( 332 ) 3, 1. (, 2002),, ( 2002, )?,,,,,,, ( non2grammatical) ( grammatical), ( non2lexical) ( lexical), ( ),, ( grammaticalize /grammaticalization ) ( lexicalize / lexicalization) ( grammatical) ( lexical) ( base), ( 2ize 2ization),, ( idiom ize / idiom ization) ( idiom ),,,,,, 3 ( : 08CYY022), (, 2008 9 ),,, 399
(2002),,,, 2.,, 2. 1 + (2007), ( ), : + + +, + ( ) + ( ), : + : (1),,,, ;, ( ) (2),, ( ) (3),,,,,,,,, ( ) + : (4), ( ) (5) ( ) (6),, ( ) +, +,, + : (7),? ( ) (8),,, ( ) (9) ( ) (10), ( ) (11),, ( (12) ( ) (13),,,,,, ( ) (14),? ( ) (15),,,,, ( ) (16), ( ) ( 1991) (17),,,, ( ) 400
(18),,, ( ) (19), :?? : ( ) (20) ( ),,, ( ) (21), ( ) +, : 1), 2),, VN, : 1),, (13) (15), VN, 2), VN,, 3) + + +,,, 4) +, ( ),, VN, V N,, broken spoken given driven done? (2005),, + N, (2005),, + (, 2000), +, + +,,,,,,,,,, : (22),,,,, ( ) (23) ( ), +,,,, 401
(2002), 31%, 45%,, +, +,, (, 2007) +,,, +,, ( ),,,, ( ) (, 2004),, ( ( 15) ),,, + +N,,,, ( idiosyncrasy),,,, +N +, +,,,,,,,, + +,, +,,, + ( lexical word),, ;, +, (morphological word) ;,,, + :,,,,,, (Jackendoff, 2008) 2. 2,, 402
(2002), 0. 2%, : A. + B. + C. +, : (24) ( ) (25) ( ) (26),, ( ) (27),, ( ) (28),,,,,! ( ) (29),,,, ( ) (30), (,,,, 3.,, 3. 1,,,,,,,, : (31), :?, :!! ( ) (32) ( ) (33), ( ) (34), ;, ( ) (35) ( ) (36),,, ( ) (2003),,,,,,,,,, ( ),, 403
,, and,, : One more can of beer and Iπm leaving( ),, (2003) V V,, (, 2002) (37) ( ) (38),, ( ) (39) :,!,,,, ( ) (40) ( ),, (, 2002),,,, : (41),,, ( ) (42),, ( ) (43), ;, ( ) (44), :,,,, :, ( ) (45), ( ) (46), ( ) ( :, ) (47),,,,,, ( ),,,, : (48),, ( ),,, : (49) ( ),,, ( ) 3. 2 / / + / +, / 404
(, 2006) : (50)?! ( ) (51),,, ( ) (52), ( ) (53), ( ) (54), ( ) (55) ( ) (56) :? : ( ) (57), ;, ( ) (58),,, ( ) (59), ( ) (60), ( ) (61), ( ) (62),,, ( ), /,,, + / +, ( 2006), ( / ),, /, / + /,,, /,, /, /,,, /,, /,, /,, (, 2002), ( ),,,,, : (63),,! ( ) (64),, (, ) (65), ( ) (66),,, ( ) (67),,,,, ( ) (68),,,! ( ) ( ) 405
:,, /,,,,, ( ) ( ),,, (, 2002) : (69),, ( ),,,, ;, / 4. 4. 1, + /, V (, 2002),,,,,,,,,,,, : (70)? ( ) (71),, ;,? ( ) (72)? ( ) (73) :? ( ) (74) :,? ( ) (75)? ( ) (76)? ( ) : (77)?? ( ) (78),,, :,,? ( ) (79)? ( ) (,, 1999),,,, (, 196 ) : (80),? ( ) 406
/ /, + /,,,,,, 4. 2,,,,,, : (81),,,,,,,,,,, 5.,,,,,, (2008) : :,, :,,,,,,,,,,,, : (82), ( :,, ) (83),? ( :, ), X X (, 2003 2004),,,, :?,, 407
, :,,,,,,,,?,,, : ( ),,,,, X,, ( ),,, +,,,,,,,,,,,,, (, 2002 ), Joseph (1990: 38 41),, ( infinitives),,,,,,, (3), + +, ( ) 408
,,, + +, +,, +,,,, (2002), +,,, 2008, ( ),, 1992, 2002 :, 2003 X,, 2004, 2006 /, 2 2007, 2007, 2008, 2 2, 2000, 2002, 2005, 3 2003, ( ), 2003, :, ( ) 2003, :, ( ) 2008, 2008, 2005, 4 2002, 2 1991, ( ), ; ( ),, 1999 2000, B rinton, Laurel., and Elizabeth. C. Traugott 2005 L exicalization and L anguage Change. Cambridge University Press. Giv n, T. 1971 H istorical Syntax and Synchronic M orphology: A n A rchaeologistπs Field Trip. Chicago L inguistic Society. Jackendoff, Rey 2008 Construction after construction and its theoretical challenges. Language, Vol. 84, No. 1. Joseph, B rian D. 1990 M orphology and U niversals in Syntactic Change: Evidence from M edieval and M odern Greek. New York & London: Garland Publishing. ( ; ; 100871) 409
ZHO NGGUO YUW EN S TUD I ES O F THE CH IN ES E LAN GUAG E September, 2009 Abstracts of M a jor Papers in Th is Issue J I N L ix in, A possible ana lysis of Ch inese buyu ( ) This paper p roposes a new analysis of buyu in term s of the notion of secondary p redication. It claim s that buyu can be classified into two categories, i. e., secondary p redication and post2posing adverbial. The former p redicates the subject or the object after the p rimary p redication, and the latter modifies the p redicate as adverbs, adpositional phrases or temporal and verbal classifiers. Key words: syntactic constituent, buyu, secondary p redication, post2posing adverbial DO NG X iufang, Syn tactic change and lex ica liza tion in Ch inese This paper p roposes that some diachronic lexicalizations be induced by syntactic changes of, e. g., content words, functional words and word order changes. However, syntactic changes are not necessary for the occurrence of lexicalization. The differences between syntactically relevant lexicalization and syntactically irrelevant lexicalization are also discussed. Key words: lexicalization, syntactic change, functional words CU I X iliang, On ka ixin ( ) and guanxin ( ) Based on the asymmetry between kaixin and guanxin ( to be happy, or to open heart literally) ( to care about, or to close heart literally) in modern Chinese, this paper analyzes the sem antic evolution paths of ka i ( to open) and guan ( to close) as well as the different paths of the lexical form s ka ix in and guanx in. It also exp lores the cognitive motivation and grammatical m echanism in the p rocess of lexicalization, and exp lains the asymmetry between ka ix in and guanx in from the cognitive perspective. Key words: ka ix in, guanx in, asymmetry, cognitive exp lanation L I B ingzhen, The seman tic evolution in the developm en t of top ic2sh ift markers This paper assumes that if several sim ilar structural units w ith the same or sim ilar meanings have the same evolution result, the network of their sem antic changes can be reconstructed by overlapp ing the evolution paths which may have gone through different routes. In modern Chinese, the cross2structural combinations, such as shuodao ( ), shuoqi ( ), zhiyushuo ( ), zaishuo ( ) and yaoshuo ( ), have developed into top ic2 479