Research on The Relationships among Service Quality, Relationship Marketing, Enterprise Image, Customer Satisfaction And Customer Loyalty An Example o

Similar documents
明 新 科 技 大 學 企 業 管 理 系 專 題 製 作 委 員 會 審 定 書 陳 淑 瑜 吳 宥 筠 王 君 文 陳 佳 鈺 之 畢 業 專 題 研 究 報 告 題 目 : 提 升 服 務 品 質 的 最 後 一 哩 路 : 整 合 IPA 與 同 理 心 地 圖 之 應 用 - 以 四 方

* ** * **

2. 文 獻 探 討 2.1 大 眾 運 輸 之 特 性 大 眾 運 輸 有 兩 項 營 運 目 的 : 第 一 是 減 少 使 用 私 人 運 輸 工 具, 以 抒 解 交 通 壅 塞 的 現 象 ; 第 二 是 藉 此 達 到 所 得 重 分 配 的 效 果 [2] 根 據 Lovelock [

Microsoft Word S-06楊朝成01-07.doc

<4D F736F F D DAAECA5F4A965A5F4A448ADFBC0B3A8E3B3C6A4A7AFE0A44F2DAED1A657ADB62E444F43>

SPSS

基于因子分析的敦煌莫高窟游客满意度研究

修 平 科 技 大 學 國 際 企 業 經 營 系 專 題 研 究 論 文 指 導 老 師 : 阮 俊 英 老 師 台 灣 金 磚 ( 鳳 梨 酥 ) 產 業 - 以 微 熱 山 丘 行 銷 策 略 為 例 學 生 : 張 佳 穎 學 號 :BY 學 生 : 吳 家 綺 學 號 :BY1

第一章 緒論

文具業藍海創新成效之探討—以雄獅文具為例

當地經營業者參考 貳 研究觀點 的培養與累積 而非流於隨商機逐流隨波 而喪失了策略意圖的建設性意義 三 網絡觀點 在產業與組織專業分工發展趨 過去對於地方觀光相關的關鍵成功 勢下 企業與機構無法獨立於其他個體而 因素研究中 傾向於以特定功能層級或特 自主 須仰仗上下游廠商 關聯企業與其 定環境範疇進

國立中山大學學位論文典藏.PDF

ii

<4D F736F F D20BDD7A4E5B6B0A455A555A658A8D6AAA95FA477A752B0A3A5BCB56FAAEDA4E5B3B E30372E30355F2E646F63>

摘要

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship among attraction, visitor satisfaction and loyalty, and visitor s willingness to

(238) product price place promotionmarketing mix 4 4P Wells and Prensky, 1996; 2003; 2006; Armstrong and Kotler, Boone and Kurtz2005Kotler an

untitled

B2烏魚子

小組工作定義 (Lee, 1999)

教 育 科 學 期 刊

中臺科技大學學位論文典藏

封面

<4D F736F F D FB0D3B77EBB50BADEB27AB8735FBB4FA55FA5ABA5DFAA51A473B0AAAFC5B0D3B77EAE61A8C6C2BEB77EBEC7AED55F5F3530B450A4CEB24DA4DFBAD6A5FEAA41B0C8AB7EBDE8BB50C555ABC8BAA1B74EABD7ACE3A8732E646F63>

國立中山大學學位論文典藏.PDF

Microsoft Word - A2

目 錄 頁 次 第 一 章 緒 論 第 一 節 研 究 背 景 與 動 機...1 第 二 節 研 究 目 的 與 流 程...4 第 二 章 文 獻 探 討 第 一 節 社 會 結 構 之 變 遷...7 第 二 節 冷 凍 調 理 食 品...10 第 三 節 消 費 者 行 為...24 第

南華大學數位論文

谢 辞 仿 佛 2010 年 9 月 的 入 学 发 生 在 昨 天, 可 一 眨 眼, 自 己 20 多 岁 的 两 年 半 就 要 这 么 匆 匆 逝 去, 心 中 真 是 百 感 交 集 要 是 在 古 代, 男 人 在 二 十 几 岁 早 已 成 家 立 业, 要 是 在 近 代, 男 人

Microsoft Word - 第3組A2-3校.doc

金 鹏 等 体 育 锻 炼 缓 解 公 务 员 心 理 压 力 相 关 量 表 的 编 制 及 常 模 的 建 立 89 此, 本 文 从 探 索 性 研 究 入 手, 对 体 育 锻 炼 缓 解 公 务 员 心 理 压 力 展 开 研 究, 尝 试 编 制 一 个 基 于 本 土 化, 具 有 良

天 主 教 輔 仁 大 學 社 會 學 系 學 士 論 文 小 別 勝 新 婚? 久 別 要 離 婚? 影 響 遠 距 家 庭 婚 姻 感 情 因 素 之 探 討 Separate marital relations are getting better or getting worse? -Exp

112 Journal of Management & Operations September 2011, Number5/6, pp The county and city government actively engage in holding festival activ

作 主 动 追 求 知 识 获 取 技 能, 在 心 理 和 生 理 上 都 非 常 积 极 的 个 体 (Zimmerman & Pons, 1986) 在 此 期 间, 自 我 效 能 感 (self-efficacy) 自 我 控 制 (self-control) 自 我 管 理 (self-

  隨著時代的進步,我國的經濟快速成長,使得國民所得不斷的攀升,民眾的生活品質、水準以及教育水準的普及大幅度的提升,再加上

Abstract The development of Internet technology has brought about the increasing number of Internet users and has also made marketing prosperous in th

國家圖書館典藏電子全文

Myers Majluf 1984 Lu Putnam R&D R&D R&D R&D

Sony Playstaion Wii IDC % CAGR

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

管 理 科 学 软 科 学 2013 年 6 月 第 27 卷 第 6 期 ( 总 第 162 期 ) 变 量 选 择 1 CAR i i CSP / 2 /

第一章 緒論

從實驗教材到官方課程──小學社會科板橋模式教材與改編本教科書的發展

E國立台東大學區域政策與發展研究所

穨6街舞對抗中正紀念堂_林伯勳張金鶚_.PDF

2

穨webj05-06

Demsetz(1982) Bain ( ) : 4 6?? ( 2005) 2004~ (2000) : ; 7 ; ;? (Lenway and Rehbein1991) ( ) ( ) ( 2006) ( 2002) Bain(1956)


Microsoft Word - 33-p skyd8.doc

文 化 產 業 經 營 對 城 市 文 化 行 銷 策 略 影 響 之 探 討 - 以 台 南 市 赤 嵌 文 化 園 區 為 例 - 李 惠 圓 余 政 龍 臺 前 言 文 化 產 業 的 發 展 與 它 所 衍 生 的 生 產 價 值 鏈 對 於 重 塑 城 市 新 意 象 具 有 深 遠 的

Abstract As an intangible assets, brand has been paid more attention now, especially in health food industry, brand is accepted as a key competence to

國立中山大學學位論文典藏

中山大學學位論文典藏

全文6-1陳文獻.doc


Microsoft Word - 建構企業訓練之課程發展模式.doc

<4D F736F F D20B0EABBDAA7D6BBBC A5FEA4E55FB6C0ABD8BA615F2E646F63>

中国消费者网上购书意向模型与影响因素实证研究

十三行博物館導覽服務滿意度與重遊意願研究

國立中山大學學位論文典藏.PDF

<4D F736F F D DB5DA34C6DA6F6B2DD6D0B4F3B9DCC0EDD1D0BEBF2DC4DACEC42E646F63>

200 5 ( CIP) /. :, ( 6 ) ISBN F239 CIP ( 2005) ( ) : ( 0411) : ( 0411) : http: www. du

6-大學圖書館參考晤談中溝通技巧之探討.indd

EJCUS1002_04.doc

運動觀賞涉入程度對運動彩券消費動機影響之研究

商 品 與 服 務, 才 能 確 保 市 場 的 競 爭 地 位 現 今 複 合 式 藥 局 在 經 營 上 面 臨 了 瓶 頸, 由 於 出 生 率 逐 年 下 降, 造 成 以 婦 嬰 相 關 產 品 為 主 軸 的 複 合 式 藥 局 銷 售 量 及 營 業 額 也 逐 年 下 降, 企 業

<4D F736F F D AA41B0C8AB7EBDE8A142C555ABC8BAA1B74EABD7BB50C555ABC8A9BEB8DBABD7A4A7ACE3A8732DA548B0AAB6AFA661B0CFAC50A4DAA74AACB0A8D22D2D E6B E E74772E646F63>

66 臺 中 教 育 大 學 學 報 : 人 文 藝 術 類 Abstract This study aimed to analyze the implementing outcomes of ability grouping practice for freshman English at a u

TOPCO崇越論文大賞暨學術研討會論文格式說明

國立高雄大學數位論文典藏

Sunac China Holdings Limited (the Company or our Company, and together with its subsidiaries collectively referred to as the Group ), is specialised i

标题

全面品質管理於軟體開發上的應用

2

Leisure Participation Type Differences And Leisure Satisfaction Differences Between Various Body Mass Indices: A Correlation Study To Taiwan s College

摘 要 摘 要 隨 著 自 由 行 的 實 施, 越 來 越 多 的 內 地 旅 客 進 入 澳 門, 有 效 地 帶 動 了 澳 門 旅 遊 博 彩 酒 店 和 零 售 等 行 業 的 發 展 然 而, 伴 隨 旅 客 數 量 的 增 加, 旅 遊 糾 紛 也 層 出 不 窮, 這 無 疑 為 以

Transcription:

Research on The Relationships among Service Quality, Relationship Marketing, Enterprise Image, Customer Satisfaction And Customer Loyalty An Example of CPC Corporation,Taiwan Gasoline Station In Tainan

Research on The Relationships among Service Quality, Relationship Marketing, Enterprise Image, Customer Satisfaction And Customer Loyalty An Example of CPC Corporation,Taiwan Gasoline Station In Tainan

1987 465 462 44 418 89.89% SPSS t Pearson 1. ( ) 2. 3. ( ) ( ) ( ) 4. i

Abstract When marching into 21st century, lots of overall and fast changes concerning the commercial activity, technology, economy and society happened in the world. Since 1987, the first private-owned gasoline-station opened here, the competition of gasoline-station business has become keener and keener. Besides the acquisition of prospect customers, the ways to increase the existing customer s loyalty by long-lasting relationship become the important issue for the management authorities. The goal of this research is to find out the correlation between customer loyalty and other four factorsthe service quality, relationship marketing, enterprise image and customer satisfaction. The research method is questionnaire survey. For a better result, we did the questionnaire survey in person. With the help of colleagues working at CPC gasoline-stations in Tainan, we got 462 questionnaires answered by customers there. Because of 44 invalid questionnaires, we actually got the return rate of 89.89%. SPSS was adopted in the research. According to the sample data, analyzing methods are as follows: Factor analysis, Reliability Analysis, Descriptive Statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Least significant difference, Regression analysis, cluster analysis. The main findings are as the follow: 1. The demographic factors of customers, such as gender, original residence, age, educational level, occupation, and monthly income have partially significant difference for customer loyalty in service quality, relationship marketing, enterprise image and customer satisfaction. 2. The customer loyalty is significant positive with every factor mentioned below customer loyalty of gasoline-stations, service quality, relationship marketing, enterprise image, customer satisfaction. 3. There are significant differences in customer loyalty among cluster 1 (higher cognitive lever), cluster 2 ( medium cognitive lever), and cluster3 (lower cognitive level). 4. The service quality, relationship marketing, enterprise image, and customer satisfaction of the gasoline-station have significant positive influence upon the ii

customer loyalty. According to the conclusions, we offer relevant suggestions for the administrators of gasoline-stations as the reference to develop their marketing way. Keywords: Relationship marketing, service quality, enterprise image, customer satisfaction, customer loyalty. iii

35 94 9293 EMBA 16 iv

...i...ii...iv... v...vii... x... 1 1.1... 1 1.2... 3 1.3... 4 1.4... 5 1.5... 6 1.6... 7... 8 2.1... 8 2.2...18 2.3...26 2.4...30 2.5...33 2.6...37...43 3.1...43 3.2...44 v

3.3...47 3.4...50 3.5...59...62 4.1...62 4.2...65 4.3 t...72 4.4...81 4.5...88 4.6...95 4.7...97...102 5.1...102 5.2...109... 111... 111... 114... 118...123...128 vi

2.1... 9 2.2... 14 2.3 22... 15 2.4... 16 2.5... 17 2.6... 18 2.7... 20 2.8... 20 2.9... 22 2.10... 23 2.11 Walter... 28 2.12... 30 2.13... 31 2.14... 33 2.15... 34 2.16... 35 3.1... 43 3.2... 51 3.3... 51 3.4 KMO Bartlett... 53 3.5... 54 3.6... 55 3.7... 57 3.8... 58 vii

3.9... 59 3.10... 60 4.1... 63 4.2... 66 4.3... 68 4.4... 70 4.5... 70 4.6... 70 4.7... 71 4.8... 71 4.9... 73 4.10... 74 4.11... 75 4.12... 77 4.13... 77 4.14... 79 4.15 One-Way ANOVA... 80 4.16... 82 4.17... 82 4.18... 83 4.19... 83 4.20... 84 4.21... 84 4.22... 85 4.23... 85 viii

4.24... 86 4.25... 86 4.26... 87 4.27... 88 4.28... 89 4.29... 90 4.30... 90 4.31... 91 4.32... 92 4.33... 92 4.34... 93 4.35... 94 4.36... 96 4.37... 98 4.38... 99 4.39... 100 4.40.. 101 5.1... 104 ix

1.1... 6 2.1... 12 2.2... 22 3.1... 44 x

1.1 1987 1987 19882 1999 2000 9 1

1987 200612 200512 669 1189 670 2528 70% 20071 200612 661 1931 2592 2000 2

(AC Nielsen Shopper Trends2004) 22 9000 5 1.2 3

1. 2. 3. 4. 1.3 31 15 1.3.1 465 95 10 95 11 465 462 44 418 89.89 4

1.4 1.1 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. SPSS 7. 5

SPSS 1.1 1.5 6

SPSS 1.6 31 7

Service Quality Relationship Marketing Customer Satisfaction Customer Loyalty 2.1 (Intangilility) (Inseparability) (Heterogenity) (Perishability) 2.1.1 Juran(1974) (fitnass of use) Sasser, Olsen & Wyckoff (1978) (service level) (service quality) (expected service level) (perceived service level) Parasuraman, Zeithaml & Berry(1985) = - (84) 8

Bateson & Hoffman (2002) 2.1 2.1 1972 Levitt 1978 Sasser 1978 Sasser,Olsen& Wychoff 1982 Churchill& Suprenant 1983 Garvin 1984 Gronroos 1984 Garvin 1985 Parasurman, Zeithaml & Berry 1985 Parasuraman, Zeithaml & Berry 1987 Ivaneevich& Mattesoon 9

2.1 1988 Parasurman, Zeithaml& Berry 1990 Lewis& Mitchell 1990 Bintner 1992 Knutson, Stevens, Patton& Thompson 1992 Cronin & Taylor 1994 Heskett Etal 84 1998 Marshall, Baker & Finn *2002 Bateson Hoffman 1. 2. Parasuraman, Zeithaml & Berry, 1985Bateson & Hoffman, 2002 10

2.1.2 Parasuraman, Zeithaml & Berry(1985) PZB (Gap) 2.1 1. (Consumer Expection-Management Perception Gap) 2. (Management Perception-Sercvice Quality Specification Gap) 3. (Service Quality Specifications-Service Delivery Gap) 4. (Service Delivery-External Communications Gap) 5. (Expected Service-Perceived Service Gap) GAP5=f(GAP1, GAP2, GAP3, 11

GAP4) Parasuraman, Zeithaml & Berry(1985) ( ) () () - 2.1 Parasuraman, A., Valarie A. Zeithaml, and Leonard L. Berry (1985), A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its implications for Future Research, Journal of Marketing, Vol.49,Fall,p.44. 2.1.3 Gronroos(1984) 1. (technology quality) 12

2. (functional quality) 3. (Corporate Image) Parasuraman, Zeithaml Berry(1985) (focus group interviews) 1. (Tangibles) 2. (Reliability) 3. (Responsiveness) 4. (Competence) 5. (Courtesy) 6. (Credibility) 7. (Security) 8. (Access) 9. (Communication) 13

10. (Understanding) Parasuraman, Zeithmal & Berry 1988 1985 2.2 1. (tangibility) 2. (reliability) 3. (responsiveness) 4. (assurance) 5. (empathy) 2.2 1985 1988 Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. & Berry, L.L. (1988), Communication and Control Processes in the Delivery of Service Quality, Journal of Marketing 52, April, pp.46. 2.1.4 1.SERVQUAL(SERVICE QUALITY) 14

Parasuraman, Zeithaml & Berry1985 97 1988 SQ=P-E( = - ) ( )22 )SERVQUAL Scale(Service Quality Scale) 2.3 2.3 22 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Berry, L.L.,1988, SERVQUAL:A Multiple-item Scale for Measuring Customer Perception of Service Quality, Journal of Retailing, Vol.64, spring,pp.12-40. Parasuraman, Zeithmal & Berry 1991 SERVQUAL 15

SERVQUAL Refined SERVQUAL 2.SERVPERF(SERVICE PERFORMANCE) Cronin & Taylor (1992) SERVPERF SERVQUAL Bouman & Wiele(1992) SERVQUAL SERVPERF SERVQUAL 2.4 SERVQUAL 1988 2.4 SERVQUAL 1991 SERVPERF 1992 22 22 22 60%40% 60%40% Va Va Va Vb Vb 1. 85 2. 94 16

2.5 2.5 Parasuraman, Zeithaml & Berry1985 Parasuraman, Zeithaml & Berry1991 Cronin & Taylor(1992) 1. (88) 2. 94 17

2.2 2.2.1 1960 (Industrial or Business-to-Business Marketing)(Gronroos, 1990) Berry (1983) Berry (1983) Sheth & Parvatiyar(1995) 2.6 2.6 *Macneil *Berry *Gronroos1990 *CopulskyWolf1990 18

2.6 Rapp & Collins1990 Berry & Parasuraman1991 Shani & Chalasani1992 *Sheth1992 Morgan & Hunt1994 Evans & Laskin1994 *Koiranen1995 *Christ, OliverPenn 1996 84 Armstrong & Kolter2000 *Zinkhan2002 1. (94) (94) 2. * Berry, 1983Berry & Parasuraman,1991 Morgan & Hunt,1994 19

2.2.2 Gronroos (1990) (transactional marketing) 2.7 Copulsky & Wolf (1990) Christopher, Payne & Ballantyne (1991) 2.8 2.7 Gronroos, C. (1990), Relationship Approach to Marketing in Service Context: The Marketing and Organizational Behavior Interface, Journal of Business Research, January, pp. 5-8. 2.8 (Transaction Marketing) (Relationship Marketing) Christopher, M., Payne, A. & Ballantyne, D. (1991), Relationship Marketing-Bribging Quality, Customer Service and Marketing Together, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd, pp.9. 20

Armstrong & Kolter (2000) 2.2.3 Shani & Chalasani (1992) 2.2 1. (Niche Marketing) 2. (Database Marketing) 3. (Relationship Marketing) Shani and Chalasani (1992) 2.9 21

2.2 Shani, D. & Chalasani s. (1992), Exploiting Niches Using Relationship Marketing, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol.3, pp. 33-42. 2.9 ( ) Shani, D. & Chalasani s. (1992), Exploiting Niches Using Relationship Marketing, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol.3, pp. 33-42. 2.2.4 Berry & Parasuraman (1991) 2.10 22

2.10 Berry, L.L. & Parasuraman, A. (1991), Marketing Service-Competing Through Quality. NY.: The Free Press. Berry & Parasuraman (1991) 1. (financial bond) 2. (social bond) (personalized) (customer) (client) Crosby, Evans & Cowles (1990) Crosby & Stephens (1987) (noncompetitive core product) 23

3. (structural bond) (Kumar, Scheer & Steenkamp, 1995) Federal Express (Lovelock, 1994) Kolter (1994) 1. (Basic Level) 2. (Reactive) 3. (Accountable) 4. (Proactive) 5. (Partnership) Armstrong & Kolter (2000) Berry & Parasuraman(1991)Berry(1995) 24

1. (financial bond) 2. (social bond) Ritz-Carlton 3. (structural bond) Berry and Parasuraman(1991)Berry(1995) Berry & Parasuraman(1991)Berry(1995) 25

2.3 2.3.1 Bayton1959 Spector1961 Boulding1959 Martineau1960 Walton1996 Reynolds1965 26

, Worcester(1972) Walters (1978) Belt & Paolillo(1982) 2.3.2 Spector(1961) 45 1. (Dynamic) 2. (cooperation) 3. (Intelligence) 4. (Characteristic) 27

5. (Success) 6. (ithdrawn) Walters(1978) (2.11) 2.11 Walter Corporate Image Store Image (Service Image) (Price Image) (Promotional Image) (Product Image) (Brand Image) (Brand-line Image) 94 Aaker(1996)Keller(1998) 1. / / 28

2. ( ) ( ) 3. 4. ( ) ( ) Walters(1978) Keller(1998) Walters(1978)Keller(1998) 29

2.4 2.4.1 2.12 2.12 1969 Howard & Sheth 1977 Hempel 1981 Oliver 1982 Churchill& Suprenant 1983 Woodruff, Cadotte & Jenkins 1991 Solomon *1995 Ostrom & Iacobucci 1997 Kotler - 30

2.4.2 2.13 2.13 1974 Czepiel, Rosenberg Akerele 1. 2. 3. 1981 Westbrook 1. 2. 3. 1987 Crosby Stephens 1. 2. 3. 1996 Walter & Jack 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1996 Zeithaml & Binter 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 31

Zeithaml & Bitner (1996) 32

2.5 2.5.1 Dick & Basu(1994) 2.14 2.14 *1994 Dick & Basu 1995 Jones & Sasser 1995 Griffin 1996 Bhote 1997 Oliver 2000 Singh & Sirdeshmukh *92 1. 94 2. 33

Raphel(1995) 2.15 2.15 Prospect Shopper Customer Client advocate Raphel, N. & Raphel, M. (1995), Loyalty Ladder, Harper Collins Publishers Inc. 2.5.2 Cuningham (1956) Monroe & Guiltinan1975 2.16 34

2.16 1993 Selnes 1. 2. 3. 1995 Jones & Sasser 1. 2. 3. *1995 Griffin 1. 2. 3. 4. 1996 Frederick 1. 2. 3. 4. 1999 Kolter 1. 2000 Gronholbt, Martensen & Kristensen 2. 3.. 1. 2. 3. 4. 1. 94 2. 94-3.* Gronholbt, Martensen & Kristensen2000) 35

Peppers & Rogers (1993) 36

2.6 95 2.6.1 (93) 93 2.6.2 (90) (94) 2.6.3 1970 37

38 Cronin & Taylor(1992) (92) ( ) ( ) (93) (95) (95) 2.6.4 PZB

(90) (93) (93) (95) (95) 2.6.5 (91) (93) 2.6.6 (90) 39

(91) (92) 2.6.7 Paul & Olson(1987) Gronroos(1988) 2.6.8 Robertson & Gatignon(1986) ( 91) 2.6.9 40

Bitner1990 Reichheld & Sasser1990 Gronholdt, Martense & Kristensen(2000) 94 96 Neal1999 Jones & Sasser 1995 Schneider & Bowen1999 2.6.10 41

(Federicks & Salter1995) ( 91 91) ( 91 91) ( 90) ( 91) (91) ( ) ( ) ) (95) 93 42

3.1 (84) Parasuraman, Zeithaml & Berry(1991) (92) (91)T 3.1 3.1 3.1 43

3.1 3.2 44

3.2.1 1-1 1-2 1-3 1-4 1-5 3.2.2 2-1 2-2 2-3 2-4 2-5 2-6 2-7 2-8 2-9 2-10 2-11 45

3.2.3-3-1 3-2 3-3 3-4 3-5 3-6 3-7 3-8 3.2.4-4-1 4-2 4-3 4-4 46

3.2.5-5-1 5-2 5-3 5-4 3.3 Parasuraman, Zeithmal & Berry(1988) () () () () 47

() Berry & Parasuraman(1991) Walters(1978)Keller(1998) () : () : ( ) ( ) Zeithaml & Bitner (1996) 48

Gronholbt, Martensen & Kristensen(2000) () () () () : () () () 20 21 30 31 40 41 50 51 60 61 () () / () 20,000 20,00040,000 40,00060,000 60,00080,000 80,000100,000 100,000 49

3.4 (Likert) (1 ) (5 ) 3.4.1 3.4.2 3.2 50

3.2 Cronbach s α Parasuraman, Zeithmal & Berry(1991) 92 23 0.9387 87 Berry & Parasuraman(1991) Berry(1995) (94) 9 0.8754 92 Walters(1978)Keller(1998) 11 0.8952 (93) (94) Zeithaml & Binter1996 94 4 0.8253 Gronholbt, Martensen Kristensen 0.8314 2000 94 4 3.4.3 45 45 3.3 3.3 51

3.4.4 465 462 44 418 89.89% 3.4.5 (Likert) 3.4.6 (Likert) 1 2 3 4 5 3.4.7 Kaiser(1997) (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacykmo) 1. KMO 0.9 2. KMO 0.8 3. KMO 0.7 52

4. KMO 0.6 KMO 0.7 Bartlett p 0.000 0.5 3.4 Kaiser 1 0.4 1. 1 Berry & Parasuraman(1991)Berry(1995) Berry & Parasuraman(1991) 92 (94) 2 Berry & Parasuraman(1991) 3 9 4 5 0.8754 3.4 KMO Bartlett KMO Bartlett ( %) p 9 2 63.219 0.869 0.000 11 2 59.292 0.900 0.000 6 1 0.4 2 53

3.5 3.5 1 2 7 0.790 8 0.785 6 0.769 9 0.738 5 0.675 4 0.651 3 0.615 2 0.848 1 0.847 4.627 1.063 51.406 11.812 51.406 63.219 Cronbach s α 0.8783 0.7463 2. 1 Walters(1978)Keller(1998) (93) (94) 2 Walters(1978)Keller(1998) : 1. 2. 3. 54

3 11 4 1 2 3 4 5 5 0.8952 6 (Observe Ratings) (Self-Reports) 2 3.6 3.6 1 2 8 0.839 7 0.819 10 0.732 9 0.681 6 0.671 11 0.661 2 0.556 4 0.849 3 0.731 5 0.666 1 0.566 5.452 1.070 49.568 9.724 49.568 59.292 Cronbach s α 0.8830 0.7597 55

3. 1 Parasuraman, Zeithmal & Berry(1991) Bouman & Wiele(1992) SERVQUAL Cronin & Taylor,1992) 92 87 2 Parasuraman, Zeithmal & Berry(1988) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 3 23 4 5 0.9387 6 ( ) 23 3.7 56

22. 3.7 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 23. 4. 1 Zeithaml & Bitner (1996) 94 2 Zeithaml & Bitner (1996) 57

3 4 4 5 0.8253 6 (Observe Ratings) (Self-Reports) 1 3.8 3.8 1 2 3 4 Cronbach s α 0.8253 5. 1 Gronholbt, Martensen & Kristensen2000) 94 2 Gronholbt, Martensen & Kristensen(2000) 58

3 4 4 5 0.8314 6 (Observe Ratings) (Self-Reports) 1 3.9 3.9 1 2 3 4 Cronbach s α 0.8314 3.5 SPSS for windows 1. Factor Analysis Principle Component 59

Analysis varimax Kaiser1966 Eigenvalue 1 0.4 2. Reliability Analysis Cronbach s α Cronbach s α (73) 3.10 3.10 Cronbach s α 0.3 0.3Cronbach s α 0.4 0.4Cronbach s α 0.5 0.5Cronbach s α 0.7 0.7Cronbach s α 0.9 0.9Cronbach s α 1. (73) 2. (94) - 3. Descriptive Statistics 4. t t-test One-Way ANOVA t P * p0.05 60

**p0.01 *** p0.001 Scheffe 5. Correlation Analysis 1 1 Pearson Spearman s Rho Kendall s Tau Pearson γ 6. Multiple Regression Analysis 7. Hieraechical Regression Analysis 8. (Cluster Analysis ) K (K-Means Method) ( ) 61

SPSS Cronbach s α t Pearson 4.1 4.1.1 418 Cronbach s α 0.7 4.1 Cronbach s α 0.9387 Cronbach s α 0.7524 Cronbach s α 0.8110 62

Cronbach s α 0.8644 Cronbach s α 0.8097 Cronbach s α 0.8072 Cronbach s α 0.8754 Cronbach s α 0.8783 Cronbach s α 0.7463 4.1 Cronbach s α Cronbach s α 0.9387 0.8754 0.8952 1.2.3.4. 0.7524 5.6.7.8.9. 0.8110 10.11.12.13.14 0.8644 15.16.17.18. 0.8097 19.20.21.22.23. 0.8072 3.4.5.6.7.8.9.. 0.8783 1. 2. 0.7463 2.6.7.8.9.10.11. 0.8830 1.3.4.5. 0.7597 0.8253 1.2.3.4. 0.8253 0.8314 1.2.3.4. 0.8314 Cronbach s α 0.8952 Cronbach s α 0.8830 Cronbach s α 0.7597 63

Cronbach s α 0.8253 Cronbach s α 0.8314 4.1.2 64

4.2 4.2.1 31 465 418 89.89% 4.2 1. 4.2 46.9% 36.8% 1 2. 4.2 88.3% 5.5%2.9% 1.4%1.2% 0 3 3. 4.2 21~30 41.4% 20 41~50 17.9%15.8% 31~40 51~60 15.3%8.4%61 1.2% 4. 4.2 47.6% ) 25.6% 19.1.4%3.1.9%2.6% 8 5. 4.2 36.6% / 23.4%12.7% / 7.7%6.9%4.1%2.4% 6.2% 65

6. 20,000 40.7% 20,000~40,000 40,000~60,000 25.1%20.6% 60,001~80,000 80,000~100,000 100,000 8.6%1.4%1.4% 9 4.2 n=418 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 120 221~30 331~40 441~50 551~60 661 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 / 2 3 263 154 1 369 23 12 5 6 0 3 75 173 64 66 35 5 11 107 80 199 13 8 32 98 17 10 153 29 53 26 170 105 86 36 6 6 9 4 5 6 7 / 8 120,000 220,000~40,000 340,000~60,000 460,000~80,000 580,000~100,000 6100,000 7 62.9 36.8 0.3 88.3 5.5 2.9 1.2 1.4 0.0 0.7 17.9 41.4 15.3 15.8 8.4 1.2 2.6 25.6 19.1 47.6 3.1 2.0 7.7 23.4 4.1 2.4 36.6 6.9 12.7 6.2 40.7 25.1 20.6 8.6 1.4 1.4 2.2 66

4.3 1. 4.3 89.0% 45%44% 11.0% 2. 1 4.3 71.3% 28.7% 2 4.3 21.5% 78.5% 3 4.3 23.9% 76.1% 4 4.3 30.9% 69.1% 5 4.3 3.3% 96.7% 6 4.3 8.9% 91.1% 7 4.3 91.6% 3.1% VIP 0.8% 1.4% 8 4.3 89.5% VIP VIP 7.7% 0.5% 1.8% 3. 4.3 77.8% 19.3% 67

1.2% 1.7% 4.3 1 46 11.0 2 184 44.0 3 188 45.0 1. 1 2 120 298 28.7 71.3 2. 1 328 78.5 2 90 21.5 3. 1 318 76.1 2 100 23.9 4. 1 289 69.1 2 129 30.9 5. 1 404 96.7 2 14 3.3 1 381 91.1 6. 2 37 8.9 1 383 91.6 7. 2 13 3.1 3 13 3.1 4VIP 3 0.8 5 6 1.4 1 374 89.5 2 VIP VIP 32 7.7 8. 3 2 0.5 4 2 0.5 5 8 1.8 1 325 77.8 2 5 1.2 3 81 19.3 4 7 1.7 1 2 6 5 1.4 1.2 3 4 5 101 228 78 24.2 54.5 18.7 1 180 43.1 2 205 49.0 3 33 7.9 1 7 1.7 2 19 4.5 3 85 20.3 4 54 12.9 5 15 3.6 1 113 27.0 2 203 48.6 3 102 24.4 1 2 3 4 5 68 143 115 78 80 2 34.2 27.5 18.7 19.1 0.5

4. 4.3 54.5%18.7%73.2%24.2% 1.4%1.2%2.6% 5. 4.3 49.0% 43.1% 7.9% 5-1. 4.3 3.6%12.9%16.5% 20.3% 1.7%4.5%6.2% 6. 4.3 48.6% 27.0% 24.4% 7. 4.3 34.2% 27.5%18.7% 19.1% 0.5% 4.2.2 1. 4.4 3 4.0763 3.9041 3.8212 69

4.4 416 2.39 5.00 3.9135 0.4930 417 2.00 5.00 3.8423 0.5769 417 2.40 5.00 4.0763 0.5446 417 1.80 5.00 3.9041 0.6130 418 1.75 5.00 3.8212 0.6311 418 2.20 5.00 3.8766 0.5686 2. 4.5 3 3.7456 3.5789 4.5 415 1.667 5.000 3.7090 0.5795 415 1.857 5.000 3.7456 0.5895 418 1.000 5.000 3.5789 0.8523 3. 4.6 3 4.1015 3.7691 4.6 418 2.00 5.00 3.9806 0.5265 418 1.50 5.00 3.7691 0.6111 418 1.86 5.00 4.1015 0.5554 70

4. 4.7 3 3.9946 4.7 418 1.00 5.00 3.9946 0.5796 5. 4.8 3 4.0120 4.8 418 1.00 5.00 4.0120 0.6179 71

4.3 t (One-Way ANOVA) 4.3.1 t 1. 4.9 1 3.9318 3.8829p 0.331 2 3.7125 3.7018p 0.857 3.7541 3.6039 3 3.9858 3.9693p 0.758 72

4 3.9914 4.0000p 0.888 5 4.0200 3.9951p 0.693 4.9 1 n=262 2 n=154 t p 3.9318 3.8829 0.973 0.331 3.8807 3.7760 1.791 0.074 4.1122 4.0156 1.750 0.081 3.9156 3.8837 0.511 0.609 3.8251 3.8133 0.184 0.854 3.8859 3.8662 0.342 0.733 3.7125 3.7018 0.181 0.857 3.7541 3.7293 0.411 0.681 3.5646 3.6039-0.453 0.651 3.9858 3.9693 0.309 0.758 3.7623 3.7808-0.297 0.766 4.1135 4.0770 0.648 0.517 3.9914 4.0000-0.141 0.888 4.0200 3.9951 0.396 0.693 *p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001 73

4.3.2 One-Way ANOVA 1. 4.10 1 4.10 p 0.622 2 4.10 p 0.592 3 4.10 p 0.243 4.10 1 2 3 4 5 F p Scheffe n=369 n=23 n=12 n=5 n=6 3.9078 4.0378 3.9674 3.8783 3.6957 0.657 0.622 3.8374 3.8913 3.9792 3.8000 3.6000 0.438 0.781 4.0748 4.1565 4.1333 3.8800 3.9200 0.418 0.795 3.8951 4.0435 4.0000 4.1600 3.6000 0.971 0.423 3.8171 4.0652 3.7917 3.8000 3.3750 1.625 0.167 3.8721 4.0087 3.9000 3.7200 3.6667 0.614 0.653 3.6961 3.8841 3.8241 3.6444 3.6852 0.700 0.592 3.7361 3.9193 3.7976 3.7143 3.5952 0.641 0.634 3.5542 3.7609 3.9167 3.4000 4.0000 1.229 0.298 3.9780 4.1146 4.0455 3.9636 3.5606 1.371 0.243 3.7696 3.8913 3.9167 3.5500 3.3333 1.325 0.260 4.0995 4.2422 4.1190 4.2000 3.6905 1.229 0.298 3.9919 4.0109 4.1875 4.2000 3.6667 0.913 0.456 4.0196 4.0761 4.0000 3.7500 3.6250 0.884 0.473 *P<0.05 **P<0.01 ***P<0.001 74

4 4.10 p 0.456 5 4.10 p 0.473 2. 1 4.11 p 0190 2 4.11 p 0.060 4.11 1 2 3 4 5 6 20 21~30 31~40 41~50 51~60 61 F p Scheffe n=75 n=173 n=64 n=66 n=35 n=5 3.8190 3.8821 3.9654 4.0087 3.9814 4.0174 1.496 0.190 3.7167 3.7919 3.9258 3.9269 4.0000 4.2000 2.474 0.032* 3.9173 4.0520 4.1563 4.2092 4.1314 4.1600 2.539 0.028* 3.8784 3.8613 3.9875 3.9636 3.9029 3.9200 0.554 0.735 3.7167 3.8049 3.8398 3.8902 3.9357 4.0000 0.913 0.472 3.7787 3.8671 3.8844 3.9788 3.9314 3.8400 0.952 0.447 3.5719 3.6751 3.8247 3.8038 3.8095 3.5333 2.143 0.060 3.5752 3.7085 3.8951 3.8460 3.8490 3.6571 2.886 0.014* 3.5600 3.5607 3.5781 3.6364 3.6714 3.1000 0.478 0.792 3.8921 3.9585 3.9872 4.0689 4.0779 4.1455 1.198 0.309 3.6733 3.7630 3.7891 3.8220 3.8571 3.8500 0.644 0.666 4.0171 4.0702 4.1004 4.2100 4.2041 4.3143 1.350 0.242 3.9500 3.9942 3.9922 4.0189 4.0429 4.0500 0.158 0.977 3.8800 4.0650 3.9688 4.0114 4.1000 4.1000 1.167 0.325 *P<0.05 **P<0.01 ***P<0.001 75

76 3 4.11 p 0.309 4 4.11 p 0.977 5 4.11 p 0.325 3. 1 4.12 p 0.000 2 4.12 p 0.006 3 4.12 p 0.029 4 4.12 p 0.081 5 4.12 p 0.135 4. 1 4.13 p 0.158

4.12 1 2 3 4 5 n=11 n=107 n=80 n=199 n=13 F p Scheffe 4.0593 3.9971 4.0561 3.8060 4.0401 5.394 0.000*** 24 34 4.0455 3.9276 4.0032 3.7211 3.8077 4.793 0.001** 34 4.1091 4.1327 4.2506 3.9789 4.1538 4.054 0.003** 34 4.0000 3.9736 4.0400 3.8050 4.1385 3.200 0.013* 4.0455 3.9393 3.9125 3.7085 4.0385 3.754 0.005** 4.0909 3.9477 4.0050 3.7799 4.0154 3.527 0.008** 3.7576 3.8063 3.8097 3.6083 3.9829 3.632 0.006** 3.8961 3.8544 3.8214 3.6400 4.0000 3.638 0.006** 3.2727 3.6262 3.7688 3.5000 3.9231 2.400 0.049* 4.0083 4.0841 4.0568 3.8977 4.0210 2.728 0.029* 3.8409 3.8808 3.8219 3.6884 3.8654 2.025 0.090 4.1039 4.2003 4.1911 4.0172 4.1099 2.522 0.041* 3.9318 4.0467 4.0781 3.9296 4.3077 2.095 0.081 3.9091 4.1075 4.0813 3.9397 4.1346 1.766 0.135 *p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001 4.13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 / F p Schffe / n=17 n=153 n=26 n=32 n=29 n=98 n=53 n=10 4.0543 3.9685 3.8389 3.9696 3.8390 3.8261 4.0059 3.9080 1.523 0.158 3.9375 3.9515 3.7794 4.1500 3.6977 3.7931 3.9567 3.9135 2.904 0.006** 4.3125 4.1510 4.0353 4.1600 3.9752 4.0483 4.1154 4.0462 2.020 0.051 3.9938 3.9388 3.7765 3.8800 3.8750 3.7862 3.9887 3.8846 0.596 0.759 4.0000 3.8750 3.7353 3.8250 3.7516 3.6552 3.9009 3.8846 1.229 0.285 3.9938 3.9041 3.8353 3.8400 3.8261 3.8069 3.9925 3.8077 0.846 0.549 3.7639 3.8061 3.7778 3.8444 3.5709 3.6322 3.8595 3.7689 2.459 0.018* 3.8304 3.8571 3.8393 3.8143 3.5968 3.6502 3.8760 3.8514 2.728 0.009** 3.5313 3.6276 3.5294 3.9500 3.4837 3.5690 3.8019 3.4615 1.205 0.298 4.1335 4.0603 3.9144 3.8909 3.8865 3.9530 4.0343 4.0455 1.648 0.120 3.9375 3.8878 3.7206 3.8250 3.6405 3.7155 3.8160 3.8462 2.040 0.049* 4.2455 4.1589 4.0252 3.9286 4.0271 4.0887 4.1590 4.1593 1.160 0.325 4.1406 4.0612 4.0294 4.0750 3.9200 3.8362 4.0425 4.0288 1.178 0.314 4.1875 4.1250 3.9559 3.6750 3.9673 3.8879 4.0047 3.9519 1.616 0.129 *p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001 77

78 2 4.13 p 0.018 3 4.13 p 0.120 4 4.13 p 0.314 5 4.13 p 0.129 5. 1 4.14 p 0.284 4-6 2 2 4.14 p 0.029 3 4.14 p 0.055 4 4.14 p 0.392 5 4.14 p 0.180

4.14 1 2 3 4 5 6 20,000 20,000~ 40,000~ 60,000~ 80,000~ 100,001 F p Scheffe 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 n=170 n=105 n=86 n=36 n=6 n=6 3.8724 3.9114 4.0220 3.9589 3.9855 3.7536 1.252 0.284 3.7574 3.8476 4.0294 3.8681 3.8750 3.6667 2.686 0.021* 3>1 4.0153 4.0590 4.2165 4.2167 4.2000 3.6667 2.847 0.015* 3.8994 3.8990 3.9279 3.9556 4.0667 3.9667 0.156 0.978 3.7794 3.8786 3.8895 3.7986 3.8750 3.6667 0.597 0.702 3.8471 3.8533 3.9953 3.9056 3.8667 3.7667 0.920 0.468 3.6312 3.6772 3.8235 3.8796 4.0926 3.6296 2.514 0.029* 3.6686 3.7156 3.8622 3.9048 4.1190 3.7143 2.306 0.044* 3.5029 3.5429 3.6802 3.7917 4.0000 3.3333 1.375 0.233 3.9198 3.9948 4.1121 4.0152 4.0000 3.6061 2.190 0.055 3.6853 3.8238 3.8721 3.8472 3.9167 3.4167 1.879 0.097 4.0538 4.0925 4.2492 4.1111 4.0476 3.7143 2.075 0.068 3.9485 4.0381 4.0349 4.0486 4.2083 3.6250 1.043 0.392 3.9750 4.0667 4.1163 3.8889 4.0833 3.6250 1.528 0.180 *P<0.05 **P<0.01 ***P<0.001 One-Way ANOVA 4.15 79

4.15 One-Way ANOVA 1. 2. 2.21-30 1. 20 1. 1. 20,000 2.2. 20,000~40,000 3. 3. 31-40 3. 3. 3. 40,000~60,000 4. 41-50 4. 4. 60,000~80,000 5. 51-60 5. 80,000~100,000 6. 4. 61 5. 100,000 6. 7. 8. 3>4 3>4 3>1 80

4.4 Pearson 4.4.1 Pearson Pearson -1+1 xy 0.5 0.25 y x 25%x y 25% 0.5 Pearson 4.16 4.26 4.4.2 4.4.2.1 4.16 p 0.000*** 81

0.679 0.000*** 0.370 0.000*** 4.16 Pearson Pearson p p 0.522 0.000*** 0.291 0.000*** 0.565 0.000*** 0.301 0.000*** 0.660 0.000*** 0.409 0.000*** 0.638 0.000*** 0.388 0.000*** *p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001 4.4.2.2 4.17 p 0.000*** 0.552 0.000*** 0.641 0.000*** 4.17 Pearson Pearson p p 0.522 0.000*** 0.533 0.000*** 0.501 0.000*** 0.628 0.000*** 0.527 0.000*** 0.631 0.000*** 0.578 0.000*** 0.611 0.000*** *p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001 4.4.2.3 4.18 p 0.000*** 82

0.555 0.000*** 0.496 0.000*** 4.18 n=418 Pearson p 0.479 0.000*** 0.517 0.000*** 0.577 0.000*** 0.549 0.000*** *p0.05 **p0.01 ***p0.001 4.4.2.4 4.19 p 0.000*** 4.19 n=418 Pearson p 0.422 0.000*** 0.498 0.000*** 0.488 0.000*** 0.495 0.000*** *p0.05 **p0.01 ***p0.001 83

4.4.2.5 4.20 p 0.000*** 4.20 0.598 0.000*** 0.629 0.000*** Pearson p Pearson p 0.477 0.000*** 0.405 0.000*** *p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001 4.4.2.6 4.21 p 0.000*** 4.21 0.582 0.000*** Pearson p 0.412 0.000*** *p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001 84

4.4.2.7 4.22 p 0.000*** 4.22 0.510 0.000*** Pearson p 0.410 0.000*** *p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001 4.4.2.8 4.23 p 0.000*** 4.23 0.594 0.000*** Pearson p 0.696 0.000*** *p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001 85

0.536 0.000*** 4.4.2.9 4.24 p 0.000*** 4.24 Pearson p 0.651 0.000*** *p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001 4.4.2.10 4.25 p 0.000*** 4.25 Pearson p 0.616 0.000*** *p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001 86

1 0.720 0.000*** 1 0.754 0.000*** 0.688 0.000*** 1 0.640 0.000*** 0.596 0.000*** 0.718 0.000*** 1 4.4.2.11 4.26 Pearson 0.754 Pearson 4.26 Pearson p Pearson p Pearson p Pearson p p 0.572 0.000*** 0.538 0.000*** 0.663 0.000*** 0.616 0.000*** 1 *p0.05 **p0.01 ***p0.001 87

4.5 4.5.1 4.27 ( B=0.2240.1650.166p<0.001 0.010.05) (Adjusted R 2 =40.7%p<0.001) CI 35.368 4.27 B VIF 1.044*** 0.102 1.993 0.09972 2.512 0.224*** 2.876 0.165** 2.774 0.166* 2.581 R 0.643 R 2 0.414 Adjusted R 2 0.407 F 57.897 p 0.000*** C.I. 35.368 *p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001 88

4.5.2 4.28 ( B=0.5110.109p<0.0010.01) (Adjusted R 2 =35.3%p<0.001)CI 16.245 4.28 B 1.692*** VIF 0.511*** 1.360 0.109** 1.360 R 0.597 R 2 0.356 Adjusted R 2 0.353 F 114.072 p 0.000*** C.I. 16.245 *p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001 4.5.3 4.29 ( B=0.2360.580p<0.0010.001) (Adjusted R 2 =51.6%p<0.001)CI 20.950 89

4.29 B 0.730*** VIF 0.236*** 1.752 0.580*** 1.752 R 0.720 R 2 0.518 Adjusted R 2 0.516 F 223.180 p 0.000*** C.I. 20.950 *p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001 4.5.4 4.30 Adjusted R 2 54.5% ( B 0.207**0.109* 0.591***p<0.010.050.001) CI 31.922 4.30 B VIF 0.423* 0.207** 2.819 0.109* 2.321 0.591*** 2.609 R 0.741 R 2 0.549 Adjusted R 2 0.545 F 165.772 p 0.000*** C.I. 31.922 *p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001 90

4.5.5 4.31 ( B=0.2190.1950.147p<0.010.01 0.05) (Adjusted R 2 =32.4%p<0.001) CI 35.368 4.31 B VIF 1.219*** 0.05015 1.993 0.219** 2.512 0.09974 2.876 0.195** 2.774 0.147* 2.581 R 0.576 R 2 0.332 Adjusted R 2 0.324 F 40.703 p 0.000*** C.I. 35.368 *p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001 4.5.6 4.32 ( B=0.4290.144p<0.0010.001) (Adjusted R 2 =28.6%p<0.001)CI 16.245 91

4.32 B 1.888*** 0.429*** 1.360 VIF 0.144*** 1.360 R 0.538 R 2 0.290 Adjusted R 2 0.286 F 84.036 p 0.000*** C.I. 16.245 *p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001 4.5.7 4.33 ( B=0.1940.584p<0.0010.001) (Adjusted R 2 =44.2%p<0.001)CI 20.950 4.33 B VIF 0.885*** 0.194*** 1.752 0.584*** 1.752 R 0.667 R 2 0.445 Adjusted R 2 0.442 F 166.130 p 0.000*** C.I. 20.950 *p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001 92

4.5.8 4.34 ( B=0.637p<0.001) (Adjusted R 2 =37.8%p<0.001) CI 4.34 1.468*** B VIF 0.637*** 1.000 R 0.616 R 2 0.379 Adjusted R 2 0.378 F 254.315 p 0.000*** C.I. 13.459 *p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001 4.5.9 4.35 Adjusted R 2 47.9% ( B 0.443***0.257***p<0.0010.001) CI 36.387 93

4.35 B VIF 0.562** 0.104 2.884 0.06650 2.345 0.443*** 3.211 0.257*** 2.216 R 0.696 R 2 0.484 Adjusted R 2 0.479 F 95.749 p 0.000*** C.I. 36.387 *p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001 94

4.6 4.36 Adjusted R 2 32.4% Adjusted R 2 35.9% R 2 3.8% Adjusted R 2 45.6% R 2 9.8% Adjusted R 2 48.3% R 2 2.7% R 2 12.5% Adjusted R 2 0.5 p 95

0.195** 0.152* 0.05428 0.05085 0.125* 0.08540 0.457*** 0.345*** 4.36 B B B B 1.219*** 1.032*** 0.617** 0.500** 0.05015 0.04003-0.01770-0.02347 0.219** 0.225** 0.108 0.114 0.09974 0.02923-0.005456-0.03944 0.147* 0.08598 0.04119 0.02766 0.111 0.006846-0.008832 0.129*** 0.8478** 0.07567* 0.254*** R 0.576 0.608 0.684 0.704 R 2 0.332 0.370 0.468 0.495 0 0.038 0.098 Adjusted R 2 0.324 0.359 0.456 0.483 R 2 a 0.125 b 0.027 c F 40.703 33.940 39.426 39.420 p 0.000 *** 0.000 *** 0.000 *** 0.000*** *p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001 a b c 96

4.7 K (K-Means Method) ( ) 4.7.1 4.37 (p<0.001) ( ) ( ) ( ) 4.7.2 4.38 (p <0.001) ( ) ( ) ( ) 97

4.37 F p Scheffe n=117 n=196 n=103 4.517 3.8878 3.2828 958.240 0.000*** 123 4.3932 3.8023 3.3058 189.890 0.000*** 123 4.6342 4.0490 3.5049 278.638 0.000*** 123 4.5179 3.9449 3.1340 430.819 0.000*** 123 4.4957 3.7806 3.1505 320.493 0.000*** 123 4.4906 3.8235 3.2971 303.260 0.000*** 123 4.2203 3.6753 3.1863 156.101 0.000*** 123 4.2760 3.7113 3.2003 167.337 0.000*** 123 4.0256 3.5485 3.1359 35.730 0.000*** 123 4.4693 3.9750 3.4484 205.322 0.000*** 123 4.2671 3.7474 3.2621 116.490 0.000*** 123 4.5849 4.1050 3.5548 172.427 0.000*** 123 4.4487 3.9732 3.5194 98.578 0.000*** 123 4.4338 4.0026 3.5510 77.071 0.000*** 123 p0.05 p0.01 p0.001 98

4.38 F p Scheffe n=169 n=183 n=63 4.2255 3.4329 3.1252 283.469 0.000*** 123 4.1944 3.4465 3.4104 137.118 0.000*** 1213 4.3343 3.3852 2.1270 737.675 0.000*** 123 4.3136 3.7904 3.6393 81.728 0.000*** 1213 4.1331 3.5765 3.3611 70.659 0.000*** 123 4.4167 3.9126 3.7982 60.665 0.000*** 1213 4.3092 3.8456 3.5873 54.702 0.000*** 123 4.2959 3.8866 3.6111 41.459 0.000*** 123 p0.05 p0.01 p0.001 4.7.3 4.39 (p<0.001) ( ) ( ) ( ) 99

4.39 F p Scheffe n=126 n=200 n=92 4.5851 3.9314 3.2599 919.627 0.000*** 123 4.4464 3.7038 2.9837 594.073 0.000*** 123 4.6644 4.0614 3.4177 380.631 0.000*** 123 4.4742 3.9613 3.4103 142.413 0.000*** 123 4.4504 4.0000 3.4375 108.352 0.000*** 123 p0.05 p0.01 p0.001 4.7.4 4.40 (p <0.001) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 100

4.40 F p Scheffe n=121 n=206 n=86 4.4298 3.8586 3.3286 334.719 0.000*** 123 4.2975 3.6305 3.0685 208.787 0.000*** 123 4.5455 3.9444 3.2865 487.063 0.000*** 123 4.5702 3.9515 3.2907 267.088 0.000*** 123 4.4041 3.9563 3.4506 117.150 0.000*** 123 p0.05 p0.01 p0.001 101

418 5.1 5.1.1 5.1 102

1. 1-1 1 2 3 4 5 6 2. 1-2 1 2 3 4 5 6 3. 1-3 1 2 3 4 5 6 4. 1-4 1 2 3 4 5 6 103

104 5. 1-5 1 2 3 4 5 6 5.1 1-1 1-2 1-3 1-4 1-5 5.1.2

1. 2.1 2. 2.2 3. 2.3 4. 2.4 5. 2.5 6. 2.6 7. 2.7 8. 2.8 9. 2.9 10. 2.10 11. 2.11 2.1 2.11 105

5.1.3 1. 3.1 2. 3.2 3. 3.3 4. 3.4 5. 3.5 6. 3.6 7. 3.7 8. 3.8 106

9. 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 Adjusted R 2 0.5 p 5.1.4 1. 5-1 107

2. 5-2 3. 5-3 4. 5-4 108

5.2 5.2.1.. 5.2.2 1. ( ) 109

2. 3. ( ) ( ) ( ) 4. 5.2.3 110

1. 2. (95) 3. (91 ) 4. (94 ) Roger J.Best 5. (95) 6. (94) 7. (94) - 8. 94/12 25 2 57-87 9. (92) 10. (95/06) 13 2 99-119 11. 96/03-3 1 25-60 12. (87) 13. (91) - 14. (93) 15. (95/12) 80 125-168 16. (95/06) - 3 1 20-41 17. (93) - 18. ( 91)3C 19. (94) - 20. (92) 21. (73) 22. (92) 111

23. 94 24. (93) 25. (93) 26. (91) 27. (88) 28. (91) - 29. (93) 30. (92) - 31. (91) 32. 90 33. (91) - 34. (93) 35. (92) - 36. (95/12) 71 77-105 37. (92) 38. (92) 39. (90) 40. (90) - 41. (93) 42. (93) 112

43. (90) 44. (91) 45. (92) - * 46. (95/03) 52 213-234 47. (93) 48. (94) - 49. (93) 50. (84) 51. (92) T 113

1. Aaker, D. A., (1996). Building Strong Brands, New York: Free Press. 2.Armstrong, G. & Kolter, P. (2000), Marketing: An Introduction. 5 th ed., Prentice-Hall, N.J. 3.Roger J. Best (2005), Market-Based Management 4 th ed., Pearson Prentice Hall. 4.Anderson, E. W. & Mary W. Sullivan (1993). The Antecedents and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction for Firms. Marketing Sciences, Vol.12, No.2, 125-143. 5.Bateson, J.E., & Hoffman, K.G. (2002), Essential of Service Marketing: Concepts, Strategy and Cases, Harcourt, Inc. 6. Bayton, J. A. (1959). Researching the corporate image. Public Relation, vol.4, No.10, 3-8 7.Berry, L.L. (1983), Relationship Marketing in Emerging Perspectives on Sorvices Markeing, American Marketing Association, pp.25-28. 8.Berry, L.L. & Parasuraman, A. (1991), Marketing Service-Competing Through Quality. NY.: The Free Press. 9. Beatty, S. E., Morris, L. M., James, E. C., Kristy, E. R. & Jungki, L.(1996), Customer-Sales Associate Retail Relationships, Journal of Retailing, Fall, pp.223-247. 10. Belt, John A., Paolillo, Joseph G. P. (1982), Journal of Management. New York: Spring 1982. Vol. 8, Iss. 1; p. 105 (9 pages) 11. Bhote, (1996). The key to Greater Profitabiliyt, New York : American Management Association, p31. 12.Bintner, M. J., (1990), Evaluating Service Encounters: The Effect of Physical Surroundings and Employee Responses, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 69-82 13. Boulding, K. E. (1959). The image. The University of Michigan Press,22. 14. Cardozo, R. N. (1965). An Experimental Study of Customer Effort, Expection and Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, l(2), 244-249. 15.Christopher, M., Payne, A. & Ballantyne, D. (1991), Relationship Marketing-Bribging Quality, Customer Service and Marketing Together, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd, pp.9 16.Christy, R., G. Oliver J. Penn (1996), Relationship Marketing in Consumer Markets, Journal of Marketing Management, Dec.,pp.175-187. 17. Churchill, G. A. Jr. & C. Surprenant (1982). An Investigation Into thedeterminants of Customer Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, l(19),491-504. 18.Copulsky, J.R., & Wolf, M.J.(1990), Relationship Marketing: Positioning for the Future, Journal of Business Strategy, July/August, Vol.11,pp.16-20 19.Cronin, J.J. & Taylor, S.A. (1992), Measuring Service QualityA Reexamination and Extension, Journal of Marketing, Vol.56, pp.55-58. 20.Crosby, L.A. & Stephens, N. (1987), Effects of Relationship Marketing on Satisfaction, Retention & Prices in the Life Insurance Industry, Journal of Marketing Research, November, pp.404-411. 21.Crosby, L.A., Evans, K.R., & Cowles, D.,(1990), Relationship Quality in Service Selling An Interpersonal Influence Perspective. Journal of Marketing Vol.54, July:68-81. 22.Cunningham, Ross M. (1956). Brand Loyalty: What, Where, How MuchHarvard Bussiness Review, Vol.34, No.1,pp.116-128. 114

23. Czepiel, John. A., Larry J. Rosenberg, & Adebayo Akerele. (1974), Perspectives on Consumer Satisfaction. Quoted in AMA Educators Proceedings (Chicago: American Marketing Association, pp.119-123. 24.Dick, A.S. & Basu, K. (1994), Customer Loyalty: Toward an Intergrated Conceptual Framework, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.22, pp.99-113. 25.Evans, J.R., & Laskin, R.L. (1994), The Relationship Marketing Process: A Conceptualization and Application, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol.23, pp: 439-452 26.Frederick F. Reichheld (1996). Learning from Customer Defections,Harvard Business Review, March-April 1996,pp.57-69. 27.Garvin, D. A., (1983), Quality on The Line, Harvard Business Review, Vo1. 2, No. 61, pp. 65-93. 28.Garvin, D. A., (1984), What Does Product Quality Really Mean Sloan Management Review, Vo1. 26, No. 1, pp. 25-43. 29.Griffin, J. (1995), Customer Loyalty, Simmon & Schuster Inc. 30.Gronholdt, L., Martensen, A. & Kristensen,K. (2000), The relationship between Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty: Cross-Industry different, Total Quality Management, Vol. 11, pp. 509-516. 31.Gronroos, C. (1984), A Service Quality Model and Its Marketing Implications, European Journal of Marketing, Vol.18, pp.37-45. 32.Gronroos, C. (1990), Relationship Approach to Marketing in Service Context: The Marketing and Organizational Behavior Interface, Journal of Business Research, January, pp. 5-8. 33. Gronroos, c., (1998). Service Quality: The Six Creteria of Good Perceived Servic Quality. Review of Business, l(9), 10-13 34.Hampel, D. J., (1977), Consumer Satisfaction with The Home Buying Process: Conceptualization and Dissatisfaction, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MS. 35.Heskett, J. L., T. O. Jones, G. W. Loveman, W. E. Sasser, and L. Schlesinger, (1994), Putting the Service-Profit Chain to Work, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 72, No.2, pp. 164-174. 36. Howard and Jagdish N. Sheth (1969). The Theory of Buyer Behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 37.Ivanvich, J. M., and M. T. Matteson, (1987), Organizational Behavior and Management, 1987, Business Publication, Plano, Texas. 38.Jones, T.O. & Sasser, W.E.Jr. (1995), Why Satisfied Customer Defect, Harvard Business Review, Nov./ Dec., pp. 88-99. 39.Juran, J.M. (1974), A Universal Approach to Managing for Quality, Quality Progress, pp.19-24. 40. Keller, K.L (1998), Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring,and Managing Brand Equity, NJ: Prentice Hall. 41.Kolter, P. (1994), Marketing Management : Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control, 6 th ed, Prentice-Hill, Englewood Cliff, N.J. 42.Kolter, P., Ang, S.H., Leong, S.M. & Tan, C.T. (1999), Marketing Management: An Asian Perspective, 2 nd ed, Prentice Hall, pp.17-31, 265-270. 43. Kotler,.P.(1997), Marketing Management::Analysis, Planning, Implementation and 115

Control, 9 ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc 4.Martineau, Pierre, The Personailiy of the Retail Store, Harvad Business Reviews,January/February 1958, p.47-55 44.Knutson, B., P. Stevens, M. Patton, and C. Thompson, (1992), Consumers Expectations for Service Quality in Economy, Mid-Price and Luxury Hotels, Journal of Hospitality & Leisure Marketing, Vo1.1, No.2, pp. 27-43. 45.Levitt, T., (1972), Production-Line Approach to Service, Harvard Business Review, Vo1. 50, No.5, pp. 41-52. 46.Lewis, B. R., and V. W. Mitchell, (1990), Defining and Measuring The Quality of Customer Service, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, Vo1.8, No.6, pp. 11-17. 47.Lovelock, C.H. (1994), Product Plus: How product Service Competitive Advantage, McGraw-Hill,N.Y. 48.Marshall, G. W., J. Baker., and D. W. Finn, (1998). Exploring Internal Customer Service Quality, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vo1.3, No.4, pp. 381-392 49.Monroe, K. B. & Guiltinan J. P., (1975). A Path-Analysis Exploration of Retail Patronage Influences. Journal of Customer Research, 19-28. 50.Morgan, R.M. & Hunt, S.D. (1994), The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, July, pp.20-38. 51. Neal, William D. (1999). Satisfaction is Nice, but Value Drives Loyalty. Marketing Reasearch, l(11), 20-23. 52.Oliver, R.L.(1981), Measurement and Evaluation of Satisfaction Processes in Retail Settings, Journal of Retailing, Vol.57, pp.25-48. 53.Oliver, R.L.(1997), Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer, McGraw-Hill, N.Y. 54. Ostrom, A. and D. Iacobucci (1995), Consumer Trade-Offs and the Evaluation of Services, Journal of Marketing, Vol.59, pp.17-28. 55.Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. & Berry, L.L. (1985), A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implication for Future Research, Journal of Marketing, Vol.49, pp.41-50. 56.Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. & Berry, L.L. (1988), SERVQUAL : A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Customer Expectations of Service, Journal of Retailing, Vol.64, pp.12-40. 57.Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. & Berry, L.L. (1988), Communication and Control Processes in the Delivery of Service Quality, Journal of Marketing 52, April, pp.46. 58.Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. & Berry, L.L. (1991), Refinement and Reassessment of the SERVQUAL Scale, Journal of Retailing, Vol.67, pp.420-450.p423 59. Paul,P.J. & J.C. Olson, Consumer Behavior: Marketing Strategy Perspectives, 1987. 60.Peppers, D. & Rogers, M. (1993), The one tone future: Building relationship one customer at a time, Currency/ Doubleday. 61.Raphel, N. & Raphel, M. (1995), Loyalty Ladder,Harper Collins Publishers Inc. 62.Rapp, S. & Collins, T.(1990), The Great Marketing Turnaround, Prentice-Hill, Englewood Cliff, N.J. 63.Reichheld, F.F. & Sasser, W.E.Jr. (1990), Zero Defections: Quality Comes to Services, Harvard Business Review, Vol.68, No.5, pp.105-111. 64. Reynolds, W. H. (1965). The role of the consumer in image building. California 116

Management Review, 7, 69-76. 65. Robertson, T.S., & Gatignon H. (1986). Competitive Effects on Technology Diffusion. Journal of Marketing, l(50), 1-12. 66.Sasser, W. E., R. P. Olsen, and O. D. Wyckoff, (1978), Management of Service Operation, Allyn & Bacon Inc., New York, NY. 67. Schneider, B. & D. E. Bowen (1999). Understanding Customer Delight and Outrage. Sloan Management Review, l(41), 35-46. 68.Selnes, F. (1993), An Examination of the Effect of Product Performance On Brand Reputation, Satisfaction and Loyalty, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 27(9), pp. 19-35. 69.Shani, D. & Chalasani s. (1992), Exploiting Niches Using Relationship Marketing, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol.3, pp. 33-42. 70.Sheth, J.N. & Parvatiyar, A. (1995), Relationship Marketing in Consumer Markets: Antecedent and Consegueces, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.23, No.4, pp.255-271. 71.Singh, J. & Sirdeshmukh, D., (2000). Agency and trust mechanisms in consumer satisfaction and loyalty judgments. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (1), 150-167. 72. Solomon, M. R.(1991), Comsumer Behavior:Buying, Having and Buying, Boston, Allyn and Bacon. 73.Spector, P. (1961). Basic Dimension of The corporate Image. Journal of Marketing, l(25), 47-51. 74.Walters, C.G. (1978), Consumer Behavior: A Integrated Framework, NewYork: Richard D. Irwin Inc. 75.Walton, S. D. (1996). American business and its environment. New York: Mac Milton Company. 76. Westbrook, Robert A. (1981). Sources of Satisfaction with Retail Outlets. Journal of Retailing 57, 68-85. 77.Woodruff, R. B., E. R. Cadotte R. L. Jenkins(1983), Modeling Consumer Satisfaction Process Using Experience-Based Norms, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.20, Aug.,pp.296-304. 78.Worcester R. M. (1972), Consumer Market Research Handbook, McGraw-Hill Book Company. 507. 79. Zeithaml,Valarie A. & Mary JoBitner (1996)., Service Marketing, McGRAW-HILL, p.123. 80. Zeithaml, V. A., and Bitner, M. J., (1996) Service marketing, McGraw Hill, NewYork, NY. 117

1. 2. 3.. ( ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.. 1. 118

2. 3. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.. 1. ----- 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 2. 3.. 1. 2. 3.. 1. 1 2. 1---2 3. 2---3 4. 3 1 2 3 4 5 1. 1 2. 2 3. 3 4.. 4 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5.... 5 6. 6 7.... 7 8..... 8 9.. 9 119

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.... 11. 12. 13. 14. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15. 16. 16 17. 18. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 19. 19 20. 21. 22. 23. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24..1 2. 3. 4. 5. 1 2 3 4 5. 1 2.. 2 3.. 3 4. 4 5. 5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6... 6 7. 7 8.... 8 9. 9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 120

1 2 3 4 5.. 1 2.... 2 3.... 3 4... 4 5.... 5 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6... 6 7... 7 8..... 8 9..... 9 10....... 10 11........ 11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 12. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1 2 3 4 5.. 1 2.... 2 3.. 3 4. 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 121

1 2 3 4 5 1.... 1 2... 2 3. 3 4. 4 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 122

1. :365 95 ( ) 82 908,472 74,077 982,549 33.64 104 613,745 247,139 860,883 22.57 28 148,635 65,534 214,169 20.35 42 225,423 40,543 265,966 17.27 108 619,766 124,376 744,142 18.77 31 130,598 29,315 159,913 13.67 71 286,443 50,690 337,132 12.98 235 1,512,213 390,239 1,902,452 22.67 270 1,122,503 483,538 1,606,040 16.19 81 300,737 114,220 414,957 14.05 100 277,100 157,922 435,022 11.91 196 725,969 348,966 1,074,935 14.93 168 527,317 228,330 755,647 12.23 94 271,144 134,714 405,859 11.69 111 313,371 189,891 503,262 12.33 97 249,865 131,260 381,124 10.71 225 646,379 315,056 961,435 11.55 171 547,657 284,866 832,523 13.35 132 393,429 159,248 552,677 11.48 48 92,210 54,634 146,844 8.29 68 146,538 106,933 253,470 10.00 59 186,076 112,155 298,231 13.72 13 21,587 11,222 32,809 6.91 8 13,351 10,742 24,093 8.63 1 1,045 2,832 3,877 10.52 2,552 10,281,572 3,868,441 14,150,013 15.19 123

2. 95 71 26,052 4,624 30,676 13.94 225 59,489 27,999 87,488 12.54 71 22,386 3,821 26,207 13.18 225 51,337 23,077 74,414 11.81 71 23,757 4,615 28,372 12.89 228 54,001 28,090 82,091 11.61 73 23,813 4,379 28,192 12.87 227 55,561 26,457 82,018 12.04 70 23,684 4,212 27,896 12.86 226 53,855 25,423 79,278 11.32 70 23,624 4,168 27,792 13.23 227 53,637 24,811 78,448 11.52 71 25,076 4,261 29,337 13.33 229 56,028 25,950 81,978 11.55 71 24,000 4,139 28,139 12.78 229 54,551 26,199 80,750 11.37 70 22,662 3,931 26,593 12.66 229 50,853 25,161 76,014 11.06 72 25,119 4,615 29,734 13.32 231 57,873 28,724 86,596 12.09 72 23,156 3,994 27,151 12.57 230 49,428 26,832 76,260 11.05 72 23,114 3,931 27,045 12.12 230 49,765 26,333 76,098 10.67 72 286,443 50,690 337,132 12.98 230 646,379 315,056 961,435 11.55 302 932,822 365,746 1,298,567 11.78 2,552 10,281,572 3,868,441 14,150,013 15.19 2.82 2.79 1.31 2.38 85.43 9.01 6.29 8.14 6.79 76.04 11.83 9.07 9.45 9.18 77.53 124

3. 87-95 12 46 22,232 3,234 25,466 17.86 126 41,678 20,514 62,192 15.92 87 172 63,910 23,748 87,658 16.44 1,723 728,158 258,265 986,423 18.47 2.67 3.05 1.25 2.58 96.70 7.31 5.72 7.94 6.30 86.19 9.98 8.78 9.20 8.89 89.01 48 22,805 3,084 25,889 17.40 149 47,458 23,611 71,069 15.39 88 197 70,263 26,695 96,958 15.88 1,884 791,182 294,157 1,085,339 18.58 2.55 2.88 1.05 2.39 93.65 7.91 6.00 8.03 6.55 82.83 11.46 8.88 9.08 8.93 85.45 53 21,619 3,047 24,666 15.01 162 47,791 21,206 68,997 13.74 89 215 69,410 24,253 93,663 14.05 2,050 791,304 276,298 1,067,602 16.80 2.59 2.73 1.10 2.31 89.35 7.90 6.04 7.68 6.46 81.79 10.49 8.77 8.78 8.77 83.65 57 22,511 3,144 25,655 14.52 174 48,381 20,510 68,891 12.77 90 231 70,892 23,654 94,546 13.20 2,159 802,651 260,656 1,063,307 15.89 2.64 2.80 1.21 2.41 91.39 8.06 6.03 7.87 6.48 80.39 10.70 8.83 9.07 8.89 83.10 125

87-95 12 58 22,486 3,352 25,838 14.37 191 50,977 21,323 72,301 12.21 91 249 73,463 24,675 98,139 12.71 2,281 828,804 270,861 1,099,666 15.55 2.54 2.71 1.24 2.35 92.40 8.37 6.15 7.87 6.57 78.52 10.92 8.86 9.11 8.92 81.75 65 24,671 3,673 28,344 14.07 204 50,873 22,484 73,357 11.60 92 269 75,544 26,157 101,701 12.20 2,366 850,528 297,688 1,148,216 15.65 2.75 2.90 1.23 2.47 89.85 8.62 5.98 7.55 6.39 74.10 11.37 8.88 8.79 8.86 77.90 64 24,996 3,899 28,895 14.56 205 52,182 22,983 75,165 11.83 93 269 77,178 26,882 104,060 12.48 2,439 855,582 294,751 1,150,332 15.21 2.62 2.92 1.32 2.51 95.73 8.41 6.10 7.80 6.53 77.74 11.03 9.02 9.12 9.05 82.02 71 25,771 4,962 30,733 13.96 223 54,903 28,820 83,723 12.11 94 294 80,674 33,782 114,456 12.56 2,531 901,411 359,914 1,261,325 16.08 2.81 2.86 1.38 2.44 86.86 8.81 6.09 8.01 6.64 75.34 11.62 8.95 9.39 9.07 78.12 126

87-95 12 72 23,114 3,931 27,045 12.12 230 49,765 26,333 76,098 10.67 95 302 72,878 30,264 103,143 11.02 2,571 820,191 320,308 1,140,500 14.31 2.80 2.82 1.23 2.37 84.68 8.95 6.07 8.22 6.67 74.58 11.75 8.89 9.45 9.04 76.99 127

311110 EMBA 94 93 06-2563304 E - mail084191@cpc.com.tw N94W0009@webmail.stut.edu.tw 128