0 0 0 0 0 0
Abstract This thesis uses text analysis research to analyze the text meaning in both Qiong-Yao romance novel and 90 s romance novel. We also comparative both romance novel in the politics of woman s body, which concerns sex and appearance, and try to find the constructed woman image and the meanings of gender in which one is conservative. After reading and analysis two kinds of romance novel, we find 90 s romance novel is more conservative. In the sexual politics subject, although sexual concept have changed from social morals to satisfied individual desire and sexual instructmental value, we see male and female in Qiong-Yao romance novel could query and challenge the traditional sexual morals. In the 90 s romance novel, male and female have much more sex freedom, but as a result of female sexual authority losting.the romance novel female also is the sexual object of male sexual desire, and must exchange body and sex for benefits. The romance novel male is infulenced whith traditional sexual concept, they emphansis on the virgin value, and see a woman as private goods, so they could violate woman s body. In the appearance politics subject, the describe of fiction male and female s appearance has changed from personal value to exciting sexual desire vaule. In Qiong-Yao romance novel, the appearance could not influence the marriage and love, but in 90 s romance novel the female appearance could effect love. Particuarly, female accept male beauty standard so as not to show herself appearance, and when she becomes beautiful, she get the right to have sex with male. Besidely, female shows her pursuing beautiful authority, not because of throwing off negative self, but also to get male beauity standar. Key wordsromance novel, the politics of woman s body, the sexual politics, the appearance politics
.......1.1..2..4 social constructionism 14... 14 24 0 34....47 98 0..103......112..120
..123
1 90 38 2000 Christian-Smith1990
2 1994 0 9038 0 0 0 0 0 1989 358 2001 4 0 1994
3 0 0 0 0 0 1 1994 235
4 social constructionism sex gender 2 / masculinity feminity 3 Kate Millett 4 2 Hester Eisenstein (1984), contemporary feminist thought, London: Georgre Allen& Unwin, p:7. 3 1993 4 2000
5 5 sex-role stereotype 6 7 5 2000 34-35 6 2000 40 7 Hester Eisenstein (1984), contemporary feminist thought, p:7.
6 1-2 instrumental role expressive 8 8 Barbara Brook (1999), Feminist Perspectives on the Body, New York: Longman, p:11-12. 9 1994 10 2001 0 40
7
8
9 11 229 12 1996 124
10 0 13 1996 124 14 1990 212
11 15 2001 11 2003 3 15 http://www.starfly.com.tw/bookstore/bookstore_letterlist.asp 16 Tim O Sullivan, John Hartley, Danny Saunders, Martin Montgomery, John Fisk1998 403 17 2001 150-1 18 Lawrence Grossberg, Ellen, Wartella, D.Charles Whitney2001
12 1994 2001 151 19 Lisa Taylor, Adrew Willis 1999 33
13
14 0 0 0 0 1998 98 20 21 20 1998 104 108 108 21 2002 78-79
15 22 1-1 78 82 22 78
16 1-2 0 0
17 23 0 0 0 24 0 25 23 1998 98 24 2002 80-81 25 2002
18 0 0 0 1-3 0 26 26 2002
19 27 28 27 2002 122-123 28 2002
20 T 29 30 29 2002 178-179 30 2002
21 31 1-4 31 2002 50-52
22 0 0 32 0 2002 32 2002 91
23 33 0 0 0 0 sexuality Vance1989 pleasure danger 34 Lewallen1989 35 33 2002 94-95 34 Vance, C.S. (1989). pleasure and danger: toward a politics of sexuality, In Vance, C.S. (eds.) pleasure and danger: toward a politics of sexuality. Pp.1. London: Pandora. 35 Lewallen, A.(1989). Lace: pornography for Women, In Gamman, L. & Marshment, M.(eds.) The Female Gaze: women as viewers of popular culture. Pp.87. London: The Real Comet Press.
24 0 2-1 2000 26 36 / / / / 36 1998 160-1
25 37 37 38 39
26 40
27 41 42
28 43 44 43 44
29 45 46 47
30 48 49
31 50 1998 105 51 1998 107 52 1998 179 53
32 54 89
33 55 173 55 222
34 0 0 0 3-1 0 2003 56 2003
35 57 2003 58 2003 59 2003 60 2002
36 0 2002 61 2002 62 2002 63 2002
37 2003 0 64 2003 65 2003
38 66 2002
39 3-2 0 67 2002
40 2002 69 68 2002 69 2002
41 2001 70 71 70 2001 71 2001 72 2001
42 2003 74 73 2003
43 74 127 0 2002 74 2003 75 2002 76 2002
44 2002 54-56 77 2002 78 2002 28
45 0 2002 29-30 0 79 2002 32
46
47 80
48 81
49 82
50 1-2 83 84
51 85 1974 86 87 1974 82 85 1974 86 1974 87 83
52 88 88
53 89 89 532
54 90 0 91 90 91 164
55 92 92 494-496
56 93 93
57 1-3 94
58 58 58 95
59 96 178 96 97 179
60 98
61 1-4 99
62 xx
63 100 101 100 101
64 102 102
65
66 103 122 103
67 104 105 104 214 105 221-222
68
69 106 0 106 289-290
70 107 19901965 108 19991966
71 109 19981969 110 20001977 111 19981969
72 112 20001977
73 0 0 0 0 0
74 0 0 0 0 0 2002
75 0 0 113 2002
76 114 2002 115 2002
77 0 2003 116 2002
78 2002 117 2002
79 0 2-2 0 0 118 2002 119 1998
80 120 2002
81 121 2002 122 2002
82
83
84 123 2002 15-18 124 2002 118 125 Karen Bouris 1996 126 2002
85 127 2002
86 2-3 128 2002 42 129
87
88 130
89 131 131 132 2001
90 2002 133 2002
91 2002
92 2002 134 2002 135 2002
93 136 2002
94 2002 2002
95 0 0 137 2002
96 2002 0 0 139 0 138 2002 139 2000
97
98
99
100 140 20001979
101 141 20001979 142 19991974 143 20001976
102 144 20001976 145 2002
103 0 146 20001979 147 2002
104 148 2001 148
105 149 2001 150 2001
106
107 2001 2002 151 2001 152 2001 106 153 2002
108 154 2002
109 2002 2001 144 156 155 2001 156 2001
110
111 157 2001
112 1-1 158 2000 26 159 1995 443-499
113
114 1-2
115 0
116 1-3
117 1-4
118
119 160 1989 91-134
120
121
122
123
124