 1417 %,, 912 % 517 % 11 4 % 512 % 413 % 819 % 811 %, 613 %
1 : 207 (2), 1996 01984 2002 01907 (3) 9 %, 2001 2002 2013 % 2813 % (4) 217 %,, 316 %, 2001 2002 1216 % 1512 % (5) 018 %,, 2001 2002 317 % 212 % (6) 1999 CSI, 1996 2002-9 % - 4 % 112 % 615 % 817 % 1114 % 1514 %, 1996 1998 38, 1999 25 2000 31 2001 33 2002 34,,, ;,,,,,,,,,, : (1),, (2),,,,
208 ( ) 7 (3),,, 12 %, (4),,,, ( ),,,, [ 1 ] At kinson S., and C. Cornwell, Parametric Estimation of Technical and Allocative Inefficiency wit h Panel Data, I nternational Economic Review, 1994, 35 (1), 231 243. [ 2 ] At kinson S., and D. Primont, Stochastic Estimation of Firm Technology, Inefficiency, and Pro2 ductivity Growt h Using Shadow Cost and Distance Functions, J ournal of Econometrics, 2002, 108 (2), 203 225. [ 3 ],,,2005 12, 34 71 [ 4 ] Caves, D., L. Christensen, and E. Diewert, The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and t he Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity, Economet rica, 1982, 50 (6), 1393 1414. [ 5 ] Coelli, T., D. Rao, and G. Battese, A n I nt roduction to Ef f iciency and Productivit y A nal ysis. Boston : Kluwer Academic Publishers,1998. [ 6 ] Fare, R., S. Grosskopf, M. Norris, and Z. Zhang, Productivity Growt h, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries, A merican Economic Review, 1994,84 (1), 66 83. [ 7 ] Fare, R., S. Grosskopf, and M. Norris, Productivity Growt h, Technical Progress, and Efficien2 cy Change in Industrialized Countries : Reply, A merican Economic Review, 1997, 87 ( 5 ), 1040 1044. [ 8 ] Farrell, M., The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, J ournal of the Roy al S tatistical S ocie2 t y,1957, 120 (3), 253 281. [ 9 ] Fisher, I., The M aking of I ndex N umbers, 3rd edition. Boston : Hohghton Mifflin, 1922. [ 10 ],,,2004 15 ( 431 ) [ 11 ],,,2006 2, 1 11 [ 12 ] Kalirajan, K., M. Obwona, and S. Zhao, A Decomposition of Total Factor Productivity Growt h : The Case of Chinags Agricultural Growt h before and after Reform, A merican J ournal of A gricul2 tural Economics, 1996, 78 (2), 331 338.
1 : 209 [ 13 ] Kumar, S., and R. Russell, Technological Change, Technological Catch2up, and Capital Deepe2 ning : Relative Contributions to Growt h and Convergence, A merican Economic Review, 2002, 92 (3), 527 548. [ 14 ] Kumbhakar S., and C. Lovell, S tochastic Frontier A nal ysis. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2002. [ 15 ] Lucas, R., On t he Mechanics of Economic Development, J ournal of Monetary Economics, 1988, 22 (1), 3 42. [ 16 ] Malmquist, S., Index Numbers and Indifference Surfaces, T radaj os de Estatistica, 1953, 4, 209 242. [ 17 ] Nishimizu, M., and Page, J., Total Factor Productivity Growt h, Technological Progress and Technical Efficiency Change : Dimensions of Productivity Change in Yugoslavia 1965 1978, Eco2 nomic J ournal, 1982, 92 (368), 920 936. [ 18 ] Romer, P., Endogenous Technological Change, J ournal of Political Economy,1990, 98 (5), S71 102. [ 19 ] Shephard, R., Theory of Cost and Production Functions. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, 1970. [ 20 ] Solow, R., Technical Change and Aggregate Production Function, A merican Economic Review, 1957, 39 (3), 312 320. [ 21 ],,2005 3, 4 16 [ 22 ] (a) :,,2006 2, 2 10 [ 23 ] (b) :,,2006 10, 57 68 [ 24 ],,, 2003,No. 200310 [ 25 ] (a), :,,2005 12, 38 45 [ 26 ] (b),,,2005 8, 10 12 [ 27 ] (c), :,2005 [ 28 ] Wu, Y., Has Productivity Contributed to Chinags Growt h? Paci f ic Economic Review, 2003, 8 (1), 15 30. [ 29 ] Wu, Y., Is Chinags Economic Growt h Sustainable? A Productivity Analysis, China Economic Review, 2000, 11 (3), 278 296. [ 30 ],,,2004 12, 55 65 [ 31 ], :,,2006 1, 50 52
210 ( ) 7 An Application of the Non2parametric Cost Frontier Model to Chinese Industrial Growth ZH EN GGE TU ( H uaz hon g N orm al U ni versit y ) GEN G XIAO ( B rooki ngs2tsi ng hua Center) Abstract This paper establishes a non2parametric cost frontier model to decompose cost growth of Chinese large and medium2size industrial firms, and finds that globalization, prop2 erty right s reform, and moderate competition promote technological progress and allocative efficiency. This means that the Chinese growth model is shifting f rom an extensive one to an intensive one at the turn of the century. In the meantime, gap s among sectors are being en2 larged, constituting a challenge for the Chinese economy. JEL Classif ication D24, C14, O33