2007 7 3-42 E-mail: Chun19800211@yahoo.com.tw ** E-mail maco0003@mails.fju.edu.tw 2007 4 15 2007 7 3
1 VCD DVD 2 3 4 5 4
6 VCD DVD 7 8 20034 9 2000 200146 5
87 9 89 12 VHSVCDDVD 90 1 90 12 VHSVCDDVD 20002001 2004 7-9 6
1986 2000 2002 2000 2003 10 1996 1997 1978 1987 how 7
what 1978 1996 2003 1999 explanation interpretation 2005c 138-139 soap opera melodrama 2005 2002 1999 11 1920 8
12 A.A. Berger 2005c142 Berger, 1991 1992: 37-38 12 Saussure signifier signified Saussure Lapsley, R. and Westlake, M. Semiotics, Film Theory: An Introduction, pp.32-66..manchester: Manchester University Press,1988 9
199688-91 pan tilt / dolly in/back crane Katz,1991 2002: 359; 383 13 1996174 14 1987420 Zettl,1995 1999: 312 10
1999468-471 editing 11
15 Kenneth Clatterbaugh, 1990 2003: 42-45 Pease 2000 16 12
Fiske 1987 幒 17 値 13
2003152-153 Basow, 1992 14
200194 Carl Jung shadow anima 1998172-177 15
18 16
19 Zettl, 1990 1991:45 backlight over-exposure 17
1999471 The personal is the political Harding, 199816 consciousness sisterhood 18
20 1999 13-14 separation Voice 19
Simmons, 2001 2003: 4-6; 40-41; 132-133 20
1996206 ~ ~ ~ voice-over narrator off-screen sound storyteller Kozloff, 1992: 81-85 2005a: 149-150 21
21 22 2000 312 23 Lacan 24 22
imaginary Lapsley, R. and Westlake, M., 1988: 67-70 1989: 8-14; 28-29 Name of the Father Phallus Penis 23
Phallus Sarup, 1993: 14-17 Phallus Phallus Mulvey, 1975: 6 24
~ ~ 25
26
199699 27
Zettl, 1990 1991 28
25 29
30
31
32
33
2000 1999-2000 2001 1981 2000 1999 1999 1986 2000 2000 1 25 7 2003 45(3) 15-24 2004 717-9 34
2005 2004 4 8 5 2002 71115-123 2005 2002 2002 -- 27(12)80-87 2003 1996 22153-193 2004 1998 1999 35
1993 1999 2002 2000 2001 2002 2000 2001 8043-47 1978 1987 2003 17121-156 2003 654-6 36
1999 2001 7 2 26 2000 2 2 5 2004 2 5 2006 3 14 http://mol.mcu.edu.tw/search_show.php?enid=51864 2004 12 13 C3 1989 1996 2004 8 10 C3 2004 12 14 CS4 2005a 5(1)27-58 2005b 1(2)31-52 2005c 37
3(2)131-172 1997 2639-259 1987 2000 2003 1996 Berger, Arthur Asa1992 Media analysis techniques 1991 Clatterbaugh, Kenneth2003 (Contemporary perspectives on masculinity:men, womwn, and politics in modern society) 1990 Katz, Steven D.2002 (Film directing shot by shot : visualizing from concept to screen) 1991 Simmons, Rachel2003 Odd girl out : the hidden culture of aggression in girls 38
2001 Tong, Rosemarie Putnam1996 Feminist thought:a comprehensive introduction 1989 Ward, Peter2005 Picture composition for film and television 2001 Zettl, Herbert1999 (Video Basics) 1995 Zettl, Herbert1991 Sight Sound Motion:Applied Media Aesthetics 1990 Basow, S. L. (1992). Gender stereotypes and roles (3rd ed). California: Books/Cole Publishing company. Fiske, J. (1987). Gendered Television: Masculinity. Television Culture (pp.198-223). London and New York: Methuen. Harding, J. (1998). Investing Sex: Essentalism and Constructionism.Sex Acts:Practices of Femininity and Masculinity,( pp.8-22). London and Thousand Oaks. Kozloff, S.R. (1992). Narrative theory and television. In R.C. Allen (Ed.), Channels of discourse, reassembled, television and contemporary criticism (2nd ed), (pp.67-100). London: Routledge. Lapsley, R. and Westlake, M. (1988). Psychoanalysis, Film Theory: An Introduction, (pp.67-104). Manchester: Manchester University Press. Lapsley, R. and Westlake, M. (1988). Semiotics, Film Theory: An Introduction, 39
(pp.32-66). Manchester: Manchester University Press. Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema, Sceen, 16(3): 6-18. Nixon, S. (1997).Exhibiting Masculinity. In Hall S.(Ed.), Representation :Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices (2nd ed),, (pp.291-336). London: Sage. Sarup, M. (1993). Lacan and Psychoanalysis. An Introductory Guide to Post-Structuralism and Postmodernism (2nd ed), (pp.5-31). London: Harvester/Wheatsheaf. Pease, B. (2000). The Men Question in Feminism and the New Men s Studies. Recreating Men: Postmodern Masculinity Politics, (pp.11-25). London and Thousand Oaks: sage. 40
TV Literature Drama Painting Soul Visual aesthetics, Cultural codes and Gender construction. Pei-Chun ChenDaniel T.H. Chao Abstract This paper adopts textual analysis, taking Painting Soul a literature drama of Public Broadcasting System as research case. It analyzes gender images, power relationships and social constructions of gender with three dimensions including visual aesthetics, characters, and dialogues. Based on the theoretical perspectives of visual aesthetics, narration theory, psychoanalysis, and feminism, this research demonstrates sexuality in the literature drama. The research results could be concluded to three parts: gender images the characters represented, gender images and power relationships aesthetically represented, and plots analysis. It shows that, males in traditional society were often portrayed dominant, nevertheless, he could be a victim in the patriarchal system and pays the higher price to maintain his privilege. On the contrary, the female in traditional society keeps her role expectation, and seems to manage to have developed several resistant strategies. Yet resistant strategies proposed by the female might not set her free, but strengthen the control of patriarchal ideology. KeywordsConstruction and Representation, Gender, Literature Drama,Painting Soul, Visual Aesthetics 41