* Bourdieu 1986 Coleman 1990 Putnam 1993 Lin 2001a / / Brown 1997 Portes 1998 * 09CSH045 07ASH001 2008BAK49B06 2010 Mark Granovettor Shin Arita Jon Pedersen 64
Lin 2001b 2005 2006 Lin 2001b name-generator position-generator Campbell et al. 1986 Lin & Dumin 1986 Wellman 1979 Marsden 1987 1990 Campbell & Lee 1991 Lin & Dumin 1986 Hsung & Hwang 1992 2005 Lin & Erikson 2008 Lin & Dumin 1986 2001 2004 Burt 1992 65
2011. 3 Lin 2001b 1 e1 e2 e1 a1 a2 e1 e2 Lin 2001b 1 2005 Lin 2001b 1 2 3 New Year s Greeter network 2001 2004 66
1 Zhou 2005 1988 Treiman 1976 1 Lin 2001a prestige reputation 67
2011. 3 Zhou 2005 Blau & Duncan 1967 Treiman 1977 Grasmick 1976 1947 45 0. 91 5 /6 Duncan 1961 Blau & Duncan 1967 Zhou 2005 Weber 1946 Goldthorpe & Hope 1972 Zhou 2005 68
legitimacy appropriateness Featherman & Hauser 1976 Hodge 1981 SEI NORC Hauser & Warren 1997 2000 2005 2001 1 69
2011. 3 1988 Weber 1946 1988 1988 Lin 2001b favor Wright 1997 70
Walder 1995 Parish 1984 Djilas 1957 Walder et al. 2000 2002 1996 1996 1998 2 2008 7-9 71
2011. 3 18 10 40 40 Kish 1350 1143 84. 7% 1 1 % % 44. 2 49. 6 55. 8 34. 4 / / 13. 2 2. 9 18-29 12. 6 800 18. 9 30-39 15. 9 800-1600 32. 2 40-49 28. 8 1600-3000 34. 0 50-59 18. 8 3000-5000 10. 3 60 23. 8 5000 4. 6 12. 5 34. 6 78. 9 8. 1 4. 2. 8 4. 4 56. 5 7. 9 12. 6 20. 0 32. 1 27. 3 22. 2 / 6. 6 8. 7 16. 8 / 5. 4 21. 4 / 12. 9 2. 8 3. 3 72
1. content free / role /location-neutral Lin & Dumin 1986 20 20 80% 88% Bian 2005 Zhao 2002 2003 2006 2009 2006 19 1 2008 19 56. 5% 47. 5% 45. 6% 16. 2% 22. 6% 23. 4% 1 7 13 Bian 2005 19 73
2011. 3 2. 2001 2 / = 5 / = 4 = 3 / = 2 / = 1 2 2 6 5 20 7 / 11 6 15 9 48 20 25 15 58 34 52 54 / 24 13 80 73 71 72 53 56 64 28 95 42 86 59 86 43 91 46 77 38 86 57 74
1 0. 94 2 3 3 2 8 42. 1% 25 19 / / / 10 75
2011. 3 3 5 7 5 5 6 3 * 6 10 5 8 7 7 / 6 7 6 6 6 6 8 10 10 9 9 10 17 23 * 21 20 21 19 13 16 13 16 15 13 29 37 * 32 34 34 33 50 57 * 53 55 55 54 / 12 14 12 14 13 13 72 74 72 73 73 73 72 72 72 71 73 71 56 55 53 57 57 53 / 27 29 27 29 31 23 * 36 46 * 38 43 42 42 54 63 * 54 61 * 59 59 40 46 * 37 46 * 42 44 42 50 * 42 48 47 44 34 41 * 35 39 38 37 53 61 * 56 58 57 59 * 0. 05 40 40 26 20 31 53 45 43 39 12 2 /3 3 3 76
2 3 1 2 3 7 9 7 8 10 12 11 8 6 6 5 2 1 5-6 19 r 0. 81 0. 01 77
2011. 3 11 0. 13 1 Zhou 2005 Lin 2001b 2002 Bian 2005 1 1 Mouw 2003 Lin & Erickson 2008 2010 78
4 1 2 3 2 1 3 0. 044 0. 122 0. 01 4 OLS 1 2 3. 142 ***. 044. 122 **. 197 ***. 183 ***. 188 ***. 007 *. 007 *. 006 * -. 019 -. 013 -. 008. 132 ***. 117 ***. 111 ***. 312. 373 *. 378 *. 714 ***. 751 ***. 742 ***. 105. 149. 131. 499 ***. 501 ***. 484 ***. 476 ***. 566 ***. 556 ***. 789 ***. 820 ***. 802 *** 6. 09 *** 6. 125 *** 6. 197 *** R 2. 241. 260. 267 R 2. 018. 007 10 1 1 F 14. 75 *** 11. 47 *** 4. 37 * 474 474 474 1 2 * p < 0. 05 **p < 0. 01 ***p < 0. 001. 1 0. 71 3 VIF 3 79
2011. 3 1 3 R 2 2 0. 007 3 F 0. 05 2 3 2 1 0. 140 0. 162 15. 7% 80
2004 3 2001 2 2002 1988 2005 9 2003 5 1996 5-6 2005 2005 2 2000 4 2010 5 1988 1998 3 2006 3 2009 3 1996 5-6 2006 2002 4 2006 6 2005 2 Bian Yanjie 2005 Occupation Class and Social Networks in Urban China. Social Forces 83 4. Blau Peter & O. D. Duncan 1967 The American Occupational Structure. New York Wiley. 81
2011. 3 Bourdieu Pierre 1986 The Forms of Capital. In John G. Richardson ed. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport CT. Greenwood Press. Brown Thomas Ford 1997 Theoretical Perspectives on Social Capital. Working paper located in http / /hal. lamar. edu / ~ BROWNTF /SOCCAP. HTML Burt Ronald S. 1992 Structural Holes The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge Mass Harvard University Press. Campbell K. P. Marsden & J. Hurlbert 1986 Social Resources and Socioeconomic Status. Social Networks 8 1. Campbell K. E. & B. A. Lee 1991 Name Generators in Surveys of Personal Networks. Social Networks 13. Coleman James 1990 Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge The Belknap Press. Djilas Milovan 1957 The New Class An Analysis of the Communist System of Power. New York Praeger. Duncan O. D. 1961 A Socioeconomic Index for all Occupations. In J. Reiss Jr. ed. Occupations and Social Status. New York Free Press. Featherman David L. & Robert M. Hauser 1976 Prestige or Socioeconomic Scales in the Study of Occupational Achievement. Sociological Methods and Research 4. Goldthorpe John & Heith Hope 1972 Occupational Grading and Occupational Prestige. In Keith Hope ed. The Analysis of Social Mobility Methods and Approaches. Oxford Oxford University Press. Grasmick H. G. 1976 The Occupational Prestige Structure A Multidimensional Scaling Approach. Sociological Quarterly 17. Hauser Robert M. & John Robert Warren 1997 Socioeconomic Indexes of Occupational Status A Review Update and Critique. In Adrian Raftery ed. Sociological Methodology. Cambridge Blackwell Publishers. Hodge Robert W. 1981 The Measurement of Occupational Status. Social Science Research 10. Hsung R. M. & Y. J. Hwang 1992 Job Mobility in Taiwan Job Search Methods and Contacts Status. Paper presented at Sunbelt XII International Conference on Social Networks San Diego the United States. Lin Nan 2001a Building A Network Theory of Social Capital. In Nan Lin Karen Cook & Ronald Burt eds. Social Capital Theory and Research. NY Aldine DeGruyter. 2001b Social Capital A Theory of Social Structure and Action. NY Cambridge University Press. Lin Nan & Mary Dumin 1986 Access to Occupations through Social Ties. Social Network 8. Lin Nan & Bonnie Erickson 2008 Social Capital An International Research Program. Oxford Oxford University Press. Marsden P. V. 1987 Core Discussion Network of Americans. American Sociological Review 52. 1990 Network Data and Measurement. Annual Review of Sociology 16. Mouw T. 2003 Social Capital and Finding A Lob Do Contacts Matter American Sociology Revi- 82
erw 68 6. Parish William 1984 Destratification in China. In James Watson ed. Class and Social Stratification in Post-Revolution China. New York Cambridge University Press. Portes Alejandro 1998 Social Capital Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 24. Putnam Robert 1993 Making Democracy Work Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton Princeton University Press. Treiman Donald J. 1976 A Standard Occupational Prestige Scale for Use with Historical Data. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 7. 1977 Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective. New York Academic Press. Walder Andrew. 1995 Career Mobility and the Communist Political Order. American Sociological Review 60. Walder Andrew Li Bobai & Donald J. Treiman 2000 Politics and Life Chances in A State Socialist Regime Dual Career Paths into the Urban Chinese Elite 1949-1996. American Sociological Review 65. Wright Eric Olin 1997 Class Counts Comparative Studies in Class Analysis. New York Cambridge University Press. Weber Max 1946 From Max Weber Essays in Sociology. Translated edited and with an introduction by H. H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills. New York Oxford University Press. Wellman B. 1979 The Community Question The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers. American Journal of Sociology 84. Zhao Yandong 2002 Measuring the Social Capital of the Laid-off Chinese Workers. Current Sociology 50. Zhou Xueguang 2005 The Institutional Logic of Occupational Prestige Ranking Reconceptualization and Reanalyses. American Journal of Sociology 111 1. 83
raised by Yang Ge and Wang Guangzhou Li Chunling 54 Abstract This article is the author s response to the questions raised by Yang Ge and Wang Guangzhou about selection bias of data used by the author s previous research. Based on discussion and data re-testing made by Yang and Wang about selection bias of reconstructed data from population sample database the author examines the effect of selection bias and evaluates the effectiveness of treatment methods. It concludes that effect of selection bias has not been verified by data re-testing. The treatment methods used by Yang and Wang could not estimate exactly the effect of selection bias and also not reduce its impact effectively. Power or Prestige The Debates and Verifications in Measurement of Social Capital Wei Jianwen & Zhao Yandong 64 Abstract The paper examines the differences between power and prestige in the light of the logic of social recognition and further proposes that when measuring individual social capital occupational power score is a better instrument than the commonly used occupational prestige score. Based on a social survey data in three cities in China the paper finds that there are significant differences between occupational power scores and occupational prestige scores. Moreover occupational power score is better both in reliability and validity in measuring individual social capital than occupational prestige scores. Social Capital Financial Network and Inter-firm Risk Contagion Case studies from Zhejiang Province Wu Bao Li Zhengwei & Chi Renyong 84 Abstract The popular view portrays social capital as wholly beneficial with no significant downside. Based on case studies of Shaoxing and Taizhou in Zhejiang Province the paper explores the relationships between social capital structure of inter-firm financial network and inter-firm risk contagion and provides empirical evidence for the downside of social capital. It is suggested that the use of social capital is positively linked with the mean value of degree centrality in the financial network and leads to a less fragmented network structure. Moreover it results in a higher degree of network cohesion thus exacerbates the inter-firm contagion risk. Therefore this paper attempts to propose a theoretical explanation for the risk contagion in Chinese real e- conomy from the perspective of social capital. The House and the Dice A case study of the wealth circulation Zhao Bingxiang & Tong Zhoubing 106 244