452 ( ) 31 1 Table 1 CSR evaluation index system for labor relations in China F F 1 L 1 L 2 L 3 L 4 L 5 L 6 L 7 L 8 L , F 2 L 10 L 11 F 3 F 4

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "452 ( ) 31 1 Table 1 CSR evaluation index system for labor relations in China F F 1 L 1 L 2 L 3 L 4 L 5 L 6 L 7 L 8 L , F 2 L 10 L 11 F 3 F 4"

乖邬
7 years ago
Views:

1 ( ) Journal of Nort heastern University (Nat ural Science) Vol131,No. 3 Mar SEM,,, (, ) :,, ,, ;, : ;;; ; : C 931 : A : (2010) SEM2Based Evaluation of Corporate Social Responsibility f or Labor Relations in China ZHA N G L an2xia, W U Xiao2kang, CH EN Tao, PU Yong2qi ng (School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang , China. Correspondent : ZHAN G Lan2xia, E2mail : mail. neu. edu. cn) Abstract : Based on the recent researches, an evaluation index system was formulated to CSR for the labor relations in China via interviews and questionaire or other ways, including 2 first2level, 11 second2level and 52 third2level indexes. The index system was composed of two parts, i. e., the CSR based on explicit contract and that on implicit contract. Then, a CSR evaluation model was developed for China s labor relations on the basis of SEM, by which the CSR performance of labor relations was evaluated for three Chinese firms, i. e., the Northeast Electric Power Co., Neusoft Group and Baosteel Group, t hus showing t he effectiveness of t he evaluation index system. Key words : corporate social responsibilit y ( CSR) ; labor relations ; cont ract t heory ; stakeholder theory ; structural equation model (SEM), [1-4 ],,,,,, SEM ( ) [5-6 ], 1,, ( 1) : : (2007BJ Y050) : ( ),,,,

2 452 ( ) 31 1 Table 1 CSR evaluation index system for labor relations in China F F 1 L 1 L 2 L 3 L 4 L 5 L 6 L 7 L 8 L , F 2 L 10 L 11 F 3 F 4 F 5 L 12 L 13 L 14 L 15 L 16 L 17 L 18 L 19 L 20 L 21 L 22 L 23 L h 1 d 7, F 6 L X 1 X 2 X 3 X 4 X 5 X 6 X 7 X 8 X 9 X 10 X 11 X 12 X 13 X 14 X 15 X 16 X 17 X 18 X 19 X 20 ( ) ( ) X 21 4 X 22 5 X 23 X 24 X 25 X 26 X 27

3 3 : SEM ,, ;,, 2. 2, ,, ( 1) 1 Fig. 1 Path diagram of implicit indexe s in SEM ) : 2) : X = x + ; (1) = + + (2) ( = 0),, (2) : = + (3) 1 2 = ( ) 3 + (4) t

4 454 ( ) 31 : t ( p + q) ( p + q + 1) / 2 (5) : p ; q ; t (5), ( 2), 2 Fig. 2 Parameter e stimation of implicit indexe s in SEM 2. 5, 22,, L ISREL8170, M A 2 Table 2 Comparison of fitting indexe s between uncorrected and corrected models 2 df 2 / df GFI NNFI CFI RMSEA M A M B M C X 10 X 10 1 < 3 > 0. 9 > 0. 9 > 0. 9 < ,,,

5 第3期张兰霞等 : 基于 SEM 的我国劳动关系层面企业社会责任评价 455 的构建得以完成 ( 见图 3) 图 3 我国劳动关系层面企业社会责任的最终评价模型 Fig. 3 Final SEM of CSR for labor relations in China 3 F1 = 0104 L L L 3 + 综合评价得分 0101 L L L 6 + 由于文中我国劳动关系层面企业社会责任评价指标体系分为显性层面指标和隐性层面指标, 因此在评价企业社会责任时分别对显性层面指标和隐性层面指标进行打分,最后得出综合得分在对显性层面指标打分时, 考虑到相关法律法规的权威性和不可侵犯性, 参评企业满足该项指标得 0101 L L L 9, ( 9) 依此可分别得到 F2 F6 的计算公式 ξ1 = 0174 X X X X X X 7, ( 10 ) 依此可分别得到 ξ2 ξ5 的计算公式应用实例分为 1,不满足该项指标得分为 0 在对隐性层面指标打分时,采取五级量表从好到坏依次打分,最 4 好为 5 分,最差为 1 分其计算式为北电网东软集团宝钢集团进行应用研究笔者 F总 = F显 + F隐, ( 6) 于 2008 年 6 月先后对东北电网的 127 名员工东 F显 = F1 + F2 + F3 + F4 + F5 + F6, ( 7) 软集团的 178 名员工和宝钢集团的 120 名员工进 F隐 = 0164ξ ξ ξ ξ ξ5 其中, 依据资料的可得性和代表性, 本文选取了东行了抽样调查, 在进行了信度效度检验后, 将其按 ( 8) 步骤应用到模型中, 最后得到三家企业的综合得分 ( 见表 3) 可见, 尽管三家企业在履行劳动关系

6 456 ( ) 31,,, 3 Table 3 Integrated score s of Northeast Electric Power Co., Neusoft Group and Baosteel Group ,,,,,, : [ 1 ] Jones P, Comfort D, Hillier D. Corporate social responsibility and the U K s top ten retailers[j ]. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 2005, 33 ( 12) : [ 2 ] Jenkins H. Corporate social responsibility and the mining industry: conflicts and constructs [ J ]. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2004, 11 (1) : [ 3 ] Carroll A B, Buchholtz A K. Business and society : ethics and stakeholder management [ M ]. Cincinnati : South2Western College Publishing House, 2000 : [ 4 ] Pavel C, Michaela A B, Christopher J B, et al. How can SEMs effectively implement the CSR agenda? a U K case study perspective [ J ]. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2004,11 (3) : [ 5 ], [J ], 2006 (20) :56-57 ( Yang Shu2hong, Xie Xiang2sheng. Application of structural equation model in enterprise employees performance evaluation[j ]. Market Modernization, 2006 (20) : ) [ 6 ],, [ M ] :, 2005 : ( Hou Jie2tai, Wen Zhong2lin, Cheng Zi2juan. Structural equation model and its application [ M ]. Beijing : Educational Science Publishing House, 2005 : ) ( 450 ) ( Han Min, Sun Zhao2xu, Qiu Wan2hua, et al. The EL ECTRE method based on the stochastic dominance relation [ J ]. S ystem Engineering, 2006, 24 ( 5 ) : ) [ 4 ] Zaras K. Rough approximation of a preference relation by a multi2attribute stochastic dominance for determinist and stochastic evaluation problems [ J ]. Operational Research, 2001,130 (2) : European Journal of [ 5 ] Zaras K. Rough approximation of a preference relation by a multi2attribute dominance for determinist, stochastic and fuzzy decision problems [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004,159 (1) : [ 6 ] Nowak M. INSDECM an interactive procedure for stochastic multicriteria decision problems [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 175 ( 3) : [ 7 ] Nowak M. Aspiration level approach in stochastic MCDM problems[j ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007,177 (3) : [ 8 ] Risto L, Joonas H, Pekka S. SMAA stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis[j ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1998,106 (1) : [ 9 ] Risto L, Pekka S. SMAA22 : stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for group decision making [ J ]. Operational Research, 2001,49 (3) : [ 10 ] Keyser W D, Peeters P. A note on the use of PROMETHEE multicriteria methods[j ]. Research, 1996,89 (3) : European Journal of Operational

Microsoft Word - A201202-493_1329751213.doc

Microsoft Word - A201202-493_1329751213.doc 5 10 15 20 25 BP 神经网络在中国创业板企业成长性预测研究 ** 孙静稳, 刘金平 ( 中国矿业大学管理学院, 江苏徐州 221116) 摘要 : 根据创业板企业的高科技和高成长性特点, 成为金融证券市场热门关注的对象, 其成长性研究是资本