BIBLID 0254-4466(2001)19:2 pp. 375-398 19 2 90 12 1763-1820 1911-1992 1 2 * 1 1962 11 2 1994 475-481 1994 539-546 375
376 19 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 3 1964 440-446 4 1967 10 18 1967 17 1 5 13 22 6 7 1936 452-465 1981 960-964 1985 97-106 1991 291-314 1995 581-591 1990 369-378 1996 129-146 8 377 9 131
377 10 11 12 13 14 10 12 5 11 1995 12 1961 1150 12 13 1987 48 14 317 16 1968 91-118
378 19 2 15 16 17 18 1041978 15 1982 25-38 1996 1995 7 1 7 9-10 16 399 17 1961 1093 5-8 1961 1158 3-4 18 1986 221
379 19 20 21 22 23 19 317 20 1982 28 30 21 7 10 22 460 23 456 585
380 19 2 24 25 26 27 28 29 24 877 234 25 317 26 738 27 1093 5-8 28 764 29
381 30 31 32 33 34 35 794-795 30 318 31 1093 9 32 734 33 743 34 568 35 196
382 19 2 36 37 38 39 40 41 36 883 37 755 38 532 39 5 29 40 1050 41 220
383 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 42 318 43 1149 1 44 42 45 995 46 18-19 47 1095 25 48 525
384 19 2 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 49 1961 1111 11 50 393 51 241 52 171 53 522 54 1989 18 55 167
385 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 56 10 5 57 10 6 58 1093 17 59 211 60 474 61 860 62 15
386 19 2 63 64 65 66 67 68 63 561 64 6 65 1 66 30 67 1 68 4
387 69 70 71 72 73 74 69 1961 1164 14 70 11 71 14 72 4 73 9 8 74 9 9
388 19 2 75 76 77 78 79 75 9 9-10 76 3 1164 11-13 77 919 78 6 79 9 11-12 1164 4-6
389 80 81 literature 82 80 8 81 13 23 82 104 106
390 19 2 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 83 13 22 84 1935 3 70 85 1935 89 86 90 87 13 21-22 88 13 22 89 4-5
391 90 91 92 93 94 90 5 91 6 92 13 24 93 13 25 94 92 22
392 19 2 95 bi-conditional 96 97 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 95 23 96 A VA x(fx Gx) x(gx Fx) F A G x(fx Gx) Cf. Quine, W. V. O., Methods of Logic (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1966), pp. 21-25, 54. 97 1990 332-338 385-388
393 98 99 100 101 102 98 74 99 3 5 100 3 101 102 10 12-13 374
394 19 2 103 104 105 106 103 81 104 377-378 105 338 106 131 145
395 107 1. 2. 3. 108 109 107 16 4 108 17 1 109 10 18
396 19 2 110 111 112 113 114 110 12 19-21 111 4 112 1936 37 113 8 114 10
397 115 116 117 118 115 11 116 117 10 118 14 23
398 19 2 On Jiao Xun s Doctrine of Xing Ling and Its Relation to Classical Studies and Literature Kwai Sang Lee Abstract Jiao Xun is a representative figure of the Yangzhou School of the Qing dynasty. His erudition is shown not only in classical studies, but also in literature, and he has developed a unique view about literary writing. He presents a literary theory of yin-yang complementation, in which all genres and their characteristics are distinguished by the doctrine of yin and yang. This magnificent system of literary thought conforms to his viewpoints on classical studies tacitly, and xing ling is a key concept blending these two areas with each other. This article aims to illustrate the relationship between classical studies and literature in Jiao Xun s literary theory, by examining the meaning of xing ling and other concepts relevant to it. Two conclusions are drawn by the author. (1) In Jiao s discourse, classical studies and xing ling are two sides of a coin, i.e., xing ling appears only in classical studies and vice versa. (2) Literature is not attached to classical studies, which means Jiao Xun never supposed classical studies were a necessary condition for the existence of literature. These two points are different from the prevalent views. Keyword: Qing dynasty, Jiao Xun, xing ling, classical studies, literary criticism * Kwai Sang Lee is a lecturer in the Department of Chinese at the Hong Kong Institute of Education.