* CO3 A 1674-2486 2011 04-0005 - 18 P. 253 * 5

1. 1949 1991 1949 1991 6

2. 7

1 2001 2 2008 8 1 2 2008 11 http / /www. rnd. ncnu. edu. tw /hdcheng /method /ways. doc

2008 / 9

disciplinary matrix 1 1. 2001 Edgar Morin 10 1 Thomas Kuhn 1969 paradigms

2001 20-21 social category 2001 17-18 2001 13 11

/ / / 2001 2. 12

2002 1 20 80 1 13

2 2 A B B C / 14

1. 3 15

3 / 20 90 / / 16

2. / 4 17

/ / 18

5 19

1 / / / 2 3. 1 2010 2 2008 20

2006 21

/ 2002.... 2010.... 2001... 2002..... 1985.... 2001.... 2010.. 6. 2006.. 5. 2008.. 1. 1991.... 2008.. 1. 22

JPA Journal of Public Administration Vol. 4 No. 4 2011 SYMPOSIUM Research Methodology Introduction Yanling He 1 Between Paradigm and Empirical Research How We Approach Social Science Inquires Yingfang Chen 5 Abstract One of the most important issues of social science research is how to discover the real substance of the knowledge avoiding the apparent gap between paradigm and empirical research. Particularly regarding social science research in China there has been a tendency to ignore the distinction between western research paradigms and Chinese social studies. It is very important to reach a common ground that encompasses western and Chinese knowledge. Social scientists assume multiple roles in social studies and should go beyond the dichotomy between paradigm and empirical research to establish valid social research methodology. The ability to recognize and solve real social problems will help improve social science research in China. Key Words Paradigm Empirical Research Social Science Subject Inquiry Role of Social Scientists The Logic Foundation of the Paradigm of Institutional Research the Differentiation of Research Object and the Thought of Analysis Fuqiang Zhu 23 Abstract It is needed to define the connotation and extensionof institution in order to establish an effective research paradigm of institution. Currently there are three main understanding on institute based on game theory game players game rules and game's equilibrium and the latter two is essential. Among them we can distinguish institute from two dimensions one is make a division between formal and informal institute because they have big difference in the trajectory of origin and the principle of formation the other 178