2005 11 105~138 94.7.25 94.11.29
106 1 2 1904 1 1996 34 2 1997 225
107 3 4 3 1989 1 337 4 1971 30
108 枬 Mine and True West and True 5 6 7 Copernicus Nicholas space of emplacement 5 (J. R. Levenson), History and Value: The Tension of Intellectual Choice in Modern China (University of Chicago Press, 1953). 1985 193 6 1998 74 1850 7 1968 1 39
109 8 extend mobile Michel Foucault space of extension 9 10 11 12 8 6 96 2189 9 Michel Foucault, Text/ Contexts of other Spaces, Diacritics, 16:1 (1986), 22-27. 10 7 41 11 1982 24 12 1985 312
110 13 14 15 13 1985 499 14 1954 649-650 27 15 2000 145
111 16 17 18 19 16 6 76 1889 17 1860-1910 1991 179-180 18 1960 1 122-123 19
112 20 21 20 2 2002 302-307 23 1 2005 346 20 Joseph Campbell rite de passage 15 3 1986 87 2000 283 8 4 1998 98 21 40 5 1974 34-35
113 22 Thomas More euthopia outopia 23 self-sufficient 24 Gorman Beauchamp civilization-only-less-so 22 Eric Voegelin, Science, Politics, and Gnosticism (Chicago: Gateway Edition, 1968), 88-89. 23 Thomas More, Utopia (Princeton: D. Van Nostrand Company, 1947) Utopia Ou-topos ou topos Eu-thopia eu 24 15 3 1986 80-81
114 civilization-only-more-so 25 26 27 28 25 Gorman Beauchamp, Utopia and Its Discontents, Midwest Quarterly, 16 (1975), 161. 26 12 1982 50 27 1996 16-23 28 1 1906
115 爲啓 29 Lewis Mumford utopia of reconstruction utopia of escape 29 7 199
116 30 31 礮 礮 礮 30 Lewis Mumford, The Story of Utopias (New York: The Viking Press, 1966), 1. 31 1956 542 123
117 32 32 26 49-67
118 33 33 2003 295
119 34 35 1891 36 37 34 1963 7413 35 1983 180 36 2003 4 37 1976 11 134
120 38 39 38 7 628 560 39 1968 82
121
122 40 41 42 43 40 1994 228 41 1 1 1915 1-6 42 1 1991 49-123 1999 809-843 43 14 2 2003 41
123 1. 2. 3. 44 虬 44 2000 184-185
124 John Fryer 45 Theodore Rousseau 45 1977 17 1983 61
125
126 46 Isaac Newton Francis Bacon 46 14 1902 1897-1916 1997 62
127 47 48 49 47 1993 138 48 1981 367 2003 41 49 1992 10-11
128 50 51 50 25 2003 802 51 1990 2 18
129 52 Karl Popper utopian engineering 53 52 2 240 53 Karl R. Popper, The Open Society and its Enemies, Vol. 1. (New York: Harper Row Publishers, 1962). 74-105.
130 礮
131 54 54 61 1991 62
132 H.G Wells 55 55 H.G. Wells, A Modern Utopia (Lincon: University of Nebrasa, 1967), 9.
133 56 56 2002 17-20
134 Harold Bloom 57 57 Blake Milton 1992 2-3
135 1956 40 5 1974 1982 12 1982 1993 1994 1984 1985 1996 1996 1986 1 1991 1999 1 1904 1996 1985 1987 1992 1984 1984 1992 14 1902
136 1960 1984 1977 1 1 1915 6 1 1919 1987 1990 1897-1916 1997 15 3 1986 14 2 2003 1996 2000 25 2003 1968 1984 2 1906 1983 2000 8 4 1998 1971 1998 1976 1989 1860-1910 1991
137 2000 2002 1997 1 1906 1984 1998 2003 20 2 2002 23 1 2005 1981 1991 61 1991 Eric Voegelin, Science, Politics, and Gnosticism (Chicago: Gateway Edition, 1968). Gorman Beauchamp, Utopia and Its Discontents, Midwest Quarterly, 16 (1975). H.G. Wells, A modern Utopia (Lincon: University of Nebrasa, 1967). Karl R. Popper, The Open Society and its Enemies, Vol. 1. (New York: Harper Row Publishers, 1962). Lewis Mumford, The Story of Utopias (New York: The Viking Press, 1966). Michel Foucault, Text/ Contexts of other Spaces, Diacritics, 16(1) (Spring). Thomas More, Utopia (Princeton: D. Van Nostrand Company, 1947).
138 From Wandering around the Island of Immortals to Envisioning the Perspective of Utopia: Spatial Imagination in Lu Sheng s Chi Ren Shuo Meng Ji Guan, Kean-fung Abstract In the late Qing era, the concepts of space were confronted with a changing geographical imagination that in turn affected literary expression. Focusing on Dream Talk of an Imbecile (Chiren shuo mengji), this article discusses the presentation of spatial transformation in the late Qing era under the impact of the Great Age of Discovery. First of all, it tracks the spatial imagination of the father-son relationship in the novel, thus exploring the shift from the traditional island of immortals (xianren dao) towards a modern vision of the town of suppressed immortals (zhen xian cheng). How did a new geographical vision concepts such as the five continents and the nation-state enter the novel s space and affect its narrative? The characters must discover that tianxia, which they had taken granted for their home, does not at all belong to them; searching for a route of escape, they construct a new surreal space: Utopia. The article goes on to analyze the visual representation of this surreal space: thus enter science and democracy, precedents of Mr. Democracy and Mr. Science of the May Fourth period. Yet when the utopian plan is completely laid out, it turns into its own other, to an anti-utopia: disposing its original ideal and causing a rift between the writing motive and its written result. Keywords: Lu Sheng, Utopia, island of immortals, late Qing, geography Ph.D student, Department of Chinese Literature, National Chengchi University.