1
2
3
99 100-101 4
() EIL EIL EIL EIL : 5
6
( ) 7
5 A2 225 390 29 3 130 A2 8
9
118.56 127.1 +8.54 151.82 153.84 +2.01 108.04 111.55 +3.51 142.34 147.53 +5.19 137.15 140.81 +3.66 147.21 151.18 +3.97 117.86 123.46 +5.6 111.11 114.39 +3.28 111.67 116.69 +5.02 140.6818 155.78 +15.1 103.57 116.14 +12.57 72.87 94.49 +21.62 104.43 115.55 +11.12 104.17 112.89 +8.72 137.7 141.1 +3.4 103.52 112.63 +9.11 103.91 112.7 +8.79 147.07 155.48 +8.41 10
134 () 134 / / 0/39=0% 2/49=4% +4% 0/46=0% 5/42=11% +11% 34/41=82% 40/42=95% +13% 0/46=0% 6/41=14% +14% 0/46=0% 4/47=8% +8% 27/47=57% 32/42=76% +19% 0/46=0% 8/44=18% +18% 0/47=0% 4/46=8% +8% 11/45=24% 18/49=36% +12% 2/49=4% 8/49=16% +12% 1/47=2% 6/46=13% 11% 46/46=100% 38/39=97% -3% 42/42=100% 40/43=93% -7% 47/47=100% 43/43=100% +0% 7/48=14% 14/37=37% +23% 31/44=70% 48/48=100% +30% 26/26=100% 33/42=78% +22% 0/48=0% 6/46=13% +13% 11
100 101 1018 1172 12 12 50 English Corner 101 1 2:40 ~ 4:25 100 101 1158 1266 100 101 12
100 101 5 11 13
( 14
15
16
17
5. 18
覧 19
20
21
English Corner 22
23
24
25
26
4,175,600 3,285,400 3,364,600 2,378,600 13,204,200 27
28
29
30
31
(2004) < >5 119-144 (2001) < >298-11 (2002)e < 2008 >2012 813 http://english.moe.gov.tw/public/attachment/732176171.doc 2000 < >37100-101 (2000) < >574-584 (1994) < >73 11-19 (2001) < > 25(3)22-33 (1994)< > (1992)< > (2002) < >195-200 (2001) < >5255-63 (2010) English Teaching & Learning, 34 (4), 75-107 (2005) < > (2006) < >157-199 (2010) < 3(2)253-274 (2010)!<English Career>33Publisher s 32
Note (2009) (2010) -- <English Career>3344 ( ) : 2011 >307-312 ( ) >6-23 ( )<99 (2011) An Analysis of the Implementing Outcomes of Ability Grouping of Freshman English in a University of Technology. < >25( 2)66-81 (2004) < >7 (4)59~78 (2008)The Outcomes and Implementation of the Ability Grouping Program of Freshman English at the National Kaohsiung Marine University< >22169-184 (1992) < >33 (4)3-8 (2002) < >30(4)505-516 Chang, Y.Y. (2010). English-medium instruction for subject coursesin tertiary education: Reactions from Taiwanese undergraduate students. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 2(1), 53-82. Gan, Z., Humpherys, G., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2004). Understanding successful and unsuccessful EFL students in Chinese universities. The Modern Language Journal, 88(2), 230-243. 33
Hsu, L. & Wang, P. (2006). A Study on English Graduation Threshold and English Learning Motivation. Journal of National Kaohsiung University of Applied Sciences, 35, 51-68. Hyland, K. (2002). Specificity revisited: How far should we go now? English for Specific Purposes, 21, 385-395. Hyland, K., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2002). EAP: Issues and direction. English for Academic Purposes, 1, 1-12. Kubanek-German, A. (1998). Survey article: Primary foreign language teaching in Europe-trends and issues. Language Teaching, 31(3), 193-205. Lazarowitz, C. Webb and R. Schmuck (Eds.), Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp.177-209). New York: Plenum Press. Nikolov, M. (2000). Issues in research into early foreign language programmes. Hungary: University of Press Pecs. In Moon, J. and Nikolov (Eds.) Research into teaching English to young learners. University Press Pecs Hungary. Olsen, R. & Kagan, S. (1992). About cooperative learning in C. Kessler (Ed.), Cooperative language learning: A teacher s resource book (pp.1-10). NJ: Prentice Hall. Slavin, R. E. (1985). Team-assisted individualization combining cooperative learning and individualized instruction in mathematics, In R. Slavin, S. Sharan, S. Kagan, R. H. Lazarowitz, C. Webb and R. Schmuck (Eds.), Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp.177-209). New York: Plenum Press. Taiwan Ministry of Education (2001). General guidelines of grades 1-9 curriculum for elementary and junior high school education: Language Arts (English). Retrieved Aug 15, 2012, from http://www.edu.tw. Taiwan Ministry of Education (2004). General guidelines of grades 1-9 curriculum for elementary and junior high school education: Language Arts (English) (Revised version). Retrieved Aug 15, 2012, from http://www.edu.tw. Tsai, Y. H. (1997). Student expectations of the freshman English course at Chinese Culture University. Hwakang Journal of English Language & Literature, 3, 49-71 34
Yang, T. L. (2011). Improving Freshmen s English Proficiency: A Case Study of English-Major Students. The Proceedings of 2011 International Conference & Workshop on English for Specific Purposes, p. 307-312. Taiwan ESP Association & HungKuang University. Taipei: Crane Publishers. 35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
CEFR 5 (1) CEFR 10 (2) 46
47
101 101 9 18 101 9 28 a. b. c. d. e. f. a. b. c. d. e. f. a. b. c. d. 48
e. 49