(209) Market EfficiencyAnomaly Behavioral Finance Information Asymmetry Initial Public Offerings, IPOs Size Effect Value Effect January Effect Going P

Similar documents
untitled

國立中山大學學位論文典藏.PDF

untitled

by market behavioral biases. In addition, behavioral biases should also be considered when discussing high-tech venturing process, especially fund-rai

J2n21

Microsoft Word - A _ doc

谢 辞 仿 佛 2010 年 9 月 的 入 学 发 生 在 昨 天, 可 一 眨 眼, 自 己 20 多 岁 的 两 年 半 就 要 这 么 匆 匆 逝 去, 心 中 真 是 百 感 交 集 要 是 在 古 代, 男 人 在 二 十 几 岁 早 已 成 家 立 业, 要 是 在 近 代, 男 人

<4D F736F F D DB5DA32C6DA2DD6D0B4F3B9DCC0EDD1D0BEBF2DC4DACEC42D6F6B2DD2BBD0A32E646F63>

: IPO, IPO,, IPO (Mok Hui, 1998 ;Chi Padgett,1999 ;Su Fleisher,1999 ;,2000 ;Chan,Wei Wang,2002 ; Tian, 2003 ;,2004), IPO, 129 % 949 %, IPO,,, IPO,, IP

保荐制度、过度包装与IPO定价效率关系研究.doc

C02.doc

IPO Baron 1982 [2] Rock 1986 [1] Allen Faulhaber 1989 [3] [9] IPO IPO 2010 IPO % 2011 IPO IPO 27.4% 2012 IPO

- 2 - Russell Thaler unexpected dramatic P t =P t-1 + P t t P t-1 t-1 2 T.Russell and R.Thaler, The Relevance of Quasi-Rationality in Competitiv

1 IPO IPO Underpricing IPO Long run underpreformence of IPO IPO Hot issue market of IPO Kevin Why new issues are underpriced the Winner s Curse Hypoth

untitled

Microsoft Word - E11F_中國審計模組_技術手冊 doc

Microsoft Word 专业学位培养方案.doc

1 CAPM CAPM % % Wippern, aGebhardt Lee Swaminathan % 5.10% 4.18% 2 3 1Gebhardt Lee Swa

Myers Majluf 1984 Lu Putnam R&D R&D R&D R&D

:? 8 ( 8 ), :, 8 12,,8,,,, : 8 8 8?,,,?, 8 ( 8 ), 8 ( 8 )? 8,, 8 8, 8, 8,, 8,,, 8,,, (price anomalies) : 8?,8 8? 8? 8,,8 8 ;,8 8 ( ) 3,, :610

untitled

Microsoft Word - 证券市场审计合谋:识别与控制.doc

Myers 2003 Ghosh Moon 2005 Blouin 2007 Chen 2008 Hoyle 1978 Lim Tan, 2010 Krishnan 2003 Balsam 2003 DeAngelo 1980 Ferguson 2004 AICPA Palmro

<4D F736F F D20B2C4A447B2D5B14DC344B4C1A4A4AED1ADB1B8EAAEC62E646F63>

3 31 Kaminsky et al Franck et al Fama French 1996 Fama - French FF3 Wu et al Kubińska 2012 Asem Tian 2011 Balvers Wu 2006 Akarim Sev

untitled

Microsoft Word - 971管理學院工作報告2

De Roon Veld (1998) 0116 %, %,,,, 180,,, Burlacu (2000) 141,,, Abhyankar Dunning (1999), %,, %, %, %, % (2

Microsoft Word - C 贺.doc

,, :, ;,,?, : (1), ; (2),,,, ; (3),,, :,;; ;,,,,(Markowitz,1952) 1959 (,,2000),,, 20 60, ( Evans and Archer,1968) ,,,

招生宣传册

( ) (insurance) KPMG (assurance),, Menon Williams (1994) Laventhol Horwath(L&H), L&H,,L&H ( [2003]2 ),,Menon Williams (1994) L&H L&H, Menon Men

謝 辭 兩 年 赴 台 求 的 日 子 就 要 接 近 尾 聲, 這 兩 年 收 穫 太 多, 要 感 謝 的 也 實 在 太 多 首 先 感 謝 我 敬 愛 的 論 文 指 導 教 授 陳 威 光 博 士 和 林 靖 庭 博 士, 感 謝 兩 位 教 授 從 論 文 選 題 到 最 後 定 稿,

( ) : ,,, 10 %,,, :,,,,, : (1) ; (2), ; (3), ; (4), ; (5) ( ), (2003),,,,,,, , 20,, ST,,,, :? ( ) 3 ( ) 77

Microsoft Word - 24-BF03.doc

GOUTAI JUNAN SECURITIIES Value Strategies Fama French EMH Irrational Behavior Naive strategies Contrarian / B M B/P / E/P / D/P / C/P

目 录 前 言 戴 维 斯 双 击 理 论 (Davis double-killing effect) 转 型 促 发 展, 前 景 广 阔 发 展 迅 速, 初 具 规 模 转 型 促 发 展, 前 景 广 阔 资 本 市 场 将

- 2 -

,,,,,Modigliani - Miller Bernanke, Gertler Gilchrist 1996,, Bernanke, Gertler Gilchrist ( ) ( ),,,, Bernanke, Gertler Gilchrist (1999),,, RBC, Bernank

i

<4D F736F F D20BDD7A4E5B6B0A455A555A658A8D6AAA95FA477A752B0A3A5BCB56FAAEDA4E5B3B E30372E30355F2E646F63>

ebookg 38-3

会计研究动态2014年第6期(总70期)

张肖飞.doc

I

07D5.FIT\)


untitled

untitled


国际商学院

2 Firms A Joint Test of the Agency Hypothesis and Insurance Hypothesis Chiawen Liu National Taiwan University Abstract The paper examines the audit cl

untitled

untitled

附件1:

中国科技论文在线

Abstract After over ten years development, Chinese securities market has experienced from nothing to something, from small to large and the course of

Demsetz(1982) Bain ( ) : 4 6?? ( 2005) 2004~ (2000) : ; 7 ; ;? (Lenway and Rehbein1991) ( ) ( ) ( 2006) ( 2002) Bain(1956)

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCES IN CHINA Vol.18 No.3 Mar 潘宁宁, 朱宏泉 基于手工收集的基金交易数据, 考察了基金持股和交易对股价中公司特有信息 ( 以股 价联动作为测度 ) 的影响. 研究发

目 錄 致 經 營 者 專 家 引 言 研 究 目 的 台 灣 銀 行 業 前 進 中 國 的 動 機 台 灣 銀 行 業 前 進 中 國 的 機 會 台 灣 銀 行 業 前 進 中 國 的 挑 戰 結 論 與 建 議 參 考 文 獻

* 2009 Mullainathan & Shleifer 2005 Gentzkow & Shapiro Shoemaker & Reese The Spiral of Silence Noelle-Neumann 1974 * 3610

上证联合研究计划第三期课题报告

ebookg 54-2

:, ( ),, :,60,, 1962,, ( ),,,,, 1986,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ( ), C,,,,,,,,,,,,, X,,,;,,, ; ( ),,, Mirrless (1976) : (1), (2),,, 60 (1996),:

IPO

: : (1),,,,? (2),,,?,,? (3),,,,? (4),,?,,,,,, ( ),,,,, ( ),,,,, ;,,,,,,,,,, ;,,, (,2003),, (private benefits of control), Grossman and Hart (1988), (c

2015 年 第 12 期 17 贷 资 产 证 券 化 进 入 常 态 化 的 稳 健 发 展 轨 道, 是 我 国 政 府 学 者 及 业 内 人 士 应 予 关 注 的 问 题 ( 一 ) 流 动 性 相 关 研 究 综 述 资 产 证 券 化 产 生 于 20 世 纪 60 年 代 末 的

上证联合研究计划第三期课题报告

754 Asian Company Handbooks Worldscope i. 10% ii. iii. iv. 10% % % % %

% %

untitled

untitled

<473A5CCDB6D7CAD1A75CCDB6D7CAD1A7BDCCB3CC5C CB5DA32D5C220D6A4C8AFB5C4B7A2D0D0D3EBBDBBD2D72E707074>

标题

股权结构对董事会结构的影响

ebookg 55-1

得 公 司 控 管 與 儲 蓄 流 通, 其 透 過 股 市 規 模 流 動 性 與 國 際 資 本 市 場 整 合 等 指 標 之 衡 量, 認 為 資 本 市 場 與 長 期 經 濟 發 展 呈 正 相 關 4 另 外, 其 於 1998 年 更 進 一 步 認 為, 資 本 市 場 的 流 動

謝 辭 轉 眼 之 間 在 文 化 兩 年 的 時 間 就 這 樣 過 去 了 回 想 當 初 大 學 被 退 學 的 我, 竟 然 能 順 利 的 畢 業, 這 都 要 感 謝 一 路 上 幫 助 我 的 人 首 先 要 感 謝 我 的 指 導 教 - 洪 乙 禎 老 師 論 文 能 順 利 完

Microsoft PowerPoint - Fall2014PomotionXu.pptx

% 5 CPI CPI PPI Benjamin et al Taylor 1993 Cukierman and Gerlach 2003 Ikeda 2013 Jonas and Mishkin

% 30% 1% U Zhou &Ruland 2006 Liu Jesen

No

TSEC MONTHLY REVIEW 2 6, SEC (Eliot Spitzer) % 3 ( ) ( ) 4 (economies of scale) (increasing returns to scale)( Carlton an


Microsoft Word - A doc

三 会 议 (26 日 ) 议 程 时 间 程 序 7:30~8:30 大 会 报 到, 地 点 : 上 海 师 范 大 学 会 议 中 心 1 号 报 告 厅 (1 楼 ) 开 幕 式 地 点 : 上 海 师 范 大 学 会 议 中 心 1 号 报 告 厅 (1 楼 ) 内 容 主 持 人 1.

<4D F736F F D20A661B0ECAE74B2A7AABAA4A4B0EAB941A7F8B0F2C2A6B1D0A87C2E646F63>


中国股票市场是否存在趋势?

Microsoft Word - 06会计学( ).doc

致 謝 投 資 基 金 這 個 議 題, 需 蒐 集 許 多 的 期 刊 報 導 研 究 專 題 等, 非 常 感 謝 黃 彥 聖 老 師 以 及 楊 子 儀 老 師 的 教 導, 提 點 相 關 金 融 資 訊 資 料, 有 助 於 專 題 內 容 的 專 業 性 與 金 融 常 識 謝 謝 黃

Microsoft Word - A _ doc

<4D F736F F D20332E313320B1BED7A8D2B5B9FABCCABBAFC8CBB2C5C5E0D1F8B5C4B8C4B8EFB4EBCAA9D3EBCAB5CAA9D0A7B9FB2E646F63>

No

2002

们 好 奇 的 是 在 股 票 市 场 周 期 转 换 的 极 端 市 场 环 境 中, 公 募 基 金 的 前 期 业 绩 表 现 将 如 何 影 响 其 风 险 调 整 行 为, 而 这 一 行 为 最 终 又 会 如 何 影 响 其 后 期 业 绩 表 现? 这 是 现 有 研 究 所 没 有

标题

PowerPoint Presentation

<4D F736F F D20C1A2CBBCB3BDA3BAB5DAD2BBBDECB6ADCAC2BBE1B5DACAAEB0CBB4CEBBE1D2E9BEF6D2E9B9ABB8E62D >

Markowitz 1952 DOT(designated order turnaround) ESP(exchange stock portfolio) ( ) , side car ETFExchange Traded Fund ETF ETF ETF ETF ETF ETF

Transcription:

(208) * ** IPOs ( ) * **

(209) Market EfficiencyAnomaly Behavioral Finance Information Asymmetry Initial Public Offerings, IPOs Size Effect Value Effect January Effect Going Public IPOs IPOs IPOs IPOs IPOs Aggarwal and Rivoli 1990Ritter 1991 Levis 1993 IPOs Aggarwal and Rivoli IPOs IPOs Fads Ritter IPOs IPOsWindows of Opportunity IPOs IPOs Window Dressing Earnings Manipulation Discretionary Accounting Accruals Reverse Teoh, Welch, and Wong 1998 IPOs IPOs 15% 30% IPOs

(210) Carter and Manaster 1990 IPOs IPOs IPOs Ball and Shivakumar 2008 DeAngelo 1981 Earnings Quality Underwriter ReputationInstitutional Ownership Auditor ReputationIPOs IPOs

(211) 1

(212) Teoh et al. 1998 1980 1992 IPOs IPOs IPOs 15% 30% Chan, Cooney, Kim, and Singh 2008 1980 2000 NYSE AMSE NASDAQ IPOs Discretionary Accounting Accruals Underwriter Reputation Venture Capital Backing IPOs IPOs IPOs Chan, Chan, Jegadeesh, and Lakonishok 2006 1971 1995 NYSEAMEX NASDAQ IPOs Ducharme, Malatesta, and Sefcik 2001IPOs

(213) IPOs Sloan 1996 1962 1991 NYSE AMEX IPOs Carter, Dark, and Singh 1998 1979 1991 NYSE AMEX NASDAQ IPOs IPOs IPOs Helou and Park 2001 Carter and Manaster 1990 IPOs IPOs IPOs Logue, Rogalski, Seward, and Foster-Johnson 2002 1988 1995 Securities Data Corporation New Issues Database IPOsIPOs IPOs IPOs IPOs Menon and Williams 1991 1985 1986 SEC IPOs IPOs Michaely and Shaw 1995 1984 1998 The Directory of Corporate FinancingIPOs IPOs

(214) IPOs Francis, Maydew, and Sparks 1999 1974 1994 NASDAQ 2007 1 Buy and Hold Abnormal Returns 2 Krishnan 2003 Agency Cost Boehmer, Boehmer, and Fishe 2006 Field and Lowry 2005 1980 2000 SDC IPOs IPOs IPOs 2006 Dor 2003IPOs 1%

(215) Momentum Trader Herding Behavior Sias 2004 Informational Cascade 2006 Nofsinger and Sias 1999 Positive-feedback Trade Scharfstein and Stein 1990 Sharing-the- Blame Phalippou 2008 1.85% 0.13% 1. 2. 2001 1 2008 12 2000 2001 2008 (1) 2001 1 2005 12 (2) 2001 1 2008 12 3. TSEC TEJ 4. 2001 2005

(216) IPOs 254 (1) (2) Discretionary Accruals, DA (3) Survival Bias IPOs 201 1. Ritter 19912007 IPOsBuy and Hold Abnormal Return BHAR (1) BHAR i,t R i,t i t R t TEJ R m,t t n n n=36 36 (2) BHAR p,t

(217) p 2. Total Accruals, TA Sloan 1996 Chan et al. 2006 t t t 3. Discretionary Accruals, DA Dechow, Sloan, and Sweeny 1995 Healy Model DeAngelo Model Jones Model Modified Jones Model Industry Model Modified Jones Model Subramanyam 1996 DeFond and Subramanyam 1998 Jones Jones Jones i,t 1 i i i,t a 1 a 2 i i i i (1) i a 0 i i t t Jones â 0 â 1 â 2 12 (2) t = [â 0 + â 1 i - i + â 2 i,t] / i 2 Jones (3) t = t / t DA DADA DA

(218) 4. =- 5. 6. 1995 Carter and Manaster 1990 Hayes 1971 Carter and Manaster The Tombstone Announcements Hayes 1 27 7. Francis et al. 1999Becker, Defond, Jiambalvo, and Subramanyam 1998 Palmrose 1988 IPOs 8. =+ + / 9. = IPOs - IPOs 10. IPOs 11. B/MTEJ B/M

(219) 1. Jones IPOs 2. IPOs IPOs IPOs Earnings Quality Underwriter Reputation Auditor Reputation Institutional Ownership IPOs 1 1 IPOs 63.18% 1 IPOs % % 3 1.49 25 12.44 9 4.48 21 10.45 4 1.99 28 13.93 5 2.49 20 9.95 3 1.49 29 14.43 8 3.98 13 6.47 4 1.99 7 3.48 7 3.48 15 7.46 2 IPOs -0.5912 IPOs IPOsIPOs 51.8585%

(220) 1 0 2 0.8905 IPOs 2 2 IPOs -0.5912 0.0074 0.0030 0.6752 0.1359-0.2369 0.0304 0.0194 0.3477 0.1146 0.060 1.0266 0.8443 4.8703 0.7469 0.0810 1.0569 0.8781 4.9419 0.7706 1 20.5522 21 27 6.0157 % 0 8.1303 4.2281 51.8585 9.8369 0 0.8905 1 1 0.3130 0.21 5.6978 2.14 113.58 12.0693-9.83 1.0177 0.27 37.58 3.5566 377 8,536 3,703 185,810 20,306.139 0.0556 0.5376 0.4608 1.1818 0.3237 3-0.0900 0.1039 1% IPOsIPOs IPOs IPOs IPOsBHAR 17.0521% 10% IPOs BHAR 8.9579%IPOs IPOs 4 IPOs Hayes 1971 4 IPOs IPOs IPOs

(221) 15.8460% 10%IPOs 10.0951% % 3 IPOs -0.0900 *** 0.1039 *** -11.076 9.725 1.1232 *** 0.9308 *** 13.856 14.001 1.0870 *** 1.0271 *** 12.840 14.956 20.3000 *** 20.8020 *** 33.953 34.434 7.6063 *** 8.6491 *** 7.681 8.876 0.9100 *** 0.8713 *** 31.639 26.018 17.0521% * 8.9579% 1.407 0.850 1. t * 10% ** 5% *** 1% 2. 3. BHAR 4 IPOs -0.0130 0.0275 ** -1.061 1.895 0.9709 *** 1.0817 *** 14.138 13.561 0.9846 *** 1.1286 *** 13.913 13.739 16.27 *** 24.7921 *** 28.371 136.613 % 7.2870 *** 8.9652 *** 7.846 8.722 0.8700 *** 0.9109 *** 25.740 31.972 10.0951% 15.8460% * 0.932 1.328 1. t * 10% ** 5% *** 1% 2. 3. BHAR

(222) 5 IPOs IPOs 23.7713% 5% IPOs 2.3051% 5 IPOs IPOs % 5 IPOs 0.0035 0.264 1.0233 *** 11.378 1.0356 *** 11.313 20.0500 *** 30.598 1.7628 *** 12.767 0.9000 *** 29.850 23.7713% ** 1.878 0.0113 0.807 1.0298 *** 18.445 1.0780 *** 18.127 21.0495 *** 39.036 14.4347 *** 13.772 0.8812 *** 27.234 2.3051% 0.235 1. t * 10% ** 5% *** 1% 2. 3. BHAR 5 IPOs IPOs Scharfstein and Stein 1990

(223) Sharing-the-Blame 6 IPOs IPOs IPOs IPOs 13.5251% 10% IPOs 8.5887% % 6 IPOs 0.0199 1.038 0.8594 *** 7.889 0.9086 *** 7.711 19.6364 *** 14.950 7.7141 *** 3.842 0-8.5887% 0.316 0.0059 0.557 1.0471 *** 18.207 1.0752 *** 18.149 20.6648 *** 46.037 8.1814 *** 11.044 1-13.5251% * 1.641 1. t * 10% ** 5% *** 1% 2. 3. BHAR IPOs IPOs IPOs IPOs

(224) 7-7.1111% 85.9851% % 7 IPOs -0.0993 *** -5.801 1.3259 *** 6.755 1.3088 *** 6.492 23.8636 *** 57.859 11.5077 *** 6.142 1 - -7.1111% -0.357 0.0819 ** 2.399 0.7325 *** 6.950 0.8558 *** 7.777 14.8000 *** 4.213 0.4393 1.239 0-85.9851% 0.861 1. t * 10% ** 5% *** 1% 2. 3. BHAR IPOs 5 IPOs IPOs IPOs 8 71.5034% 5% -30.8637% 10% 8-0.0708 1% 0.0258 5% IPOs IPOs 71.5034%

(225) 8 IPOs % -0.0708 *** -5.546 1.1965 *** 5.185 1.1563 *** 4.733 24.9091 *** 54.696 1.4398 *** 5.990 0.0258 ** 2.612 1.1660 ** 3.046 1.2488 ** 2.906 18.2000 *** 15.722 11.5155 ** 3.172 1 0 - - 71.5034% ** -30.8637% * 1.879-1.694 1. t * 10% ** 5% *** 1% 2. 3. BHAR Robustness IPOsGrowth StockValue Stock Robustness Test IPOs Robustness Test 9 16IPOs 30% 40% 30% 30% Growth Stock 30% Value Stock 9 IPOs 24.6311% 10% IPOs 18.5328% 10 9 11 IPOs

(226) 28.2433% IPOs 16.4880% 10% 12 11 13 IPOs 24.0534% 10% 19.1105% 14 IPOs -3.0053% 18.0347% 15 IPOs 27.4998% 5%-43.5146% 5% 16 15 IPOs Robustness Test 9 IPOs IPOs % -0.1226 *** -5.992 1.3946 *** 7.663 1.3622 *** 7.330 20.0000 *** 16.712 12.0213 *** 5.871 0.9667 *** 29.000 24.6311% * 1.383 0.1154 *** 6.474 1.0585 *** 9.187 1.1913 *** 9.974 21.6333 *** 19.110 9.5651 *** 6.471 0.8667 *** 13.730 18.5328% 0.993 1. t * 10% ** 5% *** 1% 2. 3. BHAR

(227) % 10 IPOs IPOs -0.0645 *** 0.1054 *** -6.631 3.834 0.8706 *** 0.8000 *** 8.673 6.816 0.8200 *** 0.8387 *** 7.691 6.865 19.2333 *** 19.2333 *** 14.850 14.266 3.1558 *** 5.4081 *** 4.324 3.553 0.9000 *** 0.8667 *** 16.155 13.730 15.6935% -0.6641% 0.531-0.035 1. t * 10% ** 5% *** 1% 2. 3. BHAR % 11 IPOs IPOs -0.0370 * 0.0401-1.448 1.251 1.2099 *** 1.2483 *** 7.605 8.619 1.2486 *** 1.3136 *** 7.624 9.384 17.3235 *** 25.3846 *** 15.578 86.365 11.1219 *** 10.3633 *** 6.854 5.107 0.91177 *** 0.9231 *** 18.466 17.321 16.4880% 28.2433% * 0.985 1.404 1. t * 10% ** 5% *** 1% 2. 3. BHAR

(228) % 12 IPOs IPOs -0.0049 0.0494 * -0.343 1.413 0.7879 *** 0.8894 *** 8.101 7.278 0.7813 *** 0.8843 *** 7.888 6.747 14.7188 *** 24.3929 *** 11.881 61.053 2.4778 *** 6.3439 *** 4.424 3.880 0.8438 *** 0.9286 *** 12.938 18.735 0.2983% 15.7620% 0.013 0.573 1. t * 10% ** 5% *** 1% 2. 3. BHAR % 13 IPOs IPOs -0.0165-0.660 1.4079 *** 7.344 1.4331 *** 7.505 21.5333 *** 19.278 3.1654 *** 7.796 0.9333 *** 20.149 24.0534% * 1.536 0.0093 0.285 1.0452 *** 10.827 1.1204 *** 10.604 20.1000 *** 16.541 18.4210 *** 12.134 0.9000 *** 16.155 19.1105% 0.932 1. t * 10% ** 5% *** 1% 2. 3. BHAR

(229) 14 IPOs IPOs -0.0266 * 0.0675 ** -1.646 2.212 0.8234 *** 0.8472 *** 8.271 7.155 0.8016 *** 0.8570 *** 7.918 6.777 16.8000 *** 21.6667 *** 10.895 25.735 % 0.6886 ** 7.8754 *** 4.882 5.532 0.8667 *** 0.9000 *** 13.730 16.155-3.0053% 18.0347% -0.151 0.625 1. t * 10% ** 5% *** 1% 2. 3. BHAR 15 IPOs IPOs 0.0282-0.0065 0.539-0.295 1.1108 ** 1.2371 *** 2.832 10.808 1.1869 ** 1.2849 *** 2.712 11.210 21.2000 *** 20.7818 *** 9.842 23.578 14.6810 ** 10.4398 *** % 2.346 8.234 0 1 - - -43.5146% ** 27.4998 ** -2.280 2.02 1. t * 10% ** 5% *** 1% 2. 3. BHAR

(230) % 16 IPOs IPOs 0.0071 0.581 0.7168 *** 5.967 0.7256 *** 5.766 15.4286 *** 4.967 2.6186 ** 2.427 0 - -41.9206% ** -2.185 0.0222 1.081 0.8510 *** 9.962 0.8430 *** 9.409 19.7359 *** 20.630 4.5017 *** 4.742 1-14.0439% 0.723 1. t * 10% ** 5% *** 1% 2. 3. BHAR IPOs 2001 1 2005 12 Going Public 2008 12 IPOs BHAR IPOs IPOs IPOs BHAR Growth Stock

(231) Value StockRobustness Test Sharing-the-Blame IPOs IPOs 71.5034% -30.8637%IPOs IPOs 1. 200614(2) 111-150 2. 19953(1) 119-143 3. 2007

(232) 27(1) 115-167 4. 2006 14(1) 41-72 1. Aggarwal, R., & Rivoli, P. (1990). Fads in the Initial Public Offering Market? Financial Management, 19, 45-57. 2. Ball, R., & Shivakumar, L. (2008). Earnings Quality at Initial Public Offerings. Journal of Accounting and Economic, 45, 324-349. 3. Becker, C. L., Defond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K. R. (1998). The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15, 1-24. 4. Boehmer, B., Boehmer, E., & Fishe, R. P. H. (2006). Do Institutions Receive Favorable Alloccations in IPOs with Better Long-run Returns? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41, 808-828. 5. Carter, R. B., Dark, F. H., & Singh, A. K. (1998). Underwriter Reputation, Initial Returns, and the Long-run Performance of IPO Stocks. Journal of Finance, 53, 285-311. 6. Carter, R., & Manaster, S. (1990). Initial Public Offerings and Underwriter Reputation. Journal of Finance, 45, 1045-1067. 7. Chan, K., Chan, L. K. C., Jegadeesh, N., & Lakonishok, J. (2006). Earnings Quality and Stock Returns. Journal of Business, 79, 1041-1082. 8. Chan, K., Cooney Jr., J. W., Kim, J., & Singh, A. K. (2008). The IPO Derby: Are There Consistent Losers and Winners on This Track? Financial Management, 37, 45-79. 9. DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3, 183-199. 10. Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting Earnings Management. Accounting Review, 70, 193-225. 11. DeFond, M. L. & Subramanyam, K. R. (1998). Auditor Changes and Discretionary Accruals, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 25, 35-67. 12. Dor, A. B. (2003). The Performance of Initial Public Offerings and the Cross Section of Institutional Ownership. Northwestern University Working Paper. 13. Ducharme, L. L., Malatesta, P. H., & Sefcik, S. E. (2001). Earnings Management: IPO Valuation and Subsequent Performance. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 16, 369-396. 14. Field, L. C., & Lowry, M. (2005). Institutional Versus Individual Investment in IPOs: the Importance of Firm Fundamentals. Penn State University Working Paper. 15. Francis, J. R., Maydew, E. L., & Sparks, H. C. (1999). The Role of Big 6 Auditors in the Credible Reporting of Accruals. A Journal of Practice and Theory, 18, 17-34. 16. Hayes, S. L. (1971). Investment Banking: Power Structure in Flux, Harvard Business Review, 49, 136-152. 17. Helou, A., & Park, G. (2001). Is There a Signaling Effect of Underwriter Reputation? Journal of Financial Research, 24, 27-43. 18. Krishnan, G. V. (2003). Audit Quality and the Pricing of Discrietionary Accruals. Journal of Practice and Theory, 22, 109-126.

(233) 19. Levis, M. (1993). The Long-run Performance of Initial Public Offerings: the UK Experience 1980-1988. Financial Management, 22, 28-41. 20. Logue, D. E., Rogalski, R. J., Seward, J. K., & Foster-Johnson, L. (2002). What Is Special about the Roles of Underwriter Reputation and Market Activities in Initial Public Offerings? Journal of Business, 75, 213-243. 21. Menon, K., & Williams, D. D. (1991). Auditor Credibility and Initial Public Offerings. Accounting Review, 66, 313-332. 22. Michaely, R., & Shaw, W. H. (1995). Does the Choice of Auditor Convey Quality in an Initial Public Offering? Financial Management, 24, 15-30. 23. Nofsinger, J. R., & Sias, R. W. (1999). Herding and Feedback Trading by Institutional and Individual Investors. Journal of Finance, 54, 2263-2295. 24. Palmrose, Z. (1988). An Analysis of Auditor Litigation and Audit Service Quality. Account Review, 63, 55-73. 25. Phalippou, L. (2008). Where Is the Value Premium? Financial Analysts Journal, 64, 41-48. 26. Ritter, J. R. (1991). The Long-run Performance of Initial Public Offerings. Journal of Finance, 46, 3-27. 27. Scharfstein, D. S., & Stein, J. C. (1990). Herd Behavior and Investment. American Economic Review, 80, 465-479. 28. Sias, R. (2004). Institutional Herding. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 5, 181. 29. Sloan, R. G. (1996). Do Stock Prices Fully Reflect Information in Accruals and Cash Flows About Future Earnings? Accounting Review, 71, 289-315. 30. Subramanyam, K. R. (1996). The Pricing of Discretionary Accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 22, 249-281. 31. Teoh, S. H., Welch, I., & Wong, T. J. (1998). Earnings Management and the Long-run Market Performance of Initial Public Offerings. Journal of Finance, 53, 1935-1974.