,,,, ; ;, ;, ; ;, (,, 2006;,, 2007),,,,, (, 2006;, 2005;,, 2011),,,,,,,, (, 2009), ( 8311 ),, 64%, 45~55,,, (, 2009), 1.2,, ( ) (Tremblay & Rog

Similar documents
Microsoft Word - 8王忠军龙立荣xb14-365_new_.doc


金 鹏 等 体 育 锻 炼 缓 解 公 务 员 心 理 压 力 相 关 量 表 的 编 制 及 常 模 的 建 立 89 此, 本 文 从 探 索 性 研 究 入 手, 对 体 育 锻 炼 缓 解 公 务 员 心 理 压 力 展 开 研 究, 尝 试 编 制 一 个 基 于 本 土 化, 具 有 良

中国科技论文在线中文稿件模板

Vol. 16 No Λ1 1 1) 2;3) 4) 5;6) 6) Λ

Microsoft Word 谢雯雯.doc


语篇中指代词的分布规律与心理机制*

Microsoft Word - 33-p skyd8.doc

政府再造的基本精神:小而美或小而能?

~ ~ ~

语篇中指代词的分布规律与心理机制*

P. C Evelyn. M. Duvall 2 quality of life cabana

a b

Microsoft Word 定版

國家圖書館典藏電子全文

Microsoft Word - 01李惠玲ok.doc

作 主 动 追 求 知 识 获 取 技 能, 在 心 理 和 生 理 上 都 非 常 积 极 的 个 体 (Zimmerman & Pons, 1986) 在 此 期 间, 自 我 效 能 感 (self-efficacy) 自 我 控 制 (self-control) 自 我 管 理 (self-

A VALIDATION STUDY OF THE ACHIEVEMENT TEST OF TEACHING CHINESE AS THE SECOND LANGUAGE by Chen Wei A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School and Colleg

JOURNAL OF NANJING UNIVERSITY OF FINANCE AND ECONOMICS Wild t % 50% 15% % 19 17%


<4D F736F F D DB5DA34C6DA6F6B2DD6D0B4F3B9DCC0EDD1D0BEBF2DC4DACEC42E646F63>

國立中山大學學位論文典藏.PDF

Hesketh and Zhu Dreze and Khera 2000 Zhao 2003 Sen and Nair Das Gupta and Li 1999 Banister 2004 Hudson and Den Boer 20

,:, ;,, [2 ],,,,,,,,,,, 2, 2. 1 (career growt h) [ 18 ], 2. 3, Bedeian [ 3 ], chay, Aryee [4 ],,,,,,, Adams [5 ] Ellstrom [6 ],, Choy Savery,,,,,,,, [

ii

顿悟的脑机制研究

Microsoft Word tb 赵宏宇s-高校教改纵横.doc

2. 文 獻 探 討 2.1 大 眾 運 輸 之 特 性 大 眾 運 輸 有 兩 項 營 運 目 的 : 第 一 是 減 少 使 用 私 人 運 輸 工 具, 以 抒 解 交 通 壅 塞 的 現 象 ; 第 二 是 藉 此 達 到 所 得 重 分 配 的 效 果 [2] 根 據 Lovelock [

吴 郁 玲 等 : 农 户 对 宅 基 地 使 用 权 确 权 效 应 的 认 知 研 究 以 武 汉 市 为 例 29 the paper tried to provide a basis to improve the confirmation policy efficiency and to f

STEAM STEAM STEAM ( ) STEAM STEAM ( ) 1977 [13] [10] STEM STEM 2. [11] [14] ( )STEAM [15] [16] STEAM [12] ( ) STEAM STEAM [17] STEAM STEAM STEA

輥輯訛 % 2010~ % Northwestern Journal of Ethnology 1. J., 1994, 3 14~ J., ~150.


Corpus Word Parser 183

62 互 動 性 裝 置 藝 術 對 幼 保 系 學 生 壓 力 情 緒 療 癒 影 響 之 案 例 探 究 62 壹 緒 論 一 研 究 背 景 與 動 機 根 據 財 團 法 人 董 氏 基 金 會 於 2008 年 1 對 大 學 生 主 觀 壓 力 來 源 與 憂 鬱 情 緒 相 關 性 研

* UNDP Volunteering Australia * 10 94

基層地政人員工作壓力與離職傾向關係之研究-以臺北縣地政事務所為例

i

,2488, %, 80 %,,, ( 1) ,,35 %, 8 ( 2),,3/ 4,; 20 %, ( 3),, 68 %, 14 % 3, 18 %,20 % ( 1), 17 % 1 %


Microsoft Word doc

CHIPS Oaxaca - Blinder % Sicular et al CASS Becker & Chiswick ~ 2000 Becker & Chiswick 196

教 育 科 學 期 刊

杨 振 洪 等 : 试 论 我 国 老 年 教 育 的 社 会 治 理 85 [2013]27 号 文 关 于 进 一 步 加 强 老 年 教 育 工 作 的 意 见 规 定, 参 加 各 类 老 年 教 育 机 构 学 习 的 老 年 人 要 保 持 在 本 地 区 老 年 人 口 的 10% 以

荨荨 % [3] [4] 86%( [6] 27 ) Excel [7] 27 [8] 2 [9] K2 [2] ; Google group+ 5 Gmail [2] 2 fxljwcy 3E [22] 2 2 fxljzrh 2D [23] 3 2 fxzphjf 3D 35

國家圖書館典藏電子全文

Microsoft Word ªÀ°Ïµo®i-¤º¤å_12¸¹¦r_

Microsoft Word - A doc

: 3 : , , ,, , :, ( Ravallion Chen, 2004 ; Khan Riskin, 2005,Yue et al, 2006),, (,2003 ;,200

察 影 响 个 体 幸 福 感 的 因 素 袁 形 成 增 进 个 人 幸 福 尧 促 进 社 会 和 谐 与 幸 福 的 解 决 方 案 已 经 成 为 了 当 前 积 极 心 理 学 研 究 的 重 点 袁 并 由 此 掀 起 了 一 场 以 幸 福 心 理 学 课 程 为 核 心 的 幸 福

Scoones World Bank DFID Sussex IDS UNDP CARE DFID DFID DFID 1997 IDS

第一章 緒論

护理2期.indd

我国原奶及乳制品安全生产和质量安全管理研究

United Nations ~ ~ % 2010

. STEM OER STEM 600 STEM CCSS STEM CCSS STEM ISTE Indiana Department of STEM Education 2013 STEM STEM STEM STEM STEM 10 STEM 2017 S

A B A 18 A a 2007b

事故的共性原因: 行为、知识、习惯

~ 10 2 P Y i t = my i t W Y i t 1000 PY i t Y t i W Y i t t i m Y i t t i 15 ~ 49 1 Y Y Y 15 ~ j j t j t = j P i t i = 15 P n i t n Y

66 臺 中 教 育 大 學 學 報 : 人 文 藝 術 類 Abstract This study aimed to analyze the implementing outcomes of ability grouping practice for freshman English at a u

1988 Demo & Acock 1988 Demo & Acock Richard & Cynthia % 1996 Feigelman

13-4-Cover-1

. 3. MOOC 2006 MOOC Automated Text Marker 2014 e-rater Yigal et al MOOC Coursera Edx 97

具有多个输入 特别是多个输出的 部门 或 单位 ( 称为 决策单元 Decision Making Unit 简称 DMU) 间的相对有效 8 性 C2R 模型是 DEA 的个模型 也是 DEA 的基础 和重要模型 假设有 n 个决策单元 DMUj( j = n) 每个 DMU 有 m

J /3 1 /3 1 / % 12% 12% 1 http / /news. sina.

(2005 (2006, (2006 ( , ( ,,,,,, ( (ASFR ASFR : x, B x x, P f x x (1 (2 4,, , 2 1 :, 1 2, 20-29

管 理 科 学 软 科 学 2013 年 6 月 第 27 卷 第 6 期 ( 总 第 162 期 ) 变 量 选 择 1 CAR i i CSP / 2 /

University of Science and Technology of China A dissertation for master s degree Research of e-learning style for public servants under the context of


http / /yxxy. cbpt. cnki. net / % % %

/ / / Kornai1993 hierarchy Weber1958 Williamson 1979 chain of command Downs 1994 Tullock 1992 Lazear1998 Li & Zhou promoti

2011第1期第二部分

1. principal Hoyt and Schwer1998 Sturdivant and Cocanougher1973 Allmon and Grant1990 voice Hunt and stress analysis Vitell1986 HV Sayre, Jo

3 : 121,, [1 ] (Stage Theory),,,,,,, 1 :, ;,,,,, 1 :11, 6,116 ; , 2003 ; 31 = Π ; 2, 1996 ;1996,,2000, Walt Rostow (1960, 1971), A. F. K. Organ

Microsoft Word - 刘藤升答辩修改论文.doc

谢 辞 仿 佛 2010 年 9 月 的 入 学 发 生 在 昨 天, 可 一 眨 眼, 自 己 20 多 岁 的 两 年 半 就 要 这 么 匆 匆 逝 去, 心 中 真 是 百 感 交 集 要 是 在 古 代, 男 人 在 二 十 几 岁 早 已 成 家 立 业, 要 是 在 近 代, 男 人

Vol. 22 No. 4 JOURNAL OF HARBIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Aug GPS,,, : km, 2. 51, , ; ; ; ; DOI: 10.

附件1:

,,,,,,, (1975) (,2004 : ) (1981) 20,, (,1987 :6) L ,, (,2005b),,, ;,,,,,, ( ) (,1989) :, :A,, ;B, ;C ;D, (,1987 : ) 16

Microsoft Word doc

( 五 ) 重 要 日 期 : 開 放 投 稿 日 :2016 年 1 月 11 日 ( 星 期 一 ) 起 投 稿 截 止 日 : 延 後 至 2016 年 4 月 11 日 ( 星 期 一 ) 下 午 5 時 止 論 文 全 文 審 查 結 果 公 告 日 :2016 年 4 月 22 日 (

WTO

Ansell Gash ~ ~ Rhodes ~ H. Haken 20 90

Microsoft Word 钟翠翠.doc

明新科技大學專題研究計畫成果報告編寫須知

标题

( s y s t e m ) ( s t r e s s ) (stress model) ( s y s t e m ) [ ] [ 5 ] C o x [ 3 ] 1 [ 1, 2 ] [ 6-8 ] [ 9 ] Tw Fam Med Res 2003 Vol.1 No.1 23

Microsoft Word - 建構企業訓練之課程發展模式.doc

~ ~


McGraw-Hill School Education Group Physics : Principles and Problems G S 24

University of Science and Technology of China A dissertation for master s degree A Study on Cross-border M&A of Chinese Enterprises Author s Name: JIA

标题

Microsoft Word - 95P-030成果報告_董金龍_

<4D F736F F D D3620B3AFB24DA8712DB747AFE0AC46A9B2BB50A4BDB0C8ADDBB27AA4A7B1B4B0512E646F63>

EJCUS1002_04.doc

entrepreneurial Lumpkin & Dess, orientation Dakhli an Schuler

(,1999) ( 1) ( ) 1., : ( Gurr,1970) (Smelser,1962) (, 1995) (McCarthy & Zald,1977), : ; ( ) (context bounded rationality) (Victor Nee,1995 :10) :, ; (

政治哲學要跨出去!

Myers Majluf 1984 Lu Putnam R&D R&D R&D R&D

Transcription:

2015, Vol. 47, No.11, 1379 1394 Acta Psychologica Sinica DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.01379 * 1 2 3 4 1 1 1 ( 1, 430079) ( 2, 430074) ( 3, 430065) ( 4, 330006) (n = 279), (n = 517), (n = 520) (n = 230),,, ; ; ; B849: C93 1, ( ),, (, 2007) (career plateau) (Smith-Ruig, 2009; Miles, Gordon, & Storlie, 2013), (Ference, Stoner, & Warren, 1977) (Veiga, 1981) (Feldman & Weitz, 1988) (Lee, 2003),, (,, 2008;, 2006;, 2006;,, 2007), (, 2007;, 2011;,, 2010),, 1.1 10, 2006 : 2014 10 22 * (71232001) (14YJC630084) (2012143) (CCNU14Z02015) :, E-mail: linda5933@163.com 1379

1380 47,,,, ; ;, ;, ; ;, (,, 2006;,, 2007),,,,, (, 2006;, 2005;,, 2011),,,,,,,, (, 2009), ( 8311 ),, 64%, 45~55,,, (, 2009), 1.2,, ( ) (Tremblay & Roger, 1993, 2004); ( ) (Milliman, 1992); ( ) (Bardwick, 1986); () (Joseph, 1996), ; ; (2008),,,, () ( ), (, 2006),,,,, ;,,,,,,,,, (, 2006;, 2014),,,,,, 1.3 20 90,,, (Slocum, Jr, Cron, Hanson, & Rawlings, 1985; Evans & Gilbert, 1984), Tremblay Roger (1993), 5,

11 1381,,,, 90,, Chao (1990),,, Chao, Joseph (1996) Milliman (1992) (2008) 16,,,,,,,,,,,, ( ),,, (, 2009),,, 2 1 2.1 2.1.1, ;,,,,,, 1,, 16 ( 8 ),, 2 2 2 2 ; 2 2 2 1 1,,, 1,, 16, 10, 6 ; 35 47 ;,, 3, 55, 43, 71%, 29%; 24 ; 11%, 76%,

1382 47 13%; 23%, 68%, 9% 3,,,, (1) ; (2), 3, 30, 2 20, 8 20,,, 14 Likert 5, 1, 5, 50, 41, 68.3%, 31.7%; 4.9%, 90.2%, 4.9%; 4.9%, 61.0%, 34.1%,, 6,, 14 2.1.2,, 320, 279, 87.19%, 82.4%, 17.2%; 96.8%, 0.7%; 0.4%, 17.6%, 60.9%, 20.4%; 16.8%, ( ) 20.8%, 40.5%, 19.0%, 1.4%; 30.1%, 49.8%, 18.6%, 0.4%; 89.9%, 7.6%; 30 ( ) 1.9%, 31 35 7.6%, 36 40 30.5%, 41 45 41.8%, 46 50 12.4%, 51 55 4.4%, 55 1.5%; 22.65, 6.07 2.2, SPSS16.0 14, (principal components analysis),, 1 ( 0.35); ( 0.35), ; ;, 10, 0.62 0.81, 60.61% 1 6, 1 1 2 Q 1 0.81 0.22 Q 2 0.80 0.15 Q 3 0.77 0.23 Q 4 0.74 0.14 Q 5 0.66 0.19 Q 6 0.62 0.20 Q 7 0.13 0.78 Q 8 0.37 0.78 Q 9 0.33 0.77 Q 10 0.09 0.73 ( ) ( 60.61%) 35.07% 25.54% Cronbach α 0.85 0.81

11 1383,,,,, 4,, (r = 0.51, p < 0.01), 0.86 0.88 (p < 0.01), (Cronbach α) 0.85 0.81, 0.87, 3 2 3.1 7,, 10, Likert 5,,,, 1250, 1037, 82.96%,, (n = 517), (n = 520) (n = 517), 67.4%, 32.6%; 88.3%, 11.7%; 5.7%, 32.0%, 53.9%, 8.4%; 10.5%, 17.6%, 56.7%, 13.4%, 1.8%; 19.4%, 33.3%, 19.2%, 11.7%, 16.4%; 70.3%, 29.7%; 30 ( ) 18.1%, 31 35 14.2%, 36 40 21.5%, 41 45 21.7%, 46 50 10.4%, 51 55 11.4%, 55 2.8%; 19.89, 10.003 SPSS16.0 LISREL8.30 3.2 3.2.1 (CFA), (EFA),,, χ 2 df χ 2 /df RMSEA SRMR IFI CFI GFI 2 3 2 χ 2 df χ 2 /df RMSEA SRMR IFI CFI GFI 4979.02 45 110.65 283.51 35 8.10 0.12 0.06 0.95 0.95 0.89 155.06 34 4.56 0.08 0.04 0.98 0.98 0.94 3 T1 0.72 0.49 Q1 0.76 0.43 T2 0.76 0.42 Q2 0.77 0.41 T3 0.70 0.52 Q3 0.67 0.55 T4 0.76 0.43 Q4 0.63 0.60 Q5 0.73 0.46 Q6 0.64 0.58 2, χ 2 /df 5, RMSEA 0.08, SRMR 0.06,,,, Δχ 2 128.45 Δdf = 1, 0.001,, 3.2.2 (n = 517),

1384 47 Cronbach α 0.82 0.85, 0.89, 0.70,, 2 1, 3.2.3,, 5,,,, 5,,,, 5,,, Slocum (1985) Savery (1989) Tremblay Roger (1993), 5,,,, 5 5, 1, 5,, 5 (r = 0.57, p < 0.01), 5 (r = 0.28, p < 0.01),, ;,,,, (, 2006;, 2014), t, (1) 5, (M = 3.18, SD = 0.96) 5 (M = 2.85, SD = 0.99) (t = 3.79, p < 0.01), (M = 2.85, SD = 0.90) 5 (M = 2.70, SD = 0.87) (, t = 1.77, p < 0.10) (2) 5, (M = 3.24, SD = 0.97) 5 (M = 2.85, SD = 0.98) (t = 4.17, p < 0.01), (M = 2.90, SD = 0.92) 5 (M = 2.69, SD = 0.86) (t = 2.49, p < 0.05),, 5,, (career success) ( ), ( ) (Seibert, Grant, & Kraimer, 1999), (career satisfaction) (Heslin, 2005),,,,,, Likert 5, 1, 5 Greenhuas Parasuraman Wormley (1990), (r = 0.41, p < 0.01), (r = 0.54, p < 0.01),, 3.2.4 t (1) (M = 2.99, SD = 0.98, M = 2.94, SD = 0.97, t = 0.56, p > 0.05),

11 1385 (M = 2.75, SD = 0.86, M = 2.78, SD = 0.92, t = 0.30, p > 0.05) ; (2) (F(4, 486) = 0.51, p > 0.05), (F(4, 478) = 3.36, p < 0.05),, (M = 2.69, SD = 0.90) (M = 2.69, SD = 0.90); (3) (M = 2.99, SD = 0.96) (M = 2.78, SD = 1.03) (t = 1.52, p > 0.05), (M = 2.72, SD = 0.84) (M = 2.87, SD = 0.97) (t = 1.07, p > 0.05); (4) (M = 2.97, SD = 0.96) (M = 3.01, SD = 1.02) (t = 0.37, p > 0.05),, (M = 3.01, SD = 0.88) (M = 2.67, SD = 0.87) (t = 3.92, p < 0.01); (5), (r = 0.32, p < 0.01), (r = 0.28, p < 0.01), (r = 0.22, p < 0.01), (r = 0.08, p > 0.05), (r = 0.01, p > 0.05), (r = 0.20, p < 0.01), 4 3,, (Lemire, Saba, & Gagnon, 1999; McCleese, Eby, Scharlau, & Hoffman, 2007; Ji-hyun & Jinkook, 2008;, 2006;, 2006;,, 2008;,,, 2011),,,,,,,,, (, 2011),,, 4.1 (organizational commitment) (Meyer & Allen, 1984),, (,, 2007), (,, 2006;,, 2007), (attribution theory) (self-service bias) (Weiner,1985),, (Blau, 1964),,, (Ji-hyun & Jinkook, 2008;,, 2008), (Allen & Meyer, 1990),,

1386 47,,,, 1,,,,, (occupational burnout),, (Maslach & Jackson, 1981),, ;,, ;, (Maslach, Jackson, & Leiter, 1996),,,,,,,,,,, (Schaufeli & Taris, 2014) (the conservation of resources, COR) (Hobfoil, 1989),,,,,,, (,,, 2011;, 2012), 2,,, (Withdrawal behavior),,, (Hanisch & Hulin, 1990),, (Judge, Scott, & Ilies, 2006),, (Griffeth, Gaertner & Sager, 1999; Taris, Schreurs, & van Iersel-van Silfhout, 2001),,,,,,,,,,,,, 3 4.2 4.2.1 (1) 7 1037 ( ) (n = 520), 2,,, 1, 67.1%,

11 1387 32.9%; 90.2%, 9.8%; 2.2%, 31.1%, 59.9%, 6.8%; 8.6%, 13.5%, 61.3%, 15.3%, 1.2%; 20.7%, 32.1%, 18.6%, 11.8%, 16.8%; 69.7%, 30.3%; 30 18.4%, 31~35 17.9%, 36~40 16.3%, 41~45 22.7%, 46~50 11.7%, 51~55 10.5%, 55 2.5%; 19.51, 9.64 (2) 2 250, 230, 92%,,,,, 2 3, 57.8%, 42.2%; 2.6%, 8.3%, 48.7%, 40.4%;, 25 4.3%, 26 30 22.2%, 31 35 22.2%, 36 40 16.5%, 41 45 12.6%, 46 22.2%; 5 29.1%, 6 10 17.4%, 11 15 13%, 16 20 12.2%, 21 28.3%; 28.7%, 43.9%, 11.7%, 10%, 4.8%, 0.9% 4.2.2, (4 ) (6 ), 10, Likert 5, 1, 5 α 0.83 0.85, 0.89;, α 0.91 0.89, 0.92 Allen Meyer (1990) ( ), Likert 5, 1 ; 5, α 0.76 0.79 0.80, α 0.89 Maslach MBI-GS ( ) (Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey),, (Maslach et al., 1996),, 16, Likert 5, 1, 5, α 0.81 0.72 0.76, α 0.87 Lehman Simpson (1992), 4,, Linkert 4, 1, 4, α 0.74 4.2.3 ( ), (n = 520), χ 2 = 955.75 df = 265 χ 2 /df = 3.61 RMSEA = 0.07 SRMR = 0.06 IFI = 0.95 CFI = 0.94 NFI = 0.93 NNFI = 0.94,, ( ), (n = 230), χ 2 = 869.68 df = 390 χ 2 /df = 2.23 RMSEA = 0.07 SRMR = 0.07 IFI = 0.96 CFI = 0.96 NFI = 0.93 NNFI = 0.96, 4.2.4, (common method bias) (1)

1388 47 ; (2), Likert 5, Likert 4 ; (3),,,, Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Lee Podsakoff (2003), Harman,, 40%,, 4 1, 24.17%; 6 1, 27.07%, (Anderson & Williams, 1992),, χ 2 df,, (Δdf = 25, Δχ 2 = 35.63) (Δdf = 30, Δχ 2 = 41.02), RMSEA CFI IFI NFI NNFI 0.01 0.02,,,,, 4.3 4, ( ) ( ), (Hierarchical Regression) (1, 0 ) (1, 0 ) 5,, (β = 0.11, p > 0.05) (β = 0.01, p > 0.05) (β = 0.05, p > 0.05) ; (β = 0.37, p < 0.01), (β = 0.15, p < 0.05), (β = 0.11, p < 0.10), 4 (n = 520) M SD 1 2 3 4 1. 3.02 0.98 (0.84) 2. 2.77 0.91 0.64** (0.86) 3. 3.14 0.82 0.03 0.23** (0.76) 4. 2.75 0.83 0.09* 0.16** 0.45** (0.78) 5. 2.76 0.87 0.04 0.03 0.69** 0.64** (0.81) (n = 230) M SD 1 2 3 4 5 1. 3.39 1.13 (0.91) 2. 2.83 0.94 0.67** (0.89) 3. 2.92 0.91 0.54** 0.60** (0.81) 4. 2.86 0.82 0.51** 0.62** 0.67** (0.72) 5. 3.78 0.66 0.27** 0.50** 0.44** 0.52** (0.76) 6. 1.96 0.57 0.39** 0.56** 0.60** 0.56** 0.53** (0.74) Cronbach α ; **p 0.01, *p 0.05

11 1389 5 (n = 520) (n = 230) 0.09 0.07 0.04 0.17* 0.06 0.11 0.25** 0.15* 0.06 0.13* 0.16 0.17* 0.10 0.04 0.02 0.10* 0.10* 0.11 0.15* 0.04 0.09 0.18** 0.21** 0.23** 0.05 0.04 0.17* 0.07 0.11 0.01 0.05 0.22* 0.19* 0.05 0.09 0.37** 0.15* 0.11 0.48** 0.52** 0.46** 0.52** Adj. R 2 0.14 0.07 0.06 0.43 0.44 0.25 0.35 R 2 0.10 0.02 0.01 0.35 0.38 0.22 0.30 p 0.10, *p 0.05, **p 0.01 1, (β = 0.22, p < 0.01), (β = 0.19, p < 0.05), (β = 0.05, p > 0.05); (β = 0.48, p < 0.01), (β = 0.52, p < 0.01), (β = 0.46, p < 0.01), 2, (β = 0.09, p > 0.05), (β = 0.52, p < 0.01), 3,, ( ),,, 5 5.1 ;,,,,,, (Milliman, 1992; Bardwick, 1986;, 2008) (Joseph, 1996) (, 2007),,,,,,, (2008),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

1390 47 (Milliman, 1992; Bardwick, 1986; Joseph, 1996;, 2008),,,,,, (,, 2011), (, 2005;, 2007),,, 5.2, ( ) ( ),,, ( ), t,,,,, 45, (r = 0.92, p < 0.01),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, (, 2010) ( ),, (, 2006) 5.3, ( ), (Ji-hyun & Jinkook, 2008; Lemire et al., 1999; Chay, Argee, & Chew, 1995; Allen, Poteet, & Russell, 1998;,, 2008),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

11 1391, ;,,,, ( ),,,,,,,,,,, ( ) 5.4,,,,,,,,,, ( ),, Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1 18. Allen, T. D., Poteet, M. L., & Russell, J. E. A. (1998). Attitudes of managers who are more or less career plateaued. The Career Development Quarterly, 47(2), 159 172. An, S. M., & Lin, Q. L. (2007). View of civil servants organizational commitment system to the government. Chinese Public Administration, (10), 76 78. [,. (2007).., (10), 76 78.] Anderson, S. E, & Williams, L. J. (1992). Assumptions about unmeasured variables with studies of reciprocal relationships: The case of employee attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(5), 638 650. Bai, G. L., Lin, W. Q., & Li, G. H. (2011). Research on the relationship among career plateau structure dimensions, job satisfaction and resignation intention. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 28(3), 144 148. [,,. (2011).., 28(3), 144 148.] Bardwick, J. M. (1986). The plateauing trap: How to avoid it in your career and your life. New York: American Management Association. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley. Chao, G. T. (1990). Exploration of the conceptualization and measurement of career plateau: A comparative analysis. Journal of Management, 16(1), 181 193. Chay, Y. W., Aryee, S., & Chew, I. (1995). Career plateauing: Reactions and moderators among managerial and professional employees. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 6(1), 61 78. Chen, Z. T., Jin, Y. Y., & Li, J. (2011). Empirical study on the relationship between career plateau and job burnout of knowledge worker. Journal of Wuhan Textile University, 24(2), 31 33. [,,. (2011).., 24(2), 31 33.] Dong, X. (2007). An analysis of the intension and extension of civil servant concept. Qi Lu Journal, (1), 148 150. [. (2007).., (1), 148 150.] Du, F. J. (2009). The ceiling of official career: A survey of cadres career development. People s Tribune, (23), 16 19. [. (2009). :., (23), 16 19.] Du, X. Y., & Tian, J. (2011). The study of civil servant s career development path based on competence. Chinese Public Administration, (11), 105 109. [,. (2011).., (11), 105 109.] Evans, M. G., & Gilbert, E. (1984). Plateaued managers: their need gratifications and their effort-performance expectations. Journal of Management Studies, 21(1), 99 108. Feldman, D. C., & Weitz, B. A. (1988). Career plateaus in the sales force: Understanding and removing blockages to employee growth. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales

1392 47 Management, 8(3), 23 32. Ference, T. P., Stoner, J. A. F., & Warren, E. K. (1977). Managing the career plateau. Academy of Management Review, 2(4), 602 612. Gao, F. (2011). Research on the situation of the career plateau of the youth P. E. Teacher in college: Take the college P. E. Teachers in Beijing as example. Journal of Beijing Sport University, 34(7), 102 105. [. (2011).., 34(7), 102 105.] Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S. & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 64 86. Griffeth, R. W., Gaertner, S., & Sager, J. K. (1999). Taxonomic model of withdrawal behaviors: The adaptive response model. Human Resource Management, 9(4), 577 590. Hanisch, K. A., & Hulin, C. L. (1990). Job attitudes and organizational withdrawal: An examination of retirement and other voluntary withdrawal behaviors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 37(1), 60 78. He, Y. (2005). Research on the achievement motivation & attribution of primary level leader (Unpublished master s thesis). Suzhou University, Suzhou. [. (2005). ( ).,.] Heslin, P. A. (2005). Conceptualizing and evaluating career success. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(2), 113 136. Hobfoil, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513 524. Hou, Y. B. (2007). The study on the civil servants of section chief s competency and relative factors (Unpublished doctorial dissertation. Jinan University, Guangzhou. [. (2007). ( ).,.] Hui, S. K., & Cao, J. (2010). Analysis on factors affecting the shaping of teacher s career plateau in elementary and middle school. Psychological Development and Education, 26(5), 527 533. [,. (2010).., 26(5), 527 533.] Ji-hyun, J., & Jinkook, T. (2008). The effects of perceived career plateau on employees attitudes: Moderating effects of career motivation and perceived supervisor support with Korean employees. Journal of Career Development, 35(2), 187 201. Joseph, J. (1996). An exploratory look at the plateauism construct. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 130(3), 237 244. Judge, T. A., Scott, B. A., & Ilies, R. (2006). Hostility, job attitudes, and workplace deviance: Test of a multilevel model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 126 138. Kou, D. Q. (2007). A study on the structure and characteristics of teacher s career plateau and its relationship to the job effect (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Southwest University, Chongqing. [. (2007). ( ).,.] Lee, B. C. P. (2003). Going beyond career plateau: Using professional plateau to account for work outcomes. Journal of Management Development, 22(6), 538 551. Lehman, W. E., & Simpson, D. D. (1992). Employee substance use and on-the-job behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(3), 309 321. Lemire, L., Saba, T., & Gagnon, Y. -C. (1999). Managing career plateauing in the Quebec Public Sector. Public Personnel Management, 28(3), 375 391. Li, H. (2006). A study of relationship between career plateau, job satisfaction, organizational commitment and turnover intention of business managers (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Chongqing University, Chongqing. [. (2006). ( ).,.] Liang, L. Z., & Zheng, F. J. (2007). The development of China's professional technical civil servants career path. Seeker, (2), 73 75, 78. [,. (2007).., (2), 73 75, 78.] Liang, W. M., & Yang, L. X. (2006). Opinions on the construction of civil servants career planning support system in China. Jiangxi Social Sciences, (8), 129 132. [,. (2006).., (8), 129 132.] Liu, X. (2014). Research on the horizontal flowing of civil servants of leading posts in China (Unpublished master s thesis). South China University of Technology, Guangzhou. [. (2014). ( ).,.] Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 2(2), 99 113. Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (1996). Maslach Burnout Inventory: Manual (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press. McCleese, C. S., Eby, L. T., Scharlau, E. A., & Hoffman, B. H. (2007). Hierarchical, job content, and double plateaus: A mixed-method study of stress, depression and coping responses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71(2), 282 299. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1984). Testing the side-bet theory of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 372 378. Miles, S., Gordon, J., & Storlie, C. (2013). Job satisfaction, perceived career plateau, and the perception of promotability: A correlational study. The Journal of International Management Studies, 8(1), 1 9. Milliman, J. F. (1992). Causes, consequences and moderating factors of career plateauing (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of Southern California. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. -Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879 903. Savery, L. K. (1989). Comparing plateaued and non-plateaued employees. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 4(1), 12 16. Schaufeli, W. B., & Taris, T. W. (2014). A critical review of the job demands-resources model: Implications for improving work and health. In W. B. Schaufeli, & T. W. Taris (Eds.), Bridging occupational, organizational and public health (pp. 43 68). Netherlands: Springer. Seibert, S. E., Grant, J. M., & Kraimer, M. L. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 416 427. Shi, K. (2006). Research on relationship and integration among civil servant s recruitment, management and exit mechanism in China (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing.

11 1393 [. (2006). ( ).,.] Slocum, J. W., Jr., Cron, W. L., Hanson, R. W., & Rawlings, S. (1985). Business strategy and the management of plateaued employees. Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 133 154. Smith-Ruig, T. (2009). Exploring career plateau as a multifaceted phenomenon: Understanding the types of career plateaux experienced by accounting professionals. British Journal of Management, 20(4), 610 622. Song, B. (2010). Research on career development channels of public officials and SWOT model. Chinese Public Administration, (12), 69 72. [. (2010). SWOT., (12), 69 72.] Taris, T. W., Schreurs, P. J. G., & van Iersel-van Silfhout, I. J. (2001). Job stress, job strain, and psychological withdrawal among Dutch university staff: Towards a dual process model for the effects of occupational stress. Work & Stress: An International Journal of Work, Health & Organisations, 15(4), 283 296. Tremblay, M., & Roger, A. (1993). Individual, familial, and organizational determinants of career plateau: An empirical study of the determinants of objective and subjective career plateau in a population of Canadian managers. Group & Organization Management, 18(4), 411 435. Tremblay, M., & Roger, A. (2004). Career plateauing reactions: The moderating role of job scope, role ambiguity and participation among Canadian managers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(6), 996 1017. Veiga, J. F. (1981). Plateaued versus non-plateaued managers: Career patterns, attitudes, and path potential. Academy of Management Journal, 24(3), 566 578. Wang, S. (2011). Problems with civil servant performance appraisal and counter measures. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Science), (1), 25 31. [. (2011).. ( ), (1), 25 31.] Wang, Z. Q., & Zhang, H. (2007). Research into relationship between career plateau and job satisfaction of enterprise employees. Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University (Social Sciences Edition), 24(6), 56 59. [,. (2007).. ( ), 24(6), 56 59.] Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548 573. Xie, B. G., & Long, L. R. (2008). The effects of career plateau on job satisfaction, organizational commitment and turnover intentions. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 40(8), 927 938. [,. (2008).., 40(8), 927 938.] Xie, B. G., Long, L. R., & Zhao, Y. J. (2008). Development of career plateau questionnaire and research on its validity and reliability. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 16(4), 344 347. [,,. (2008).., 16(4), 344 347.] Yu, C. (2006). Research on construct of career plateau and the relationship between it and job performance of knowledge employees. Studies in Science of Science, 24(6), 929 933. [. (2006).., 24(6), 929 933.] Zhang, W. Q. (2006). On the career management of common civil servants in China government (Unpublished master s thesis). Northeastern University, Shenyang. [. (2006). ( ).,.] Zhang, Z. S. (2005). International comparison and reference research of civil servant's career development management. Journal of US-China Public Administration, 2(5), 1 6. [. (2005).., 2(5), 1 6.] Zhao, Y. R. (2012). The relationship of middle school teachers career plateau, job burnout and turnover intention (Unpublished master s thesis). Shandong Normal University, Jinan. [. (2012). ( ).,.] The Career Plateau of Chinese Public Servants: Construct, Measurement and Its Psychological and Behavioral Influence WANG Zhongjun 1 ; LONG Lirong 2 ; LIU Lidan 3 ; HUANG Xiaohua 4 ; JIA Wenwen 1 ; LI Lu 1 ; MA Hongyu 1 ( 1 Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior, Ministry of Education; School of Psychology, Central China Normal University; Key Laboratory of Human Development and Mental Health of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430079, China) ( 2 School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China) ( 3 School of Humanities, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430065, China) ( 4 United Front Work Department, CPC Jiangxi Provincial Committee, Nanchang 330006, China) Abstract The career plateau is a serious problem for Chinese public servants, especially for those who at the lower level of public organizations, which occurs when an individual has limited vertical and horizontal career mobility. Since career plateau is of great influence on individual career development as well as organizational efficiency, this study investigated the career plateau phenomenon of Chinese public servants. Firstly, the typical features of Chinese public servants career plateau were found with the content analysis of data collected from 16 public servants, using structured interviews and open-ended questionnaires for other 43 public servants from

1394 47 various public organizations. Meanwhile, the initial items for Public Servants Career Plateau Questionnaire (PSCPQ) were also established. Secondly, data collected from a sample of 279 public servants of diverse organizations was used to explore the CSCPQ s conceptual construct, reliability and validity by exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Thirdly, conducting Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) for data from another larger sample of 517 public servants, the validity and reliability of the PSCPQ was confirmed. Eventually, this study investigated the relationship between career plateau and civil servants occupational psychological and behavioral outcomes, such as organizational commitment, occupational burnout and withdrawal behavior in workplace by hierarchical multiple regression analysis for data of 520 public servants and another sample (n = 230) from three public organizations. The research results indicated the career plateau of public servants was a two-dimension structure in Chinese public organizations context. The dimensions include the stagnation of promotion and the marginalization of position, which are completely different from the constructs of employees career plateau of enterprises found in previous studies. The Cronbach α coefficients of the two dimensions are all above 0.80 and show a steady and acceptable status in different samples. The Cronbach α coefficients of the entire PSCPQ is also above 0.87 in different sample. These results showed that PSCPQ developed in this study had good psychometric reliability and high validity. Furthermore, the results showed that after controlling demographic variables, the stagnation of promotion of public servants was significantly positive related to emotional burnout and cynicism, and was not related to organizational commitment, professional efficiency as well as withdrawal behavior at work. After controlling demographic variables, the positional marginalization of public servants was significantly negative related to organizational affective commitment, normative commitment and professional efficiency, and was positive related to organizational continuance commitment, emotional burnout, cynicism as well as withdrawal behavior. These results would be of enlightenment to the management practices and career development for public servants in Chinese public organizations. Finally, implications and directions for future research are discussed. Key words public servants; career plateau; stagnation of promotion; marginalization of position