02206.doc
|
|
|
- 府 邬
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CSMAR (2001) (1) (2) 1 (1) (2) (1) (2) Modigliani Miller ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (ACES) ( ),, [email protected] [email protected]
2 CSMAR (2001 ) ( ) (TEJ) H (Huang Song 2001) G-7 / 2 Modigliani Miller (MM) 1958 ( Harris Raviv (1991), ), Harris Raviv ( 1 The Pecking Order Hypothesis) / Harris Raviv(1991) Harris Raviv(1988),Stulz(1988), Israel(1991) / Brander Lewis(1986) Brander Lewis(1986) (2000) / Titman(1984) Titman 1 (2002). 2
3 (The Static Tradeoff Model) Modigliani Miller(1958,1963) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) V L V U T C B V L = V U + T C B T C 0 100% Miller(1977) T S T B Miller V L = V U (1 TC )(1 T + 1 (1 TB ) S ) B V L V U T C T S T B B 1 T ) = (1 T )(1 T ) ( B C S Kraus Litzenberger(1973) Kim(1978) Bradley, Jarrel Kim(1984) 3
4 2.1.3 Jensen Meckling(1976) Harris Raviv(1991) Jensen Meckling CEO 2.7% (Berger, Ofek Yermack, 1997) Jensen(1986) Grossman Hart(1982) (firm-specific human capital) Jensen Meckling Harris Raviv(1990) ( ) ( ) Stulz(1990) ( ) ( ) (trading off) (underlying assets) (put option ) (call option, ) (exercise price) (asset substitution effect) Diamond(1989) ( ) 4
5 2 2.2 Ross(1977) Myers Majluf(1984) Myers Majluf(1984) Myers Majluf Myers Majluf Krasker(1986) Brennan Kraus(1987) Narayanan(1988) Noe(1988) Constantinides Grundy(1989) Heinkel Zechner(1990) Myers(1998) (1) (2) (3) (4) (quasi-equity) 2.3 Shyam-Sunder Myers(1999) (statistical power) Myers Chirinko Singha(2000) Fama French(2002) Booth (2001) (cross-sectional test) Titman Wessels (1988) Rajan Zingales (1995) Wald (1999) Booth (2001) Wiwattanakantang (2001) 2 Ross(1977) 5
6 Bradley Jarrell Kim (1984) (1) (2) (3) Titman Wessels (1988) - (factor-analytic technique) ( ) Berger Ofek Yermack (1997) (entrenchment-shocks) Jensen (1986) Rajan Zingales (1995) ( ) ( Q ) Wald(1999) G-7 Wald Booth (2001) ( ) GDP Booth (2001) Demirguc-Kunt Maksimovic (1999) Rajan Zingales(1995) G CSMAR 1000 Rajan Zingales (1995) 6
7 (robustness analysis) ( ) Rajan Zingales (1995) Rajan Zingales (1995) (G-7 ) ( 7.9% ) 50 (IAS) (2000 ) G-77 G-7 (18.0%) (18.4%) G-7 G % 52% G-7 42% 8.8% G % Masulis (1988, P1) ( ) Megginson (1997, P305) Bradley Jarrell Kim (1984) 20 ( ) Titman Wessels (1988) Rajan Zingales (1995) 3 (1) (non-equity liabilities to total assets) (2) (debt to total assets) (3) (debt to net assets) (4) (debt to capital) (5) (interest coverage ratio) EBIT/ EBITDA/ EBIT EBITDA 3,, (robustness check).,,.. 7
8 Rajan Zingales (1995) Rajan Zingales (1995) Rajan Zingales (1995) G-7 Booth (2001) / G-7 4 Booth ( ) 6% 24% 15% G-7 45% 12% % ( ) ( ) ( ) Rajan Zingales (1995) Rajan Zingales G-7 G-7 ( ) 4 6 Chen and Xiong(2001) 78%-86%,,. Q,., Q.. 8
9 G-7 ( ) ( ) Myers (1984) (2002) 3.4 Miller (1977) (gain from leverage) (1 TC )(1 TS ) G = 1 (1 T ) B T C T S T B (capital gain) 20% 33% ( ) 16.25% 33% 15% ( %) 15% 6.25% (!) 15% ( ) Rajan Zingales (1995) G-7 15% G (investment propensity) G-7 7 9
10 ( + ) = = = (1 + ) = ( ) 1 1 = ( ) G ( ) G (Jensen Meckling (1976) Jensen (1986) ) ( ) A A B H A B ( ) ( ) H A A A A A A 100 A B H B H ( ) ( A B H ) 10
11 % 60% 0.017% 66 Friend Lang (1988) 10% CEO 2.7% (Berger Ofek Yermack 1997) B/H Booth (2001) /GDP GDP Miller % GDP ( ) GDP GDP A Kruskal-Wallis Kruskal-Wallis 1% (dummy variable ) B C ( 1999 ) 31.1% 33.4% (1999 ) 57.6% 52.6% 0.54 B 47.1% 43.6% 40.1% (2001 )
12 4.3 Bowen (1982) Bradley (1984) Long Malitz (1985) Kester (1986) ( ) / Titman (1984) Maksimovic Titman (1991) % 50% 30% Bradley (1984) Bradley (1984) 21 (C2) (B) (D) (C4) (C4) 9% Bradley (1984) Bradley (1984) (ROA) 9 (B) % 9.7% 7.3% 9 12
13 Harris Raviv (1990) Wald (1999) 1958 Modigliani Miller Jensen (1986) Williamson (1988) Chang (1999) Friend Lang (1988) Titman Wessels (1988) Kester(1986) (Rajan Zingales (1995) Wald (1999) Wiwattanakantang(1999) Booth (2001) ) Long Maltiz(1985) Wald (1999) / (EBIT) Myers Majluf (1984) Jensen Meckling (1976) Williamson (1988) Harris Raviv (1990) Marsh (1982) Long Malitz (1985) Friend Lang (1988) Rajan Zingales (1995) Wald (1999) (liabilities) ( ) (effective marginal tax rate) MacKie-Mason (1990) / MacKie-Mason ( 13
14 (tax loss carry-forwards) ) / MM MacKie-Mason 33% 15% (loss carry-back) (liabilities) (non-debt) Marsh (1982) Fama Jensen (1983) Rajan Zingales (1995) Harris Raviv (1990) Stulz(1990) Ross (1977) Noe (1988) Narayanan(1988) Poitevin(1989) Harris Raviv(1988) Stulz(1988) Marsh (1982) Rajan Zingales (1995) Wald (1999) Booth (2001) Rajan Zingales (1995) Wald (1999) Wald (1999) ( - ) ( 0.79) (spurious correlation) (NTDS) DeAngelo Masulis (1980) DeAngelo Masulis (1980) Bradley (1984) NTDS NTDS Wald (1999) Chaplinsky Niehaus(1993) (investment tax credit ) NDTS Jung Kim Stulz(1996) Jensen (1986) Stulz(1990) (discretion) Berger Ofek Yermack(1997) Myers (1977) 14
15 Jensen Meckling (1976) Kester (1986) Kim Sorensen (1986) Smith Watts (1992) Wald (1999) Rajan Zingales (1955) Booth (2001) Titman Wessels(1988, ) Wald (1999) Titman Wessels (1988) Rajan Zingales (1995) ( Q ) Booth (2001) Q Hsia(1981) (OPM) (CAMP) Modigliani-Miller (Booth (2001)) ( Bradley (1984) Chaplinsky Niehaus(1993) Wald(1999)) ( Titman Wessels(1988)) Booth 5.2 (liabilities) (Gibson, 2001, p248 ) (trade credit) Q ( 3.0) Toy (1974) (TL) (ROA) Q (LD) (MLD) 0.83 (TD) (MTD) 0.77 (TL) 10 15
16 (MTL) 0.72 TD TL % NDTS( / ) ( / ) (0.50) ( ) Q (- 0.41) NDTS Q 5.3 Logit (OLS) ROA % (1) (2) (NDTS) NDTS (3) Q ( Q ) Hsia (1981) (LD) % (TL) % 16
17 (1) (2) ( ), 0.354( ) ( ) F 1% F 10% 5% R (1) (2) 1994 (balanced data) (3) 2000 (endogeneity) ROA Q (4) (0.54) (0.17) (0.50) 11 (5) 140 (MTL), R ( ) % (1.61) 1% 17
18 50% 50% ( ) Myers(1984) % 6% Myers % 14 Myers B/H ROA 1.5 Fama French(2002) Myers(1984) Chang(1999) B/H 3-4 ( ) ( ) 0.017% (1035 ) 12% 9%
19 19 ( ) ( ) 46% 14%) % 13,.. 13
20 (2000 )
21 ( ( ) ( ( ) ( ( ) ( ( ) ( ( )) ) ) ) ) I II (0.46) 0.12(0.14) 0.22(0.23) 0.06(0.07) 0.27(0.29) 0.06(0.08) 0.28(0.31) 0.06(0.08) na na na na
22 : 1) 2000 A 954. CSMAR. 2) :, 954,, 100. Rajan Zingales(1995)., ) Rajan Zingales(1995).,. : 1) CSMAR. = /, =( + )/ =(( + )/ = - - = /( + ) = + ) I EBIT/ II EBITDA/ ( ) EBITDA ( ) :. 2) Rajan Zingales (1995) Booth (2001) Booth (2001) 3) 22
23 ( ) ( 2791 ) ( 2497 ) 0.23(0.20) 1.34(1.02) -0.34(-0.02) (0.50) 0.85(0.80) 0.15(0.20) (0.36) 0.72(0.55) 0.28(0.45) (0.30) 0.72(0.62) 0.28(0.38) ) ) Rajan Zingales (1995) OECD : ( "Financial Statements of Non-Financial Enterprises") 23
24 EBIT ( ) EBIT EBIT (1- - ) CSMAR 2% ( ) Rajan Zingales (1995) 24
25 Panel A (1033 ) ( ) 39.31(43.67) (11.62) (36.14) (0.0) (-0.89)*** (-0.35)*** (-0.10)*** (TL) (-0.10)*** (0.08)** (0.09)*** Panel B TL TL TL TL (2.32)** (2.65)*** (2.49)** (2.74)*** (3.04)*** (2.62)*** H/B (2.45)** (1.90)* F- (5.40)** (7.35)*** (5.71)*** (6.12)*** Panel C ( ) (%) 0.044(0.017) ( ) 1.89(0.66) (0.87)*** (TL) (-0.03) (-0.01) 1) A 100 B H 2) 3) *, ** *** 10%, 5%, 1% 25
26 GDP H EP H EP H EP H EP H EP H EP H EP H EP H EP H EP M EP M EP M MP M MP M MP M MP L MP L MP M MP L MP L WP L WP H WP L WP L WP M WP M WP L WP M WP L WP L WP L WP
27 ( ) (t- ) (12.05) (-3.05)*** (15.13) (-2.31)** (11.00) (-1.61) (12.63) -8.92(-2.13)** (18.02) -8.9(-1.51) (15.16) -6.74(-1.35) (15.82) -6.56(-2.00)** (17.71) -6.38(-1.48) (18.83) -6.32(-1.36) (17.34) -5.47(-1.65)* (16.69) -5.06(-1.33) (20.22) -4.64(-1.40) (14.46) -4.38(-1.34) (16.73) -4.34(-1.30) (15.62) -4.26(-1.09) (11.92) -4.09(-0.60) (15.06) -3.85(-0.98) (16.78) -3.84(-0.77) (17.66) -3.61(-0.82) (16.26) -1.81(-0.44) (11.84) -1.34(-0.28) (17.76) 0.53(0.11) (11.33) 0.69(0.12) (15.93) O (15.66) 2.17(0.66) (19.21) 4.22(1.28) (17.24) 4.46(1.06) (15.06) 4.46(0.96) (17.34) 6.48(1.79)* (18.42) 6.56(1.52) (18.17) 6.99(2.46)*** (21.21) 11.97(3.78)*** (17.92) R F- 4.43*** 27
28 1) 1999 ( ) GDP (2000) (2000) 2) 3 H L M GDP 3) 1996 ( ) ( ). A 1) *, **, *** 10%, 5% 1% 2) O: 28
29 Panel A Kruskal-Wallis P < < <0.001 Panel B (TL) ( ) TL (t- ) (18.53) 7.01(4.37)*** (17.28) 3.42(1.96)** (15.57) O (17.92) R F- (11.01)*** Panel C (TL) ( ) TL (t- ) (18.5) 2.85(2.03)** (15.59) -3.95(-2.32)** (17.59) O (17.92) R F- (11.99)*** 1) *,**, *** 10%, 5% 1% 2) O:. 29
30 TL TL : (2001)
31 B 12 C2 2 L 9 D 38 A 27 K 38 C0 C4 F C1 C C5 21 C6 98 C9 14 C7 160 H 94 G 62 C3 21 M 80 J 30 E
32 ( ) (T ) TL B (8.23) -11.6(-2.14)** R C (6.12) D L (7.32) -5.9(-0.96) -5.9(-0.96) D (12.97) -3.77(-1.05) R A (11.1) -3.54(-0.88) -3.54(-0.88) K (9.44) -3.06(-0.85) -3.06(-0.85) C (11.61) -1.87(-0.57) -1.87(-0.57) C (13.15) -0.83(-0.29) R F (13.3) -0.59(-0.16) -0.59(-0.16) C (11.95) O C (12.8) 2.40(0.72) 2.4(0.72) C (8.95) 2.75(0.63) 2.75(0.63) C (15.51) 3.29(1.14) 3.29(1.14) C (10.52) D C (13.42) 3.96(1.47) 3.96(1.47) H (15.67) 9.34(3.2)*** 9.34(3.2)*** G (12.42) 9.58(3.02)*** 9.58(3.02)*** C (17.63) 11.08(2.53)*** 11.08(2.53)*** M (14.31) D J (19.22) 14.46(3.73)*** 14.46(3.73)*** E (21.17) 14.65(3.17)*** 14.65(3.17)*** (13.54) R F (5.29)*** (4.69)*** 1) D O R: 2) C2 2 C9 M 3) ) ***, **, * 1%, 5% 10% 32
33 TL TL B C D C C C C C C G/C C (2001) ( ) 14 33
34 : ( ) (ROA) +/- - (SIZE) (TANG) +/ (TAX) + + (NDTS) - - (GROW/Tobin s Q) (VOLTY) Q - - +/- - (MANAG) + +/- (INSTITU)?? 1) "+ " "-" ; "+/-" "?" 2) 34
35 LD MLD TD MTD TL MTL ROA SIZE TANG TAX NDTS Tobin's Q GROW INSTITU MANAG VOLTY ) 799 2) LD TD ( ) TL LD TD TL (MLD) (MTD) A (2000 ) H B H B A H B 3) ROA 35
36 LD MLD TD MTD TL MTL ROA SIZE TANG TAX NDTS Tobin s Q GROW INSTITU MANAG LD 1 MLD TD MTD TL MTL ROA (-0.06)* SIZE (0.06)* (0.05)* TANG (0.06)* (-0.02)* (0.05)* (0.05)* 1 TAX (0.01)* (0.05)* (-0.03)* (0.07)* (0.00)* (0.05)* 1 NDTS (0.02)* Tobin's Q (-0.04)* 1 GROW (0.03)* (0.04)* (-0.07)* (-0.04)* INSTITU (-0.06)* (0.06)* 1 MANAG (-0.05)* (-0.03)* (-0.02)* (0.03)* (0.00)* (0.05)* 0.14 (0.04)* (-0.03)* (-0.06)* 0.07 (0.05)* (0.05)* 1 VOLTY (0.03)* (-0.04)* 0.17 (-0.05)* (-0.02)* (-0.03)* (0.00)* 0.1 (0.01)* * 5%. 36
37 ROA (-13.25)*** (-9.05)*** (-14.15)*** (-9.85)*** (-9.93)*** (-9.74)*** (-9.22)*** (-9.7)*** (-9.07)*** SIZE (7.36)*** (4.22)*** (7.89)*** (4.69)*** (4.54)*** (4.06)*** (3.51)*** (4.00)*** (3.51)*** NDTS (-5.63)*** (-5.92)*** (-5.49)*** (-5.78)*** (-5.68)*** (-3.37)*** (-2.73)*** (-3.09)*** (-2.6)*** INSTITU (3.43)*** (3.9)*** (3.3)*** (3.76)*** (3.74)*** (3.53)*** (3.39)*** (3.31)*** (3.47)*** VOLTY (1.46) (2.29)** (1.28) (2.11)** (2.11)** (2.13)*** (2.02)** (1.66)* (1.75)* TOBIN'S Q (-4.48)*** (-4.49)*** (-4.45)*** (-4.98)*** (-4.97)*** (-4.25)*** (-4.38)*** GROW (5.6)*** (5.61)*** (5.6)*** (5.4)*** (5.09)*** (4.81)*** (4.78)*** TANG (-3.34)*** (-2.12)** (-3.24)*** (-2.55)*** TAX (0.74) (0.73) (0.93) (1.13) (1.2) MANAG (1.16) (1.04) (0.99) (0.81) (0.87) NO NO NO NO NO YES NO YES NO NO NO NO NO NO YES YES R
38 2000 ROA (-9.85)*** (-11.12)*** (-4.51)*** (-8.39)*** (-9.82)*** (-7.27)*** SIZE (4.69)*** (7.03)*** (1.95)** (4.17)*** (9.2)*** (3.86)*** NDTS (-5.78)*** (-4.06)*** (-3.19)*** (-4.76)*** (-1.92)* (-6.54)*** TOBIN'S Q (-4.49)*** (-5.45)*** (-1.14) (-1.52) (-3.61)*** (-4.42)*** GROW (5.61)*** (4.21)*** (3.52)*** (5.24)*** (4.81)*** INSTITU (3.76)*** (4.33)*** (0.79) (3.77)*** (3.74)*** VOLTY (2.11)** (-0.07) (-0.91) (1.35) (2.46)** TANG 16.5 (6.3)*** OBS R
39 1) 799 *, **, *** 10%, 5%, 1%. 2) F 1% 5% 10% 1). 2) ) ) (Endogeneity) 5) (0.54) (Multicollinearity) (0.17) (0.50) % 6) 39
40 VARIABLES TL MTL LD LD MLD TD TD MTD ROA (-9.85)*** (-5.56)*** (-2.13)** (-2.53)*** (-0.99) (-7.96)*** (-7.88)** (-4.68)*** SIZE (4.69)*** (9.86)*** (0.23) (1.00) (1.64)* (0.14) (0.00) (3.92)*** NDTS (-5.78)*** (-4.1)*** (0.82) (-1.93)* (1.93)* (-3.87)*** (-2.92)*** (-2.39)** TOBIN'S Q (-4.49)*** (-12.95)*** (-3.61)*** (-2.68)*** (-5.27)*** (-5.24)*** (-5.33)*** (-10.55)*** GROW (5.61)*** (6.32)*** (1.54) (1.94)* (2.16)** (3.45)*** (3.38)*** (4.31)*** INSTITU (3.76)*** (0.844) (-0.83) (-0.46) (-2.39)** (2.87)*** (2.8)*** (0.29) VOLTY (2.11)** (-0.37) (0.57) (0.57) (-1.24) (1.77)* (1.77)* (-0.93) TANG (5.44)*** (-0.94) R
41 Listed Unlisted T Listed Unlisted B C2 D C0 C4 C1 C8 C6 C7 G/C5 C3 Total 41
42 =100*(A A110227)/A100000; =100*(A A A A A A A A A A111801)/A100000; =100*A111227/A100000; =100*(A A A A A A111601)/A100000; =100*A110000/A100000; =100*A130000/A100000; =100*A120527/A100000; =100*(A A140113); =100*(A A A A A A120801) /A100000; =100*A100000/A100000; =100*(A A212101)/A400000; =100*(A A A A A A A A A A A A A A211701)/A400000; =100*(A A A A A A A A212401)/A400000; =100*A210000/A400000; =100*A230101/A400000; =100*(A A220201)/A400000; =100*A410000/A400000; =100*(A A A A A220416) /A400000; =100*(A A410000)/A400000; =100*A300000/A400000; =100*A400000/A (1) =(A A410000)/A400000; =(A A A A220201)/A400000; =(A A A A220201)/(A A A A212101); =(A A A A220201)/ (A A A A A300000); I =(B B110604)/B110604; II=(B B D D D610801)/B110604; =(B B C C110501)/B A CSMAR (2001 ) 42
43 ( D ); (2) : TL=A A410000; TA=A400000; TD=A A A A220201; EQUITY=A300000; NA=A A A A212101; EBIT=B B110604; INTEREST=B110604; EBITDA=B B D D D610801; =B B C C110501( D ); Sum_TL, Sum_TA, Sum_TD, Sum_Equity, Sum_NA, Sum_EBIT, Sum_Interest, Sum_EBITDA =Sum_TL/Sum_TA; =Sum_TD/Sum_TA; =Sum_TD/Sum_NA; =Sum_TD/(Sum_TD+Sum_Equity); I =Sum_EBIT/Sum_Interest; II =Sum_EBITDA/Sum_Interest; (3) : B/H, (MVE)= *2000 (1) (2) MVE+A A410000; A MVE. ( ), CASHFLOW=D100000; EQUITY=D D D D320601; DEBT=(D D D D310301) -(D D D D D D320615; Sum_Cashflow, Sum_Equity, Sum_Debt, = 100*(Sum_Equity+Sum_Debt) /( (Sum_Equity+Sum_Debt+Sum_Cashflow); =100*Sum_Debt/(Sum_Equity+Sum_Debt); =100*Sum_Equity/(Sum_Equity+Sum_Debt);, EBIT=B B110604; PDEBT=B110604; PDIVIDEND=B230403*B140101/B150101; PCapitalGain=(B B230403)*B140101/B150101; 43
44 Sum_ebit, Sum_debt, Sum_dividend, Sum_CapitalGain,, =sum_debt/ Sum_ebit; =Sum_Dividend/ Sum_ebit; =Sum_CapitalGain/Sum_ebit. : LD=(A A220201)/(A A A220201); TD=(A A A A212101) /(A A A A A212101); TL=(A A410000)/(A A A410000); MLD, MTD MTL, B/H (MVE)= *2000 A MVE : , ROA=(B B110604)/A100000; SIZE=log(B110127) =log(b b110113); TANG=A130000/A100000; TAX=(B B140601)/(B B B140601); NDTS=C110401/A (1997 ) = D610601/A100000(1997 ); Tobin s Q=(A A MVE)/A (MVE)= *2000 ; GROW=Dif(sales)/sales sales=b =B B dif() 44
45 Value of Corporate Control, Evidence from China s Distressed Firms, Working Paper, School of Economics and Finance, the University of Hong Kong. Bai, Chongen, and Shan, Li, 2000, Capital structure and product market strategy, Annals of Economics and Finance 1, Berger, G. Philip, Eli Ofek and David L. Yermack, 1997, Managerial entrenchment and capital structure decisions, Journal of Finance 52, Booth, Laurence, Varouj Aivazian, Asli Demirguc-Kunt, and Vojislav Maksimovic, 2001, Capital structures in developing countries, Journal of Finance56, Brennan, Michael, and Alan Kraus, 1987, Efficient financing under asymmetric information, Journal of Finance 42, Bradley, Michael, George A. Jarrell, and E. Han Kim, 1984, On the existence of an optimal capital structure: theory and evidence, Journal of Finance 39, Chang, Chun, 1999, Capital structure as optimal contracts, North American Journal of Economics and Finance 10, Chaplinsky, Susan and Greg Niehaus, 1993, Do inside ownership and leverage share common determinants? Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 32(4), Chen, Zhiwu and Peng Xiong, 2001, Discounts on illiquid stocks: evidence from China,2001, Yale ICF Working Paper NO.00-56, Available at Chirinko, Robert S., and Anuja R. Singha, 2000, Testing static tradeoff against pecking order models of capital structure: a critical comment, Journal of Financial Economics 58, Constantinides, George M. and Bruce D. Grundy, 1989, Optimal investment with stock repurchase and financing as signals, The Review of Financial Studies 2, DeAngelo, H. and R. Masulis, 1980, Optimal capital structure under corporate and personal taxation, Journal of Financial Economics 8, Demirguc-Kunt, Asli, and Vojislav Maksimovic, 1999, Institutions, financial markets and firm debt maturity, Journal of Financial Economics 54, Diamond, Douglas W., 1989, Reputation acquisition in debt markets, Journal of Political Economy 97, Fama, E.F. and Jensen, Michael, 1983, Agency problem and residual claims, Journal of Law and Economics 26, Friend, Irwin, and Larry H.P. Lang, 1988, An empirical test of the impact of managerial self-interest on corporate capital structure, Journal of Finance 43, Gibson H. Charles, 2001, Financial Reporting and Analysis: Using financial accounting information, South- Western College Publishing. Grossman, Sanford J. and Oliver Hart, 1982, Corporate financial structure and managerial incentives, in J. McCall, ed: The Economics of Information and Uncertainty, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 45
46 Harris, Milton, and Artur Raviv, 1988, Corporate control contests and capital structure, Journal of Financial Economics 20, Harris, Milton, and Artur Raviv, 1990, Capital structure and the information role of debt, Journal of Finance 45, Harris Milton, and Artur Raviv, 1991, The theory of capital structure, Journal of Finance 46, Heinkel, Robert, and Josef Zechner, 1990, The role of debt and preferred stock as a solution to adverse investment incentives, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 25, Hsia, C. C., 1981, Coherence of the modern theories of finance, Financial Review, Winter 1981, Israel, Ronen, 1991, Capital Structure and the Market for Corporate Control: The Defensive Role of Debt Financing The Journal of Finance Jensen, Michael C. and William H. Meckling, 1976, Theory of the firms: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics 3, Jensen, Michael C., 1986, Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers, American Economic Review 76, Kester, Carl W., 1986, Capital and ownership structure: a comparison of United States and Japanese corporations, Financial Management 15, Kim, E. Han, 1978, A mean variance theory of optimal capital structure and corporate debt capacity, Journal of Finance 33, Kim, Wi Saeng and Eric H. Sorensen, 1986, Evidence on the impact of the agency costs of debt in corporate debt policy, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 21, Kraus, A., and R. Litzenberger, 1973, A state-preference model of optimal financial leverage, Journal of Finance 28, Krasker, William, 1986, Stock price movements in response to stock issues under asymmetric information, Journal of Finance 41, Long, Michael and Ileen Maltiz, 1985, The investment-financing nexus: Some empirical evidence, Midland Corporate Finance Journal 3, MacKie-Mason, Jeffrey K., 1990, Do taxes affect corporate financing decisions? Journal of Finance 45, Maksimovic, Vojislav and Sheridan Titman, 1991, Financial policy and reputation for product quality, Review of Financial Studies 4(1), Marsh, Paul, 1982, The choice between equity and debt: An empirical study, Journal of Finance 37, Masulis, Ronald W. 1988, The Debt/Equity Choice, Ballinger Publishing Company. Megginson, William L., 1997, Corporate Finance Theory, Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc. Miller, Merton, and Franco Modigliani, 1961, Dividend policy, growth and the valuation of shares, Journal of Business 34, Miller, Merton, 1977, Debt and taxes, Journal of Finance 32, Modigliani, Franco, and Merton Miller, 1958, The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment, American Economic Review 48, Modigliani, Franco, and Merton Miller, 1963, Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital, America Economic Review 53, Myers, Stewart C.,1984, The capital structure puzzle, Journal of Finance, 39, Myers, Stewart C. and Nicholas S. Majluf, 1984, Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have, Journal of Financial Economics 13, Myers, Stewart C., 1998, Still searching for optimal capital structure, in Joel M. Myers, Stewart C. and Donald H. Chew, Jr. Ed. The Revolution in Corporate Finance, Third edition, Blackwell Publishers Inc. 46
47 Narayanan, M. P., 1988, Debt versus equity under asymmetric information, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 23, Noe, Thomas, 1988, Capital Structure and signaling game equilibria, Review of Financial Studies 1, Poitevin, Michael, 1989, Financial signaling and the deep-pocket argument, Rand Journal of Economics 20, Rajan G. Raghuram, and Luigi Zingales, 1995, What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data, Journal of Finance 50, Ross, Stephen, 1977, The determinants of financial structure: The incentive signaling approach, Bell Journal of Economics 8, Shyam-Sunder, Lakshmi and Stewart C. Myers, 1999, Testing static tradeoff against pecking order models of capital structure, Journal of Financial Economics 51, Smith, Clifford, and Ross Watts, 1992, The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend and compensation policies, Journal of Financial Economics 32, Stulz, Rene, 1988, Managerial control of voting rights: Financing policies and the market for corporate control, Journal of Financial Economics 20, Stulz, Rene, 1990, Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies, Journal of Financial Economics 26, Titman, Sheridan, 1984, The effect of capital structure on a firm s liquidation decision, Journal of Financial Economics 13, Titman, Sheridan, and Roberto Wessels, 1988, The determinants of capital structure choice, Journal of Finance, 43, Toy, Norman, Arthur Stonehill, Lee Remmers, Richard Wright, and Theo Beekhuisen, 1974, A comparative international study of growth profitability, and risk as determinants of corporate debt ratios in the manufacturing sector, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 9, Wald, John K. 1999, How firm characteristics affect capital structure: an international comparison, Journal of Financial Research 22(2), Williamson, Oliver, 1988, Corporate finance and corporate governance, Journal of Finance 43, Wiwattanakantang, Yupana, 1999, An empirical study on the determinants of the capital structure of Thai firms, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 7,
- 2 -
* *, - 1 - - 2 - / (1) (2) (3) (4) - 3 - 1 5 2 8 2.1. 8 2.2. 11 2.3. 12 3 14 4 19 5 30 6 35 6.1. 35 6.2. 35 37 39-4 - 1., 2003 adverse selection, (agent problem) (moral hazard) 2001 4 26 2002 2003 1-8
1 CAPM CAPM % % Wippern, aGebhardt Lee Swaminathan % 5.10% 4.18% 2 3 1Gebhardt Lee Swa
Zingales 2000 Corporate finance is the study of the way firms are financed 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 1 1 1 CAPM CAPM 2001 2.42% 20002001 1.18% Wippern, 1966 2003aGebhardt Lee Swaminathan 2003 1 1998 2000 1 1998
Myers Majluf 1984 Lu Putnam R&D R&D R&D R&D
2018 1 156 1 2 2 1. 233030 2. 233030 2005 ~ 2015 A F830. 2 A 1008-2506 2018 01-0015-12 1 2015 1 2017-07-18 71540004 BBSLDQDKT2017B02 1990-1993 - 1964-1 15 2018 1 2025 2015 1 2011 2 + Myers Majluf 1984
C02.doc
ST * * * # 1998 2000 ST ST ST ST Key Words: Listed Companies, Special Treatments, Announcement Effects 1998 3 16,,,Special Treatment,ST 2000 12 ST 81 27 1999 2000 ST ST ST 1 Distress Financial DistressPerformance
股权结构对董事会结构的影响
1 a b (Boycko, Shleifer, and Vishny, 1996) (Barberis et al, 1996) (Shleifer, 1998) (Megginson and Netter 2001) 1 70432002/G02 a b 1 (Megginson and Netter 2001) Hermalin and Weisbach, 2001 Williamson 1975
上证联合研究计划第三期课题报告
80 2 3 1 2 2.1 2.2 2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.3 2.3 2.3.1 2.3.2 2.4 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 4 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.4.1 4 4.4.2 4.4.3 4.4.4 5 5.1 5.1.1 5.1.2 5.1.3 5.1.4 5.2 6 5 1 1 monitoring monitoring cost 2incentive 0 t =
De Roon Veld (1998) 0116 %, %,,,, 180,,, Burlacu (2000) 141,,, Abhyankar Dunning (1999), %,, %, %, %, % (2
(, 510275) :, 2001 4 2003 12 88,,,, : ; ; :F830191 :A :1002-7246(2005) 07-0045 - 12,, ( ),, Asquith Mullins (1986) Masulis Korwar (1986) Mikkelson Partch(1986) - 3 %,Dann Mikkelson (1984) Eckbo (1986),Mikkelson
谢 辞 仿 佛 2010 年 9 月 的 入 学 发 生 在 昨 天, 可 一 眨 眼, 自 己 20 多 岁 的 两 年 半 就 要 这 么 匆 匆 逝 去, 心 中 真 是 百 感 交 集 要 是 在 古 代, 男 人 在 二 十 几 岁 早 已 成 家 立 业, 要 是 在 近 代, 男 人
我 国 中 小 板 上 市 公 司 IPO 效 应 存 在 性 检 验 及 原 因 分 析 姓 名 : 于 洋 指 导 教 师 : 黄 蕙 副 教 授 完 成 时 间 :2012 年 12 月 谢 辞 仿 佛 2010 年 9 月 的 入 学 发 生 在 昨 天, 可 一 眨 眼, 自 己 20 多 岁 的 两 年 半 就 要 这 么 匆 匆 逝 去, 心 中 真 是 百 感 交 集 要 是 在 古
Microsoft Word - 24-BF03.doc
MAY 19, pp397-417 企 業 選 擇 不 同 撤 資 方 式 之 因 素 沈 筱 玲 黃 意 茵 東 吳 大 學 企 業 管 理 學 系 東 吳 大 學 企 業 管 理 學 系 [email protected] [email protected] 摘 要 本 研 究 主 要 探 討 企 業 選 擇 三 種 不 同 撤 資 方 式 ( 資 產 出 售 資 產 分 割 權 益 分
Microsoft Word - 1.doc
1980 1984 1989 1992 1992 1995 200% 2000 7,288.6 3,701.1 World Trade Organization WTO WTO 1995 WTO 20 2000 1 10 98 WTO multinational enterprises MNE 1996 20 1996 500 1980 1980 1990 1992 1996 1980 Hymer
RESEARCH REPORT A Survey on the Effectiveness of Corporate Governance of Companies Listed in ShenZhen Stock Exchange 2003.12.05 0086 ...1 ABSTRACT...2...3...6...6...9...10...10...17...25...32...34...36...37...38...38...38...48...56...57
untitled
IPO 2005 6 13 14 2005 6 20 Equity WarrantDerivative Warrant covered warrant third party warrant 1 dilution effect 2 3 1 2 3 4 2003 1911 19 60 70 1973 1989 1 2004 2004 2003 49,166 38,479 27.77% USD millions)
36-FM11.doc
2004 May 22, 2004 pp748-762 - [email protected] E-VIEWS - q (MVA) 2001 2003 170 q (MVA) 1% : ( q MVA) q q (MVA) : (Corporate Governance) q(tobin s q) (Market Value Added) (Independent Directors) An Empirical
,, :, ;,,?, : (1), ; (2),,,, ; (3),,, :,;; ;,,,,(Markowitz,1952) 1959 (,,2000),,, 20 60, ( Evans and Archer,1968) ,,,
: : : 3 :2004 6 30 39 67,, 2005 1 1 2006 12 31,,, ( Evans and Archer) (Latane and Young) (Markowitz) :,,, :?,?,,,, 2006 12 31, 321, 8564161,53 1623150, 18196 % ; 268 6941110, 81104 %, 50 %,,2006,,,2006,
untitled
A Market Test of the Fund s Investment Behavior: Empirical Study Based on the Biggest Institutional Investor of China Stock Market Yi Yao& Zhiyuan Liu (Business School, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071
untitled
RESEARCH REPORT 2000~2006 1. 2. 2000 2001~2006 3. 4. A-HA A-HH A-HAA-H H 2 3 1992 9 10 1993 10 IPO 14 Black(1974) P/E ratiocost of capitalsarkissian and Schill (2004) home bias home premium + 2005 1 2
庫藏股與買回對股利發放之影響_4_.doc
The International Journal of Accounting Studies 41 2005 7 77-101 * * 2002 10 2005 17 77 78 41 2005 7 The Effect of Stock Repurchases on Dividend Payouts Kuei Hui Cheng National Taipei University Abstract
Demsetz(1982) Bain ( ) : 4 6?? ( 2005) 2004~ (2000) : ; 7 ; ;? (Lenway and Rehbein1991) ( ) ( ) ( 2006) ( 2002) Bain(1956)
( ) 2009 5 * 2004~2006 20 1 1989~2005 28% GDP 65% (2008) 20% 90.31% 2 2005 2 24 3 (1995) ( 2004) (Bian and Soon1997) * (20080440118) (70772084) (70802062) (70532003) - 97 - Demsetz(1982) Bain ( 5 2005)
A 1 2 1 2 1.1 2 1.2 6 1.3 7 2 9 2.1 9 2.2 10 3 11 3.1 12 3.2 13 3.3 15 4 20 4.1 21 4.2 22 22 2 Merrill Lynch Bernstein 18 sell-side indicator 18 60 sell-side indicator 1 1.1 1952 (H.Markowitz) 3 (Economics
by market behavioral biases. In addition, behavioral biases should also be considered when discussing high-tech venturing process, especially fund-rai
The implications of Behavioral Finance on Corporate Finance Muh-Guei Shiau Associate Professor Department of Business Administration China Institute of Technology There are two ways to re-discuss the issues
國立中山大學論文典藏.PDF
1.1 77 2 (Exchangeable Bond) 79 4 84 87 Dann and Mikkelson(1984) Green(1984) (straight debt) Stein(1992) 1 1.2 (partial anticipate) 1 ( ) 2 1 Chaplinsky & Hansen(1993) 2 Chaplinsky & Hansen(1993) Jung,
1 1 2 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 2 1 1 Reservation Value 2 3 1 ( ) 2 Vesting Period VestedOptions 5-10 At- the- money Option Fair Marke Value Option In- the- money Options Discount Option Out-of-the-money
Lewis
2011 6 World Economic Papers December, 2011 * 2005 2010 2005 * 985 email jadeyyx@ 163. com 600 200433 985 email zhangping_4@ sina. com 985 2011SHKXZD003 2011M500711 20110490654 11CJL024 2011 6 33 Lewis
FVA MVA I
* *, 00 983 1 000 11 001 6 00 6 00 11 FVA MVA I ... 1 1 []... 1 1.1... 1 1.... 1 1.3... 3 1.4... 4... 4.1... 4.... 5 3... 6 3.1... 7 3.... 9 3.3... 10 3.4... 16 3.5... 18 4... 19 4.1... 19 4.... 19 5...
07D5.FIT\)
股 权 结 构 与 信 息 披 露 : 国 外 文 献 回 顾 魏 文 君 ( 长 江 大 学 管 理 学 院, 湖 北 荆 州 434023) 摘 要 : 关 于 股 权 结 构 与 信 息 披 露 关 系 的 研 究, 国 外 文 献 主 要 是 从 股 权 分 散 管 理 层 ( 内 部 人 ) 持 股 机 构 投 资 者 持 股 和 大 股 东 持 股 等 四 种 不 同 类 型 股 东 持
Microsoft Word - 971管理學院工作報告2
管 理 學 院 97 學 年 度 第 一 學 期 校 務 會 議 工 作 報 告 管 理 學 院 1. 師 資 面 (1) 學 院 師 資 結 構 年 齡 學 位 職 級 的 組 成 本 院 專 任 教 師 共 88 位, 教 授 4 位 副 教 授 41 位 助 理 教 授 25 位 講 師 18 位 師 資 結 構 表 如 下 數 量 與 素 質 企 管 系 國 企 系 會 計 系 觀 光 系
01-article.doc
59 1990 (top-down) (bottom-up) 1980 ( ) 1970 ( ) ( ) ( ) 1990 ( ) 1970 60 ( ) 1977 66% 1986 31%(Hoshi, ( ) Kashyap and Scharfstein, 1990) 84 8 ( ) (firewall) ( ) ( ) 1980 ( (Savings and Loans Association))
( ),,,,,, (, 1995 ;1996) ; (,1996) ; (,1996),,, :, ( ), ( ),, (,1960, 190 ),, (,1991),,,,, ( ), ( ) ;,, ;,,,, (,1994),, ;, (,1980),,, ( Pejovich,1990
1997 1 ( ),, (1996) (1996) (1996),, ( ), 80,,, 80,,,, (Donaldson and Preston,1995),, ( ),,,,, 11 :,, ( ) 12 ( ),,,,,, (, 1995 ;1996) ; (,1996) ; (,1996),,, :, ( ), ( ),, (,1960, 190 ),, (,1991),,,,, (
J2n21
當 代 會 計 第 二 卷 第 二 期 民 國 九 十 年 十 一 月 127-146 頁 Journal of Contemporary Accounting Volume 2 Number 2, November 2001 PP. 127-146 現 金 增 資 採 用 詢 價 圈 購 方 式 對 外 部 股 東 財 富 之 影 響 * ** 李 建 然 林 子 瑄 摘 要 : 本 研 究 利
untitled
1,2, 2, 2 1, 350002; 2, 510275 ) A,, F830 A 1, investor relation management,irm. National Investor Relations Institute NIRI,,, [1].,IRM.,IRM [2]., IRM. 2004 3, IRM,98, 82, 75, 37% [3].,,., IRM,.1999 6,
<4D6963726F736F667420576F7264202D20ACE3B051BDD7A4E5A874A6433130302D3520BB4FC657A4F4AA47A57EBE50A46AB3B0AABAB2A3BE50BEF7A8EE2E646F63>
研 討 論 文 系 列 100-5 臺 灣 水 果 外 銷 大 陸 的 產 銷 機 制 :Zespri or Sunkist? 呂 雅 茹 指 導 教 授 : 羅 竹 平 中 華 經 濟 研 究 院 編 中 華 民 國 100 年 2 月 臺 灣 水 果 外 銷 大 陸 的 產 銷 機 制 : Zespri or Sunkist? 摘 要 建 議 成 立 二 家 互 補 又 競 爭 的 農 企 業,
序 言 本 研 習 資 料 手 冊 按 照 投 資 相 連 長 期 保 險 考 試 範 圍 編 纂 而 成, 該 考 試 試 題 將 按 本 研 習 資 料 手 冊 擬 定 內 文 每 章 結 尾 部 份 另 列 有 模 擬 試 題 供 參 考 在 香 港 保 險 業 監 理 處 的 應 允 下,
保 險 中 介 人 素 質 保 證 計 劃 投 資 相 連 長 期 保 險 考 試 研 習 資 料 手 冊 2010 年 版 序 言 本 研 習 資 料 手 冊 按 照 投 資 相 連 長 期 保 險 考 試 範 圍 編 纂 而 成, 該 考 試 試 題 將 按 本 研 習 資 料 手 冊 擬 定 內 文 每 章 結 尾 部 份 另 列 有 模 擬 試 題 供 參 考 在 香 港 保 險 業 監 理
第二章.doc
(Diversification) Rumelt(1974) 3 1. Rumelt(1974) (Synergy) 3 Chandler(1962) Gort(1962) - 8 - (Economic of Scope) Teece(1982) Rumelt(1982) Amit and Livant(1988) Williamson(1976) (Debt Capacity) 2. Amihud,
关键词:
RUC-BK-113-110204-11271333 2001 11271333 : 2005 4 15 1 2 Abstract Basing on the outlines of basic principles of conception, basic structure and operational mechanism of asset securitization, first, the
IPO Baron 1982 [2] Rock 1986 [1] Allen Faulhaber 1989 [3] [9] IPO IPO 2010 IPO % 2011 IPO IPO 27.4% 2012 IPO
Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics 10.13781/j.cnki.1007-9556.2015.05.004 IPO 300071 ~ [] [ ] A Study of the Effect of the Underwriters Interest Maximizing Behavior on IPO Overpricing
,,,,,Modigliani - Miller Bernanke, Gertler Gilchrist 1996,, Bernanke, Gertler Gilchrist ( ) ( ),,,, Bernanke, Gertler Gilchrist (1999),,, RBC, Bernank
RBC 3 (, 100871) RBC,, RBC,, ; ; F83015 A 1002-7246(2005) 04-0016 - 15 RBC,, Modigliani - Miller (1958 ),, RBC,, RBC,?? Gertler 1988, Fisher Keynes,,,,,,,,,, 2005-03 - 05 (1978 - ),,, (1970 - ),,,, 3 Chi
國立中山大學學位論文典藏.PDF
Black Scholes I...1...1...3...4...6...6...19...28...28...29...63...63...68...70...72...74...78...82...92...92...93...95...98 -1...5-1...9-2...9-3...9-4...12-1...53-1...79-2...79-3...81-4...84-5...85-6...86-7...90-8...90
東吳大學 104 學年度碩士班研究生招生考試試題第 2 頁, 共 7 頁 5. Consider a project with the following cash flows. Year Cash Flow 0 -$16, , ,000 What s the IRR o
東吳大學 104 學年度碩士班研究生招生考試試題第 1 頁, 共 7 頁 一 選擇題 60 分 ( 單選 每題 3 分 ) 1. Which of the following items can be found on an income statement? a. Accounts receivable b. Long-term debt c. Sales d. Inventory 2. A 15-year,
M 2 ΠGDP (1996) M2ΠGDP (2000) (2000) (2001) (2001) (2001) (2002) (2002) (2002) (2003) (2001) (2005) (2005) (2006) (2004) M2ΠGDP ; M2ΠGDP ; M2ΠG
3 2006 GDP 1017 % (CPI) 115 % 2005 (Pagano 1993 ; King and Levin 1993 ;Rajan and Zingales 1998 ; 2001) (1984) (1989) (1992) (1992) (2005) M2 (1996 1997) (2000) ; (2002) (2006) ( ) 3 ( 06&ZD004-01) 4 2007
untitled
smart money 5 1 overconfidence 90% 70%, 2, 3 6 4, 5 6 82 80 1 7 58.27% 22.18% 19.53 39.79 36.45 23.74 72 64 1 Thaler Johnson 1990 7 2 8 42 26 21.33 10.66 58.33 8.33 3 9 (reference point) 10 11 (ambiguity
<4D6963726F736F667420576F7264202D20BDD7A4E5B6B0A455A555A658A8D6AAA95FA477A752B0A3A5BCB56FAAEDA4E5B3B93130302E30372E30355F2E646F63>
股 市 投 資 人 之 風 險 承 擔 對 投 資 決 策 因 素 之 影 響 - 以 某 證 劵 公 司 高 雄 地 區 投 資 人 為 例 陳 榮 方 國 立 高 雄 應 用 科 技 大 學 企 業 管 理 系 副 教 授 [email protected] 陳 麗 梅 國 立 高 雄 應 用 科 技 大 學 高 階 經 營 管 理 研 究 所 研 究 生 [email protected]
Kaminskiy VITAL 1 VITAL Silico Medicine Pathway Pharmaceuticals Aging Analytics VITAL VITAL VITAL Aging Analytics observer 2 VITAL VITAL VITAL VITAL V
2014 Aging Analytics 2014 5 VITAL Validating Investment Tool for Advancing Life Sciences Deep Knowledge Ventures Deep Knowledge Venture 17CFX072 61 Kaminskiy VITAL 1 VITAL Silico Medicine Pathway Pharmaceuticals
untitled
1 1975-1988 1934 1951 7 1962 2 1971 12 22 47 29 13 1934 1974 1975 1988 Lee & Yoo, Margin Regulation and Stock Market Response: Further Evidence From The U.S and Some Pacific-Basin Countries[J].Review of
Social Organizations Civil Society Organizations Non - Government Organizations NGO Non - Profit Organizations NPO T
80 2012 6 1674-5205 2012 06-0080- 011 100871 Abstract Pursuant to relevant laws social organizations can be societies private non - enterprise entities or foundations and they can be terminated by canceling
:,,,, ;,,,,, Becker Tomes(1986), ( ), ( ),, ;,,,, , (CNHS) , ( ),CHNS,, CHNS :CHNS,, 30 %, 30 %, 30 % (1992),
2006 9 3 : CHNS, 90, ;, ;,1997 2000, :,, 30 % :,, 90,? :??,, 3, :100875 :xingchunbing @gsm. pku. edu. cn ;,,, 6 (,2006) CHNS, 1989 1409, 650 ; 582 402 162, 1072 1256 1325, 90 (1991 1993 ), (, 2006) (transition
中国金融体系运行效率分析(提纲)
20 90 6 1...1 1.1...1 1.1.1...1 1.1.2...3 1.2...6 1.2.1...6 1.2.2...7 2...8 2.1...9 2.1.1...9 2.1.2...11 2.2...13 2.2.1...13 2.2.2...15 2.3...17 2.3.1...17 2.3.2...20 3...21 3.1...22 3.1.1...22 3.1.2...25
LABOR ECONOMICS AND PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH CENTER ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY WORKING PAPERS SERIES 70233003 Zhu & Warner, 2000 (1999) : % % % % 1993 12358 51 6 34794 99 8 684 24 8 19468 113 9 1994 19098
1994 ~ % % 49% 2 GDP 1 2 Rawski GDP 1978 GDP 1978 =
GDP GDP 1 0. 089 GDP 30 2008 Hsieh and Klenow 2009 600 200433 lm@ fudan. edu. cn ouyanghanchu@ yahoo. com. cn 10YJA790126 71133004 B101 YES 12 3 1994 ~ 2010 9. 9% 1 1 90 1994 16 1994 0. 32 0. 51 15 0.
49 Schroeder & Aoki 2009 Li Bird & Ebel SSCI Journal of Public Economics Zhang & Zou DC cbe = + 2 DC be =
48 2011 6 158 Shirk 1993 Montinola et al. 1996 1997 2010 2010 10BZZ035 2010 2010R0083 49 Schroeder & Aoki 2009 Li 2010 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Bird & Ebel 2006 504 1 SSCI 2 1998 Journal of Public Economics Zhang
CHIPS Oaxaca - Blinder % Sicular et al CASS Becker & Chiswick ~ 2000 Becker & Chiswick 196
2015 3 179 2015 5 Comparative Economic & Social Systems No. 3 2015 May 2015 2001 ~ 2011 F812 A 1003-3947 2015 03-0020-14 Wu & Perloff 2004 Benjamin et al. 2004 Sicular et al. 2007 1998 2003 40% 1985 2.
11期(copy)
中 国 农 学 通 报 2014,30(11):29-33 Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin 海 洋 渔 业 上 市 企 业 内 在 价 值 评 估 探 讨 基 于 DDM 和 市 盈 率 模 型 王 颖, 周 露 ( 上 海 海 洋 大 学 经 济 管 理 学 院, 上 海 201306) 摘 要 : 近 期 国 务 院 发 布 关 于 促 进 海 洋 渔
管 理 科 学 软 科 学 2013 年 6 月 第 27 卷 第 6 期 ( 总 第 162 期 ) 9 10 11 12 2 3 3. 1 变 量 选 择 1 CAR i 20 20 140 21 120 2 2 i CSP 66 16 1 1 1 / 2 / 0 3 4 + + 5-6 7 8
软 科 学 2013 年 6 月 第 27 卷 第 6 期 ( 总 第 162 期 ) 管 理 科 学 叶 陈 刚, 王 ( 对 外 经 济 贸 易 大 学 国 际 商 学 院, 北 京 100029) 2012-10 - 12 国 家 社 会 科 学 基 金 重 点 项 目 ( 10AZD014) ; 国 家 自 然 科 学 基 金 项 目 ( 70672060) ; 教 育 部 人 文 社 会
Microsoft Word - 2015专业学位培养方案.doc
北 京 工 商 大 学 专 业 学 位 硕 士 研 究 生 培 养 方 案 (2015 年 ) 研 究 生 部 2015 年 9 月 目 录 经 济 学 院 专 业 学 位 硕 士 研 究 生 培 养 方 案 金 融 硕 士 研 究 生 培 养 方 案... 3 金 融 硕 士 研 究 生 培 养 计 划 安 排 表... 5 保 险 硕 士 研 究 生 培 养 方 案... 6 保 险 硕 士
2001 9 : p = i p i 21, 1991,,,, M 0 M 1 M 2 ;, 1990, : (1990,2000) 2001 (1996,1998 2000) (1999 2001 ) (1996. 1 2001. 1) (1990 2001 ) (1952 1996) (1997
: Ξ ( 518001) :,,,, ;,,,, ;,, :,,,,, ;,,, ;,,,, ;, 11,,,,, : (1) ; (2) ; (3) ; (4), ; (5),,p i i = a i Π n j = 1 a j, Ξ, 12 2001 9 : p = i p i 21, 1991,,,, M 0 M 1 M 2 ;, 1990, : (1990,2000) 2001 (1996,1998
Business Forum Basel 1. (Basel ) (2004) 2006 Basel (Probability of Default) (Standardized Approach) IRB (Foundation Internal Rating- Base
Business Forum 97 94 97-108 Basel 1. (Basel ) (2004) 2006 Basel (Probability of Default) (Standardized Approach) IRB (Foundation Internal Rating- Based Approach, FIRB) PD PD (Default Correlation) PD LGD?
untitled
RESEARCH REPORT 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 Selection Criteria Effect Hypothesis 4 5 3 180 180 2002-12-18 2003-01-02 10 18 18 2003-06-13 2003-07-01 12 18 18 2003-12-16 2004-01-02 12 18 18 2004-06-15 2004-07-01 12
* 2009 Mullainathan & Shleifer 2005 Gentzkow & Shapiro Shoemaker & Reese The Spiral of Silence Noelle-Neumann 1974 * 3610
2012 7 * 2009 Mullainathan & Shleifer 2005 Gentzkow & Shapiro 2006 2009 Shoemaker & Reese 1996 2007 1 The Spiral of Silence Noelle-Neumann 1974 * 361005 xmuyou@ sina. com 361005 wjturnip@ 163. com 71102061
标题
香 港 知 识 溢 出 对 内 地 创 新 能 力 影 响 的 实 证 研 究 以 广 东 省 为 例 王 鹏 赵 捷 摘 要 : 改 革 开 放 以 来, 内 地 经 济 技 术 和 创 新 水 平 的 提 高 离 不 开 源 自 香 港 的 知 识 溢 出 本 文 以 广 东 省 为 例, 运 用 1990 ~ 2010 年 粤 港 两 地 经 济 社 会 数 据, 从 知 识 溢 出 角 度
untitled
Granger Granger Granger M1 ECM M1 M1 20 90 1 2005 2004 10 12 7 2004 11 10 2004 11 17 Vasicek(1977) Dothan (1978) Courtadon (1982) Cox Ingersoll and Ross (1985) Chan Karolyi Longstaff and Sanders (1992)
多元化经营与企业价值.doc
* Toin s q * 999 997 46 Herfindahl 00 Matsusaka00 379 998-000 999 SIC Toin s q Weston970 CEO Gertner 994 CEO CEO smart money effectstein997 CEO winner-picking smarter money effecthuard Palia999 60 Khanna
Microsoft Word - A200811-1700.doc
影 响 人 民 币 对 美 元 汇 率 走 势 的 因 素 分 析 卢 莉 倩 宁 波 大 学 商 学 院, 浙 江 宁 波 (315211) E-mail: [email protected] 摘 要 :1994 年 外 汇 管 理 体 制 改 革 后, 我 国 实 行 以 市 场 供 求 为 基 础 的 有 管 理 的 浮 动 汇 率 制 度, 年 7 月 21 日 又 对 汇 率 参 考
2007 7,,, Faccio (2006) 47,,, Leuz Oberholzer2Gee (2006),,,,,,,,Fan Wong Zhang (2007a),,, Chen Li Su (2005),, ;, Fan Rui Zhao (2006) 23,,,,Fan Wong Zh
: : 2001 2003, :, ;,,,,, ( ), :,,,,,,,, (Williamson,2000 ;,2004 ;,2005),,,La Porta,,,, (La Porta et al,1998),, (La Porta et al,1999) Roe (2000), 3,(Center for Institutions and Governance), :200433,: sufexlj
長久以來,經濟學者最常利用國民生產毛額(Gross National Product, GNP)來作為一個國家或經濟社會福利水準高低之衡量標準
Research Center For Taiwan Economic Development (RCTED) GNP GNP GNP GNP 1960 Easterly 1997 95 3 2001 US13,000 4 1950/60 2 4 PPP GNI US18,000 Anand and Ravallion1993 1985 85 GDP Pritchett and Summers
