488 () 6,,, (, 2005),,, 1952,, 50,,,,,,,, 1953, (, 1988),,, ( Walker, 1984),,,, 2,, ,,, (, 1991),,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 1954,,,,, ( ), ,,,

Similar documents
50 :, :,,,,, 1959,,,,, 1962 (, 1993 ;, 1999), ( ) (Lin, 1990), 1959 (,1995) (food availability decline,fad) , (,1988) (Chang & Wen,1997 ; Yan

, 70 ;, 90,, :, ( Freedman,1995) , 7,, , 80,,,, ;,,,90,,,, , , 2000, 2000, 2000,

572 ( ) 9 (1997),,,,,, (, 1997),, (, 1998), (, 2006),,,,,,,, (, 1997),, ( Naughton, 1994) (Lipton and Sachs, 1990 ;, 2004 ; ),,, (, 1997) (1998),,,,,,

% % * ~ 14 % 15~ 64 % 65 %

3 : 121,, [1 ] (Stage Theory),,,,,,, 1 :, ;,,,,, 1 :11, 6,116 ; , 2003 ; 31 = Π ; 2, 1996 ;1996,,2000, Walt Rostow (1960, 1971), A. F. K. Organ

: 3 : , , ,, , :, ( Ravallion Chen, 2004 ; Khan Riskin, 2005,Yue et al, 2006),, (,2003 ;,200

(2005 (2006, (2006 ( , ( ,,,,,, ( (ASFR ASFR : x, B x x, P f x x (1 (2 4,, , 2 1 :, 1 2, 20-29

JOURNAL OF NANJING UNIVERSITY OF FINANCE AND ECONOMICS Wild t % 50% 15% % 19 17%

be invested on the desilting of water sources and to paved canals with cement mortar while drinking water project can focus on the improvement of wate

% % % 1. 39% % 2000 ~ % 1

瑏瑠 % 瑏瑡 % % 瑏瑢 19

,, :,;, ;, ;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 21,,,,,,,,, ( ),,,,,( ),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, , 1300, 31 2,1200,466,, 2 (,2005 :4) 631

United Nations ~ ~ % 2010

350 ( ) 9,,,,,,,,,,, :,,,,,,, ( Ergin and Sgnmez, 2006) Gale and Shapley (1962), Gale2Shapley,, Gale2Shapley ( (2007) ) Dubins and Freedman (1981) Gal

C J. C. Caldwell 訛 輯 輥 訛 輰 輥 Victor Nee 1 輥 輱 訛 ~


untitled

C doc

Hesketh and Zhu Dreze and Khera 2000 Zhao 2003 Sen and Nair Das Gupta and Li 1999 Banister 2004 Hudson and Den Boer 20

%

Bairoch, ) (Angus Maddison,1926 ) (Bairoch, 1976, 1981), 1960, , 220, 228 ; , 447, 310, 178 (1993) (1988) Peter Brecke (

(),,,,;, , (Π, ), , , 5162 %, U , ,,1992, , : ;

,, (18 ) , , % ,,; (3) ,a 100 %,b, 6 (, ),c , , , 2000 ; (4),2

( ) [11 13 ] 2 211,,, : (1),, 1990 ( ) ( ),, ; OD, ( ) ( ) ; , ( ), (2) 50 %,, 1999 ( ) ( ) ; (3),,

标题

%

,,,,, 1972 ; 60, 60,,, 1, 30, 6 10,,,, ,,, IU SSP,,,,,,, 1/ 5,,,,, 1952,,,, 3p, pop ulation, poverty, pollution (,, ), 3p IU SSP,, 1.

江 汉 学 术 总 第 34 卷 氏 的 杂 姓 村 本 研 究 采 取 田 野 调 查 的 访 谈 法 和 文 献 档 案 法 收 集 资 料 笔 者 对 A 村 干 部 和 普 通 村 民 进 行 深 度 访 谈, 并 获 得 该 村 自 年 的 全 部 计 划 生 育 对

6 ( ) 36 5 %, 70,, ;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, :,,,,,,,, :,,,, ( ),,,,, :,,,, [1 ]379,,,,,,,,,,, 20 50,,,,

4 23,2004),,, (2002), 2000, 2000, , (2002) (2004), , , % ; 0 3, : (1) ; (2) 100 % ; (3

,,,,,, (William Parish) , 2865, : (1966 ) 20,,, 20, :,, :,, (Destratification) (Parish,1984 :84-120), 1983 (N = 1774) (Xie &Lin, 1986) 19

i-v

Lewis

CHIPS Oaxaca - Blinder % Sicular et al CASS Becker & Chiswick ~ 2000 Becker & Chiswick 196

% 82. 8% You & Kobayashi % 2007 %

引言

2005 6, :,,,,,,,, ;,,,, :, ;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, :,3,, 1959,89, 98 :,: 1,1959 2

Jul Journal of Chinese Women's Studies No. 4 Ser. No. 148 * CFPS 2010 C A Where does the Ti

國家圖書館典藏電子全文

2005 3,? :; ;, ;,,,,,,1 % %,,,,, 1 %,,,, : () ;, ;,,,,,,,,,,,,, (2004) ( GBΠT ) 16 (2004), (2004) 47

:,,,, :,,,,,,,,,, Slesnick (1991) Culter Katz (1992),,,,,, ;, ( Friedman,1957) (Moligdiani,1950),,,, 1 ( )Π (World Bank,2000), ( CHIP 1

510 ( ) 7 (2002) 20 90,, ( Young, 1993),,,, (2003),,,,,,,,,,, ( ),,,,, (2001),,,,, (2004),,, ( ) (2003), ( ), (2003),,, ( 2002) (2003) (2000),,,,,,,

Microsoft Word - Wang Qing.doc

:,; ;, ( ) 25,, 80 90, 90,,,,,,, ( ), ( ), %,, , ,, ( ),,, ;,,,,,,,,,, ( ) , , 3395,3400, 20 % 30 %,

: : : :1996,??,,,,,,,, :,,,,, Goldsmith (1969) 35,, Shaw(1973) Gurley Shaw(1960), Demirg c2 Kunt Levin (2001) 150 (1992)

2 32,,,, 211, 1980,, (implosion, ),, : (lowest - low fertil2 ity), 1. 3 TFR ( Kohler, Billari and Ortega, 2002) ; (very low fertility), 1. 5 TFR (Cald

越南政經改革與憲政制度之演變


~ ~

Hwang Yang Kipnis Wong 1996 Wong & Salaff 1998 Wank 1996 Bian

Coleman Simkus Andorka 5 Parkin 6 Shavit Blossfeld Bourdieu, Pierre, Cultural Reproduction and Social Reproduction, in Pow

: 3 ( ) :, 1990 UNDP, Spearman HDI,,, ( ), 1990,,,,,, : 1990 (UNDP), ( Human Development Index, HDI), HDI :, ;, ;, GDP(PPP ) (UNDP, 2004) HDI 1

third in 20 years. The student population will be in the range of million before Keywords education age population family planning

2008 5,,,,,,,,,, (,2002),,,?,,,,,, 1994 : 1994,, ( GDP ),, (,2004),,,,,,, highly decentralized,, decentralization, ( ),,,, fiscal decentralization (re

DID 13. 0% 20. 2% 12. 6% 30 1 Leland 1968 Zeldes 1989 Zeldes 1989 Carroll Skinner 1987 Zhang & Wan

,, , 1 (,2006) %, 1. 47,, %, 4. 5, 84 %(,2008a,2008b,2009),,,,, : %, %,?,,,,,,,,, (20

中國的經濟改革模式與金融體制

~ 10 2 P Y i t = my i t W Y i t 1000 PY i t Y t i W Y i t t i m Y i t t i 15 ~ 49 1 Y Y Y 15 ~ j j t j t = j P i t i = 15 P n i t n Y

Oates U

(New Economics of Labor Migration NELM Taylor Martin (2001) ) NELM NELM 2 ( 2007; 2000) (1) 3 U=U(x wa x wm x wl ;x ha x hm x hl ) U'>0U''<0 (1) ( 200

农业发展中的性别参与和土地经营

49 Schroeder & Aoki 2009 Li Bird & Ebel SSCI Journal of Public Economics Zhang & Zou DC cbe = + 2 DC be =

中国主权资产负债表风险分析

當 代 史 學 第 8 卷 第 3 期 (2007 年 9 月 ) 文 博 專 輯 香 港 近 十 年 來 文 博 事 業 的 發 展 周 佳 榮 1997 年 7 月 1 日 香 港 特 別 行 政 區 成 立 以 來, 本 地 的 文 博 事 業 有 了 很 大 的 進 展, 博 物 館 數 目

政治制度史研究的省思:以六朝隋唐為例

093_114_Koh_khee_heong

a Honig 986 Hershatter Walder

IPCC CO (IPCC2006) 1 : = ( 1) 1 (kj/kg) (kgc/gj) (tc/t)

嶺南地區的大開發時期始於宋代 當時 由於陸上絲路無法通行 朝廷特別注重南方 海上貿易發展 於廣州設 市舶司 管理 來華朝貢和貿易的蕃舶 北宋滅亡後 南宋 定都江左 大量北方漢人被迫逃往南方 有 朝廷官宦家眷沿贛江南下 或越過南嶺 定 居南雄地區 或沿北江直下廣州 在珠江三 角洲地區開基立業 繁衍後代

语篇中指代词的分布规律与心理机制*

political-legal Max Weber Essays in Sociology

2007 3,, 1981 : :, :,,,, :,,, ( ) ;,, :, : :, :, 1984 : 1999,218 2

Chap3Chinese

Feder Chapple 2002 Barslund Stiglitz Klychova Pal

: 3 :,,,,,,,,,,,, :, 30 9 %, (1994) (The Myth of Asiaπs Miracle),,,,, 1997,,,,, :,,,,, (1994) 1998, 1998,,,,,,, ( ),, :,?,? 3,, :100871, e

文章

:,,, 1948, 1956, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 1948,,, [1 ], ( ),, [ Sergei Goncharenko, Sino2Soviet Mi

2004 1, 1980,21 %, 13 %,, 2002, GDP 34 %(1) 1 GDP 1 20 :,,,, % % % ( ), , , 1162,65 %, ,,

2002 5,,,,, 1990,, 1996,,,,,, 1949,,,2000, ;20, 3,2000 7,1990, , , :( ), , 31 ; :, :,2001,

2011_1_核红.indd

494 ( ) 12 (reversal) % (Berstein1984) : (Yang 1996;KungandLin2003); (KungandChen2011) LinandYang (2000)

于 水 等 : 多 源 流 理 论 视 角 下 宅 基 地 使 用 权 确 权 政 策 的 议 程 设 置 研 究 基 于 江 苏 省 4 市 的 调 查 83 push forward the confirmation of homestead use right of rural central

2006 4,,,, TFP (,2003),, 90,,,, 2005,, ;,,,,,, (disembodied),,,, (,2003),,,,,, : y = Af ( k, l) : y, k, l, A, : = - -, ( ), ( ),,,,90,,,:,,,,,,,,,,,,,

:, ( ),, :,60,, 1962,, ( ),,,,, 1986,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ( ), C,,,,,,,,,,,,, X,,,;,,, ; ( ),,, Mirrless (1976) : (1), (2),,, 60 (1996),:

Scoones World Bank DFID Sussex IDS UNDP CARE DFID DFID DFID 1997 IDS

WTO GDP 9.4% GDP 8.1% , , % 15.7% ( 1999) (GATT)

语篇中指代词的分布规律与心理机制*

~ Jason Thompson, A History of Egypt: From Earliest Times to the Present, Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press, 2008, p

:,,,,,, :,,,,,,,, (, 2007), ( Scott, 1985),,,,,,, : :,, ;, (L i & OgB rien, 1996) (policy2based resistance) ( rightful resistance),,,,, 35

( s y s t e m ) ( s t r e s s ) (stress model) ( s y s t e m ) [ ] [ 5 ] C o x [ 3 ] 1 [ 1, 2 ] [ 6-8 ] [ 9 ] Tw Fam Med Res 2003 Vol.1 No.1 23

% % 2 (1) 基 层 义 务 教 育 扩 张 的 产 物

2001 2,, (Devine & Kiefer, 1991), :, ;,,,,?, 300, 57 % ( Granovetter, 1974),, ( Fernan2 dez & Weinberg, 1997) :,, ( Granovetter, 1973),,,,,,,, (Lin, 1

:,,, (Naughton,1999 ;Xu,2002 ; Fan and Wei,2003 ;, 2004,2006 ;,2004,2006 ;,2006),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ISCP ( 1),, ISCP SCP ISCP,I( Institution) ; S ( Struc

國立中山大學學位論文典藏.PDF

17 20 ;,,,,,15 ;,, 3 (Push2Pull Theory),,,, 20 70, (Bertil Lintner) ,, [1 ], 17, :(17-19 ),,,,,2000,,,,, 15,,,,,,,,, 17,1511,1570, 1626,

Francis L. K. Hsu Under the Ancestors Shadow Francis Hsu, Under the Ancestors Shadow: Chinese Cultu

5月15期

16 (),,, ,,,,, ;,, ;,,,,,,,,,,,,,, :,,, 1982,,, [2 ]63,,?,,,,, 1954, 1975, ,,1978,,1954, 1975,,1975,,,, 1975, 197

1994 ~ % % 49% 2 GDP 1 2 Rawski GDP 1978 GDP 1978 =


Transcription:

6 2 2007 1 () China Econo mic Quarterly Vol. 6, No. 2 J anuary, 2007 : 3 1959 1961, ;,, ( FAD),,, FAD,,, ( Sen, 1981),, 1943 1972 1974 1949 7 %21 %,,,,,,, 1958 566 1959 497 ; 1959 6. 7, 1961 6. 6, 1, 1960 1 68. 58, 100 7, 1958 1962 633 (, 2005), 3 :,,210095 ; (025) 84396764 ; E2mail :ivannj @163. com CCER,, 1,,

488 () 6,,, (, 2005),,, 1952,, 50,,,,,,,, 1953, (, 1988),,, ( Walker, 1984),,,, 2,, 1955 3,,, (, 1991),,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 1954,,,,, ( ), 2 1957 1. 931,,, 1958,2000,4532, 13. 8 1 3. 5 1 (,1984)

2 : 489,,,,,,,,,,, 1958,, 11, 99. 1 % (, 1988),,,,,,,,,,,,,,, (Lin and Yang, 2000 ; ),, 3,,,,, 2005,,,,,,,, 1959 1961,, :, ;,, ;, ; 3,,,,

490 () 6, Panel data ;,,,, ( Food Availabil2 ity Decline, FAD), FAD,, FAD,,, ( Entitlement),,,,, 4, (), (),,,, (),,,,,,,,, 20 80, 1959 1961,, Ansley (1981) 5 1650 ; John (1982) Peng (1987) 2300 ; Ashton (1984) 2950 ; Banister (1987) 3000 ; (1993) 1956 1957 4,,,, 5,

2 : 491 1962 1963, 1960 1961 1395 ; Cheng (1994) 4300 ; 3300 (Ashton et al., 1984) ; 2005 1,, 1959 1961 3250, 1959 1961, FAD,,,, (, 2005) FAD,,, FAD,, 1960 1959 1961,,, (Lin, 1990),,,, 1958,,, ;, Yang and Li (2005),,,, ;, ( Yang, 1996) (Chang and Wen, 1997),, (, 2003),, 1959 1961,,, (, 1994),,,,

492 () 6, (Lin and Yang, 2000),,, ;,,,, (Bernstein, 1985),,,, 6,,,, ( ),, 7,,,,,, 1953, 1958 ;,,,,,,, 1957 8 9. 47 ;,,,,,,, 1960 100. 85,,,, 6,,,,,, 7 1955 :,, (,1991) 8 1957, 1957,,1958,,1960

2 : 493 () 55 9 1954 1977, 1954, 1954,, ; 1977 1978,,,,,, ; 1986, 1982 (1949 1980), 1999 1 1959 1961,, 1957 1. 026 %1960 1. 841 %, 79. 4 %, 135. 5 %, 1960, 1. 4,,, 1 ( ) :,,, 1999 9, 1982

494 () 6, 2 1960, ;,,, 1959 8. 5 %,, 3,,,, 1961, 1961,, 1961 1962, 1962,, : 2 () : 3

2 : 495 (, 2005),, 1, 1960, 223. 9, 100. 85,,,,,,,,, 69 %,,,, 5 %, 10,,,,,, 11,,, 4 1959 1961,, 12,,,, 1973 13 ;, 45 %, 14,,,, 15 10,( ),,1987,10 11,,,1991,3 12,,,, 13,,,1980,117 14,,,1980,118 15,,, ;,,

496 () 6 4 : (),,,,, ;,,, : DR = f ( C, H), DR, C, H,,,,,,

2 : 497, : C = f ( G), G :,,,,,,,,,,, 16,, FAD,,, ( FAD), FAD,,,,,,, : G = f ( R, IP, POP,CPP,U P), R, IP, PO P (/ ), CPP, U P (/ ), DR = f ( H, R, IP, PO P,CPP,U P), () 1,, 1959, 1958 55. 9 %, 1959 1958 1. 5, 1959, 1960, 1963, 1956 1960,,, 1959 1958 20. 3 %, 16,,,,,,,,(1)

498 () 6, 1960,,, 1964,, 1962 1957, 1965,,,,, 1959 1958 0. 002, 3. 83 %, 1959,, 1960 1. 6 %, 0. 59 %, 1962, 1 ( ) ( %) () ( %) (1/ 10 ) 1954 1955 1956 12. 12 11. 66 12. 81 14. 19 14. 00 13. 83 9. 96 10. 29 10. 17 2. 11 2. 07 2. 00 1957 10. 04 14. 89 357 9. 33 1. 92 1958 9. 33 16. 25 335 8. 96 1. 76 1959 14. 55 17. 73 267 8. 71 1. 78 1960 18. 41 18. 06 270 8. 56 1. 77 1961 13. 35 16. 45 252 7. 28 1. 77 1962 10. 36 14. 86 270 7. 41 1. 74 1963 9. 04 14. 49 313 8. 05 1. 69 1964 10. 13 14. 24 373 9. 58 1. 66 1965 9. 48 14. 17 388 10. 30 1. 60 1966 8. 05 13. 99 410 10. 28 1. 56 1967 7. 81 13. 34 408 10. 75 1. 51 1968 7. 65 13. 25 404 10. 68 1. 46 1969 6. 80 12. 09 392 10. 21 1. 42 1970 6. 85 11. 43 411 9. 84 1. 38 1971 7. 38 11. 55 431 9. 52 1. 34 1972 6. 84 11. 54 429 9. 92 1. 32 1973 6. 52 12. 63 448 10. 23 1. 29 1974 6. 61 12. 08 443 10. 21 1. 27 1975 6. 46 12. 02 439 9. 97 1. 25 1976 6. 48 12. 15 456 9. 60 1. 23 1977 6. 48 12. 11 431 9. 75 1. 22 :,, (1949 1980) :, (1949 1980),

2 : 499 (),, : 1.,,,,,, (Chang and Wen, 1997),, 2.,,,,, () ( Panel data), :, ;, ; 1957, (unbalanced panels), (balanced panels), : lndrit = 0 + 1 Ci + 2 Y t + 3 IPit + 4 lnpopit + 5 lncppit + 6 U Pit + it. (1) 0,, Ci,,,,,, Y t,,,,

500 () 6,,,, 1959 1960 1961 1, 0,,, (1) : lndrit = 0 + 1 Ci + 2 Y t + 3 IPit + 4 lnpo Pit + 5 lncppit + 6 U Pit + 7 lndrit - 1 + 8 DIPit + 9 lndpo Pit + 10 DlnCPPit + 11 DU Pit + 12 DlnDRit - 1 + it. (2), lncpp, 5 0,, 3 4 6 0,,, ( 5 + 10 ) < 0 ;,,,,, ( 3 + 8 ) < 0 ( 4 + 9 ) > 0 ( 6 + 11 ) < 0, 8 9 10 11 0 ;,,, 12 0,, 7 0,,,, : R1 R2 R3, 1959, R1 = 1, 0 ; 1960, R2 = 1, 0 ; 1961, R3 = 1, 0 15, (2) : lndrit = 0 + 1 Ci + 2 Y t + 3 IPit + 4 lnpo Pit + 5 lncppit + 6 U Pit + 7 lndrit - 1 + 8 R1 IPit + 9 R1 lnpo Pit + 10 R1 lncppit + 11 R1 U Pit + 12 R1lnDRit - 1 + 13 R2 IPit + 14 R2 lnpopit + 15 R2lnCPPit + 16 R2 U Pit + 17 R2lnDRit - 1 + 18 R3 IPit + 19 R3 lnpopit + 20 R3lnCPPit + 21 R3 U Pit + 22 R3 lndrit - 1 + it, (3) 8 1959, 13 1960, 18 1961,,,,

2 : 501 2 2 lndr Log( ), = U P, = / IP lnpop, = (1949 1980) / Log( ), = (1949 1980) / lncpp Log () (1949 1980) D R1 R2 R3,1, 0 1959,1959 1,0 1960,1960 1,0 1961,1961 1,0 (2) (3),, :,, (2) (3),,,,,,,,,, (), 3 (2),,,,, 0. 372-0. 009,, R 2 0. 674 0. 709,,, 4 (3),, (2),

502 () 6 3 (2) (1) (2) (3) (4) U P( ) - 0. 007 3 ( - 3. 119) - 0. 004 3 3 ( - 2. 072) - 0. 016 3 ( - 3. 302) - 0. 012 3 ( - 2. 789) IP() - 0. 129 ( - 1. 480) - 0. 206 3 3 ( - 2. 563) - 0. 206 ( - 0. 601) - 0. 494 ( - 1. 576) lncpp() - 0. 152 3 ( - 3. 350) - 0. 154 3 ( - 3. 665) 0. 035 (0. 691) 0. 013 (0. 279) lnpop ( ) 0. 108 (1. 359) 0. 120 (1. 631) 0. 303 3 3 (2. 303) 0. 232 3 3 3 (1. 935) LnDR t - 1 () 0. 413 3 (11. 228) 0. 441 3 (11. 386) U P D( ) 0. 001 (0. 258) 0. 002 (0. 578) 0. 032 3 (4. 313) 0. 032 3 (4. 708) IP D( ) - 1. 315 3 ( - 5. 120) - 0. 767 3 ( - 3. 136) - 2. 399 3 ( - 2. 875) - 1. 544 3 3 ( - 2. 019) lncpp D( ) 0. 256 3 (3. 148) 0. 170 3 3 (2. 230) - 0. 045 ( - 0. 431) - 0. 098 ( - 1. 012) lnpop D( ) - 0. 090 3 3 ( - 2. 508) - 0. 118 3 ( - 3. 540) 0. 603 3 3 (1. 970) 0. 883 3 (3. 152) LnDR t - 1 D( ) - 0. 088 3 3 3 ( - 1. 658) - 0. 110 3 3 ( - 2. 082) U P t - 1 ( ) 0. 005 (1. 204) 0. 005 (1. 327) IP t - 1 () - 0. 027 ( - 0. 321) 0. 028 (0. 358) lncpp t - 1 () - 0. 322 3 ( - 6. 324) - 0. 243 3 ( - 5. 177) lnpopt - 1 ( ) - 0. 069 ( - 0. 622) 0. 039 (0. 385) U P t - 1 D( ) - 0. 029 3 ( - 4. 816) - 0. 028 3 ( - 5. 039) IP t - 1 D( ) 0. 972 (1. 295) 0. 721 (1. 050) lncpp t - 1 D( ) 0. 338 3 (3. 461) 0. 290 3 (3. 244) lnpopt - 1 D( ) - 0. 710 3 3 ( - 2. 320) - 1. 036 3 ( - 3. 694) R 2 0. 674 0. 722 0. 709 0. 758 200. 883 295. 317 253. 468 354. 221 0. 372-0. 009 0. 357-0. 036 : t, 3 1 %, 3 3 5 %, 3 33 10 % :, (1949 1980),1982 ;,,1986

2 : 503 (2), IPlnCPP,,, ; U P lnpo P 10 %,,,,,,,,,, lncppt - 1,,,,,,,,, (2), lncpp, lncppt - 1,,,,,, lncpp D lncppt - 1 lncppt - 1 D, - 0. 029,,, (U P U P D ),,,,, (U Pt - 1 U Pt - 1 D ),,, ( IP D IPt - 1 IPt - 1 D ), ( IPt - 1 IPt - 1 D ),,,,,,,, (lnpoplnpop D lnpo Pt - 1 lnpopt - 1 ), CPP FAD, FAD, U PIP POP, D

504 () 6,, lncpp lncpp D, U P U P D IP D lnpop lnpo P D, FAD, - 0. 029, - 1. 442, (3), 4, 2,, U PIP lnpop lncpp (2),, 1959 (U Pt - 1 R1 ) 1960 ( U Pt - 1 R2 ), 1961 ( U Pt - 1 R3 ) ;,, (U P) 1959 1960, 1961,, 1959, 1960, ( CPP),,, ;, ( POP),, 4 (3) (1) (2) (3) (4) U P( ) - 0. 007 3 ( - 3. 248) - 0. 004 3 3 ( - 2. 143) - 0. 014 3 ( - 3. 075) - 0. 012 3 ( - 2. 935) IP() - 0. 140 ( - 1. 645) - 0. 218 3 ( - 2. 836) - 0. 220 ( - 0. 653) - 0. 535 3 3 ( - 1. 797) lncpp() - 0. 118 3 ( - 2. 629) - 0. 118 3 ( - 2. 896) 0. 080 (1. 613) 0. 039 (0. 895) lnpop ( ) 0. 108 (1. 386) 0. 115 (1. 633) 0. 256 3 3 (2. 022) 0. 222 3 3 (1. 988) LnDR t - 1 () 0. 413 3 (11. 739) 0. 436 3 (12. 129)

2 : 505 ( ) (1) (2) (3) (4) U P t - 1 ( ) 0. 005 (1. 313) 0. 005 (1. 467) IP t - 1 () - 0. 029 ( - 0. 359) 0. 020 (0. 280) lncpp t - 1 () - 0. 281 3 ( - 5. 707) - 0. 217 3 ( - 4. 982) lnpopt - 1 ( ) - 0. 091 ( - 0. 856) 0. 026 (0. 276) U P R1 (1959 ) - 0. 007 ( - 1. 187) 0. 006 (1. 043) 0. 020 (1. 603) 0. 079 3 (6. 373) IP R1 (1959 ) - 1. 748 3 ( - 5. 002) - 0. 268 (0. 763) - 2. 863 ( - 1. 635) 3. 180 3 3 (1. 973) lncpp R1 (1959 ) - 0. 179 ( - 1. 472) - 0. 012 ( - 0. 107) - 0. 763 3 ( - 5. 029) - 0. 327 3 3 ( - 2. 377) lnpop R1 (1959 ) - 0. 060 ( - 1. 224) - 0. 096 3 3 ( - 2. 155) - 0. 967 3 3 3 ( - 1. 814) - 1. 810 3 ( - 3. 768) LnDR t - 1 R1 (1959 ) 0. 472 3 (4. 668) 0. 700 3 (6. 702) U P R2 (1960 ) 0. 002 (0. 370) 0. 005 (1. 031) 0. 026 3 (2. 657) 0. 029 3 (3. 302) IP R2 (1960 ) - 1. 085 3 3 ( - 2. 238) - 0. 309 ( - 0. 681) - 5. 208 3 ( - 3. 641) - 3. 720 3 ( - 2. 932) lncpp R2 (1960 ) 0. 829 3 (5. 880) 0. 728 3 (5. 632) 1. 077 3 (5. 626) 0. 841 3 (4. 744) lnpop R2 (1960 ) 0. 040 (0. 807) 0. 022 (0. 491) 1. 098 3 (2. 974) 1. 414 3 (4. 321) LnDR t - 1 R2 (1960 ) - 0. 080 ( - 1. 163) - 0. 141 3 3 ( - 2. 096) U P R3 (1961 ) 0. 008 (0. 855) 0. 005 (0. 587) 0. 021 (1. 385) 0. 013 (0. 951) IP R3 (1961 ) - 0. 264 ( - 0. 571) - 0. 176 ( - 0. 420) 1. 208 (0. 718) 0. 517 (0. 341) lncpp R3 (1961 ) 0. 392 3 (2. 765) 0. 363 3 (2. 664) 0. 152 (0. 689) 0. 122 (0. 616) lnpop R3 (1961 ) - 0. 214 3 ( - 4. 126) - 0. 256 3 ( - 5. 455) 2. 854 3 3 3 (1. 792) 3. 181 3 3 (2. 264) LnDR t - 1 R3 (1961 ) - 0. 359 3 ( - 5. 261) - 0. 369 3 ( - 5. 587) U P t - 1 R1 (1959 ) - 0. 026 3 ( - 2. 790) - 0. 057 3 ( - 6. 596) IP t - 1 R1 (1959 ) 1. 489 (0. 888) - 3. 284 3 3 ( - 2. 161) lncpp t - 1 R1 (1959 ) 0. 815 3 (5. 775) 0. 380 3 (2. 960)

506 () 6 ( ) (1) (2) (3) (4) lnpopt - 1 R1 (1959 ) 0. 867 (1. 644) 1. 651 3 (3. 472) U P t - 1 R2 (1960 ) - 0. 025 3 ( - 2. 606) - 0. 026 3 ( - 3. 140) IP t - 1 R2 (1960 ) 3. 717 3 (3. 254) 2. 943 3 (2. 922) lncpp t - 1 R2 (1960 ) - 0. 337 3 3 ( - 2. 132) - 0. 162 ( - 1. 118) lnpopt - 1 R2 (1960 ) - 1. 074 3 ( - 2. 879) - 1. 442 3 ( - 4. 364) U P t - 1 R3 (1961 ) - 0. 019 3 3 3 ( - 1. 706) - 0. 016 33 3 ( - 1. 680) IP t - 1 R3 (1961 ) - 1. 782 ( - 1. 043) - 0. 975 ( - 0. 629) lncpp t - 1 R3 (1961 ) 0. 326 (1. 441) 0. 308 (1. 541) lnpopt - 1 R3 (1961 ) - 3. 074 3 3 3 ( - 1. 931) - 3. 469 3 3 ( - 2. 470) R 2 0. 688 0. 746 0. 733 0. 793 231. 978 352. 731 308. 217 450. 389 0. 359-0. 019 0. 341-0. 015 : t, 3 1 %, 3 3 5 %, 3 33 10 % :, ;, (), (1953 1957 ),, 1953 1957,,,,,,, ;,,,,

2 : 507,,, :, : lndr54 58 lndr59 61 lndr62 77 = 0 + 1 IP54 57 + 2 lnpop54 57 +, (4) = 0 + 1 IP54 57 + 2 lnpop54 57 +, (5) = 0 + 1 IP54 57 + 2 lnpop54 57 +. (6) IP ( ) PO P ( ) 1954 1957, DR54 58 1954 1958, DR62 77 1962 1977,, (4) (6) ; DR59 61 1959 1961, (5),,, (5), DR IP POP, CHOW, 1959 17, 5 (4) (5) (6),, 5 %,,,, ; (1959 1961 ), ; (1962 1977 ),,, F,, R 2 ( PO P), 1954 1957, 17 1961 CHOW,,

508 () 6 5 lndr (1954 1958 ) lndr (1959 1961 ) lndr (1962 1977 ) IP() (1954 1957 ) - 12. 009 3 3 ( - 2. 536) - 50. 386 3 ( - 2. 809) - 5. 829 ( - 0. 272) lnpop ( ) (1954 1957 ) - 0. 071 ( - 1. 260) - 0. 119 3 33 ( - 1. 823) - 0. 129 ( - 1. 333) R 2 0. 147 0. 210-0. 009 F2 5. 582 6. 909 0. 772 P 0. 006 0. 002 0. 467 CHOW F 21. 026 P 0. 000 : t, 3 1 %, 3 3 5 %, 3 33 10 % :,,,,,,,,,,,,, ;,, ;,,,,,,,,,,,

2 : 509,,,,,,, ;,,, 1958,,, 1959,, 1961 1962 1963 1958 (1),,, 1958, 1961,,,,, ( ), 1 1975 () ( %) () ( %) 206 163 194 200 209 218 226 244 200 :,,,1980,109

510 () 6 [ 1 ] Aird, J.,Population Studies and Population Policy in China, Population and Development Re2 view, Vol. 8, No. 2 (J un., 1982), 267 297 [ 2 ] Ashton, B., K. Hill, A. Pizza and R. Zeitz,Famine in China, 1958 1961, Population and De2 velopment review, 1984, 10 (4), 613 645. [ 3 ] Banister, J., China s Changing Pop ulation. Stanford : Stanford University Press, 1987. [ 4 ] Berstein, T.,Stalinism, Famine, and Chinese Peasant s : Grain Procurement During t he Great Leap Forward, Theory and S ociet y, 1984, 13 (3), 339 377. [ 5 ] Chang, G. and J. Wen,Communical Dining and t he Chinese Famine of 1958 1961, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1997, 46 (1), 1 34. [ 6 ] Chen, Chu2yuan., China s Economic Develop ment : Growth and S t ructural Change. Boulder : Westview, 1982. [ 7 ],1959 1961,, 2005 1,14 28 [ 8 ] Coale, A. J.,Population Trends, Population Policy, and Population Studies in China, Popula2 tion and Development Review, 1981, 7 (1), 267 297. [ 9 ],( ) :,1987 [ 10 ],1959 1961,,2005 1, 66 71 [ 11 ],:, 1999 [ 12 ],, 1986 [ 13 ], (1949 1980), 1982 [ 14 ],:,1991 [ 15 ],, 1993 4 5,13 22 [ 16 ],:,1991 [ 17 ] Johnson, D. G.,China s Great Famine : Introductory Remarks., China Economic Review, 1998, 9 (2), 103 109. [ 18 ] Kung, J. and J ustin Yifu Lin,The Causes of China s Great Leap Famine, 1959 1961, Eco2 nomic Develop ment and Cultural Change, 2003, 52 (1), 51 73. [ 19 ] Kung, J., and L. Putterman,China s Collectivization Puzzle : A New Resolution. J ournal of Development S t udies, 1997, 33, 741 763. [ 20 ] Li, W. and D. T. Yang,The Great Leap Forward : Anatomy of a Central Planning Disaster, J ournal of Political Econom y, 2005, 113 (4), 840 877. [ 21 ], ::,1994 [ 22 ] Lin, J ustin Yifu.,Collectivization and China s Agricultural Crisis in 959 1961, J ournal of Po2 litical Econom y, 1990, Vol. 98, No. 6, 1228 1252.

2 : 511 [ 23 ] Lin, J ustin Yifu, and D. T. Yang,On t he Causes of China s Agricultural Crisis and the Great Leap Famine, China Economic Review, 1998, 9 (2), 125 140. [ 24 ] Lin, J ustin Yifu and D. T. Yang,Food Availability, Entitlement s and t he Chinese Famine of 1959 1961, Economic J ournal, 2000, 110 (460), 136 158. [ 25 ], ( 1958 1965) :, 1984 [ 26 ] Osmani, S.,The Entitlement Approach to Famine : An Assessment, in K. Basu et al., (eds. ), Choice, Wel f are, and Development : Essays in Honour of A martya Sen. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1995. [ 27 ] Peng, X. Z.,Demographic Consequences of t he Great Leap Forward in China s Provinces, Pop2 ulation and Develop ment Review, 1987, 13 (4), 639 670. [ 28 ],:,1980 [ 29 ] Sen, Amartya K. Poverty and Famine. Oxford, U. K. : Clarendon Press, 1981. [ 30 ] Walker, K. R., Food Grain Procurement and Consum ption in China. New York : Cambridge Uni2 versity Press, 1984. [ 31 ] Yang, Dali L. Calamity and Ref orm in China : S tate, Rural Society, and Institutional Change since the Great L eap Famine. Stanford : Stanford University Press, 1996. [ 32 ],(1949 1966), :,1988 [ 33 ],,,2003 2,54 64 Cash Crop, Food Entitlement and Chinese Famine : A Test on Sen s Entitlement Theory ZIYIN G FAN L IN GJ IE M EN G ( N anj i ng A g ricult ural U ni versit y) Abstract Using panel data to analyze the different death rates across the provinces in the Chinese Famine during the period 1959 1961, this paper concludes that the hierarchical food entitlement system at that time was the main cause for the finding that rural residents in grain producing areas died of hunger with a much higher rate than rural residents in food deficient Areas or urban resident s. Under this hierarchical system, cash crop areas were more privi2 leged than conventional food deficient areas in acquiring food during the famine years. Assum2

512 () 6 ing away the effect of the communal dining halls, we find food availability decline ( FAD) and Sen s Entitlement both contributed significantly to the increase in the death rate during the famine, but the latter has more explaining power. JEL Classif ication I38, N55, Q18