71/2 98.06/98.12101-123 臺灣地區資訊組織文獻書目計量分析 A Bibliometric Analysis on the Literature of Information Organization in Taiwan Chiao-Min Lin 摘要 71 97 610 60 97 113 92 Abstract The purpose of this study is to explore the characteristics of the literature on information organization in Taiwan. A total of 610 articles from 1882 to 2008 and 113 theses and dissertations from 1971 to 2008 were identified and analyzed. The growth of literature, research subjects, author productivity, the distribution of journals and organizations are addressed. The results of this study reveal that the journal articles in Taiwan had been up-growing except after 2003, but the theses and dissertations had been growing stably. The major research subject of journal articles is classification theory and descriptive cataloging, but the theses and dissertations are knowledge organization. The zone analysis from Bradford s law is not applicable to journal productivity. Productivity is mainly focused on single author and toward coauthor. The Journal of Educational Media and Library Sciences is the major journal that publishes information organization articles. The National Taiwan University is the most productive schools of theses and dissertations, but various schools have their characteristics of research subjects. Keywords: Bibliometrics; Information Organization; Classification and Cataloging; Literature Growth; Bradford s Law (Assistant Professor, Graduate Institute of Library, Information and Archival Studies, National Chengchi University) 101
7 1/2 98.06/98.12 壹 前言 metadata92 3 If I have seen farther than others, it is because I was standing on the shoulders of giants 1969A. Pritchard bibliometrics 貳 文獻探討 ( ) 102
103 1996 9 1997 20069 2246 6 metadata 96
7 1/2 98.06/98.12 descriptive bibliometrics evaluative bibliometrics Narin, Olivastro, & Stevens, 1994 1. 2. 3. 4. ( ) 2001 L I S A Library and Information Science Abstracts 15,842 75% 2001 2002 OPAC 77.82%8 2002 2005 L I S A 1491metadata 2005 2006LISA information literacy 104
2006 2006 1,746 311 8 Excel SPSS 8 2006 2007L I S A ERIC1992-2005 1,982 2007 1970 1974(Gail Schlachter) (D. Thomison)1925-1972 660 44% Chicago Michigan Columbia Illinois Case Western Reserve RutgersSchlachter & Thomison, 1974 1980 John N. Olsgaard & Jane K. Olsgaard College and Research Libraries Library Journal Library Quarterly Library Trends RQ 32.6% 84% 28.1% 26.9% Olsgaard & Olsgaard, 1980 1987 (P. E. Feehan)1984 91 2,869 50.5% Feehan, Gragg, Havener, & Kester, 1987 1988 S. Z. Atkins 9 1975-1984 105
7 1/2 98.06/98.12 Atkins, 1988 2005 Mari Davis DIALOG 1973-2004 1,388 1985 1991 2004 Scientometrics Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Journal of Information Science Journal of the Medical Library Association Information Processing and Management Journal of Documentation 1970 1980 1990 Davis, Wilson, & Horn, 2005 參 研究方法與過程 ( ) http://readopac.ncl.edu. tw/ncl3web 1970 1945 5 1980 106
711982 023.3023.4 610 ( ) http://etds.ncl.edu. tw/theabs/index.jsp 45-97 843 113 61 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 107
7 1/2 98.06/98.12 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. metadata 13. EXCEL EXCEL 肆 研究結果與分析 ( ) 71 97610 1. 7197 90 80 92 74 8239 80 108
88 chaos 1997150 80 2. 71 97 70 80 70 80 71 14 14 85 38 365 72 10 24 86 24 389 73 7 31 87 29 418 74 18 49 88 42 460 75 26 75 89 25 485 76 30 105 90 33 518 77 24 129 91 32 550 78 32 161 92 14 564 79 17 178 93 9 573 80 22 200 94 9 582 81 27 227 95 8 590 82 39 266 96 12 602 83 32 298 97 8 610 84 29 327 109
7 1/2 98.06/98.12 7 0 80 80 90 3. 61022 588 (1) 588 310 28 1 27 1 310 71.9%1 47.1% 13.9% (2) 588310 87.8% 8.5% 110
71-80 81-90 91-97 17 15 6 38 34 37 9 80 9 12 10 31 42 44 14 100 19 20 6 45 14 23 5 42 19 17 36 17 48 7 72 3 8 3 14 4 13 9 26 22 35 1 58 45 17 62 1 5 6 200 318 92 610 3.1% 0.6% 22588 701.180 1.1690 1.39 1 (3) 28 27 14 13 13 9 8 8 7 7 111
7 1/2 98.06/98.12 % % 28 1 1 0.3 28 4.8 27 1 2 0.6 55 9.4 14 2 4 1.3 83 14.1 13 2 6 1.9 109 18.5 9 1 7 2.3 118 20.1 8 2 9 2.9 134 22.8 7 2 11 3.5 148 25.2 6 6 17 5.5 184 31.3 5 3 20 6.5 199 33.8 4 9 29 9.4 235 40.0 3 14 43 13.9 277 47.1 2 44 87 28.1 365 62.1 1 223 310 100 588 100 22 % 516 87.8 50 8.5 18 3.1 4 0.6 588 100 71-80 1.10 193 213 81-90 1.16 303 350 91-97 1.39 92 128 112
1 28 2 27 3 4 14 14 13 13 5 9 6 8 8 7 7 7 4. 610 70 5 1 59 7 70 4 1155 4 11 55 1 a a 2 31 44.3% 28.6% 80.3% 113
7 1/2 98.06/98.12 % % 59 1 1 1.4 59 9.7 54 1 2 2.9 113 18.5 52 1 3 4.3 165 27 49 1 4 5.7 214 35.1 30 1 5 7.1 244 40 28 1 6 8.6 272 44.6 25 1 7 10 297 48.7 21 1 8 11.4 318 52.1 20 1 9 12.9 338 55.4 18 2 11 15.7 374 61.3 15 1 12 17.1 389 63.8 14 3 15 21.4 431 70.7 13 2 17 24.3 457 74.9 12 2 19 27.1 481 78.9 9 1 20 28.6 490 80.3 8 3 23 32.9 514 84.3 7 2 25 35.7 528 86.6 6 2 27 38.6 540 88.5 5 2 29 41.4 550 90.2 4 2 31 44.3 558 91.5 3 5 36 51.4 573 93.9 2 3 39 55.7 579 94.9 1 31 70 100 610 100 114
115 10 8 59 54 52 49 30 28 25 21 20 18 ( ) 60 97 113 1. 85 95 96 97 97 59 54 52 49 30 28 25 21 20 18
7 1/2 98.06/98.12 61 1 1 81 1 16 62 2 3 82 3 19 63 0 3 83 1 20 64 0 3 84 4 24 65 0 3 85 2 26 66 0 3 86 5 31 67 0 3 87 6 37 68 2 5 88 4 41 69 0 5 89 10 51 70 0 5 90 5 56 71 2 7 91 5 61 72 1 8 92 9 70 73 2 10 93 7 77 76 1 11 94 6 83 77 1 12 95 16 99 78 1 13 96 11 110 79 1 14 97 3 113 80 1 15 116
97 81 9597 2. 90 20 3. 61-70 71-80 81-90 91-97 1 3 3 5 12 2 2 1 3 8 1 4 4 9 1 2 4 3 10 2 2 3 1 4 1 1 2 2 3 3 8 3 3 6 2 5 7 1 7 2 10 6 9 15 2 18 20 5 10 41 57 113 117
7 1/2 98.06/98.12 2 1 3 5 1 12 3 3 2 8 1 2 1 4 1 9 1 1 3 4 1 10 1 1 2 1 2 1 4 1 1 2 1 1 2 4 8 1 1 2 2 6 4 1 2 7 4 5 1 10 4 5 3 1 2 15 1 1 3 5 5 5 20 1 7 1 14 23 23 33 11 113 3323 118
伍 結論 7197 6097 ( ) 80 90 7197 90 80 92 90 80 ( ) 71 97 70 80 80 90 ( ) 28 71.9% 1 119
7 1/2 98.06/98.12 47.1% 13.9% 87.8% 70 1.1 90 1.39 ( ) 28 27 10 ( ) 610 70 70 4 11 55 1 a a 2 28.6% 80.3% ( ) 85 9597 3323 ( ) 90 120
參考書目 Yu, Hui-Min 2001 A Bibliometric Study of Indexing and Abstracting, 1977-2000 B u l l e t i n o f t h e Library Association of China 67 121-138 Wang, Mei-Ling96 Metadata Cataloging and Metadata Education in Taiwan Library and Information Science Programs Journal of Library & Information Science 33 1 103-122 Wu, Ming-Der 1997 [Fen lei bian mu jiao cai bian zuan ji hua yan jiu] TaipeiMinistry of Education Chen, Ho-Chin 92 Information Organization Lujou, Taipei National Open University Chen, Ya NingChen, Shu-Jun 2005Metadata An Analysis of Metadata Research and Application Development in LIS Based on a Hybrid Approach of Quantity and QualityBulletin of 121
7 1/2 98.06/98.12 Library and Information Science 55 51-77 Tsay, Ming-Yueh 1997 Literature Growth Models Bulletin of the Library Association of China 59 135-153 Tsay, Ming-YuehFang, Bih- Ling 2006 A Bibliometric Analysis on the Literature of Information Literacy Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences 44 2 133-152 Tsay, Ming-YuehHung, Shih- Fang 2002OPAC A Bibliometric Study of Online Public Access Catalog Literature University Library Quarterly 6 115-38 Ts a y, M i n g-yu e hl i o u, Chiung-Fang 20071992-2005 A Study of Informetric Research and Its Development, 1992-2005Bulletin of Library and Information Science 61 42-56 Ouyang, James C. Kuan, ChungTung, Chiung-Huei Shiue, Jr-Feng 2006 The Status Quo of Library and Information Science Research in Taiwan: A Meta-Analysis of Journal Articles and Dissertations/Theses Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences 43 4389-411 Atkins, S. Z. (1988). Subject Trends in Library and Information Science Research, 1975-1984. Library Trends, 36, 633-658. Davis, M., Wilson, C. S., and Horn, A. (2005). Information Decision-Making in Libraries: Informetric Research as Input to LIS Education and Practice. Australian academic and research libraries, 36(4), 195-214. Feehan, P. E., Gragg II, W. L., Havener, W. M., & Kester, D. D. (1987). Library and Information Science Research : An Analysis of the 1984 Journal Literature. Library and Information Science Research, 9, 173-185. Narin, F., Olivastro, D., & Stevens, K. A. (1994). Bibliometrics Theory, Practice and Problems. Evaluation Review, 18(1), 65-66. Olsgaard, J. N., & Olsgaard, J. K. (1980). Authorship in five library periodicals. 122
College & Research Libraries, 41, 49-53. Schlachter, G., & Thomison, D. (1974). The Library Science Doctorate: A Quantitative Analysis of Dissertations and Recipients. Journal of Education for Librarianship, 15, 95-111. 98 9 6 98 10 30 123
1. 2. http://jlis.lis.ntu.edu.tw http://ntur.lib. ntu.edu.tw 3. E-mail 4. APA Style 5. 6. 7. 8. Wordemail jlis@mail.lis.ntu.edu.tw 106171 02-3366-2955 02-2363-2859