5 : : 37 ( ),,,, [1 ] (P193),, [2 ] (P1 ),,,?,,??, ( ), ( ) ( ) ( ),, [3 ] (P ) [4 ] (P ) [5 ] (P ) [6 ] (P ),,,, [

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "5 : : 37 ( ),,,, [1 ] (P193),, [2 ] (P1 ),,,?,,??, ( ), ( ) ( ) ( ),, [3 ] (P ) [4 ] (P ) [5 ] (P ) [6 ] (P ),,,, ["

袋乌孙
5 years ago
Views:

23 5 2005 9 ( ) Tribune of Political Science and Law (Journal of China University of Political Science and law) Vol. 23,No. 5 Sep.

1 ( ) Tribune of Political Science and Law (Journal of China University of Political Science and law) Vol. 23,No. 5 Sep : (, ) :,,, ;,,, ;,,,,, : ; ; :DF3 :A : (2005) ,,, : : (1963 ),,,, , 4,,,,,, ( ) ,, ( :, 1991, 1-5 ; :, 1991, 5 ; :, :, 1996, 104 ) 2004, 25,, :, :, 2001, 93 ; :, ; :, :, 1998, 426 ; : 90, :, 1998, 432 ; :, : 1996, 1996, 97 ; :, ; : ( ), ; : 20, ; :, ; : :, ; :, :, 2004, 355 ; :, :, 2004, 454 ; :, ; :, 2000 ; : :, http :ΠΠwww. dastu. comπinfoπbyπzflwπxzflwπ29. htm,

2 5 : : 37 ( ),,,, [1 ] (P193),, [2 ] (P1 ),,,?,,??, ( ), ( ) ( ) ( ),, [3 ] (P ) [4 ] (P ) [5 ] (P ) [6 ] (P ),,,, [5 ] (P1190 ) [7 ] (P1207 ) [8 ] (P1191 ) [9 ][10 ] (P16),, [11 ] (P1207 ) [12 ] (P141 ) [13 ] (P183 ) [14 ] (P182 ) [15 ] (P1664 ) [16 ] (P1217 ),,, (, 2000 ) (, 2000 ), (, 2003 ) (, 2003 ) (, 2004 ),,,,,, ;, ;,,,,,

3 38 ( ) 2005,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ( ), [17 ][5 ] (P1190 ),,?, :,,,,,, ( ),,,,,,,,,,,,,, [13 ] (P ) [12 ] (P141-65),,,,, ( ) ( ),,,, ;,

4 5 : : 39,,,,,,,, ( ),,,,,,,, [3 ] (P1181) [4 ] (P1105) [6 ] (P1175), (, ),,,,,,,,,,, ( ), ( ),, [7 ] (P ) [8 ] (P1191 ),,, [18 ] (P1195),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,?,,,,,,, ; ( [ ] J. : ( 2 ),, 2002, ),, ( :, 2003, 179 ),

5 40 ( ) 2005,, [19 ] (P1140 ),,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ( ) :,, [20 ][21 ],, [22 ],,,,,, ( ),, [23 ] (P ),, [24 ] (P186) [25 ] (P1160),,,,,,, [26] (P ) [27] (P ) [28] (P ) [29] (P ), [30] (P124),, :, ( ) :, : ( 1 ), 2003, 121 :,1983, ,, ( :, 1986, 124 )

6 5 : : 41, ( ),,,, [31 ] (P169 ),,, [32 ] (P ) [33 ] (P1165 ) [34 ] (P1132 ),, 15, [35 ] (P164-85), [17 ][5 ] (P1190 ) 1989, [36 ] (P1211 ) [37 ] (P170 ) ; 1988 [38 ] (P1150), [39 ] (P1124 ), 1989, [40 ] (P176 ) [1 ] (P193 ) [41 ] (P1248 ) [42 ] (P1114 ) [18 ] (P ) [43 ] (P1160 ),,,,,,,, ( ),,,,,, ;,,,,,, :, 1988, ,, :,, 80,, ( :, : ( ), 2005, 514 ),,,, ( ) ( 650 ),,,, ( :, ; :, ; : 7 12, ),,,, ( :, ; :, ),,, 64 2,,,?,

7 42 ( ) 2005 ( ),,, [44 ] (P1303), 2003 ( ), ( 2005 ),,,,,,, (Agency Action) ( ),,,,,,,, [21 ][22 ][45 ][46 ],,,,,, ;,, [47 ][48 ],,,,,, rule ( ) order ( ),,,,,,,,,,,, ( ), ;,, 40 1

8 5 : : 43,, ( ),, ( ),,,, ( ) : ; ; ;,,, ( ) ( ),,,,,,,, [49 ], (, ), ( 2 ), ( ),, :, ;, 1 ;,,?,,,,,,, ( ),,,,,,,,,,,,,, ;,,,,,,,,

9 44 ( ) 2005,,,,,,,,,,,,, ( ),,,, [50 ] ( ),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 1949, 30,,,,,,,

10 5 : : 45,,,,,, [ ] [1 ], 1 [M]1 :, [2 ], 1 [M]1 :, [3 ], 1 [M]1 :,19991 [4 ], 1 [M]1 :, [5 ], 1 [ Z]1 :,19911 [6 ], 1 [M]1 :,,20051 [7 ] 1 [M]1 :,20031 [8 ], 1 [M]1 :, [9 ], 1 [J ]1,2000, (3) 1 [10 ], 1 [M]1 :,19961 [11 ] [ ] 1 [M]1, 1 :,20001 [12 ] [ ] J, 1 ( 2 ) [M]1, 1 :,20021 [13 ] [ ] 1 [M]1, 1 :,19991 [14 ] [ ], 1 [ C]1, 1 :,19951 [15 ] 1 [A ]1, 1 [M]1 :,20021 [16 ] 1 [M]1 :, [17 ], 1 [J ]1,1991, (12) 1 [18 ], 1 [M]1 :,19881 [19 ] 1 [M]1 :,20021 [20 ] 1 [J ]1,1995, (3) 1 [21 ] 1 [J ]1,2003, (1) 1 [22 ], 1 [J ]1 ( ),2003, (6) 1 [23 ], 1 [M]1 :, [24 ] 1 [M]1 :, [25 ] 1 [M]1 :, [26 ], 1 [M]1 :,19851 [27 ] 1 [ M] 1 :, [28 ] 1 [M]1 :, [29 ], 1 [M]1 :,19861 [30 ] 1 [M]1 :, [31 ] 1 [M]1 :, [32 ] 1 [M]1 :,19881 [33 ], 1 [M]1 :,19901 [34 ], 1 [M]1 :,19911 [35 ], 1 [M]1 :,19881 [36 ], 1 [M]1 :,19891 [37 ], 1 [M]1 :,19891 [38 ], 1 [M]1 :,19881 [39 ], 1 [M]1 :,19891 [40 ], 1 [M]1 :,19901

11 46 ( ) 2005 [41 ] 1 [M]1 :,19921 [42 ], 1 [M]1 :,19941 [43 ], 1 [M]1 :, [44 ] 1 [M]1 :, [45 ], 1 (verwaltungsakt) [J ]1,2005, (1) 1 [46 ] 1 [J ]1 ( ),2004 (2) 1 [47 ] 1 [J ]1,1995, (1) 1 [48 ] 1 [J ]1,2000, (2) 1 [49 ] 1 [J ]1, 2003, (9) 1 [50 ] 1 [M]1 :, Classification of Administrative Action : Notion Reconstruction or Thoroughly Overhauling Ye Bi - feng (Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai ) Abstract : The literature of classification of administrative action is rather confused. To solve this problem, we only need to keep a few necessary classifications in terms of function, while bringing other large numbers of classifi2 cations into relevant principles introduction and discussion. In the sense of connotation of administrative action, no2 tion reconstruction is unnecessary for the thoroughly overhauling can well meet the need. That is, defining adminis2 trative action as the function of administrative power and to classify it level by level. In view of the system construc2 tion of administrative law, defining scope of administrative remedies is not fully decided by the classification of ad2 ministrative action. So there is no need to unduly attack the division of general administrative action and specific ad2 ministrative action. Such division mainly serves to build up the self2discipline system of legal administration. More2 over, from the perspectives of drawing Administrative Procedural Act and gathering statistics of administrative acts, it s also necessary to define administrative action as the function of administrative power and to classify it level by level. Key Words :Classification of Administrative Action ; Literature Review ; System Construction ( )

P

28 5 2010 9 Tribune of Political Science and Law Vol. 28 No. 5 Sep. 2010 1981 1982 1981 1982 5 1982 1982 1 P. 537-538 2 P. 234 1982 1980 9 10 1982 12 4 1980 9 17 1981 2 28 1981 4 1 4 20 5 1 4 1 5 1981