---------------------------------------------------- 92 92 2 8 (02)2331-8268 www.get.com.tw ( ) Rank Will Psychology 1. 2. 3. ( ) Hamiliton Person in situation ( ) Helen Perlman P P 1.Person 2. Problem : 3. Place 4. Process ( ) 53
---------------------------------------------------- 92 54 ( ) 1. 2. 3. ( ) 1. 2. 3. 4. ( ) 1. 2. 3. 4.
---------------------------------------------------- 92 55 ( ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. ( ) 1. 2. ( ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ( ) 1. 2. 3. ( ) 1. 2. Clarification 3. 4. ( ) 1. Self-Disclosure 2. Support
---------------------------------------------------- 92 56 3. Modeling 4. 5. ( ) 1. Confrontation 2. Exploration 3. 4. ( ) ( ) 1. 2. 3. ( ) 1. 2. 3.
---------------------------------------------------- 92 57 ( ) 1. 2. 3. 4. ( ) 1. 2. 3. 4. ( ) 1. 2. 3.
---------------------------------------------------- 92 58 4. ( ) 1. 2. 3. 4. ( ) 1. 2. ( ) 1. 2. ( ) 1. 2. ( ) 1. 2.
---------------------------------------------------- 92 59 ( ) ( ) ( ) 3 1. 2. 3. ( ) Skidmore Thackeray 3 1. 2. 3. ( ) Profession
---------------------------------------------------- 92 Greenwood 5 1. A body of theory 2. Code of ethics 3. Professional authority 4. (Professinal culture) 5. Sanction of the community ( ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Ethics in social work ( ) Ethics in social work 60
---------------------------------------------------- 92 ( ) Professional code of ethics in social work 1. 2. 3. ( )T.J.Froehiich Self Organization Environment Ariangular Mode 1. Self Froehiich 2. Organization 3. Environment ( )Lowenberg Dolgoff 1992 1. 2. 3. 61
---------------------------------------------------- 92 62 4. 5. 6. 7. ( ) 1. 2. ( ) 1. Locality development 2. Social Planning 3. Social action
---------------------------------------------------- 92 63 ( ) 1. 2. 3. ( ) 1. 2. a. b. c. d. e. ( ) a. b. c. d. e. f. 1. 2. 3. ( )Pinderhughes 1983 capacities Lee 1994 knowledgeofoppression transformation parsons 1. 2. 3. ( ) collaborative and egalitarian relationship
---------------------------------------------------- 92 Torre 1985 1. 2. 3. Simon 1994 1. collaborative partnership 2. 3. 4. 5. 64