1 Freud, 1856~1935
2
3
4 sex idea
5 sex attitude
6 sex ideas Idea
7 Idea
8
sex attitude attitude Bender & Sorochan (1989) 9
10
11 vicarious 1930
12 attitude idea
13 Campbell1947 J. H. Mann1960Wrightsman1962
14
Nutt & Sedlucek, 1974Sneddon & Kremer, 1992 Hobart,1972 Nutt & Sedlucek, 1974Sneddon & Kremer,1992 Sorenson1999 Sulanowski1998 HIVhuman immunodeficiency virus 15
16 HIV AIDS gender role gender role attitude
17 Torois & Offer 1979
18 onanism
intimacy, intimate intimus inner-most intimare Mackey, Diemer, & O Brien, 2000 19
20 Hatfield1984 Wynne & Wynne1986 intimacy
21 Mackey 2000 openness reciprocity interdependence of partners Scharf&Mayseless2001 closeness disclosing intimacy
22 Erikson (1963) M.Herbert1987
Olson emotional intimacy social intimacy intellectual intimacy sexual intimacy recreational intimacy spiritual intimacy aesthetic intimacy Olson Schaefer & Olson, 1981 Schaefer &Olson(1981) Personal Assessment of Intimacy in Relationships,PAIR 23
Rytting model of intimacy sexual non-sexual sphere physical mental emotional/spiritual modality Spooner,1982 Libby&Whitehurst (1977) breadth openness depth Cox, 2002 Olson Schaefer & Olson1981 Schaefer & Olson1981 24
25 Hook, et al., 2003 Larson 2000
26 Mackey 2000 Knox 2001 affection commitment socioeconomic resources
Hatfield &Rapson1996 love and affection expression of warm 27
LarsonPeterson & Birch (2000) KnoxSturdivant & Zusman (2001) Mackey Moore (2001) 28
29
30
91 5,116 1.47% 4,504 0.58% 154 0.15% 11 0.06% 52.28% 165 1.69% 30.17% 9.85% 31
32
33
34
35 ready-made answers
36
37
38
KrejcieMorgan 39
40
41
42 subject matter experts, SMEs Reliability Analysis Cronbach's a Validity Analysis
43 Cronbach's a Devellis (1991) Cronbach's a Likert
Likert 44
Schaefer and Olson1981 Personal Assessment of Intimacy in Relationships, PAIR 45
46
47
48
coding SPSS/PC One-Way ANOVA One-Way ANOVA product correlation 49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Eta effect size 61
62
Eta effect size 63
64
65
effect size 66
67
68
69
Larson 2000 91 Hook 200392 Mackey 2000 Eta 70
effect size 71
Eta effect size 72
73
effect size 74
75
Eta effect size 76
77
Eta effect size 78
79
Eta 80
effect size 81
82
83
effect size 84
Eta effect size 85
86
effect size 87
88
effect size 89
90
effect size 91
92
Eta effect size 93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105 Data mining measurement invariance
106 idiosyncratic cross-validation
107 96520 http://www.apc.gov.tw/chinese/docdetail/detail_tca.jsp?docid=p A000000001018&linkRoot=4&linkParent=49&url=
108 93 http://info.gio.gov.tw/public/attachment/731216465853.doc
109
110
111
112 Rubin,L.b.
113 Jamieson,L. Stoop,D; & Stoop,J.
114
Bender, S. J.; & Sorochan, W. D. (1989). Teaching Elementary Health Science. 3rd ed. MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Inc., Cox, F.D. (2002) Human intimacy marriage, the family, and its meaning. WadsworthThomson Learning. Hobart, C. W. (1972). Sexual permissiveness in young English and French Canadian. Journal of Marriage and the Family,34,292-303. Hook, M., K, Gerstein, L.H., Detterich, L.,Gridley, B. (2003). How close are wemeasuring intimacy and examining gender differences. Journal of Counseling and Development,81,462-472. Knox, D., Sturdivant, L., Zusman, M.E.(2001). College student attitudes toward Sexual College Student. Journal,35,241-243 Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, P. W. (1970). Determing sample size for research activities. Education and Psychological Measurement, 30, p. 607-610 Larson, J.H., Peterson, D J.,Birch, P. (2000). The relationship between perceived dys functional family-of-origin rules and intimacy in young adult dating relationships. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy,26,161-175. Mackey, R.A., Diemer, M.A., O Brien, B.A. (2000). Psychological intimacy in the lasting relationships of heterosexual and same-gender couples. Sex Roles,43(4),201-208. 115
Moore, K.A., McCabe, M.P., Brink, R.B. (2001). Are married couples happier in their relationships than cohabiting couples Intimacy and relationship factors. Sexual and Relationship Therapy,16(1),35-46. Nutt, R. L., & Sedlacek, W. E. (1974). Freshman sexual attitude and behavior. Journal of College Student Personal,15,346-351. Schaefer, M., Olson, D. (1981). Assessing intimacy The PAIR inventory. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 7,47-59 Sneddon, I. & Kremer, J. (1992). Sexual behavior and attitude of university students in Northern Ireland. Archives of Sexual Behaviot,21(3),295-312. Sorenson Andrew S. Phillips, Carolyn P. (1999). Hurdles : An activity for homosexuality education. Journal of Sex Education & Therapy,20(3), p198-203. Sulanowski, B. k (1998). Coorientihg Gender Groups to Sex Norms : A Study of Attitudes, Perception, Consensus and Sex Communication among College Students in Malawi(HIV, Immune Deficiency) Torois, Offer (1979). Social Cognitive Theory. Glanz,K.,Lewis,F.M. & Rimer,B.K., Health Behavior and HealthEducation. 116