視藝評論的教育意義和價值

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "視藝評論的教育意義和價值"

绘看郝
7 years ago
Views:

2 ( )

5 (modernism)

6 强强

8 / Contextualism Freudianism and Psychoanalysis (Formalism)

9 Phenomenology Marxism Feminism

10 Semiotics sign signifier signified Structuralism Deconstruction

12 Brillo, 1964 AndyWarhol, Plywood boxes with serigraph and acrylic Boxes: 43.2 x 43.2 x 35.6 cm each National Gallery of Canada Woman Holding a Balance Vermeer, c.1664 Oil on canvas 40 x 36 cm National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC

14 Osborne (1955, 1970) Weitz (1972)

15 Broudy (1972) 啓 (enlightened cherishing) ( aesthetic communication) (Broudy, 1951, 198) (Broudy, 1951, 198)

16 Barkan(1962, 1966) & Munro(1956) Alloway(1975) Coleman (1979, 202)

17 Feldman(1973, 50) (informed talk about art) Feldman (1994)

18 -- (Wolff & Geahigan, 1997) (Wolff & Geahigan )

19 (comprehensive)

20 (art-based) (responding to art) (visual literacy) (Childers, et al., 1998; Tucker, 2002) (Feldman, 1994) (Wolf & Geahigan, 1994)

21 Danto (1981, 1982, 1992); Jeffers (2003) -- (intertextuality) -- (collaborative interpretation) -- ( )

22 ( )

23 ( )

25 ( )

26 (Hirst, 1997)

27 (Feldman, 1994) (Tucker, 2002) (technical language) (Barnet, 2000) (plausible) (coherent) ( rhetorically effective) Barnet(2000, 24)

29 (description) (a data-gathering process) (Barrett, 1994, 22) (subject matter and content)

30 -- (internal information) 1) (subject matter) (the persons, objects, places, and events in a work of art) (Barrett, 1994, 23) 2) (medium) 3) (form) (Barrett, 1994, 22) -- (external information)/ (contextual information)

31 (visual elements) (design principles) (intelligent seeing) Tucker(2002, 25) (vocabulary) (Tucker, 2002)

32 Barrett(2003) 麽 Danto(1981) Sullivan, (2005, 18)

35 Barrett(1994, 71-78) 19 (principles of interpretation) (aboutness) ( )

37 = Barrett(2003, 198)

38 (visual text) (intertextuality) (the death of the author) (Barthes, 1977) (who is an author) (Foucault, 1984) (reception theory) (Elkins, 1996)

39 1) ( ) 2) 3) ( 4) ( ) 5) ( ) 6) ( ) 7) 8) ( 9) Feldman(1994, 35)

40 (criteria) (Barrett, 1994)

41 ( ) 1) ( ) 2) ( ) 3) / ( ) 4) / ( Feldman(1994)

42 (interdisciplinary)

43 (art-based) (in art) (about art) (discourse)

46 Hirst(1997, 10) Tucker(2002, )

47 Tucker(2002, )

48 1) (well-structured) -- 2) (semi-structured) -- 3) (ill-structured) --

49 (essential questions) -- (in art) -- (about art) / (subsidiary/secondary questions) --

50 (guiding questions) -- --

51 Hirst(1997, 70-76) (comparative analysis or comparison questions) (argument or pro-con debate or argumentative questions) (organization around key ideas or key ideas on a key issue questions) (first-hand experience)

52 Hirst, (1997, 78)

53 Hirst (1997, 84-85) (focus) (integrate) (develop) (be specific) (address) (have a particular point of view)

54 Hirst(1997, 96) 1) 2) 3)

55 -- -- 覧

56 / (Guernica )

57 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 7) 8) 9)

58 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15) 16)

59 1. Barnet, S. (2000). A short guide to writing about art (6th ed.). New York: Longman. 2. Barrett, T. (1994). Criticizing art: Understanding the contemporary. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing. 3. Barrett, T. (1997). Talking about student art. Worcester, MA: Davis Publishing. 4. Barrett, T. (2003). Interpreting art: Reflecting, wondering, and responding. New York: McGraw- Hill. 5. Butler, C. (2002). Postmodernism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

60 6. Feldman, E. (1994). Practical art criticism. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. 7. Hirst, E. P. (1997). Writing about art. South Melbourne: Addison Wesley Longman. 8. Tucker, A. (2002). Visual literacy: Writing about art. New York: McGraw-Hill. 9. Wolff, T. E., & Geahigan, G. (1997). Art criticism and education. Urbana, Ill:University of Illinois Press. 10.Wolff, T. E., & Geahigan, G. (1998)

61 11. (2001) 敎 12. (2000) (2004) 敎敎 ( ) 14. (2001),

62 Thank you!

(mass media) Sturken & Cartwright (Sturken & Cartwright, 2001, pp.81-82) 1 (Barnard, 1998) Stuart Hall(1993) Jewels of the Art World 56 57

Why Shall We Need to Teach the Visual Culture? Yu-Chun CHEN John Berger(1974) (Ways of seeing) (signifier) (signified) (Hall, 1973) (mass media) Sturken & Cartwright (Sturken & Cartwright, 2001, pp.81-82)