2 FLLTP 2012 4 2003 28. 5 ESP 2012 2010 590 20 3. 2011 10 08 5 academic concerned with educationespecially at college or university level 2007 5 29 32

FLLTP 2012 4 1 我 国 第 一 份 以 学 术 英 语 为 导 向 的 大 学 英 语 教 学 指 导 文 件 的 制 定 与 说 明 蔡 基 刚 中 国 第 一 份 地 方 性 的 大 学 英 语 教 学 指 导 性 文 件 上 海 市 大 学 英 语 教 学 参 考 框 架 ( 下 面 简 称 参 考 框 架 ) 最 近 正 在 研 制 中 为 什 么 要 制 定 这 样 的 大 纲? 上 海 市 大 学 英 语 教 学 参 考 框 架 和 现 行 的 大 学 英 语 课 程 教 学 要 求 有 何 区 别? 文 本 用 制 定 说 明 的 形 式 和 附 录 参 考 框 架 来 探 讨 这 些 问 题, 并 用 这 种 方 法 求 教 各 方 专 家 和 更 多 的 读 者 大 学 英 语 教 学 ; 学 术 英 语 导 向 ; 教 学 大 纲 制 订 1. 2010-2012 2. 2020 Hyland & Hamp-Lyons 2002 EAP Hutchinson & Waters 1987 EGP 1 ESP ESP EAP EOP 2 EGAP ES- AP Jordan 1997 EAP ESP 50 15 2007 ESP ESP

2 FLLTP 2012 4 2003 28. 5 ESP 2012 2010 590 20 3. 2011 10 08 5 academic concerned with educationespecially at college or university level 2007 5 29 325 5. 2001 2011 12 927 51% 67. 3% 2008 12 85. 1% 3 9 1615 68. 5% 49. 3% 10 10 2003 11. 3% 45% 23. 6% 20% 8 6 2005 4. 2010 21 Hyland & Hamp-Lyons 2002 2011 9 6. 150 237 347 332 2011 11 3

FLLTP 2012 4 3 8. 2002 2003 10% 10 16 2003 7. 2001 1000 3000 5000 6000-7000 11 2010 8 2009 9. 2012 2002 4200 10 4700

Hyland 2002 2006 10. 2010 2010-2020 11. 100% 12. + = 13. Diller 1978 1 1000 Hazenberg & Hulstun 1996 10000 4 FLLTP 2012 4

FLLTP 2012 4 5 2010 350 7 28 Coxhead 12000 100 12000 80% 10. 6% 570 " " 570 13200 15. 15000 8000-10000 1987 1630 4200 3500 8000 14. Nation 2001 West 1953 GSL 2000 carecarefulcarefullycarelesscarelessness 80% Coxhead 2000 AWL 570 8-10% 90% 5% 570 570 Coxhead 400 A Framework of Reference for EFL Teaching at Tertiary Level in Shanghai

6 FLLTP 2012 4 EAP EGAP English for General Academic Purposes ESAP English for Specific Academic Purposes EGP ESP EOP EAP

FLLTP 2012 4 7 I II III 6 10-16 2 8 6 8 8 2 12 1 2

1500 570 AWL 8000 570 AWL 10000 8 FLLTP 2012 4

FLLTP 2012 4 9 Agnes. L. 2005. ELT today the experience of HKU and relevance for China. Teaching English in China 1. pp 3-17. AlexanderO. Argent S. & Spencer J. 2008. EAP Essentials A Teacher s Guide to Principles and Practice. Reading Garnet Publishing Ltd. CoxheadA. 2000. A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly 34. pp 213-238. Diller K1978. The Language Teaching Controversy Row- leymass Newbury House Publishers. Hazenberg S & J. Hulstun. 1995. Defining a minimal receptive second-language vocabulary for non-native university students an empirical investigation. Applied Linguis- tics 17 /2. pp 145-163. Hutchinson T. & A. Waters. 1987. English for Specific Purpose. Cambridge Cambridge University Press. Hyland. K. 2002. Specificity revisited how far should we go now English for Specific Purposes. 21 /4. pp 365 - ESP 395. - 12. Jordan R. R. 1997. English for Academic Purposes. Cambridge Cambridge University Press. Nation P. 2001 Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge Cambridge University Press. NorthB. 2000. The development of a common framework 1 scale of language proficiency. PhD thesisthames Valley University. Reprinted 2000New YorkPeter Lang. ESP WestM. 1953. A General Service List of English Words. London LongmanGreen. 2012 2 2002 6 " ESP /EAP 2006 " " ESP /EAP " 6 ESP /EAP 2001 3 7 2012 2005 2005 2 24 4 ESP 2010 http / /www. 360doc. com /content /10 /0713 /19 / 167207_38793538. shtml 2002 ESP 2010 ESP ESP Hyland K. & Hamp-Lyons. 2002. EAP Issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purpose 1. pp 1 2008 2006-2007 1 2010EAP ESP 2003 4 200433 220 陈 家 刚 ) ( 下 转 第 41 页 )

FLLTP 2012 4 41 2009 Johnson 2008 Baayen 2008 GriesS. & A. Stefanowitsch. 2004. Extending collostructional analysis a corpus-based approach to alterna- R tions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics9 /1 pp97-129. GriesS. 2009. Statistics for Linguistics with R A Practical R opennlp Introduction. Berlin & New York Mouton de Gruyter. Snowball GriesS. 2009. Quantitative Corpus Linguistics with R A stemming zipfr Practical Introduction. London & New York Routledge. JohnsonK. 2008. Quantitative Methods in Linguistics. MaldenMA and Oxford Blackwell. p. 20 Larson-HallJ. 2009. Review on K. Johnson 2008 s Quantitative methods in linguistics Sociolinguistic Studies3 /2pp279-284. SpectorP. 2008. Data Manipulation with R. New York Springer. 5. 11 Expected distribution Observed distribution StefanowitschA. & S. Gries. 2003. Collostructions on the interaction between verbs and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics8 /2pp209-243. 2009 2 BaayenR. H. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Data A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge Cambridge University Press. 430074 1037 陈 家 刚 ) A Review of Quantitative Corpus Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction by LEI Lei & PAN Fan Abstract: This article is a review of Quantitative Corpus Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction by Stephan Gries. The book under review is the first monograph that gives a systematic introduction to the use of the R language in quantitative corpus linguistic research. From the methodological perspective,it is particularly significant for the development of linguistics or corpus linguistics. Limitations of the book are also discussed in this article. Key words: quantitative corpus linguistics; the R language; programming. 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 檿 9 The Design and Illustration of the EAP-Oriented Guidelines for EFL Teaching at Tertiary Level by CAI Jigang Abstract A Framework of Reference for EFL Teaching at Tertiary Level in Shanghai the first local guidelines for EFL Teaching at Tertiary Level in mainland China is being drawn up. Why is it needed as there exists a national College English Curriculum Requirements What is the major difference between the two The paper addresses these questions. Key words EFLT at tertiary level EAP-oriented guidelines syllabus design