國立中山大學學位論文典藏

Similar documents
從實驗教材到官方課程──小學社會科板橋模式教材與改編本教科書的發展

i-v


<4D F736F F D D DA4E9AA76AEC9B4C1BB4FC657AAECB5A5BEC7AED5BDD2ABE1B8C9B2DFB867C5E7AAECB1B42E646F63>

南華大學數位論文

186 臺 灣 學 研 究. 第 十 三 期 民 國 一 一 年 六 月 壹 前 言 貳 從 廢 廳 反 對 州 廳 設 置 到 置 郡 運 動 參 地 方 意 識 的 形 成 與 發 展 肆 結 論 : 政 治 史 的 另 一 個 面 相 壹 前 言 長 期 以 來, 限 於 史 料 的 限 制


穨1-林聖欽.doc

Microsoft Word - 1王志宇.doc

Microsoft Word - 論文獎助扉頁5份.doc

2011 餐 年 旅 教 育 創 新 發 展 學 術 研 討 會 論 文 集 To Discuss the Implementation Status of the 99 Vocational Hospitality Programme Group -By C School for Example

南華大學數位論文

标题

/ 3 /

TWGHs S

政治哲學要跨出去!

Microsoft Word ºÂ¾åÄõ.doc

语篇中指代词的分布规律与心理机制*

A VALIDATION STUDY OF THE ACHIEVEMENT TEST OF TEACHING CHINESE AS THE SECOND LANGUAGE by Chen Wei A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School and Colleg


跨越文藝復興女性畫像的格局—

穨應用布魯納教學論於中文教學

The Subjective Japanese Migrants in Asia A Case of Taipei and Shanghai Sachiko KANETO Abstract Since the mid of 1990s, in search of new life or constr


2004 5,,,,,,,,,, :,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,9 12,,,,,,,,,,,,, : 4, 1958, (), 1987,417 (),7, 32

McGraw-Hill School Education Group Physics : Principles and Problems G S 24

093_114_Koh_khee_heong

投影片 1

mode of puzzle-solving

國小三年級閱讀理解教學行動研究

1 * 1 *

44(1) (1) (4) (4) 63-88TSSCI Liu, W. Y., & Teele S. (2009). A study on the intelligence profile

道 家 思 想 有 著 相 當 大 的 成 分 是 落 在 身 學 傳 統 的 範 疇, 特 別 是 人 萬 物 與 道 的 關 係 時, 身 學 的 觀 看 視 野 特 別 有 其 解 釋 性, 事 實 上, 在 道 家 的 思 維 中 並 不 是 不 存 在

<4D F736F F D203036AE61AE78A4E5A4C6B8EAA5BBB9EFBEC7AED5B1D0A87CBC76C554A4A7ACE3A8732E646F63>

第四章 东正教 俄中关系之意义再被稀释的重要因素

Microsoft Word - 從家長觀點來看融合-輔大.doc

±i©uµY

218 台灣文學研究學報 第五期 一般論文 結構的當時 作為一個企圖和日語本位主義文化擴張進行抵抗 扭轉不均衡文化流向的批判性知識社群 以民間文學整理作為鏈 接的契機 以學院資源取得合法關鍵 不計採取民族文學遺產 化 知識化的柔軟姿態 開拓創作與言論空間 林荊南等人的努 力具有不可漠視的文化價值與啟

语篇中指代词的分布规律与心理机制*

穨CY03519.PDF

國立臺南大學數位論文典藏.pdf

1

西漢晚期以來,儒家思想對社會已有了深入的影響,當時不論士庶,普遍對孝悌之行抱有由衷的敬意。在此背景下,原本存在於大家庭的治家之法,在士人階層發生了深刻而微妙的變化。士人立身以禮、躬行實踐的結果,推動著家庭內的倫理關係趨向於嚴謹規矩。

<4D F736F F D2035B171AB73B6CBA8ECAB73A6D3A4A3B6CBA158B3AFA46CA9F9BB50B169A445C4D6AABAB750B94AB8D6B9EFA4F1ACE3A873>

Integration of English-Chinese Word Segmentation and Word Alignment

M M. 20

2 特 殊 教 育 與 復 健 學 報 緒 論 每 到 身 心 障 礙 學 生 升 學 大 專 校 院 甄 試 的 簡 章 公 佈 時, 高 中 職 老 師 都 可 以 聽 到 身 心 障 礙 學 生 問 : 為 什 麼 學 系 這 麼 少? 部 分 學 生 因 選 擇 少 而 不 參 加 甄 試

國家圖書館典藏電子全文

Journal of Curriculum Studies September, 2013, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp A Study of the Relationship between Senior High School Curriculum and the Mult

南華大學數位論文

问 她! 我 们 把 这 只 手 机 举 起 来 借 着 它 的 光 看 到 了 我 老 婆 正 睁 着 双 眼 你 在 干 什 么 我 问, 我 开 始 想 她 至 少 是 闭 着 眼 睛 在 yun 酿 睡 意 的 我 睡 不 着 她 很 无 辜 地 看 着 我 我 问 她 yun 酿 的 yu

~ Jason Thompson, A History of Egypt: From Earliest Times to the Present, Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press, 2008, p

Microsoft Word - Alan Jameson's Master's Thesis.pdf

content

Chap3Chinese

39

<4D F736F F D D3532A4E9AA76AEC9B4C1BB4FC657C160B7FEA9B2A5C1AC46B3A1B4DEB2A3A7BDAAFEC4DDAA4CB77EB8D5C5E7B3F5A4A7ABD8A5DF2E646F63>

E國立台東大學區域政策與發展研究所

Microsoft Word - S.3 guide book 15-16

English Language

第一章 緒論

荨荨 % [3] [4] 86%( [6] 27 ) Excel [7] 27 [8] 2 [9] K2 [2] ; Google group+ 5 Gmail [2] 2 fxljwcy 3E [22] 2 2 fxljzrh 2D [23] 3 2 fxzphjf 3D 35

66 近 代 中 國 婦 女 史 研 究 第 22 期 生 長 發 育 和 功 能, 成 為 臺 灣 教 育 史 上 一 個 新 的 現 象 以 女 性 生 殖 生 理 掛 帥 的 課 文, 描 述 性 器 則 詳 女 略 男 詳 內 略 外 詳 構 造 略 機 制, 說 明 保 健 則 著 重 清

TI 3 TI TABLE 4 RANDBIN Research of Modern Basic Education

香港藝術發展局委託報告

Microsoft Word - 6_0目錄.doc

On Macro-Planning for China s English Education from Elementary to Tertiary Levels in the Era of Globalization MEI Deming ZHAO Meijuan Abstract This p

新 竹 縣 教 育 研 究 集 刊 第 十 一 期 民 100 年 12 月 Guo,Na-Yi Teacher of Chu-Bei Elementary School Abstract The purpose of this action research was to examine the

P

南華大學數位論文

/ JACAR Ref. A JACAR Ref. B /

72,, :,,,1905,,,,,, 1911,,,,, (,, ),,,,,,,, ,,1918 4,,,,,,,,, :,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,5 :1. ;2. ;3. ;4. ;5.,,,, :1. ;2. ;3. ;4. ;5.,;6. ;7.

untitled

4 10% 90%

I

<4D F736F F D20B1D0A87C2D312DABC4B4A3AEC9B4C1B943C0B8BCCBBBAAA4A7ACE3A8732DBDB2A8CEBF50A142B7A8B251A6B62E646F63>

6張謇教育思想之研究.doc

第16卷 第2期 邯郸学院学报 年6月

[ ] 1966 [ ] [ 1993]

國 史 館 館 刊 第 23 期 Chiang Ching-kuo s Educational Innovation in Southern Jiangxi and Its Effects ( ) Abstract Wen-yuan Chu * Chiang Ching-kuo wa

念「舊」新潮流─國立臺灣圖書館舊籍行銷策略探究

*王心齋說得好:「天理者,」

66 臺 中 教 育 大 學 學 報 : 人 文 藝 術 類 Abstract This study aimed to analyze the implementing outcomes of ability grouping practice for freshman English at a u

Prasenjit Duara 3 nation state Northwestern Journal of Ethnology 4 1. A C M J M M

星,1983: 頁 8) 但 後 來 在 日 本 教 育 界 權 威 後 藤 新 平 ( ) 的 堅 持 下, 把 新 式 教 育 的 雛 型 帶 入 了 臺 灣, 開 啟 臺 灣 新 式 教 育 的 濫 觴, 就 這 樣 一 步 步 的 將 臺 灣 帶 往 文 明 國 家 的 旅

2006中國文學研究範本檔

ZHONG Chong A Study on the Map of Provincial Capital of Zhejiang Past and Present



國立高雄大學○○○○○○學系(研究所)(標楷體18號字

慣用左手兒童寫字與書法表現能力之研究論文計劃大綱

致 谢 本 人 自 2008 年 6 月 从 上 海 外 国 语 大 学 毕 业 之 后, 于 2010 年 3 月 再 次 进 入 上 外, 非 常 有 幸 成 为 汉 语 国 际 教 育 专 业 的 研 究 生 回 顾 三 年 以 来 的 学 习 和 生 活, 顿 时 感 觉 这 段 时 间 也

Analysis of Cultural Elements of Meinong s Paper Umbrella Painting Abstract Meinong paper umbrellas are a traditional industrial art for the Hakka peo

中 國 學 研 究 期 刊 泰 國 農 業 大 學 บ นทอนเช นก น และส งผลก บการด ดแปลงจากวรรณกรรมมาเป นบทภาพยนตร และบทละคร โทรท ศน ด วยเช นก น จากการเคารพวรรณกรรมต นฉบ บเป นหล

Microsoft Word doc

untitled

Fudan Education Forum Vol.16 No.5 [2] [3] [4] 90 [5] [6] [7] Martha Nussbaum [8]

南華大學數位論文

附件1:

天 主 教 輔 仁 大 學 社 會 學 系 學 士 論 文 小 別 勝 新 婚? 久 別 要 離 婚? 影 響 遠 距 家 庭 婚 姻 感 情 因 素 之 探 討 Separate marital relations are getting better or getting worse? -Exp

Transcription:

A Study of Japanese Colonial Education Policies in Taiwan the Case of Language Textbooks for Elementary School. Abstracts The major purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between Japanese colonial policies and colonial education, and its impact upon the contents of public elementary school and the language textbooks. Through a variety of analyses, the study intended to discuss the issues relating to the formation and implementation of Japanese colonial educational policies in Taiwan, and to prove the colonial elites to reproduce specific Japanese cultural values, political orientations on the minds of Taiwan s children in public elementary school. This study, based upon the result of review of related literature and documents and the analyses of the contents of public school s language textbooks, traced several controversies in the formation and implementation of Japanese colonial educational policies during the occupation period. To deepen the researchers understanding of the process, some in-depth interviews of educated people aged over 70 were also conducted. The final conclusions were reached through the combination of these three steps of explorations and some suggestions have been achieved. The conclusions of this study were as follows: The implementation of colonial policies is based on the extent of how the colonial education was practiced. The goals and intentions of colonial elites could also be found in the colonial education policies. The colonial education policies changed along with the needs of social situations in Taiwan and in Japanese, and perspectives of the key colonial elites.. The key components which the language textbooks were trying to brain wash Taiwan s children were teaching Japanese language, moral education, knowledge and skills in life, the spirit of Japanese culture, and the development of healthy bodies in students.. The contents of language textbooks changed along with the changes of colonial education policies. The perspectives of colonial elites could also be found in the changing of shifts of emphases in the contents of the language textbooks. The formation and implementation of colonial educational policies in Taiwan are

based on Japan s colonial policies, and the control of contents and their ideology in language textbooks were the major approaches. Two suggestions for further study were provided by the researcher as follows. Suggestion for related studies Based upon the conclusions of the study, interested researchers can deepen their understanding of the topic by analyzing textbooks of other subjects, extending the study s span to include elementary schools in 1941-1945, and conducting more oral history interviews.. Suggestion for comparative studies The conclusions of this study could be the starting points for the researchers to conduct a comparative study the contents of school textbooks in Japan, Taiwan, Manchu and Korea during the colonial period.

...1..1..5.10.15.16 21.21.25.30 39.39 1919 46.55.64 68.68.82..104 104 118..135

135 139 141 146..146..153..165..170

1.7 2.8 3...36 41924 1931 62 5...69 6...71 7...73 8...76 9.104 10..106 11...107 12...108 13 109 14...115 15.116

1...9 2.19 3.20 4.73 5.74 6.75 7.76 8.77 9.77 10 78 11.78 12 79 13 79 14 80 15 80 16 87 17 87 18 88 19.88 20.88 21.89 22.89 23.90 24.91 25.93 26.94

27 94 28.94 29.94 30.96 31.97 32...100 33...101 34...101 35...101 36...102 37...102 38...103

1

2

2000 2000 2000 ( ) 1922 3

1. 2. 3. 4. 4

5

1941 4 1. 1919 2. 1994 1 7 6

1 34 1901 1-12 2 1913 1-12 12 1923 1-12 12 1937 1-12 17 1942??? 1-4 1-8 1 12 5 2 1994 135 1895 1 7 1997 1898 1994 1931 1940 2 8 7

2 34 1901 1901-1912 1-12 12 1923 1923-1936 12 1937 1-12 1937-1941 3.8.10. 11.12 1994 135 1999 1-12 2 1913 1913-1922 1-12 1. 48 2 2. 8

9 1 1 1919

Altbach & Kelly1978 Education and Colonialism Kelly1978 1968 P. Tsurumi1977 apanese Colonial Education in Taiwan, 1895-1945 1981????? 1988 Tsurumi1977 Japanese Colonial Education in Taiwan, 1895-1945 10

1981????? 1988 1994 1994 1997 2000 1994 11

1994 1997 2000 1994 1919 1-12 1-12 1997 12

13

1981????? 14

1898 1941 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1901-1912 7. 1913-1922 8. 1923-1936 9. 1937-1941 10. 15

1 7 dimensions 16

1. 1 A. B. 2 paragraph 1996 A. A B 17

C D 3 = 100% 18

19 2. 1 2 2 2 3 3 20 5-6

20 2-4 3

Memmi 1998 Memmi 21

Kelly Mak,1997 22

Kelly1978 Rothermund1997 1999 1999 1985 1998 1 2 23

3 4 1998 24

Kelly1982 Kelly 25

DeFrancis,1977 1819 1 29 140 1821 1942 1945 1959 1942 2 1945 9 1946 1948 1955 1959 1963 8 1965 8 9 1999 1997 19 26

20 Tan, 1997 1942-1945 1949 1955 1956 1 2 3 4 5 6 27

1997 1910 8 22 1910 10 1 1998 1998 1 1904.12 1906.8 2 1906.8 1911.819061909 3 1911.8 1945.8 1911 1922 2 28

1908 1919 5 1912 1922 1924 1998 29

1991 1841-1909 1847-1889 1889 1890 1896 29 1897 15 1999 1. 2. 1 30

2 3 Tsurumi1984 1895 5 8 5 10 5 21 31

6 17 6 17 18 1997 1896-1898 1898-1941 32

1922 1995 33

1997 1. 2. 3. 4. 34

1998 1994 35

Kelly1978 50 3 3 1871-1879 1880-1885 1886-1903 1904-1909 1910-1917 1918-1932 1933-1940 1941-1945 1994 1904 4 36

1945 8 4 1904-1945 1993 1. 1904-1909 2. 1910-1917 1907 3 21 1908 4 1910 4 1918-1932 10 1914 3 7 37

1933-1940 1941-1945 1941 3 1941 1943 38

1895 28 1896 29 1898 1919 1907 1919 1904 37 39

1914 10 40

Komagome Mangan(1997) 1895-1922 1. 2. 3. 4.1910 1919 1993 1912-1926 41

1918 1919 10 1919 1922 1939 1895 28 1983 42

1995 43

1896 3 31 1995 1898 1977 44

1898.11.10 45

1919 1898 1919 21 1919 1897 1898 31 7 28 178 1. 2. 46

3. 4. 5. 1898 31 1898 31 8 16 78 1. 1 2 2. 1 2 47

3 4 1977 1901 35 1902 36 1901 24 1902 2 1 1 31 1902 4 1 3 31 48

1904 37 1904 37 3 31 24 1. 1898 2. 49

3. 4. 1898 1904 1 2 3 4 50

1907 40 1907 40 2 26 1898 14 1898 1981 54 2396 1907 142 34,400 1907 40 51

1. 2. 1912 1907 1912 11 28 40 1. 1994 1898 52

2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 53

1996 7. 8. 1919 54

1919 1941 1919 8 1919 1981 1919 10 12 2000... 55

1918 1919 1922 11 1931 6 1936 11 8 7 9 2 1937 1938 12 1937 56

1994 1941 4 57

1919 1919 1. 2. 3. 6 58

1922 1922 11 1922 1. 2. 1940 59

1912 1919 1917 1922 1920 1919 1920 1921 1919 1921 1919 1920 1921 1. 2. 1919 60

3. 1922 1. 4 3 2. 3. 4. 1924 1931 4 4 61

41924 1931 1923.7.20 13 60 1926.9.26 15 71 1928.4.28 3 29 1931.1.28 6 2 1981p1304.1305 1933 1931 6 1937 1936 1994 1937 40 62

1939 1940 1941 4 63

1904 1912 1922 1904 64

1919 1919 8 1922 11 1981 65

1904 1904 1912 66

1898 67

dimensions 1. 2 3. 4. 1931 1937 1933 1939 68

1912 1898????. 1. 2. 5 5 69

1. 2. 3. 4. 43 6 1. 984 2. 1,115 3. 1,494 4. 1,094 6 (1901-1912) (1913-1922) (1923-1936) (1937-1941) 12 12 12 7 984 1,115 1,494 1,094 3.8.10.11.12 70

1. 52 7 8 (1) 2. 68 7 71

(1) 3. (2) 81.75 7 (1) (2) 7 78 150 52 53 78 68 103 126 81.75 72

73 35.37 21.4 13.11 8.84 8.23 6.03 5.28 1.42 0.71 4 8 1901 4 21.04 35.37 6.03 8.84 0.71 1.42 5.28 13.11 8.23 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 %

74 31.12 29.06 13.27 9.60 9.15 3.05 2.87 1.08 0.81 58 37.28 21.89 20.26 7.43 6.22 3.08 1.81 1.14 0.54 6 8 5 13.27 31.12 3.05 9.6 0.81 1.08 2.87 9.15 29.06 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 %

75 36.84 16.45 16.18 29.06 7.13 5.58 2.47 2.10 0.09 78 6 21.89 37.28 3.08 6.22 1.14 0.54 1.81 7.43 20.62 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 %

40 36.84 35 30 25 % 20 15 16.18 16.45 13.16 10 5 0 2.47 77.13 5.58 0.09 2.1 (1901-1912) (1913-1922) (1923-1936) (1937-1941) 21.04 2 13.27 3 21.89 2 16.18 3 35.37 1 31.12 1 37.28 1 36.84 1 6.03 6 3.05 6 3.08 6 2.47 7 8.84 4 9.60 4 6.22 5 16.45 2 0.71 9 0.81 9 1.14 8 7.13 5 1.42 8 1.08 8 0.54 9 0.09 9 5.28 7 2.87 7 1.81 7 2.10 8 13.11 3 9.15 5 7.43 4 5.58 6 8.23 5 29.06 2 20.62 3 13.16 4 76

21.04% 13.27% 21.89% 16.18% 8 8 8 35.37% 31.12% 37.28% 36.84% 9 8 9 77

6.03% 3.05% 3.08% 2.47% 10 8 10 8.84% 9.60% 6.22% 16.45% 11 8 11 78

0.71% 0.81 1.14% 7.13% 12 8 12 1.42% 1.08% 0.54% 0.09% 13 8 13 79

5.28% 2.87% 1.81% 2.10% 14 8 14 13.11% 9.15% 7.43% 5.58% 15 8 15 80

81

82

83

1898 1901 1901 1903 1994 1989 1994 1994 (1) 12 (2) / /???????? 84

(3) 1994 (4) 1994 (1) 1994 (2) (3) 85

1923 12 1937 12 (1) (2) 1937 86

(1) 16 17 (2) 1937 16 17 87

18 19 20 21 22 18? 19 20 88

21 22 2122 89

1898 1898 23 23... 90

mararia 24 (???????). 24 91

..??????????????? 92

(1) 25... 25 (2) 93

26 27 26?? 27?? 28?? 29?? 94

28 29 (1) (4) 95

(5) 1. (1) 30 30 96

(2) 31 31 97

?????????????????????????????????? (3). 5. (1) 98

(2).... 32 99

32. (3),.. 33 100

34 33 34 35 35 101

36 37 36 37 38 102

38. 103

AB A A1A2A3A4A5A6 B 4 B1B2B3B4 1? 9 9 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 B1 B2 B3 B4 v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v 104

A1 A2 A6 B4 B2 B3 105

2 (1) 10 10 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 B1 B2 B3 B4 v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v A1 A3 106

3? 11 11 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 B1 B2 B3 B4 v v v v v v v v v v A1 A2 107

4? 12 12 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 B1 B2 B3 B4 v v v v v v v v v v v A5 A2 A3 A4 108

5 13 13 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 B1 B2 B3 B4 v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v A3 109

A5 6 1937 1936 A5 110

A3 B3 7 111

1. 2. A1 A3 A2 (1) (2) B2 1. 112

2. A1 A5 A4 (1) (2) (3) B1 1. 2. A5 1. 2. 3. 113

B1 B3 1939 114

8 14 14 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 B1 B2 B3 v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v A5 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) A3 B1 115

9 Kelly 15 15 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 B1 B2 B3 B4 v v v v v v v v v v v A2 116

10 A2 A3 A6 19 20 B1 B3 117

1 2 1. Kelly Mak,1997 1 2 118

3 1985 1998 1 2 3 4 1995 1. 2. 3. 4. 119

120

3 1919 1918 1919 1922 1939 121

1896 3 31 1995 1898 Kelly1984 1890 23 1912 1919 122

1922 123

4 5 1919 1. 11898 1898 21907 1907 2. 11898 124

31904 1898 1904 31912 1912 1. 11919 1919 21922 1922 11 125

1940 2. 11919 1919 21922 31937 1937 1940 1941 4 1. 126

8 2. 1904 3. 1919 1922 11 4. 127

8 1. A1 B3 B2 2. 128

A1 A2???? A3 B1 B1 B2 B3 129

6 7 8 9 10 1919 1901 1903 1913 13 1922 11 1923 1936 1937 dimensions 1. 2 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 43 6 130

1 4 8 1901 13.11% 2 5 8 9.15 4 2.87 3 6 8 13.27 21.89 6 1922 131

4 7 8 1 10 8 2 11 8 12 8 3 14 8 15 8 132

1. (1) (2) (4) 2. (1) (2) (3) 3. 1937 12 (1) (2) 4. 1937 (1) 133

(3) 1. A2 2. 3. 134

135

1895 1912-1926 1918 1936 11 9 2 136

1937 137

138

1 2 3 4 139

140

1999 1997? (1939) : :1995 1901-1912 1-12 1915 1913 1.5.6.9.10.11.12 1914 1913 2.3.7.8 1915 1913 1923 3.4 1936 1923 5 1933 1923 6.8.12 1935 1923 7 1936 1923 9 1931 1923 10 1940 1923 11 141

1999 1997 (1939) : :1995 1901-1912 1-12 1915 1913 1.5.6.9.10.11.12 1914 1913 2.3.7.8 1915 1913 1923 3.4 1936 1923 5 1933 1923 6.8.12 1935 1923 7 1936 1923 9 1931 1923 10 1940 1923 11 141

1929 1937 1 1937 1937 2 1938 1937 4.5 1939 1937 6.7 1940 1937 9 1941 1902 (1922) : (1917) : 1924 1943 1981 1997 1916 1996 1993 1956 1999 1931 1999 11-19 142

1993 1943 1984 1995 1995 151-182 2000 1998 1922 2000Rothermund, D. (1984) : 1977 16 3 264-283 (1983) : (1998) : 1996 1 1997 4 2 7-56 1997 p16-46 1977 1994 143

144 1997 2000 v6n3 71-76 ; 1994 : (1996) : 1988 1985 Watson, K.;? 10 12-15 1993 238-289 2000 1999 1997 1998 404-420

Altbach, P. G., & Kelly, G. P.1978.Education and Colonialism. Longman. Chang, H. & Myers, R. H.(1986). Japanese Colonial Development Policy in Taiwan, 1895-1906: A Case of Bureaucratic Entrepreneurship. Journal of Asian Studies 22, p.23-34. DeFrancis, J.1977. Colonialism and Language Policy in Viet Nam. The Hague: Mouton. Kelly, G. P.1979. The Relations Between Colonial and Metropolitan Schools: A Structural Analysis. Comparative Education 15, 3,p. 209-215. Kelly, G. P.1982. Teachers and Transmission of State Knowledge: A Case Study of Colonial Vietnam. Comparative Education 45, 3, p.176-94. Kelly, G. P.1984. When I become a Fonctionnaire : School Knowledge in French Colonial Africa. Occasional Paper Series, n.11, Comparative Education Center. State university of New York at Buffalo. Komagome, T. & Mangan, J. A. (1997). Japanese Colonial Education in Taiwan 1895-1922: Precepts and Practices of Control. History of Education 26,3, p.307-322. Mak, G. C. J.1997. Reconstructing Schooling Processes: A Review of Gail Kelly s Works on Colonial Education in Indochina and French West Africa, 1918-1938. Comparative Education Review, v41, n2, p.210-213. Takekoshi, Y. (1907). Japanese Rule in Formosa. London: Longman. Tan, J.1997. Education and Colonial Transition in Singapore and Hong Kong: comparisons and contrasts. Comparative Education, v33, n2, p.303-312. Tsurumi, E. P. (1977). Japanese Colonial Education in Taiwan. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 145

146

147

148

149

150

1922 151

152

153 1901

154

155

156

1913 157

158

159 1 2 3 1

160 2 3 1923

161 1 2 3

162

1937 163

164

165

166

21.04 13.27 21.89 16.18 35.37 31.12 37.28 36.84 6.03 3.05 3.08 2.47 8.84 9.60 6.22 16.45 0.71 0.81 1.14 7.13 1.42 1.08 0.54 0.09 5.28 2.87 1.81 2.10 13.11 9.15 7.43 5.58 8.23 29.06 20.62 13.16 167

168?????

Kelly Kelly 169

-- A1 1? 2 (3) (4)? 3? 4? 5 170

6 1937 7 8 1. 2. 9 Kelly 10 1. 16 2. 3. 171

4. 5. 6. 63 7. 8. A2 1? 1941 2 (5) (6)? 6 12 172

3? 4? 5 6 1937 173

7 1. 2. 8 12 9 Kelly 174

1. 2. 10 1. 1937 2. 1937 3.??.?? A3 1? 2 (7) (8)? 1. 2. 175

3. 3? 4? 5 6 1937 176

7 8 9 Kelly 10 1. 2. 3. 4. 177

178 5. A4 1? 2 (9) (10)? 1937 1941 3? 1902

179 4? 5 6 1937 7

180 1. 2. 3. 8 9 Kelly 10 1. 2. 3. A5 1?

1. 2. 3. 2 (11) (12)? 1. 2. 3? 4? 5 6 1937 181

7 1. 2. 3. 4. 1. 2. 3. 8 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 9 Kelly 1. 2. 3. 182

10 A6 1? 2 (13)? 3? 1. 2. 3. 183

184 5 6 1937 8 1. 2. 3. 10 19.20 1. 2. B1 1??????????

2 (14) (15)? 3? 4? 5 6 1937 185

186 7 8 9 Kelly 10

187 1. 2. 19 3. 4. 5. 6. 2:1 B2 1? 2 (16) (17)? 3

188? 4? 5 6 1937 7 8 9

189 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. B3 1? 1941 2 (18)

(19)?????? 3? 4 5 1937 7 190

191 8 10 1. 2. 3. 4.70.80.90 5. 6. B4 1?

2 (20) (21)? 3? 4 5 1937 6 1. 2. 192

3. 4. 5. 6. 193