2013 2 37 EXAMINATIONS RESEARCH No. 2 2013 General No. 37 姚 霞 本文在分析 PISA TIMSS 和 NEAP 三项国际学生科学素养测评现状 的基础上, 提出对我国科学素养测评的启示 : 1. 明确测评目标和测试框架, 在深入研究课程教材的基础上设计恰当的试题 ; 2. 根据测评目标, 采用科学的测评方法和工 具 ; 3. 多维度收集学生学业成绩信息, 进行合理解释 PISA; TIMSS; NEAP; 科学素养 ; 测评 G424. 74 A 1673-1654 2013 02-053 - 011 OECD 1988 PISA TIMSS NAEP 1 PISA Program for International Student Assessment PISA PISA PISA 1 1. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development OECD 30 姚霞, 教研员, 上海市浦东教育发展研究院上海,200127 53
2013 2 37 1 PISA 2. PISA PISA PISA PISA literacy 2 3 2 2 PISA2006 1 PISA 54
PISA 2 PISA 3 PISA2006 knowledge of science 1 knowledge about / 2 science 3 1 2 1 PISA 3 1 2 3 1 PISA2006 2 3 4 5 1 PISA 2006 enquiry / / DNA 55
2013 2 37 4 PISA2006 2 PISA2006 PISA2006 2 PISA 2006 TIMSS Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study TIMSS 1. 1999 IEA International Association for the Evaluation of Education IEA Achievement IEA 1959 TIMSS TIMSS2007 TIMSS 1 2 3 1 4 5 2 4 IEA 56
TIMSS 3 5 3 TIMSS 2. TIMSS TIMSS2007 biology physical science knowing applying reasoning scientific inquiry 40% 35% 25% 30% 35% 35% TIMSS2007 45% 35% 20% 35% 20% 25% 20% life science 1 3 1 IEA TIMSS 2007 57
2013 2 37 3 TIMSS2007 / / / / NAEP 1. NAEP National Assessment of Educational Progress NAEP 1969 NAEP / NAEP 6 NAEP 58
Science Contents Science NAEP Practices 4 2. NAEP NAEP2009 7 1 5 TIMSS PISA NAEP2009 4 8 NAEP2009 9 5 NAEP2009 NAEP scale 1. score achievement levels 0 ~ 500 PISA TIMSS 0300 PISA TIMSS curriculum achievement 10 1 NAEP2009 59
2013 2 37 PISA 15 PISA 12 TIMSS 11 TIMSS PISA TIMSS PISA NEAP 1 3 TIMSS 6 TIMSS NAEP PISA PISA PISA TIMSS TIMSS PISA 6% PISA TIMSS PISA 7 PISA 50% ~ TIMSS 60% TIMSS TIMSS TIMSS 6 12 TIMSS2007 PISA2006 TIMSS2007 PISA 2006 15 19% 18% 19% 45% 35% 47% 37% 47% 31% 1% 0 1% 1% 0 5% 60
7 13 TIMSS2007 PISA2006 TIMSS2007 PISA 2006 15 57% 54% 62% 43% 46% 38% 2. PISA PISA TIMSS TIMSS TIMSS1995 1999 2003 PISA 15 15 85% TIMSS PISA trend item 35 20 80% 50% 3. 5% 14 TIMSS PISA TIMSS 16 4 PISA TIMSS 4 61
2013 2 37 TIMSS PISA J. 2007 3. PISA TIMSS 253. 134. 43 /oecd /pdfs /browseit /9806031E. pdf. 4 M 5 M 6 EB /OL tid = 165. 7 J. 2007 6. 8. PISA TIMSS 9. 2009 9. 10 J. 2007 2. 11 M 12 accno = ED503624. 14 J 9. Basic School Students Mathematics Achievement 19952003. 1. 2. PISA J. 2009 7. 3 OECD. Assessing Science Reading and Mathematical Literacy A Framework for PISA2006 EB /OL. http / /213... 2007 11... 2007 21.. NAEP. http / /www. eachina. org. cn /viewthread. shtml. 2009 NAEP2009 J. 2007 10. NAEP J.. PISA TIMSS.. 2007 29-30. 13 Daniel J. McGrath. Comparing TIMSS with NAEP and PISA in Mathematics and Science EB /OL. http / /www. eric. ed. gov /ERICWebPortal /recorddetail. PISA PISA2003. 2006 15 Jolita Dudait & Aist Elijio. Change in Lithuanian through 16 Jens Henrik Haahr with Thomsa Kibak Nielsen Martin Eddert Hansen and Sren Teglgaard Jakobsen 2005 Explaining Student Performance Evidence from the International PISA TIMSS and PIRLS Surveys Danish Technological Institute.. TIMSS PISA J. 2007 3. 62
The Enlightenment from Scientific Literacy Assessment Programs Yao Xia Shanghai Pudong Institute of Education Development Shanghai 200127 Abstract This paper analyzes the development of international students scientific literacy assessment programs such as PISA TIMSS and NEAP. It proposes that there are three enlightments for how to assess Chinese students scientific literacy 1 To make clear the evaluation target and the test framework study the curriculum designation and explore the appropriate examination questions 2 To adopt scientific evaluation methods and tools. 3 To collect the students academic achievement information and explain it reasonably. Key words PISA TIMSS NEAP Scientific Literacy Assessment 63