Cruickshank 1990 Danielson(1996) (Garland & Shippy, 1995, pp.15-17). () 1. (component) (element) 2. () (What the teacher knows) Shulman

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Cruickshank 1990 Danielson(1996) (Garland & Shippy, 1995, pp.15-17). () 1. (component) (element) 2. () (What the teacher knows) Shulman"

秀列扈
7 years ago
Views:

1 Yu Da Academic Journal No.8, pp August 2004 * ** *** (value-added) (Thomson, 1992) Danielson(1996) Schmoker(1999) % Schmoker Lortie (Schmoker, 1999) Goodlad 1970 (Schmoker, 1999) ( 85) NSC H * ** *** 21 22

2 Cruickshank 1990 Danielson(1996) (Garland & Shippy, 1995, pp.15-17). () 1. (component) (element) 2. () (What the teacher knows) Shulman Shulman (personal characteristics) (mental abilities) () (What the teacher teach) (process- product) () (How the teacher teaches) 1. ( )

3 3. ( components ) ( domains (planning and preparation) ( the classroom environment ) ( instruction ) ( professional responsibilities ) ( elements () (How the teacher reacts to pupils) Danielson 1 : () (What the teacher expects) () (How the teacher manages the classroom) (Educational Testing Service) ( The PRAXIS Series ) Danielson(1996) (Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching) Danielson 25 26

4 2. () (Stronge2002) Danielson,1996,pp.3-4 Stronge( 2002) : () ( ) ( )

5 7. () ( 92) () Benson(2000) (formative evaluation) (National Board of Professional Teaching Standards) (self-evaluation) (self-critique) () (students of learning) (a culture of constructivist teaching) 1. () (Images of teaching) 29 30

6 ( a vision of critical Likert-type reflection) () () 6 1 Benson(2000) (partnership class) SPSS for windows % Danielson(1996)

7 () % % () %

8 () % % %

9 () % Crobacch α

10 () Danielson (components) () () 7 () ()

11 () () 1 Danielson () () Cruickshank () ShulmanDanielson Stronge () () 41 42

12 () (85) (87) (89) ( (92) (86) ( ) (85) (85) ( (86) ( ) Benson, S. H. (2000, Feb.). Make mine an A. Educational Leadership, 57(5): Copeland, W. D.(1982). Student teachers' preference for supervisory approach. Journal of Teacher Education, 33(2): Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Garland, C. and Shippy, V. (1995), Guiding clinical experiences: Effective supervision in teacher education. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corp. Glickman, C. D. ; Gordon, S. P. and Ross-Gordon, J. M. (1995). Supervision of instruction: A developmental approach. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Grimmett, P. P. and Ratzlaff, H. C. (1986), Expectations for the cooperating teacher role. Journal of Teacher Education, 37(6): Schmoker, M. (1999). Results: The key to continuous school improvement(2 nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD Shulman, L. (2001 Feb.). Appreciating good teaching: A conversation with Lee Shulman. Educational Leadership, 58(5): Stronge, J. M. (2002). Qualities of effective teachers. VA: ASCD. Thomson, S. D.(1992). School leadership: A blueprint for change. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press

13 The Construction of Teaching Inventory of Teacher s Effectiveness for Junior High and Elementary Schools Chin-Chang Chiu * Fang-Lang Fang ** Shu-Yu Chang *** Abstract Both investigating the effectiveness of primary and junior high school teachers in order to develope a proper teaching checklist is the main point of this research. In first stage, we adopted the teaching professional scheme of Danielson(1996) to prepare teaching checklist. And then used this checklist to inquire 400 teachers of 20 primary and junior high schools. The respond rate and effective rate of this survey are 91.75and % respectively. Moreover, item and factor analysis be used to modify this checklist. During second stage, we invited 12 experts to examine and modify this checklist by 2 rounds. After two stages procedure have mentioned above, this checklist includes 4 categories and 50 items. There are a teaching plan and preparation, b teaching knowledge and skills, cclassroom environment operation, and d)professional responsibility and growth. This checklist not only can be a useful tool to review intern and beginning teachers of primary and junior high school but self-evaluation of veteran teachers. Key words: teacher effectiveness, teaching checklist * Professor, Department of Child Care and Education ** Assistant of project, National Cheng-Chi University Candidate of Doctor Program *** Assistant of project, National Cheng-Chi University Student of Master Program 45

(170) 2 Key Words: teacher evaluation, teacher professional development, formative evaluation

1 (169) (170) 2 Key Words: teacher evaluation, teacher professional development, formative evaluation 2000 1997 3 (171) Sergiovanni Starratt 1983 1998 (172) 4 1995 1998 1997 2002 Danielson McGreal 2000