004 6 volailiy Hull Whie(987) vega( kappa) innovaion erm Poerba Summers(986) French, Schwer Sambaugh(987) Bollerslev, Engle Wooldridge (988) Bailie De

Similar documents
深圳股票市场稳定性研究报告

untitled

untitled

Black & choles Hull & Whie GARCH GARCH EGARCH EGARCH EGARCH GARCH EGARCH EGARCH GARCH GARCHEGARCH I

ARIMA

报告总结

《金融评论》投稿 封面

中国封闭式基金折价问题研究

摘 要

中国沪深股票市场流动性研究

中國概念股股價與投資績效之研究

untitled

組織變革活動系絡與變革成效之探討

中国股票市场信息流对股价波动的影响分析

<4D F736F F D203039BDF0C8DAB9A4B3CCCBB6CABFA1AAA1AAC0BCCEB0C3F7A1AAA1AAB1CFD2B5C2DBCEC4>

CPI Facor-Augmened Vecor Auoregressive FAVAR Sargen & Sims 1977 Giannone e al Sock & Wason 2002a Bai & Ng 2006 Bernanke e al FAVAR Boivin

untitled

ARCH 系 列 模 型 介 绍 与 应 用 目 录 一 波 动 率 基 本 概 念... 3 二 Black-Scholes 期 权 定 价 公 式 中 的 波 动 率... 4 三 GARCH 类 模 型 简 述... 5 四 基 于 沪 深 300 指 数 样 本 的 GARCH 类 模 型

% %! # % & ( ) % # + # # % # # & & % ( #,. %

VaR 3.1 VaR 3.2 VaR

2004 8, Gebhard,Lee Swaminahan(2000) (Discouned Residual Income Model) Fama French(1999),, Fama French(1999),,Wu, Sercu,and Chen(2000) FF ( ), ( Keire

按揭贷款、资产回报与房地产价格

13 中 南 大 学 学 报 ( 社 会 科 学 版 ) 01 年 第 18 卷 第 1 期 GARCH 模 型 的 均 值 方 程 中, 得 到 GARCH M 模 型 : y = γ1 x + δσ + u σ α α β σ = 0 + 1u 条 件 方 差 σ 代 表 了 期

國家圖書館典藏電子全文

Taiwan Fuures Exchange, TAIFEX TAIFEX Taiwan Sock Index Fuures 00 4 expiraion eec S&P 500 ( ). Kawaller, Koch and Koch 987 S&P

基於VECM模型的散裝運輸運價BDI指數之預測


) & ( +,! (# ) +. + / & 6!!!.! (!,! (! & 7 6!. 8 / ! (! & 0 6! (9 & 2 7 6!! 3 : ; 5 7 6! ) % (. ()

! /. /. /> /. / Ε Χ /. 2 5 /. /. / /. 5 / Φ0 5 7 Γ Η Ε 9 5 /


invesigae he lag relaionship linkage beween he sock marke of U.S. and he sock of Japan and he sock of Taiwan.According o he empirical resuls analysis,

財務統計.doc

! # % & # % & ( ) % % %# # %+ %% % & + %, ( % % &, & #!.,/, % &, ) ) ( % %/ ) %# / + & + (! ) &, & % & ( ) % % (% 2 & % ( & 3 % /, 4 ) %+ %( %!

c Takahashi and Sato 2001 the instantaneous short rate ATSM 2 Takahashi and Sato 2001 Hull and White

! Ν! Ν Ν & ] # Α. 7 Α ) Σ ),, Σ 87 ) Ψ ) +Ε 1)Ε Τ 7 4, <) < Ε : ), > 8 7

& &((. ) ( & ) 6 0 &6,: & ) ; ; < 7 ; = = ;# > <# > 7 # 0 7#? Α <7 7 < = ; <

南華大學數位論文

untitled

,!! #! > 1? = 4!! > = 5 4? 2 Α Α!.= = 54? Β. : 2>7 2 1 Χ! # % % ( ) +,. /0, , ) 7. 2

untitled

&! +! # ## % & #( ) % % % () ) ( %

Ρ Τ Π Υ 8 ). /0+ 1, 234) ς Ω! Ω! # Ω Ξ %& Π 8 Δ, + 8 ),. Ψ4) (. / 0+ 1, > + 1, / : ( 2 : / < Α : / %& %& Ζ Θ Π Π 4 Π Τ > [ [ Ζ ] ] %& Τ Τ Ζ Ζ Π

!! )!!! +,./ 0 1 +, 2 3 4, # 8,2 6, 2 6,,2 6, 2 6 3,2 6 5, 2 6 3, 2 6 9!, , 2 6 9, 2 3 9, 2 6 9,

22 Journal of Taiwan Land Research Vol. 10, No.2 pp. 1~22 * ** 摘 要 ARCH GARCH Markov-Switch-ARCH SWARCH ARCH-M *

untitled

# # # #!! % &! # % 6 & () ) &+ & ( & +, () + 0. / & / &1 / &1, & ( ( & +. 4 / &1 5,

表 1:股指收益的基本统计结果

., /,, 0!, + & )!. + + (, &, & 1 & ) ) 2 2 ) 1! 2 2

MRS-GARCH MRS-GARCH Bernanke and Gertler (1999) ; ; Cecchetti (2000) ( ) Gray (1996) MRS-GARCH (2001) 500 t- Gray t- S t S t S t =1 ; 90 S t =2 Hamilt

elections. In addition, the positive CARs exist during the full event date that indicates the election bull run do happen in Taiwan. When incumbent go

4= 8 4 < 4 ϑ = 4 ϑ ; 4 4= = 8 : 4 < : 4 < Κ : 4 ϑ ; : = 4 4 : ;

!! # % & ( )!!! # + %!!! &!!, # ( + #. ) % )/ # & /.

CPI Krugman 1986 Dornbush 1987 Mark - up Pricing - to - Market Obstfeld and Rogoff 1995 Dornbush 1987 Redux NOEM 2008 NOEM CPI Tayl

10-03.indd

# ( + + # + # 6 +,! + # +! +, + # ( + ) ( + ( + ) + 7! + # + /8 + ) ( +! + #. + ( +, +! + # + # + + ( ! ( + ) ( + ) +, + ( + 9% +! +, + ( +

%! # # % % & # ( ) ( +, & +, +, & +, & +, +, &!

/ / Critical Mass of Web Servers * Network economics Network externalities positive feedback effect Critical Mass WWW

, ( 6 7 8! 9! (, 4 : : ; 0.<. = (>!? Α% ), Β 0< Χ 0< Χ 2 Δ Ε Φ( 7 Γ Β Δ Η7 (7 Ι + ) ϑ!, 4 0 / / 2 / / < 5 02

% 5 CPI CPI PPI Benjamin et al Taylor 1993 Cukierman and Gerlach 2003 Ikeda 2013 Jonas and Mishkin

Pair Copula - GARCH - t 5 Domowitz and Hakkio 1985 ARCH GARCH Nieuwland et al GARCH BF / DM DG /DM FF /DM IL /DM SP /DM Torben

8 9 8 Δ 9 = 1 Η Ι4 ϑ< Κ Λ 3ϑ 3 >1Ε Μ Ε 8 > = 8 9 =

/ Ν #, Ο / ( = Π 2Θ Ε2 Ρ Σ Π 2 Θ Ε Θ Ρ Π 2Θ ϑ2 Ρ Π 2 Θ ϑ2 Ρ Π 23 8 Ρ Π 2 Θϑ 2 Ρ Σ Σ Μ Π 2 Θ 3 Θ Ρ Κ2 Σ Π 2 Θ 3 Θ Ρ Κ Η Σ Π 2 ϑ Η 2 Ρ Π Ρ Π 2 ϑ Θ Κ Ρ Π

! # %& ( %! & & + %!, ( Α Α Α Α Χ Χ Α Χ Α Α Χ Α Α Α Α

中国人民银行工作论文 No.2015/12

!!! #! )! ( %!! #!%! % + % & & ( )) % & & #! & )! ( %! ),,, )

786

Β 8 Α ) ; %! #?! > 8 8 Χ Δ Ε ΦΦ Ε Γ Δ Ε Η Η Ι Ε ϑ 8 9 :! 9 9 & ϑ Κ & ϑ Λ &! &!! 4!! Μ Α!! ϑ Β & Ν Λ Κ Λ Ο Λ 8! % & Π Θ Φ & Ρ Θ & Θ & Σ ΠΕ # & Θ Θ Σ Ε

,,,,,,,,, Lucas (1973) Sargen (1971),,, Hansen Singleon (1982) GMM () Gal Gerler (1999) GMM, Xiao e al (2008),GMM,,,,,,, (2004),,, (2005),,,,,

# # 4 + % ( ) ( /! 3 (0 0 (012 0 # (,!./ %

國立中山大學學位論文典藏.PDF

) Μ <Κ 1 > < # % & ( ) % > Χ < > Δ Χ < > < > / 7 ϑ Ν < Δ 7 ϑ Ν > < 8 ) %2 ): > < Ο Ε 4 Π : 2 Θ >? / Γ Ι) = =? Γ Α Ι Ρ ;2 < 7 Σ6 )> Ι= Η < Λ 2 % & 1 &

& & ) ( +( #, # &,! # +., ) # % # # % ( #

<4D F736F F D DAE7DB24DAB542DA5E6A9F6AEC9B6A1AE74B65AB9EFA578AAD1ABFCBCC6B27BB366BB50B4C1B366AABABC76C5542E646F63>

> # ) Β Χ Χ 7 Δ Ε Φ Γ 5 Η Γ + Ι + ϑ Κ 7 # + 7 Φ 0 Ε Φ # Ε + Φ, Κ + ( Λ # Γ Κ Γ # Κ Μ 0 Ν Ο Κ Ι Π, Ι Π Θ Κ Ι Π ; 4 # Ι Π Η Κ Ι Π. Ο Κ Ι ;. Ο Κ Ι Π 2 Η

08-01.indd

2 2 Λ ϑ Δ Χ Δ Ι> 5 Λ Λ Χ Δ 5 Β. Δ Ι > Ε!!Χ ϑ : Χ Ε ϑ! ϑ Β Β Β ϑ Χ Β! Β Χ 5 ϑ Λ ϑ % < Μ / 4 Ν < 7 :. /. Ο 9 4 < / = Π 7 4 Η 7 4 =

8 9 < ; ; = < ; : < ;! 8 9 % ; ϑ 8 9 <; < 8 9 <! 89! Ε Χ ϑ! ϑ! ϑ < ϑ 8 9 : ϑ ϑ 89 9 ϑ ϑ! ϑ! < ϑ < = 8 9 Χ ϑ!! <! 8 9 ΧΧ ϑ! < < < < = 8 9 <! = 8 9 <! <

: 29 : n ( ),,. T, T +,. y ij i =, 2,, n, j =, 2,, T, y ij y ij = β + jβ 2 + α i + ɛ ij i =, 2,, n, j =, 2,, T, (.) β, β 2,. jβ 2,. β, β 2, α i i, ɛ i

. /!Ι Γ 3 ϑκ, / Ι Ι Ι Λ, Λ +Ι Λ +Ι

9!!!! #!! : ;!! <! #! # & # (! )! & ( # # #+

9 : 3 25 Levy Black Scholes (973)Meron(976)Madan (998)Carr Wu (24)Kim (2822) Levy Levy-Khinchine Levy Φ dl (u) Ε[e iudl ]=e -Ψ (u) dl Ψ dl (u)=-iuυ+ u

Α 3 Α 2Η # # > # 8 6 5# Ι + ϑ Κ Ι Ι Ι Η Β Β Β Β Β Β ΔΕ Β Β Γ 8 < Φ Α Α # >, 0 Η Λ Μ Ν Ο Β 8 1 Β Π Θ 1 Π Β 0 Λ Μ 1 Ρ 0 Μ ϑ Σ ϑ Τ Ο Λ 8 ϑ

: ; # 7 ( 8 7

南華大學數位論文

经 济 与 管 理 耿 庆 峰 : 我 国 创 业 板 市 场 与 中 小 板 市 场 动 态 相 关 性 实 证 研 究 基 于 方 法 比 较 视 角 87 Copula 模 型 均 能 较 好 地 刻 画 金 融 市 场 间 的 动 态 关 系, 但 Copula 模 型 效 果 要 好 于

= Υ Ξ & 9 = ) %. Ο) Δ Υ Ψ &Ο. 05 3; Ι Ι + 4) &Υ ϑ% Ο ) Χ Υ &! 7) &Ξ) Ζ) 9 [ )!! Τ 9 = Δ Υ Δ Υ Ψ (

Chap 1 Black-Scholes定價理論


untitled

4 # = # 4 Γ = 4 0 = 4 = 4 = Η, 6 3 Ι ; 9 Β Δ : 8 9 Χ Χ ϑ 6 Κ Δ ) Χ 8 Λ 6 ;3 Ι 6 Χ Δ : Χ 9 Χ Χ ϑ 6 Κ

, & % # & # # & % & + # & # # # & # % #,

24 OECD 1960~2002 CO 2 GDP 43% GDP EKC 2007 [16] GDP U GDP 1996 U N GDP Musolesi e al [17] Brock and Taylor 2010 [1] ~ 2001 CO 2

1 a benevolen governmen Baaglini Coae 005 Golosov 007 Berola 1993 Peroi 1993 Alesina Rodrik 1994 a self - ineresed governmen Besley Case 1995 Acemoglu

untitled

;,, ( ),,,,, ;,,,, (2006) 6, :,,,, OPEC, 10,, 30 %, 9 Π,,12 Π 20 80,, ( 5 Π ), Π, 10 Π, (2003),,, ( ) 100,, (, ) 5,, 10,,, (, 2005), (

Microsoft Word doc

07-3.indd

! + +, ) % %.!&!, /! 0! 0 # ( ( # (,, # ( % 1 2 ) (, ( 4! 0 & 2 /, # # ( &

國立中山大學學位論文典藏.PDF

马翔我国上市公司资本结构、公司治理与公司绩效研究全文

Transcription:

004 6-3 CARR(Condiional Auo-Regression Range) CARR GARCH CARR GARCH Chou(00) S P500 CARR CARR GARCH

004 6 volailiy Hull Whie(987) vega( kappa) innovaion erm Poerba Summers(986) French, Schwer Sambaugh(987) Bollerslev, Engle Wooldridge (988) Bailie Degennaro(990) Andersen Bollerslev(997) Alizadeh, Brand Diebold(00) Morgan(976) heeroscedasiciy Mandelbro(963) Fama(965) lepokuric fa ail Mandelbro(963) clusering Cassuo(995) Engle(98) ARCH(Auo-Regression Condiional Heeroskedasiciy) Bollerslev(986) GARCH(Generalized Auo-Regression Condiional Heeroskedasiciy) vega kappa

3 (parsimony) ARCH/GARCH Bollerslev, Chou Kroner(99) Bollerslev, Engle Nelson(994) range proxy Mandelbro(963) Parkinson(980) Brand Jones(00) EGARCH Chou(00) CARR(Condiional Auo-Regressive Range) GARCH CARR dominance S&P500 Brand Jones(00) Chou(00) Chou(00) Brand Jones(00) CARR CARR Chou(00) Chou(00) CARR

4 004 6 ARCH/GARCH Hull Whie(987) (Sochasic Volailiy) Parkinson (980) Chou(00) Gallan, Hsu Tauchen(999) Alizadeh, Brand Diebold(00) Chou(00) GARCH CARR GARCH Brand Jones(00) EGARCH EGARCH CARR Engle Russell (998) ACD (Auoregressive Condiional Duraion) CARR CARR 3 GARCH CARR CARR(p,q) () R α R ε ~ iid f (.) = λ ε λ = ω + p + q i i i= = β λ () range duraion

5 High Low R P R = ln P ln P λ R λ E( R I ) λ 0 ε ω w > 0 α i α i 0 i =,..., p β β 0 =,..., q p α + i= i q = β CARR α + β p i= i q = < ω = ω /( ( p i= q α i + β ) α i + β = p i= q = ( ω ) Chou(00) ε CARR (log likelihood funcion) 4 i T,..., RT ) = [ln( λ ) + ] = λ R L( ω, α, β ; R () CARR (3) p q α i R i + β λ + i= = L λ = ω + φ X (3) l= l, l 3 4 Engle Russell(998)

6 004 6 CARRX (3) ( ) (leverage effec) 5 CARR (Quasi-Maximum- Likelihood Esimaion mehod QMLE) Engle Russell(998) QMLE Bollerslev Wooldridge(99) Robus 6 (realized volailiy) (Sum of Square Daily Reurn SSDR) (Weekly-Reurn-SQuared WRSQ) (Weekly RaNGe WRNG) (Absolue Weekly -RETurn AWRET) CARR GARCH CARR GARCH MV = γ + FV ( CARR) + u (4) 0 γ MV = γ + FV ( GARCH ) + u (5) 0 γ 0 + γ FV ( CARR) + γ MV = γ FV ( GARCH ) + u (6) 5 Black (976) Chrisie(98) leverage effec D E raio 6

7 MV (measured volailiy) (proxy) FV (CARR) FV (GARCH ) CARR GARCH (4) γ γ 0 ˆ γ CARR γ 0 CARR ˆ (4) (5) Ad.R-squared CARR GARCH (6) γ γ CARR GARCH 0 ˆ0 γ CARR GARCH CARR(,) k 7 λ f, + = E( λ+ I ) = ω + αr + ˆ ˆ ˆ βλ λ = ( λ ) ˆ ˆ ( ) ˆ I = ω + αe R I βe( λ f, + E + + + + I = ˆ ω + ˆ αe ( λ ) ˆ + I + βe( λ+ I = ˆ ω + ( ˆ α + ˆ) β E ( λ + I ) = ˆ ω + ( ˆ α + ˆ) β ˆ ω + ( ˆ α + ˆ) β λ ) ) 7 λ

8 004 6 k ˆ ω( ( ˆ α + ˆ) β ) λ ) ( ˆ α + ˆ) β k f k k E λ k I ˆ α ˆ, + = ( + ) = + ( + β λ (7) λ f, + k k GARCH(,) (8) ˆ ω( ( ˆ α + ˆ) β ) h ) ( ˆ α + ˆ) β k f k k E h k I ˆ ˆ, + = ( + ) = + ( α + β h (8) h f, + k k Roo Mean Square Error RMSE Mean Absolue Error MAE CARR GARCH = T +, T +,..., T +τ V FV (9) (0) = T + T + τ RMSE = ( FV V ) (9) τ MAE = τ T + τ = T + FV V (0) V MV CARR GARCH FV forecased volailiy MV (scale) FV adused forecased volailiy AFV () MV =ψfv + u =,..., T () AFV = ψfv

9 988 6 3 003 0 3 795 8 CARR GARCH CARR range GARCH reurn ( ) high low = 00 [(ln( P ) ln( P )] close close = 00 [ln( P ) ln( P )] WRNG WRET 795 794 6.304 0.0 5.336 0.376 3.865.06 0.5-5.34 3.89 4.86.60-0.333 0.00 6.477 Jarque-Bera 50.89(0.000) 44.50(0.000). Jarque-Bera p-value. WRNG WRET 3. 988 6 3 003 0 3 795 4. 8 988 6 3 799 4 994 998 00 00

0 004 6 Jarque-Bera(JB) 9 JB 50.89 JB 44.50 JB 3 lepokuric CARR GARCH 40 30 0 0 0-0 -0-30 00 00 300 400 500 600 700 WRNG WRET 9 Jarque-Bera= N ( S + ( K 3) ) χ ( ) 6 4 N S K α = 5% χ α () = 5. 99 95% Jarque-Bera 5.99

CARR CARR GARCH CARR GARCH 988 6 3 003 0 3 795 CARR GARCH LR Likelihood Raio es 0 CARR GARCH CARR CARR(,) CARR(,) CARR(,) LR es CARR(,) LLF(Log Likelihood Funcion) -835.809 CARR(,) -835.308 CARR(,) LLF -835.30 CARR(,) β 0.07 0.0 CARR(,) α -0.0-0.95 0 CARR(,) 0 LR = ( L L ) ~ null alernaive χ ( k) k k= α = 5% LR χ () 3. 84 > α =

004 6 988/06/03~003/0/03 CARR R ε ~ iid = λ ε λ = ω + p α R i i i= = f (.) + q β λ log likelihood func. CARR(,) CARR(,) CARR(,) -835.30-835.809-835.308 ω 0.387(3.409) 0.387(3.37) 0.37(.84) α 0.63(8.394) 0.65(6.47) 0.67(6.54) α -0.0(0.95) β 0.674(6.744) 0.655(3.498) 0.684(.63) β 0.07(0.0) ρ 0.04 0.0 0.00 ρ 0.050 0.049 0.049 Q() 7.30(0.836) 7.365(0.833) 7.399(0.830). R. -value wih robus sandard error p-value 3. ρ ρ 4. Q() Q 5. GARCH 3 GARCH(,) GARCH(,) GARCH(,) 3 LR es GARCH(,) LLF -94.343 GARCH(,) -94.38 GARCH(,) LLF -94.350 GARCH(,) β 0.030 0.08 GARCH(,) α -0.04-0.36 0 GARCH(,) GARCH

3 3 CARR(,) GARCH(,) CARR GARCH CARR(,) α 0.63 GARCH(,) α 0.3 CARR GARCH 3 988/06/03~003/0/03 GARCH y h ε = ε = ω + Ω p q α iε i + i= = ~ N(0, h ) β h GARCH(,) GARCH(,) GARCH(,) log likelihood func. -94.350-94.343-94.38 ω.63(.98).83(.76).098(.877) α 0.3(3.798) 0.34(.36) 0.39(.43) α -0.04(0.36) β 0.85(6.577) 0.78(.808) 0.85(6.044) β 0.030(0.08) ρ 0.036 0.036 0.036 ρ -0.7-0.07-0.08 Q().388(0.045).448(0.044).555(0.043). y. -value wih robus sandard error p-value 3. ρ ρ 4. Q() Q 5.

4 004 6 CARR(,) GARCH(,) 4 CARR GARCH FV (CARR) FV (GARCH) FV (CARR) FV (GARCH) MV SSDR WRSQ WRNG AWRET 0 FV (GARCH) γ -value -0.8 -.05-0.40 -.34 FV (CARR) γ 0 CARR(,) MV GARCH(,) FV (CARR) FV (GARCH) Ad.R-squared MV SSDR WRSQ WRNG AWRET FV (CARR) 0.56 0.97 0.453 0.77 FV (GARCH) 0.468 0.36 0.395 0.44 FV (CARR) FV (GARCH) MV CARR GARCH Chou(00) S&P500 S&P500 CARR GARCH

5 4 CARR(,) GARCH(,) MV = γ + FV ( CARR) + u 0 γ MV = γ + FV ( GARCH ) + u 0 γ MV = γ FV ( GARCH ) + u 0 + γ FV ( CARR) + γ MV γ 0 γ γ Ad.R-squared Durbin-Wason SSDR 0.57 (0.484) 0.49 (3.885) 0.56.73 SSDR 0.088 (0.06) 0.859 (.994) 0.468.39 SSDR 0.668 (0.484) 0.44 (6.33) -0.09 (-0.8) 0.56.79 WRSQ -.867 (-0.369) 0.56 (4.65) 0.97.885 WRSQ 0.588 (0.30) 0.99 (4.05) 0.36.807 WRSQ.0 (0.557).54 (3.08) -.37 (-.05) 0..838 WRNG -0.355 (-0.87).060 (4.96) 0.453.807 WRNG -0.594 (-.98).56 (3.883) 0.395.504 WRNG -0.87 (-0.68).0 (6.533) -0.096 (-0.40) 0.453.85 AWRET -0.055 (-0.5) 0.575 (6.85) 0.77.996 AWRET -0.063 (-0.) 0.795 (6.47) 0.44.944 AWRET 0.43 (0.30) 0.750 (3.935) -0.86 (-.34) 0.78.985. Whie Heeroskedasiciy-Consisen Sandard Errors & Covariance -value. 4 MV(Measured Volailiy) (calendarweek) (Sum of Square Daily-Reurn SSDR) (Weekly-Reurn-SQuared WRSQ) (Weekly RaNGe WRNG) (Absolue Weekly-RETurn AWRET) 3. FV (CARR) FV (GARCH ) CARR(,) GARCH(,) MV SSDR WRSQ MV WRNG AWRET 4. 988 6 3 003 0 3 795 5. 4 Durbin-Wason u FV (CARR) FV (CARR) FV (GARCH) Durbin-Wason

6 004 6 CARR(,) GARCH(,) CARR(,) GARCH(,) GARCH 644 CARR(,) GARCH(,) 645 646 696 5 645 5 3 647 4 648 00 743 3 00 5 FV(CARR) FV(GARCH) MV RMSE MAE 5 5 CARR RMSE MAE GARCH CARR GARCH 5 00

7 5 RMSE = T + 00 00 = T + ( AFV MV ) MAE = 00 + 00 T = T + AFV MV RMSE SSDR WRSQ WRNG AWRET CARR GARCH CARR GARCH CARR GARCH CARR GARCH 4.63 6.00 47.03 48.358.396.566 3.0 3.80 6.008 7.97 50.43 5.865.637.848 3.53 3.354 3 5.787 7.98 50.059 5.74.653.898 3.44 3.35 4 5.755 7.464 45.480 45.779.644.840 3.070 3. 3 3.46 4.694 43.804 44.96.498.674.983 3.046 6.873 3.99 43.508 43.677.46.495.943.958 5.00.776 40.939 4.078.35.467.809.839 MAE SSDR WRSQ WRNG AWRET CARR GARCH CARR GARCH CARR GARCH CARR GARCH 0.389.96 4.46 4.783.799.948.60.37.0.678 5.43 5.76.950.48.83.366 3.9.797 5.475 5.9.0.9.99.373 4.373.40 3.440 3.554.06.7.05.60 3 9.758.067.03.878.885.999.70.7 6 9.343 0.84.60.948.775.90.7.66 5 9.085 0.333 0.55.367.848.04.09.68. 988 6 3 003 0 3 795. CARR(,) GARCH(,) 3. AFV Robusness Over The Couner OTC 996 4 003 0 3 40 3 6 6 3 405 3 998 00 00 996

8 004 6 RMSE CARR GARCH 6 OTC RMSE = T + 50 50 = T + ( AFV MV ) MAE = 50 + 50 T = T + AFV MV RMSE SSDR WRSQ WRNG AWRET CARR GARCH CARR GARCH CARR GARCH CARR GARCH 4.395 6.078 54.49 55.40.74.95 3.430 3.503 5.445 6.454 57.34 57.564.903 3.040 3.68 3.673 3 5.70 6.656 57.95 57.7.888 3.03 3.63 3.660 4 6.068 6.978 57.908 58.38.985 3.58 3.683 3.75 3 3.93 4. 30.670 3.4.456.655.905 3.04 6.85 3.434 8.539 8.58.596.704.76.740 5.68 3.66 9.636.975.873 3.30.43.55 MAE SSDR WRSQ WRNG AWRET CARR GARCH CARR GARCH CARR GARCH CARR GARCH 0.97.367 8.066 30.379.979.83.564.709.59.874 30.45 3.3.73.74.740.87 3.97.977 30.54 3.554.48.95.733.868 4.987 3.9 3.76 33.750.3.49.777.940 3.04.94 3.59 5.875.05.6.496.66 6 0.840.705.865 3.58.97.39.366.399 5 0.7.090 8.89 0.57.586.834.0.39. 996 4 003 0 3 40 OTC. CARR(,) GARCH(,) 3. AFV 50

9 CARR Chou(00) CARR 4 GARCH Black (976) Chrisie(98) leverage effec D E raio CARR CARRX () λ ω + αr + βλ φ( re ) () = + r φ TGARCH TCARR (3) LR es λ (3) = ω + αr + βλ + γkr K K=0 R () (3) 7 CARRX(,) φ -0.05-4.79 LR es LR 9.706 φ -0.05 CARR TCARR(,) 4

0 004 6 7 988/06/03~003/0/03 CARR CARR(,) CARRX(,) TCARR(,) log likelihood funcion -7400.566-7395.73-7398.035 ω 0.059(6.53) 0.063(6.636) 0.058(6.6) α 0.06(7.343) 0.0(7.43) 0.84(4.897) β 0.765(55.49) 0.767(56.446) 0.77(57.633) φ γ -0.05(-4.79) 0.03(3.8) ρ 0.04 0.045 0.038 ρ 0.09 0.03 0.00 ρ -0.00 0.00 0.00 Q().03(0.037).504(0.043) 7.53(0.3). -value wih robus sandard error p-value. ρ ρ 3. Engle(98) ARCH 0 ARCH Chou(00) GARCH Parkinson(980) CARR CARR CARR GARCH (candlesick plos) K

CARR GARCH Chou(00) OTC CARR CARR GARCH CARR CARR CARR GARCH. Alizadeh, S., M. Brand, and F. Diebold (00), Range-based esimaion of sochasic volailiy models, Journal of Finance,57, 047-09.. Andersen, T., and T. Bollerslev (997), Heerogeneous informaion arivals and reurn volailiy dynamics: Uncovering he long run in high frequency reurns, Journal of Finance,5, 975-005. 3. Ballie, R. T., and R.P. DeGennaro (990), Sock Reurns and Volailiy, Journal of Finance and Quaniaive analysis, 5, 03-4. 4. Black, F. (976), Sudies of Sock Price Volailiy Changes, Proceeding of he 976 Meeings of he Business and Economics Saisics Secion, American Saisical Associaion, 77-8.

004 6 5. Brand, M.W., and C.S. Jones (00), Volailiy Forecasing wih Ranged-Based EGARCH Models, working paper,universiy of Pennsylvania,USA. 6. Bollerslev, T., R. Chou, and K. Kroner (99), ARCH modeling in finance: a review of he heory and empirical evidence, Journal of Economerics,5, 5-59. 7. Bollersleve, T. (986), Generalized Auoregressive Condiional Heeroskedasiciy, Journal of Economerics, 3, 307-37. 8. Bollerslev, T., R. Engle, and D. Nelson (994), ARCH models, in Handbook of Economerics, IV, 959-3038, ed.engle,r.f., and McFadden,D.C., Amserdam: Norh-Holland 9. Bollerslev, T., R. Engel, and J. Wooldridge (988), A Capial Asse Pricing Model wih Timing-vary Covariance, Journal of Poliical Economy, 96, 6-3. 0. Bollerslev, T., and J. Wooldridge (99), Quasi maximum likelihood esimaion and inference in dynamic models wih ime varying covariances, Economeric Reviews,, 43-7.. Cassuo, A.E. (995), Non-Normal Error Paerns: How o Handle Them, The Journal of Business Forecasing: Mehods and Sysems, 4, 5-6.. Chou, R. (00), Forecasing financial volailiies wih exreme values: he Condiional AuoRegressive Range (CARR) Model, Working paper, The Insiue of Economics Academia Sinica, Taiwan. 3. Chrisie, A.A., (98), The Sochasic Behavior of Common Sock Variances: Value,Leverage, and Ineres Rae Effecs, Journal of Financial Economics, 0, 407-43. 4. Engle, R. (98), Auoregressive condiional heeroscedasiciy wih esimaes of he variance of U.K. inflaion, Economerica, 50, 987-008 5. Engle, R., and V, Ng (993), Measuring and esing of he impac of news on volailiy, Journal of Finance, 48, 749-778. 6. Engle, R., and J. Russell (998) Auoregressive condiional duraion: a new model for irregular spaced ransacion daa, Economerica, 66, 7-6. 7. Fama, E. F. (965), The Behavior of Sock Marke Prices, Journal of Business, 38, 34-05. 8. French, K., W. Schwer, and R. Sambaugh (987), Expeced sock reurns and volailiy, Journal of Financial Economics, 9, 3-9.

3 9. Galan, A., C. Hsu, and G. Tauchen (999), Calculaing volailiy diffusions and exracing inegraed volailiy, Review of Economics and Saisics, 8, 67-63. 0. Glosen, L.R., R. Jagannahan, and D. Runkle (993), On he Relaion Beween he Expeced Value and he Volailiy of he Nominal Excess Reurn on Socks, Journal of Finance, 48, 779-80.. Hull, J. and A. Whie (987), The pricing of opions on asses wih sochasic volailiies, Journal of Finance, 4, 8-300.. Lung, G.M., and G.E.P. Box (978), On a Measure of Lack of Fi in Time Series Models, Biomerika, 65, 97-303. 3. Mandelbro, B. (963), The Variaion of Cerain Speculaive Prices, Journal of Business, 36, 94-49. 4. Morgan, I.G.(976), Sock Price and Heeroskedasiciy, Journal of Business, 49, 496-508. 5. Nelson, D.B. (99), Condiional Heeroskedasiciy in Asse Reurns : A New Approach, Economerica, 59, 347-370. 6. Parkinson, M. (980), The exreme value mehod for esimaing he variance of he rae of reurn, Journal of Business, 53, 6-65. 7. Poerba, J., and L. Summers (986), The persisence of volailiy and sock marke flucuaions, American Economic Review, 76, 4-5. 8. Zakoian, J.M. (994), Threshold Heeroskedasic Models, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Conrol, 8, 93-955.

4 004 6