( 329 ) 3 ( 5 ), ( 5 ) ( ) (65, 645 ), 10, 632, 1. 9, 2. 4,, ;,, :,, ;,,, Zipf Zipf,, (, 1980;, 1985;, 1989; Nunberg, 1995; Pustejovsky and Bog

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "( 329 ) 3 ( 5 ), ( 5 ) ( ) (65, 645 ), 10, 632, 1. 9, 2. 4,, ;,, :,, ;,,, Zipf Zipf,, (, 1980;, 1985;, 1989; Nunberg, 1995; Pustejovsky and Bog"

彪老柴
5 years ago
Views:

1 ( 329 ) 3 ( 5 ), ( 5 ) ( ) (65, 645 ), 10, 632, 1. 9, 2. 4,, ;,, :,, ;,,, Zipf Zipf,, (, 1980;, 1985;, 1989; Nunberg, 1995; Pustejovsky and Boguraev, 1996; Langacker, 1999; Ravin and Leacock, 2000;, 1997;, 2004;, 2007; Kintsch, 2007)????, ( 5 ) ( 10, 632 ), 5,,,,,, 5, 000,, , 3 (AcRF2Tier 1, WBS No. R ),, 120

2 , 65, 463, 182, 65, 645 :, ;,,,,,, 5, 82% (53, 623 ), 18% (11, 840 ) : (1) (5, 334 ), : ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (2) (15 ) : :,, 2, 2,,, 3 ( ), 4 ( ), (3) (6, 457 ), : (4) (34 ), :,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, , 623,, : (1), 41, 340 ( 77% ) : ; :, : (2), 12, 283, 23%,,, (, 2001),, : (1) (2) : 1,, ; 2,,, ( ),

3 ( lexicalize) (, 1996;, 2001;, 2007),, 5 :,,,,, 5,, 2, 3 : a) + ( ) (1, 198 ) : (1) ( ) : (2) : (3), : (4), : 4, 1, 3, b) + (446 ) : (1) (2) (Ch ny ),,, 2, : (1), :, (2) : (3) (Qu n) 3, 1, ; 2, 3,,, 1 c) + / / (10, 632 ) : ( ) (1) : (2) ( ) ; ( ) :, (1) : ( 2) : (3) : (4) ( S ng) 4, 1 ( ), 3, 2. 3 (65, 645) : 1) (12, 022 ), (53, 623 ) ; 2) (41, 340 ), (12, 283 ) ; 3) + ( 2a, 1, 198 ), (11, 085 ) ; 4) + (2b, 446 ) ; 5), (2c ), 10, 632, ( ), ( ),, 122

4 , 632, 25, 015, 2. 4, ( ), : (1) ( 2) : ( 3) : (4) : (5) ; : (6) ( ) : (7) : 7, 1 6,, 5, , 632, 1,, 2 ( 8, 403, 79% ), : (1) : (2) : 3, 1, 498, 14% : (1) ; : (2) ; :, (3) ; : 4, 393, 317%, : (1) ( ) : (2) : (3) : (4) ( ), :

5 5,, 338, 313% 10, 23 ( ) : , 24 : 1 (1) : (2) : (3) ; : (4) : (5) ; : (6) ( ) : (7) : (8) : (9) : (10) ; ; : (11) ; : (12) ; : (13) ; : ( 14) ( ) : (15) : (16) : (17) : (18) ( ) : (19) : (20) ; : (21) ; : (22) : (23) : ( hu ngr) (24) : , 632, 1, 4, 119 1,, 8, 482, 7918% ;, 1, 660, 1516% ;, 9514%, 462, 413% ;, 28, 013% , % 2 8, % % % 10, %,,, ( 2) 3. 2, 24, , 8, : (1) ; :, (2) ; :, (3) ; :, (4) : (5) ( ) :, (6) : (7) ( ) ; :,, (8) : 2. 1, 4, : 124 ( ) (1) : (2) :, (3) ( ) :,

6 , (4) ; : 2 : (1), (2), 1, ( 2) : 8, 4, 2, 4 1,, 2 / 1 24 / / / /2 1,, :, 3 ( ), 2, 85%, , 1178; (73% ),, 4, 1146;, 55% 5,, 68%,, 1132,, 9,, 1, :, ;,,??,,

7 , 2005, 15,, 5, 000 (, 2005), 10, 632, 973 ( ), 9, 659, 18, 839, 637, 1, 950,, 1, ( 213 ), 1 ( de), 1, 737, , 15 ( ) : 1 ( le) ( h ) 2, : , ; 10, ; (10 999), 3, ( 6318% ) ( ) ;, 1514% 2018% % 63. 8% 20. 8% % 4, : 126

8 ( ) :, 4,,, (2006), (,, 1986) 8, 441, ,

9 5,,,, 0 9, 5 ; , :,, 2, 10%, 9, ( ) :,,, ,, 14, 7, 3 ( ) , :,, ;,, 4. 2,,,,, ;,, ( delexicalization),, ( Stubbs, 2001),, (, 1983 ),,,, 1932, ( Zipf),,, frequently occurring words tend to be polysemous ( Zipf, 1932), Zipf, Leacock and Chodorow (1998) (B rown Corpus), WordNet 86% 1, , ( the p rincip le of least effort),, ( Zipf, 1949),, Kortmann and Kgnig (1992),

10 2001, (Leech) 1 (B ritish National Corpus, BNC),, 1000 ( 8, 000 ), 95% 5% 50, (Leech, Rayson and W ilson, 2001) 100 : the, be, of, and, a, in, to, have, it, to, for, I, that, you, he, on, with, do, at, by, not, this, but, from, they, his, that, she, or, which, as, we, an, say, will, would, can, if, their, go, what, there, all, get, her, make, who, as, out, up, see, know, time, take, them, some, could, so, him, year, into, its, then, think, my, come, than, more, about, now, last, your, me, no, other, give, just, should, these, peop le, also, well, any, only, new, very, when, may, way, look, like, use, her, such, how, because, when, as, good, find,,,,,,,, ( Emergent Grammar) :,, ;,, (Bybee and Hopper, 2001),, ( 65, 645 ), 10, , 2. 4, :, ;,, 9,, 5, 000, :,, ;,, ,, ;,,, Zipf,,, 1996, 2004 ( 2 ), 1989, 2007, , 2 129

11 1997, 1980, 2004, 1983, 2006 ( 5 ), , , ( ), 2001, , V + N, 3 Bybee, Joan and Paul Hopper ( eds. ) 2001 F requency and the Em ergence of L inguistic S tructure. Am sterdam: John Benjam ins. Kintsch, W alter 2007 Meaning in context. In Thomas K. Landauer, Danielle S. McNamara, Simon Dennis, W alter Kintsch ( eds. ), Handbook of Latent Sem antic A nalysis. NewYork: Psychology Press. Kortmann, Bernd and Ekkehard Kgnig 1992 Categorial reanalysis: the case of deverbal p repositions. L inguistics. 30: Langacker, W. Ronald 1999 Gramm ar and Conceptualization. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Leacock, Claudia and Martin Chodorow 1998 Combining local context with WordNet sim ilarity for word sense identification. In Christiane Fellbaum ( eds. ), W ordn et: A L exical Reference System and its A pplication, Cambridge, MA: M IT Press. Leech, Geoffrey, Paul Edward Raysonand and Andrew W ilson 2001 W ord Frequencies in W ritten and Spoken English: B ased on the B ritish N ational Corpus. London: Longman. Nunberg, Geoffrey 1995 Transfers of meaning. Journal of Sem antics, (12) : Pustejovsky, James and B ranim ir Boguraev ( eds. ) 1996 Lexical Sem antics: The Problem of Polysem y. Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press. Ravin, Yael and Claudia Leacock ( eds. ) 2000 Polysem y: Theoretical and Com putational A pproaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Stubbs, M ichael 2001 W ords and Phrases: Corpus S tudies of Lexical Sem antics. Oxford; Malden, MA: B lackwell Publishers. Zipf, George Kingsley 1932 Selected S tudies of the Principle of Relative Frequency in Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press Hum an B ehavior and the Principle of L east Effort: A n Introduction to Hum an Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Addison W esley Press. ( ) 130

12 ZHO NGGUO YUW EN S TUD IES O F THE CH IN ES E LAN GUAG E March, 2009 Abstracts of M a jor Papers in Th is Issue L I Yafe i, Ch inese loca lizers: gramma tica l na ture and theoretica l sign if icance This paper argues that ( a) Chinese localizers form a class deviating from nouns, w ith the sim ilarities and differences determ ined by the Princip le of Economy; ( b) treating localizers as clitics, though correct for certain members of the class, fails to p rovide an exp lanation for the different syntactic behaviors between localizers and nouns; ( c ) the locative p reposition za i ( ) is best analyzed as a light P that takes a localizer phrase as comp lement. Key words: localizer, noun, p re /postposition, clitic, case, the Princip le of Economy, categorical deviation, L IU Tanzhou, light P The phenom enon of unerga tive in tran sitive verbs tak ing objects This paper suggests that Chinese unergative intransitive verbs can take objects in the construction which highlights the sense of quantity2counting, and the decisive licensing condition of this construction is that the object of the unergative intransitive verb should be a quantifier phrase. and unergative verbs obviously. This usage conflicts w ith the syntactic differences between unaccusative verbs It p roposes that so2called unaccusative verb construction and unergative verb construction in Chinese share the same syntactic structure and derivation, while the quantifierπs sentence2final focalizing and its moving to the specifier of FocusP are key step s of the derivation. Key words: unergative intransitive verbs, unaccusative verbs, quantifier phrase, FocusP, sentence2final focalization W ANG Hu i, Polysem ous words: m ean ing, length and frequency This paper analyzes 10, 632 Chinese polysemous words extracted from The Con tem pora ry Ch inese D ictiona ry ( the Fifth Edition). It show s a strong correlation between the quantity of word meanings and the frequency of the word. H igh2frequency words tend to possess more meanings than low2frequency ones. On the other hand, high2frequency words also p rove the shortest and simp lest. These parameters follow the pattern p redicated by Zipfπs Principal of Least Effort. frequency in Chinese. It is hoped that the results of this study w ill impel in2dep th investigations of word Key words: polysemous words, word frequency, word meaning, word length, HO U Ru ifen, B ieshuo ( ) and b ieti ( ) Zipfπs law In Modern Chinese, both bieshuo ( ) and bieti ( ) have their discourse functions

(2002),,,, 2.,, (2007), ( ), : + + +, + ( ) + ( ), : + : (1),,,, ;, ( ) (2),, ( ) (3),,,,,,,,, ( ) + : (4), ( ) (5) ( ) (6),, ( ) +, +,, + : (7

(2002),,,, 2.,, (2007), ( ), : + + +, + ( ) + ( ), : + : (1),,,, ;, ( ) (2),, ( ) (3),,,,,,,,, ( ) + : (4), ( ) (5) ( ) (6),, ( ) +, +,, + : (7 ( 332 ) 3, 1. (, 2002),, ( 2002, )?,,,,,,, ( non2grammatical) ( grammatical), ( non2lexical) ( lexical), ( ),, ( grammaticalize /grammaticalization ) ( lexicalize / lexicalization) ( grammatical) ( lexical)