(5) 175-208 2003 7 queeny@mail.ntpu.edu.tw wangson@mail.ntpu.edu.tw ntpu-lo@yahoo.com.tw fang@mail.ntpu.edu.tw 25% [ ]2003/5/12; [ ]2003/6/16; [ ]2003/6/27
176 (5) 2000 A.I.D.SVIRUS Kapferer(1990 1992) Kapferer
177 (rumor) Knapp (1944) Allport and Postman (1947) Knapp(1944) Knapp Knapp Allport and Postman(1947)
178 (5) (proposition) (Rosnow 1988) Knapp, 1944; Allport and Postman, 1947; Rosnow,1977, 1988; Fiske and Taylor, 1991; DiFonzo and Bordia, 1994, 2000; Bordia and Rosnow, 1998 ) DiFonzo and Bordia (2002) (anxiety) (importance) (belief) Fiske and Taylor (1991) Pendleton (1998) Allport and Postman (1947)
179 (reduction) (accentuation) (assimilation) (action) (numbers) (sizes) Allport and Postman (1947) (the laws of forgetting) (Gestalt) Peterson and Gist (1951) Allport and Postman (1947) Peterson and Gist (1951) Kapferer (1990) Peterson and Gist Allport and Postman Allport and Postman Peterson and Gist Caplow (1947)
180 (5) Allport and Postman (1947) The Psychology of Rumor basic law of rumor) (importance) Chorus (1952) Allport and Postman (social intellect) c c (critical sense) Buckner (1965) Buckner (critical (uncritical set) set) (transmission set) (1) (2) (3) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
181 (Knapp 1944 Mizerski 1982 Herr et al. 1991 Kapferer 1990) (Face-to-Face Communic (Bordia 1998) an Communication, CMC) Bordia et al. (1999) (social context cues) Walther (1996) (hyperpersonal communication) (Waltherand 1992 Hollingshead Burgoon et al. 1993 Walther 1995 Bordia and Rosnow 1998) Rogers (1995) (interactivity) (demassifying) (mass communication) (non-linearity) (asynchronous) Rosnow (1998) Help-Net Wheelanet al. (1994)
182 (5) inclusion)(counterdependency and fight) (trust and structure) (work) (termination) Shibutani (1966) Fisher (1998) Shibutani (1966) Fisher (1998) (e-mail)
183 (http://www.ettoday.com/etrumor/index.htm) (http://urbanlegends.about.com/ http://www.snopes.com/ http://hoaxinfo.com/) 397 53 344 344 79.65% 20.35% 10.47% ( 1~36 ) 8.72% ( 37~66 ) 1.16% ( 67~70 ) 78 74 3 1 0 100 83 15 2 0
184 (5) 55 52 1 2 0 111 65 17 25 4 344 274 36 30 4 100% 79.65% 10.47% 8.72% 1.16% 1992 36 1 (2.78%) 5 (13.89%) 30 (83.33%) 9 (25%) ( 28~36 ) 9.pps 8 27 (75%) 27 7 (25.93%) 12 (44.44%) 16 (59.26%) Progesterex
185 911 C!Auto Sending Stop!0000 ( 344 ) 3 Hannah and Sternthal (1984) (th role of memory)
186 (5) 36 Peterson and Gist (1951) Chorus (1952)
187 Allport and Postman (1947) Peterson and Gist (1951) Chorus (1952) DiFonzo and Bordia (1994) (generation) (evaluation) (dissemination)
188 (5) (1992) ( ) (1992) J.N.(1990). Rumors: uses, interpretations, and images, New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. Allport, G. W. and L. J. Postman (1947). The psychology of rumor, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Bordia, P., N. DiFonzo and A. Chang (1999). Rumor as group problem solving: developing patterns in information computer mediated groups, Small Group Research 30(1), 8-28. Bordia, P. and R. L. Rosnow (1998). Rumor rest stops on the information highway, Human Communication Research 25(2), 163-179. Buckner, H. T. (1965). A theory of rumor transmission, The Public Opinion Quarterly 29(1), 54-70. Caplow, T.(1947). Rumors in war, Social Force 15, 302. Chorus, A. (1952). The basic law of rumor, The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 48, 313-314. DiFonzo, N. and P. Bordia (1994). Reining in rumors, Organizational Dynamics 23, 47-62. DiFonzo, N. and P. Bordia (2000). How top PR professionals handle hearsay :corporate rumors, their effects, and strategies to manage them, Public Relations Review 26(2), 173-190. DiFonzo, N. and P. Bordia (2002). Corporate rumor activity, belief and accuracy, Public Relations Review 28, 1-19. Fisher, D. R. (1998). Rumoring theory and the Internet, Social Science Computer Review 16(2), 158-168. Fiske, S. T. and Taylor, S. E. (1958). Social Cognition, 2 nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York. Hannah, D. B. and Sternthal, B. (1984) Detecting and Explaining the Sleeper Effect, Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (2), 632-642. ch, Sep84, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p632, 11p, 1 chart; Herr, P. M., Kardes, F. R., and Kim, J. (1991). Effect of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility diagnostic perspective, Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 454-462.
189 Hollingshead, A. B., McGrath, J. E., and O Connor, K. M. (1993). Group task performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer mediated communication versus face-to-face work groups, Small Group Research 24, 304-333. Kapferer, J. N. (1990). Rumors uses, interpretations, and images, New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. Knapp, R. H. (1944). A psychology of rumor, Public Opinion Quarterly 53, 467-481. Mizerski, P. (1982). An attribution explanation of the disproportionate influence of unfavourable information, Journal of Consumer Research 19, 301-310. Pendleton, S. C. (1998). Rumor research revisited and expanded, Language & Communication 18, 69-86. Peterson, W. and N. Gist (1951). Rumor and public opinion, America Journal of Sociology 57, 159-167. Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovation, 4 th ed. Free Press, New York. Rosnow, R. L. (1977). Gossip and marketplace psychology, Journal of Communication 27(1), 158-163. Rosnow, R. L. (1988). Rumor as communication: A contextual approach, Journal of Communication 38(1), 12-28. Shibutani T. (1966), Improvised news: A sociological study of rumor, Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill. Walther, J. B., and Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction, Human Communication Research 19, 50-88. Walther, J. B. (1995). Rational aspects of computer mediated communication: experimental observations, Organizational Science 6, 180-203. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction, Communication Research 23(1), 3-43. Wheelan,S. A., Verdi,A. F., and McKeage, R. (1994). The group development observation system: origins and applications, Philadelphia: PEP Press.
190 (5) 1 Auto Sending Stop 1. 1 AAAAAAA 3 Auto Sending! Auto Sending Stop Stop e-mail WormAlert@so mewhere.com 2 A.I.D.SVIRUS 1. 1 OPEN:VERY -COOL A.I.D.S 2 Sophos A.I.D.SVIRUS 3 A.I.D.S. 4 ( ) 5MB Format 3 Jdbgmgr.exe 1. 1 Jdbgmgr.exe 2 Jdbgmgr.exe IE (hoax) 4 Java 2. 14 3.
191 4 1. 1 3 POP 29.99 4 9.95 e-mail POP (10 Outlook Express ~100 ) 5 1. 1 2 4 100 (10 100 ~100 ) 10 6 1. 1 4 7 1. 1 3 DEHA 2. 4 DEHA DEHA DEHA DEHA 10
192 (5) 8 1. 1 2 4 9 1. 15 1 3 2. 3. GOP GPT
193 10 1. 2. 3. 4. 1 2 3 4 11 1. 1 4 12 1. 1 2 3
194 (5) 13 Progesterex 1. 1 Progesterex Rohypnol 3 4 Progesterex Rohypnol Progesterex 2. Progesterex Progesterex 14 1. 1 2 3 2. 4, 3. 15 1. 1 4 C 2.
195 16 1. 1 3 4 2. 17 1. 1 NASA 1969 13 2 13 1969 11 1995 18 1. 1 Dr. Mills 1994 2 1987 2. 15 15
196 (5) 19 1. 1 2 2. 3 4 2. 50 70 20 1. 1 2 2. 3 3 4 4 21 1. 1 2 3 4 2. 22 1. 1 D 2 3 10 4 Weekly World News
197 23 1. 2. 1 2 3 24 1. 1 2 3 4 25 15,000 1. 10,000 1 2 3 4 26 HIV 1. 1 2 3 4
198 (5) 27 911 1. 1 CNN 2 1654 3 2. 3. 28 1 FBI Bonsai Cat 2 3 4 29 1 4
199 30 1 2 3 4 31 911 1 CNN 2 3 32 1 2 3 33 1 2 3 4 34 1 2 4 35 1 2
200 (5) 36.pps 1 2 3 Power Point 4 1-- http://www.ettoday.com/etrumor/index.htm 2 http://urbanlegends.about.com/ 3 http://hoaxinfo.com/ 4 http://www.snopes.com/
201 ( 2003 3 15 ) 1~36 37~66 66~70 1.!Auto Sending Stop 2. A.I.D.SVIRUS 3. Jdbgmgr.exe 14. 15. C 19. 20. 21. 23. 24. 25. 26. 4. 27. 911 5. 6. 28. 7. 29. 8. 30. 9. 31. 911 10. 32. 11. 33. 12. 34. 13. Progesterex 35. 36..pps 16. 37. 17. 38. 18. 39. 40. 41. 42. 22. 43.
202 (5) 44. 45. 77. 78. 46. 79. 47. 80. 48. 81. 49. 82. 50. 83. 51. 84. 52. 85. 53. 86. 54. 87. 55. 88. 56. 89. 57. 90. 91. 58. 92. 59. 93. 60. 94. 61. 95. 62. 911 96. 63. 97. 64. 98. 65. 99. B 66. 100. 67. 101. 0800 68. 102. 69. Word 911 103. 70. 104. 71. 105. 72. 106. 73. 107. 74. 108. 75. 109. 76. 110. 6
203 111. 142. 112. 143. 113. 144. 114. 145. 115. 146. 116. 147. 117. 148. 118. 149. 119. 120. 150. 121. 151. UV 122. 123. 152. 124. 153. 125. 154. IC 126. 155. 127. 156. 157. 128. 158. 129. 159. 160. 130. 131. 132. 161. 162. 163. 133. 164. 134. 165. 135. 166. 136. 167. 137. 168. 169. 138. 170. 139. 171. 140. KTV 172. 141. 173.
204 (5) 174. 205. 175. 206. 176. 207. 208. 177. 209. 178. 210. 179. vbs 211. 180. 212. 181. 213. 182. 214. 183. 215. 184. 216. 217. 185. 218. 186. 219. 187. 220. 188. 0 1 221. 189. 222. 190. 223. 191. 224. 192. 225. 193. 226. 194. 227. 195. 228. 196. 229. 197. 230. 198. 231. 199. 232. 233. 200. 234. 201. 235. 202. 236. 203. 112 237. 204. 238.
205 239. 272. 240. 273. 241. 274. 242. 275. 243. 276. 244. 277. 245. 278. 246. 279. 247. 280. 13 248. 281. 282. 249. 283. 250. 284. 251. 285. 252. 286. 253. 287. 254. 288. 255. 256. 289. 257. 290. 258. 291. 259. 292. 260. 293. 261. 294. 262. 295. 263. 296. 264. 297. 265. 298. 266. 299. 267. 300. 268. 301. 269. 302. 270. 303. 271. 304.
206 (5) 305. 339. 306. 340. 307. 341. 308. 342. 309. 343. 310. 344. 311. 312. 313. 314. 315. 316. 317. 318. 319. 320. 321. 2=1 322. 323. 324. 325. 326. 327. 328. 329. 330. 331. 332. 333. 334. 335. 336. 337. 338.
207 An Exploratory Study on the Transnational Dissemination Phenomenon of Internet Rumors Hsin-Ying Lee, Chih-Chien Wang Shao-Kang Lo, Wen-Chang Fang Graduate Institute of Information Management, National Taipei University Abstract Rumor is an ancient phenomenon. In the past, it was usually passed along from person to person orally. However, the Internet has changed the way people transmit the rumors. We found that the content of some prevailing Internet rumors in Taiwan are the same with as or similar to those spread in the other foreign countries. Therefore, it could be conjectured that some rumors in Taiwan were possibly translated from or adapted to Chinese from the overseas originals; in other words, the Internet is also a form of mass media that facilitates the spread of rumors abroad. This paper collected the Internet rumors from four websites in Taiwan and in other foreign areas and adopted content analysis to find out the similarities and differences between the Chinese translations and the originals. The results reveal that twenty-five percent of the Internet rumors in Taiwan are translations, thus the transnational dissemination phenomenon does exist in Taiwan. Moreover, most of the translated rumors are not only negative but also false, and they involve the several kinds of processes along the communication chain: reduction, accentuation, assimilation and snowballing effect. Key Words: Internet; Internet rumor; Transnational communication; content analysis; Qualitative research
208 (5)