3 :,, ( ) ( ),,,,,, 2007, : ( ),, 3 7,,,,, : (UGC) ( :PolyU2099Π02H), ( :A - PA1S & A - PA5K), : Scales & Streeter,2003 ; Lohmann &Lohmann,2005 ; Ginsberg, 1976 ;Martinez2Brawley,1981 ; Collier, 2006 174
:, (suburb),, ;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 50 60,,,,,,,,, 1908 20 30 20 50, 20 60,,, 175
2008. 6 (,2005) 1976 ( Ginsberg,1976) 20 80 90,, : (1) ; (2) ; (3) ; (4) ; (4) (rurban) (,2005) : (1),, (2) 20 90,, ( ) (,2005), : (1) ( 24 ) ; (2), ; (3) ; (4) (,2005), ( ) (lack perspective), ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 176
,,,,,, 1923,,,,, 4 80 %,,,, :, ;, ;, ;,,,, (,2000),, (, 2000),,,,, ( ),, NGO NGO,,, ;,,, ; ;,, 177
2008. 6,,,, 300,,!,!, ( ),,,,, NGO, ( ),,,,,,,,,, ( ), ( social network) (social capital) (assets) (capacity) ( Kretzman & Mcknight, 1993), ( assets building),, ( Kretzman & Mcknight,1993) 178
(Michael Sherraden), (Sherraden,1991 ; Guo, et al., 2008),,,, (capacity inventory) (Snow, 2001),,,, ( ) (Saleebey,2004), : :,,,,,,,,, : ( ), (Saleebey,2004) : (1) (empowerment) (Barbara Levy Simon) : ; ; ; ; ( Simon, 1994, Saleebey, 2004 ) ( 2 ) (membership),,,,,, 179
2008. 6,, (3) (resilience), (4) (dialogue and cooperation), (Saleebey,2004), ( ) ;, (,, ) ;, ; ; (Saleebey,2004),20 90, :,,,, (Benson,1997 ;Mcknight,1997, Saleebey,2004),,, (Saleebey,2004) ( ) 2007, 1. 7,, 2001 3,, 180
,,,, 347,1469, 80 % 8 ( ), 6,, ( ),,,,,,,,,, ; ;,,, 20 4-6 2000 8, 62 285 ; 2002, 16 44,,,,,, ( ) ( ),, ( ) 7,,,,, 181
2008. 6, 7,,,,,,,, ; ( ),,,, (2008 400 ), ;, ( ), ( ),,,,,,, ( ),,,,,,,,,,, 2006,, 2.,,, :,2007 ; (2007) 182
,, ( ),,,,,,,,,,,,,, 1978,,,,,,?,,,, ;,, ( ),?,, 1, 1,,,,,?, 183
2008. 6 1,,,,,, ( ),, ;,,,,,,,,,,,,, 184
,,,,,, ( 2) 2,,, ( ), ( Kretzman & Mcknight, 1993),,,?,,,,,, 185
2008. 6, ( ),,,,,,,,, ( ) ( ),,,,,,,,,,, ( ),, :,, ( ) ;,,,, ( ) ( ), 7,,,,,,,,, 186
3. ( 2), : (1),, ( ) (2),,,, ;, (3),,,,,,, : (1),,, ; (2),, ; (3),,,, ; (4),,,,,,,,, ;,,,,, :, 187
2008. 6,, ( ),, 2007 2,, ( 300,1100 ),,, ( ), : (1) 2007 7 11-12, 13 ( ),,,,, (2) 2007 7 21-22 15,, (3) 2007 10 27,,, 4 30 50,,,,, 6171,,,,,,,,, 188
(4),, 2007 11 24,,, 800,,,, 7,,, 2007 2,4,,,,,,, 5, ( ), ( ),,,, 200, 8,,,,,,,,,,,,, ( ),,,, 5,,,,, 189
2008. 6,,,,, ( ),,,,,,,,,,,,,, ( ), 267, 403, 216 Π, :403 216 Π - 267 = 78113 ;,, 272, 6136 Π, :272 6136 = 1730,,,,,, ( ),, ( ), ( ),???, 190
,, (,2008),,, ( ),,,,,,,,,, 2007 11 24, : (1) ; ;, ; (2) 10, 10 27,,,,, ;,,, 1000,,,,,,,, 191
2008. 6,,,,,,,, ( ),,,, ;,,, ;,,, (paradigm shift),,,,,,, ( ) ( ),,, ( ),,,,,,, 192
:,O. L. W.,2005, ( 9 ),, :,2004,,, :,2000,, :,2007,, :,2008, :, 2 21,2000,,,, : Benson,P1 L11997, All Kids Are Our Kids : What Communities Must Do to Raise Caring and Responsible Children and Adolescents. San Francisco : Jossey2Bass. Collier, K. 2006, Social Work With Rural Peoples. Vancouver : New Star Books. Ginsberg, L. H. ( ed. ) 1976, Social Work in Rural Communities : A Book of Readings. New York : Council on Social Work Education. Guo, B., J. Huang, L. Zou &M. Sherraden 2008, Asset2based Policy in Rural China : An Innovation in the Retirement Social Insurance Programme. China Journal of Social Work 1. Kretzman,J. P. & J. L. Mcknight 1993, Building Communities from the Inside Out. Evanston, IL : Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University. Lohmann, N. & R. A. Lohmann 2005, Rural Social Work Practice. New York : Columbia University Press. Martinez2Brawley, E. E. 1981, Seven Decades of Rural Social Work : From Country Life Commission to Rural Caucus. Westport CT: Praeger Publishers. Saleebey,D. (ed. ) 2004, The Strengths Perspective in Social Work Practice. Boston, MA : Allyn and Bacon. Scales, T. L. & C. L. Streeter 2003, Rural Social Work : Building and Sustaining Community Assets. Belmont, CA : Thomson Learning. Sherraden, M. 1991, Assets and the Poor : A New American Welfare Policy. Armonk, N. Y. : M. E. Sharpe. Snow, L. K. 2001, The Organization of Hope : A Workbook for Rural Asset2based Community Development. Chicago : ACTA Publications. : ( ) ( ) : 193
Strength Perspective in Rural Social Work : A practice model of capacity and assets building in rural China Zhang Heqing, Yang Xicong & Gu Xuebin 174 Abstract: Based on seven years experience of practicing rural development in Luzhai village in Yunnan province of China, the authors try to generalize a strength perspective practice model of rural social work in the context of China s economic and social development. This practice model goes beyond the debate between macro ( radical) and micro ( clinical) social work and emphasizes on developing the capacity of local people and exploring the assets of the community. In the paper, the authors first introduce the development of rural social work in western societies and then clarify two perspectives of rural social work. At the end of the paper, the authors demonstrate one of such experimentations of rural2urban alliance and fair trade in Yunnan province from 2007 to 2008. REVI EW Strong and Weak Cultural Programs : Reading J. C. Alexander s Cultural Hermeneutics Zhou Yi 194 Abstract: According to Jeffery C. Alexander s discussion of his strong and weak programs, this article summarizes a shift in cultural sociology the endeavor of cultural sociology to move from minority to main streams came about in the contexts of changing perspectives from sociology of culture to cultural sociology, and of emerging cultural trends from weak program to strong program. Through the discussion of cultural autonomy and cultural ideal types, we find that power of cultural explanation has been pushing its way from periphery to relative autonomy, and then to complete autonomy. BOOK REVI EW Adhesive Identities : Reading Fenggang Yang, Chinese Christians in America : Conversion, Assimilation, and Adhesive Identities Fang Wen 214 The Daily Life and the Real Voice of Subaltern Group : Reading Kim Won, The Female Worker 1970 : Their Anti2history Lu Heng 224 246