2012.13-14 笮 - 20 [1] 1998 6% 2008 34% 1 1 2010 46.9% 76.3% 54.9% 2 1 1977-2008 [2] [3] 52.24% / 100871-65 -
[4] [10] [5] 3 [6] 2 2004 68% 2008 80% 4 2005 1333 2007 1734 2008 1647 2 2004-2008 5 6 [7] 2009 6 9 A B 3-12 1. 2005 2. [8] 2006 100 [9] - 66 -
Levin Levy and Merry [11][12] 1. (paradigmatic change) (mission and purpose change) [20] Morley (cultural change) (change in functional processes) [21] [13][14] 2005 [22] [23] 3 [15][16] Brint and Karabel [17][18] 3 4 3 [24] [19] - 67 -
3 [25] [26] 2. [27] 1 1 A A 68 - -
2 A A A 3 6 22 4 6 4 69 - -
A B A A A B 4 45% 70 - -
A B 6 10 90% 100% 100% 5 A 71 - -
15 60 A [28] 6 72 - -
1. [29] [30][31] [32] [33] [39][40] - 2. [34][35] [36] [41] [42] [37][38] - 73 -
[43] 09&ZD058 1 1997 2009 2 2011 3 2000 6.3% 2005 11.9% 2009 4 2003 2009 5 1949 80 1989 1993 1993 6 [1][39]. [M]. : 2009. [2]Gerber, T. P., & Schaefer, D. R. Horizontal Stratification of Higher Education in Russia: Trends, Gender Differences, and labor Market Outcomes [J]. Sociology of Education, 2004.77(1): 32-59. [3],. [J].,2006,(11). [4]. 2009 [Z]. 2011. [5]. [J].,2011,(1). [6]Fan, C. C., Huang, Y., Bell, D.A., Park, A., & Brandt, L. Educated and Fearing the Future in China[J]. New York Times. 2010 4. [7][8][28][40]. [Z].2005. [9]. [Z].2006. - 74 -
[10]. [Z].2009. [11][14][34]Levin, J. S. The Revised Institution: The Community College Rmission at the end of the Twentieth Century [J]. Community College Review, 2000,(2): 1-25. [12][27]Levy, A., & Merry, U. Organizational transformation. New York: Praeger, 1986. [13] Levin, J. Organizational Paradigm Shift and the University Colleges of British Columbia. Higher Education,2003,46.447-467. [15] [33]Bailey, T., & Averianova, I. E. Multiple Missions of Community Colleges: Conflicting or Complimentary? (No. Brief No.1). Community College Research Center, 2006. [16][32]Bailey, T., & Morest, V. S. The Organizational Efficiency of Multiple Missions for Community Colleges [Z]. Community College Research Center,2004. [17][30]Brint, S. G., & Karabel, J. B.. The Diverted Dream: Community College and the Promise of Educational Opportunity in America, 1900-1985[M]. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1989; [18][31]Karabel, J. B. Community Colleges and Social Stratification: Submerged Class Conflict in American Higher Education. Harvard Education Review, 1972, (4): 521-562. [19]Bailey, T., & Averianova, I. E. Multiple Missions of Community Colleges: Conflicting or Complimentary? (No. Brief No. 1). Commu - nity College Research Center, 2006. [20]Gumport, P. "Academic Restructuring: Organizational Change and Institutional Imperatives". Higher Education, 2000,(1): 67-91. [21][24][35][41]Morley, L. "Producing New Workers: Quality, Equality and Employability in Higher Education". Quality in Higher Educa - tion, 2001,(2):131-138. [22]Knight, P. T., & Yorke, M.."Employability and Good Learning in Higher Education". Teaching in Higher Education, 2003,(1). [23][37]Kruss, G.."Employment and Employability: Expectations of Higher Education Responsiveness in South Africa". Journal of Education Policy, 2004, (6): 673-689. [25] [36]Slaughter, S., & Leslie., L. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997. [26]. [J]. 2010 1. [29]Clark, B. R. "The 'Cooling out' Function in Higher Education". American Journal of Sociology, 1960(6): 569-576. [38][42]McQuaid, R. W., & Lindsay, C. "The Concept of Employability. Urban Studies", 2005, (2): 97-219. [43]Becker, G. S. Human capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1975. Employability as a New Mission Organizational Changes in Chinese Higher Vocational Colleges Yang Po (School of Education, Beijing University, Beijing 100871) Abstract: The analysis is based a multiple-case study. The analytical framework is developed from sociology theories and organizational theories. This study argues that vocational colleges in China have been experiencing substantial transformations. At the macro-level, influenced by the neo-liberal arguments for globalization, they have been transforming from social institu - tions to industries, with cultivating employability as their new mission. At the micro-level, under the influence of the new mis - sion, there have been considerable changes in program goal, program development, curriculum development, dominant pedagogy, faculty development, and internal management. These changes fit the rhetoric of the employability as core competency, as well as the impact-reaction model for organizational change. The implication of these changes is that Chinese vocational higher ed - ucation institutions may be degenerated to employment training organizations. Key words: employability, vocational college, institutional mission - 75 -