( 71 ),,,,, ( 2003) :, ;,,,, ( ) ( ) ( ),,,,,, ( causative),,,,,,,,, (V, R, VR ) : (3) a b c. V + R VR, (p rom inent),,,, V R ;,

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "2005 1 ( 71 ),,,,, ( 2003) :, ;,,,, ( ) ( ) ( ),,,,,, ( causative),,,,,,,,, (V, R, VR ) : (3) a. 1 + 2 b. 1 + 2 c. V + R VR, (p rom inent),,,, V R ;,"

慈磋沈
7 years ago
Views:

1 : 3,,, g ( ),, (1980, 1986),,,, : (1) : a. (, ) b. ( ) (, ) (2) : a. (, ) b. (, ), ( argument structure) ( ),,,,,, (motivation), 3,, 5

2 ( 71 ),,,,, ( 2003) :, ;,,,, ( ) ( ) ( ),,,,,, ( causative),,,,,,,,, (V, R, VR ) : (3) a b c. V + R VR, (p rom inent),,,, V R ;, V ( ) ; R ( ), V R ( unmarked),,,, : > > > ( ),,, 6

3 :,,, ( V R ) ( ) ( ),,,,,,,, ( ) ( ),,,,,, ( thematic role),, ( dative), ( theme) (patient),,,,,,,,, V R, ( co2referencial) ; ( disjoint referencial), V R : ( ), ( ), ( ),, : (4) a. (, ) b. ( ) (, ) (5) a. (, ) b. ( ) (, ) (6) (7) ( ) (, ) (, ), 7

4 ( 71 ) (4), V,,, ( causer) R V (5), V ; R ( demoted), ( causee), V,, ; V R,,,,,,, (4) (5), (4a) (5a) ; (4b) (5b) V, R (5b),, ;, ( ),, ( verb2copying construc2 tion) (4b),,,,,, (4b) (5b) V,, V V,, ( underlying agent2patient relation), ( higher causer2causee rela2 tion),, (5b) (6) (7) (6), V R V ( ), ; R V, R ( ), ; V R, (7), V R,,, R V,,,,,, R, V 8

5 :, (6),, V, R, (4b) (5b),, (7) (4a) (5a),,,,,,, ;,, ( boundary),,, : (8) (Boundary Princip le),,, : ( ) V R, ; ( ), V, R ; ( ),, ( ),, ;, ( ) ; ( ) V R,,,,, : :, :, V R, V R,,,, V V, R R,,,, 9

6 ( 71 ),,,,,,, ( ) ;,,,, ( thematic hi2 erarchy), (, 2003), ;,,,,,,, ; + ( ) ( ), V,,,,, ;,,,,,,,, (2004),,, ; V R V 1 V 2 V 3, R 1 R 2, 1,,,,,,,, V + V + V +, 10

7 : (V 1 + R 1 ),,, : (9) a. : + : + b. : + (9) 1 ( ), ( ),, (10) a. : + : + b. : + : + (10), 2 ( ) ( ) (10b), (10a),, (, 1994), (10b), : (11) a. b. (11a), ( 11b),, V 1 + R 1,, ( + ), V 1 + R 1, V 2 + R 1 V 3 + R 1, (V 2 + R 1 ),, : V R, V R, (12) : + : + (12) ( ) 1 ( ),, 11

8 ( 71 ) : (13) : + ( ) : + ( ) V R,,, (14) : + ( ) : + ( ) (14) 2 ( ) :, : (15) a. : + ( ) : + ( ) b. : + ( ) : + ( ) (15) ( ) (V 2 + R 2 ) V 2 + R 2,, : V R, V R (16) a. : + : + b. : + (16), / : (17) : + ( ), (metonomy), (16a),,, (18) : + ( ) 12 : + ( )

9 : (18) ( ),, V 2 + R 2 :,, ( ),, V 2 + R 2, (V 3 + R) V 3 + R, (19) : + ( ) : + ( ) (19) (20) : ( ) + ( ) : + ( ) (20), V ( ) R,, : V R (21) : / + / / (21), V R,,, (V 1 + R 2 ) V R, V R : (22) : ( ) + : ( ) +,, ;,,,,, ( ),,,,,,, ( ), ( ) 13

) : + ( ) (20), V ( ) R,, : V R (21) : / + / / (21), V R,,, 3.

10 ( 71 ) 3. 6,,,, : (23) : + : + (24) : + ( ) : + ( ) (25) : + ( ) (23) (24) (25), V R V, V, V V, ; ;,,, : (26), V R :, ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ), ( ) ( ), ( 26), : (27) : + (28) : + : + (29) : (27) (28) (29) V,,,, V, V,, V (percolate) 3. 7, : (30) : (31) : : ( 30) 1, ( 31) 2 14

11 : ( causative) ( ergative), 1,, 2, (30),,,, 3. 8, 20, ( ), : NP, S, O ; NP O ; a. V 1 + R 1 b. V R S +VR V 2 + R 1 S + (V +NP) +VR V 2 + R 2 S +VR +O V 2 + R 2 S + (V +NP) +VR +O V 3 + R 1 S + (V +NP 1 +NP 2 ) +VR +O V 1 + R 2 V S +VR +O V 1 + R 1 ( ) V 2 + R 1 ( ) V R S +VR +O S +VR +O R R V 2 + R 1 ( ) S + (V +NP) +VR +O V 3 + R 1 S + (V +O 2 ) +VR +O 1 V 3 + R 2 S +VR +O 1 +O 2 V 1 + R 1 V 2 + R 1 V 3 + R 1 V 1 + R V 2 + R V 3 + R S +VR S + (V +NP) +VR S + (V +NP 1 +NP 2 ) +VR S +VR S +VR +O S +VR +O 1 +O 2 1 S +VR +O 2 S +VR,, 15

S +VR +O V 1 + R 1 ( ) V 2 + R 1 ( ) V R S +VR +O S +VR +O R R V 2 + R 1 ( ) S + (V +NP) +VR +O V 3 + R 1 S + (V +O 2 ) +VR +O 1 V 3 +

12 ( 71 ) S + VR + O 1 ( 1991: 246) :,,,, V 2 + R 1, ( ),,, ( ad hoc), ( ), ( ),, (32) ( ( ), ) (33) ( ) (, ) (, ), ( ) (, ) (34) ( ) (, ) ( ) (, ), (35) (, ) (, ) (35), V, (36), (, ) (37) ( ) (, ) (, ) ( ) (, ) (36) (37) (36), V (37),,, (38) (39) ( ) ( ) (38) (39), (38) ; (39),, V 16

13 :,,,, 5. 1 (40) : + : +,,,,, (40), Cheng & Huang(1994) Gao (1997) ( 2002),,,,,, ( 1986 ) ( 1986 ) Huang & L in (1992) (1995, 2002) ( 1986: 189),,, : (41) : 3 3 :?? ( ), : (42) : :,, (1995),,,,,,,, ( default),,, ;,, : (43) = ( ) 17

14 ( 71 ) = ( ), ( ),,,,, ( ),, ( shadow arguments), ( cognate object),, ( free object) 5. 2 (44) : + 3 : + 3,,,,,,,, (44) (45) : (45) : + : +,,,,,, ( 1996, 2000) (1998),, : (46) a., ( ) b.,, ( ) c.,,, ( ), : (47) a., ( ) b.,,, ( ) c., (, ),, 18,, V + R ( )

15 :, V + R ( ) ( 5. 3 ),,,,, /,, 5. 3 (48) : + ( ) /3 : + ( ) /3 (45),,,,,,, ( 1990) ( 1994) ( 1997) (2001),,,,,,,,, ;,,,,, : (49),,,,, ( ),, 5. 4,,,,,, ( last re2 sort),,, 19

16 ( 71 ),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, (2003),,,,,, (1a),, (1b),,, (1993) (1995) (1995), (2001), (2002),,, (2003) L i(1990, 1995) Gu (1992) Gao (1997), ( thematic theory), : V R V, : ( ), ( ) 20

17 :, (2004) (1998), 1 (1996), 1 (2000), : (2003), 1 (1995), (1995) (2002), ( ), : (1993) V - R, 2 (1980), 2 (1986), : (1994), 1 (1990) VA, 1 (2001) VA, 6 (1997), (1995), : (2003), (2004), 6 (1995), (1995) (2002), : (1991), : (1986),, :, 1999 (1994), 4 (2001), 5 Cheng, L isa Lai2Shen and C. 2T. James Huang ( ) (1994) On the A rgument Structure of Resula2 tive Compounds. InMathew Y. Chen & Ovid J. L. Tzeng ( ed. ), In Honor of W illiam S 2Y W ang: Interdisci2 plinary S tudies on Language and Language Change. Taipei: Pyram id Press. Gao, Q ian ( ) (1997) Resultative verb compounds and BA2construction in Chinese. Journal of Chinese L in2 guistics 25. Gu, Yang( ) (1992) The Syntax of Resultative and Causative Compounds in Chinese. Doctoral D issertation, Cornell University. Huang, Chu2ren & Fu2W en L in ( ) (1992) Composite event structures and comp lex p redicates: A temp late2based app roach to argument selection. guistic Society of M id2am erica. In Proceeding of the Third A nnualm eeting of the Form al L in2 L i, Yafei( ) (1990) On V2V compounds in Chinese. N atural Language and L inguistic Theory 8. L i, Yafei( ) (1995) The thematic hierarchy and causativity. N atural L anguage and L inguistic Theory 13.,,,,, 21

Chen & Ovid J. L. Tzeng ( ed. ), In Honor of W illiam S 2Y W ang: Interdisci2 plinary S tudies on Language and Language Change. Taipei: Pyram id Press.

18 CH INESE TEACH ING IN THE WO RLD SH3J I, H%NY? J I%O XU No. 1 M arch 2005 Abstracts of papers in th is issue The in tegra ted process of the VRC s argum en t structure and relevan t problem s SH I Chunhong, p5 This paper focuses on the integrated p rocess of the VRC s argument structure and some relevant p roblem s. Based on the semantic features of the VRC, it introduces the boundary p rin2 cip le of the VRC in the p rocess of the argument structure integration, along with various possi2 ble ways to distinguish argument raising, and uses various types at different levels to research into the VRC s argument selection and syntactic arrangem ent. Finally, it discuses the app lica2 ble range of the boundary p rincip le and the conditions for some excep tions to occur. Key w ords verb2resultative construction (VRC) argument structure integration bound2 ary p rincip le verb2copying construction excep tions On the m etaphor ica l levels of the SVC in m odern Ch inese Gao Zengx ia, p22 The serial verb construction is one with the p rincip le of temporal sequence as its structu2 ring rule and its members of various types are the result of operations of their sequential rela2 tions at three metaphorical levels, namely, the concep tual, logical and cognitive levels, there2 fore the inner structures of the SVC are of different qualities. Key w ords serial verb constructions( SVC) semantic relations metaphorical levels The theory of preconce ivedness: a cogn itive study on the sequence in m odern Ch inese L U Chuan, p32 This paper attemp ts to exp lain the reasonability of the sequence in modern Chinese from a cognitive perspective called the theory of p reconceivedness. syntax has a direct bearing on the cognitive model of the Han nationality. The obvious iconicity in Chinese A simp le Chinese sentence consists of a verbal chunk as the p ivot of the event and several periphery chunks. Chinese, the p reconceived periphery chunks are aligned before the p ivot chunk, but the to2be p reconceived periphery chunks are after the p ivot chunk. Finally the author suggests that the contrast between cognitive models of different nationalities should be subsumed into textbooks of Chinese as a second language. Key w ords cognitive model degree of p reconceivedness degree of await2revealedness In

the VRC s argument structure and some relevant p roblem s.

:,,,,,,,, : ( ),, ; ( ),, 1. 1 (, 2003), (perspective), :! :!,,,,,,, Talmy(2000),, : ( ) (perspectival modality), ( synop tic mode), ;, ( sequential m

2005 1 ( 71 ),,, :, 50, 20,, (, The Princip le of Temporal Sequence, PTS), (, 1985),,,,,, Durie (1997),,, ( ),,,,, COCO ( ),,, 22 :,,,,,,,, : ( ),, ; ( ),, 1. 1 (, 2003), (perspective), :! :!,,,,,,, Talmy(2000),,