* 1990 2007 * 118 54 6 e-mail b95a01128@gmail.com NSC 99-2815-C-002-112-H ** 2011 2011 12 10 11 1
Igniting Beacon's Flame? Observation of Mobilizing Structure in Indigenous Movements Through Shi-Jou Tribe Anti-Demolition Protest Chun-Ta Juan Department of Sociology, National Taiwan University Abstract Indigenous movements have been spreading in different tribes during past twenty years, transforming from pan-indigenous ethic movements led by Alliance of Taiwan Aborigines into pro-tribalism and pro-indigenous nationalism after 1990 s. In recent years, power of tribes seems to congregate under the ideology of tribalism. In different movements, we can observe grassroots activists ignite beacons flame : establishing contacts between tribes, turning problems of specific tribes into common issues of whole indigenous groups, and then draw more attention. So my questions are: how does mobilizing structure in late indigenous movements be formed? And how does this mobilizing structure (organizations and social networks) function in the protests? Focusing on the mobilizing structure would help us to understand and explain the development of late indigenous movements. According to my case study on Shi-Jou Tribe Anti-Demolition Protest, which has been conducted for three years, my findings are as follows: the main activists in this homeland defense campaign of urban indigenous groups of northern Amis Tribe are not students like those who took action in Lo-Sheng Sanatorium Conservation Movement and drew public s attention owning to their student identity; rather, the activists in Shi-Jou Tribe Anti-Demolition Protest are mobilized via networks accumulated during previous indigenous movements. Most activists outside of tribes share pan-indigenous identity and are in common social networks, and young indigenous people are deeply influenced by these networks. On this basis, Shi-Jou Tribe is thus able to connect other indigenous movements, exchange information, empower each other, strengthen solidarity, and finally, call for ethnic identity. Accordingly, I emphasize on the importance of this mobilizing structure based on the unique historical context in indigenous movements. These organizations and social networks grow their complexity as indigenous movements develop and through the use of Internet, bringing about more potential in mobilizing, hence indigenous people are capable to keep transforming their discontent into social movements. Keywords Indigenous Movement, Ethnic Identity, Mobilizing Structure, Tribalism, Shi-Jou Tribe 2
2008 2 30 2 28 3 8 1980 1990 1 2008 2 28 3
1994, 2005; 1999, 2003; 2001; 2005; 2005; 2005; 2010 2008 2010 2010 2011 2008 2010 1990 2007 mobilizing structure 1983-1999 1989 Sidney Tarrow 1998 2005 Snow et al. 2004; della Porta and Diani 2006 4
2 3 1987: 61 2001: 264 1994: 22 1980 1983 1987; 2001; 2003 4 2 2004 8 7 3 2011 4 10 4 theology of liberation oppositional consciousness 5
2005: 41 2003: 108 1987 17 1994 1980 1990 2001; 2005 2001: 287 countermovement 1999 1994 1997 1998 1999 1996 5 2003 2011 5 6
1996 2006 1980 2003 1983 1993 1990 2003 1989 6 2011 1993, 2004 Tribalism 6 Liglav A-wu 7
1996 1994 1994 1996 2000: 61 7 1990 2003: 216 1995 1997 1992 1999 1998; 2003 7 1988 220 8
1999-2011 1999 9 2002 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2005 2010; 2011 2000 2005: 58 1997 2001 8 9 8 http://www.coolloud.org.tw 9
IPACT 10 11 12 13 12 51 1 51 1999 9 2007 McCarthy and Zald 1977: 1214 51 41 10 2 1999 9 9 http://www.lihpao.com 10 http://ipact.atipc.org 11 http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/hunter-motion 12 http://www.abohome.org.tw 13 collective action social movement protest event 10
2005 2 15 36 14 Sra 15 20 23 BOT 16 1999.09~2011.11 1999.09 2005.02 1999.09 0 2005.02 3 2000 6 2006 2 2001 0 2007 4 2002 2 2008 3 2003 5 2009 9 2004 2 2010 10 2005.02 0 2011.11 5 15 1 36 14 2007 http://blog.yam.com/smangus/article/11947743 15 Sra 16 2011 Sra http://61.219.160.133/index.php 11
2007: 79 2007 9 13 2007 2008 political opportunity structure Tarrow 1998: 70 legal mobilization McCann 2006: 34-35 18 17 2011 http://pnn.pts.org.tw/main/?p=32096 18 12
2008; 2010 2010 Pangcah 19 2011 http://www.88news.org/?p=14248 13
2007; 2010; 2010 20 1 2 3 4 social movement organizations, SMO 21 20 BOT 21 14
2001 1990 Staggenborg 1988; Giugni 1998 Pangcah 2005 22 Gaga framing repertoire 22 96 2092 98 7210 15
23 della Porta and Diani 2006: 132 2001: 147 2005: 113 facebook plurk twitter 1999 2007 micro-mobilization 1979 23 2011 IPACT http://ipact.atipc.org/index.php 16
Taluan 24 Lom'a 25 Niyaro' 26 1997 2009 38 150 2007 2008 3 2008 2010 Pangcah 2008 24 25 26 17
1991: 30 2011: 16-19 20 collective behavior approaches Smelser 1962; Gurr 1970 1970 resource mobilization political process Tilly 1978: 53 2007: 214-217 McCarthy and 18
Zald 1973; Tilly 1978 John McCarthy Mayer Zald professionalization resource mobilization 1960 issue entrepreneurs McCarthy and Zald 1973, 1977 conscious constituencies 2005: 93 Staggenborg 1988 Doug McAdam 1982 indigenous resources 1960 McAdam 1982: 29-35 McAdam cognitive liberation McAdam 1982: 36-50 19
Passy 2001; Lim 2008 mobilizing structure network Tarrow 1998; 2007 della Porta and Diani 2006: 115-134 Passy 2001 1 a socialization function 2 a structural-connection function 3 a decision-shaping function Roger Gould 1991, 1993 1848 1871 20
Gould structure Gould 1991: 727 Gould 1 2 Gould 3 2007: 296-302 ecology 27 1989 Zhao 1998 2007: 305-309 Gould 1991; della Porta and Diani 2006 27 Zhao 1998: 1495 21
weak tie strong tie 2008 2007 2008: 137-153 ibid 2008: 167-170 22
28 29 1997: 90-93; 2006: 2 2009 1985; 1996; 2005, 2006, 2008 28 2011 10 50,236 29,424 http://www.apc.gov.tw/ 29 23
30 2006 2007 31 32 33 70 34 35 2007 12 1 12 12 36 12 16 30 2008 1 3 31 2007 10 21 32 2010 12 11 33 2007 9 18 34 2007 TVBS 12 26 35 2007 12 27 36 2007 12 13 24
1996 mala-paliw 2010 A B C D E 25
F G 2009 37 38 2008 2008 7 4 39 2009 2010 37 38 39 2008 7 5 26
biographical background 1980 40 2008 2 30 2 28 3 8 2009 2010 8 40 2011 3 5 41 2009 12 31 27
NGO 42 2010 Pangcah 43 44 Suming 45 1999 2007 46 47 42 2010 8 7 43 2010 11 24 44 45 2008 12 31 46 2010 11 24 47 2008 28
2009 1997 29
1984 45 mama no kapah 2004 2009: 60 2008 2007: 82 2004 2008 48 2008 5 21 30
2009: 58; 2011: 102 50 51 49 2008 50 51 2010 6 6 31
2010 2007; 2007; 2007 52 2010 12 28 32
2007: 59 2010 2008 2010 33
53 2011 54 1 27 55 56 2011 3 5 patektek 35 2007 53 54 2010 12 26 55 2011 1 28 56 2009 57 2011 2 24 34
Passy 2001 35
51 1999 1980 36
37
1 1999.09~2011.11 2000 2000 2000 2003 2005 2006 2007 2009 2010 2011 2008 BOT 2006 1973~2003 2004 2010 BOT 2003 2001 2010 2000 2000 2000 2003 2004 2010 2009 2009 38
26 2010 2007 2002 2002 2002 2003 2005 BOT 2005 2008 2009 BOT 2009 Pangcah 2010 Sra 2011 2010 2007 2010 2009 2007 2007 2008 2009 1026 2002 2004 2008 2008 2009 2009 39
2010 2009 2010 2011 2011 2011 51 1999 9 IPACT 40
2005 2005 8 13 8 14 1993 2: 28-40 2004 2010 2007 2007 2011 400-445 2005 2011 1-32 2007 6: 1-18 2007 337: 79-90 1994 4: 22-38 2005 2005 8 13 8 14 2008 1999 31: 83-100 2003 95-135 41
2008 223: 66-71 2009 : 硏 1997 硏 2007 2001 25: 111-156 2009 39/40: 62-68 2001 263-310 2008 2010 461-494 1999 : 122-131 2001 23: 4-26 2000 1998 1998 11 17 19 2010 1-22 2010 2005 61-67 2004 SARS 1996 2005 2005 2005 11 11 11 42
12 1991 3 (2/3): 1-31 2010 77: 97-134 2011 2006 1980 90 1985 23: 177-193 2007 2: 141-168 200 2006 2008 2010 2008 3: 65-98 2006 2005 2005 8 13 8 14 2003 51: 85-224 2007 1987 1996 1989 21-46 43
2007 1999 34: 221-292 della Porta, Donatella and Mario Diani, 2006, Social Movements: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. Giugni, Marco G., 1998, Was It Worth the Effort? The Outcomes and Consequences of Social Movements. Annual Review of Sociology 98: 371-393. Gould, Roger V., 1991, Multiple Networks and Mobilization in the Paris Commune: 1871. American Sociological Review 56: 716-29., 1993, Collective Action and Network Structure. American Sociological Review 58: 182-96. Gurr, Ted, 1970, Why Men Rebel. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Lim, Chaeyoon, 2008, Social Networks and Political Participation: How Do Networks Matter? Social Forces 87 (2): 961-982. McAdam, Doug, 1982, Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency 1930-1970. Chicago: Chicago University Press. McCann, Michael, 2006, Law and Social Movements: Contemporary Perspectives. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 2006. 2:17-38. McCarthy, John D., and Mayer N. Zald, 1973, The Trend of Social Movements in America: Professionalization and Resource Mobilization. Morristown, N.J: General Learning Corporation., 1977, Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory. American Journal of Sociology 82 (6): 1212-41. Passy, Florence, 2001, Socialization, Connection, and The Structure/Agency Gap: A Specification of the Impact of Networks on Participation in Social Movement. Mobilization 6 (2): 173-192. Smelser, Neil J., 1962, Theory of Collective Behavior. New York: Free Press. Snow, David A., Sarah A. Soule, et al., 2004, Mapping the Terrain. Pp.3-16 in The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule and H. Krisei. Blackwell Publishing. Staggenborg, Suzanne, 1988, The Consequences of Professionalization and Formalization in the Pro-Choice Movement. American Sociological Review 53 (Aug): 585-606. Tarrow, Sidney, 1998, Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious 44
Politics, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press. Tilly, Charles, 1978, From Mobilization to Revolution. New York: Random House. Zhao, Dingxin, 1998, Ecologies of Social Movements: Student Mobilization during the 1989 Prodemocracy Movement in Beijing. American Journal of Sociology 103 (6): 1493-1529. 45