30 5 2012 09 Tribune of Political Science and Law Vol. 30 No. 5 Sep. 2012 * 2005 3 5 * 08AJY037
60 2012 1 2 3 4 1 2 1 2008 1 2008 8 5 2011 1 2 2005 1 2 3 4 2009 1
5 61 1 1 1 2007 2010 2007 2011 2009 2009 2007 2009 2005 2009 1 1 2 3 4 5 2008 3
62 2012 2005 2007 2010 2008 2009 2009 2011 < > 2005 2008 2006 2008 2011 1
5 63 1 2007 2 2 2 2007 130 2007 12 2008 1 1 2008127 2008 11 2009 3 1 1 2010 8 2010 6 2010 6 2 2011 14
64 2012 2010 47 2010 7 2010 9 1 2011 124 2011 12 2012 3 1
5 65 1 1. 2. 3. 1 2007 8
66 2012 3 5 2003 2005 142 21 14. 8% 3 3 % 18 2 11. 2 28 8 28. 6 26 8 30. 8 10 1 10. 0 21 1 5. 8 40 1 2. 5 142 21 14. 8 1 4. 1 2009 6
5 67 1 5 16 5. 6 1 2009 3 2012 2
68 2012 6. 1 2007 8 600 690 560 7 7. 8. 1 2007 130
5 69 1 2007 4 4 2 4 9. Organization for Economic Co - operation and Development OECD cost - benefit analysi regulatory analysis impact assessment IA COM proposal SEC OECD regulatory impact analysis RIA OECD OECD OECD 1 2008 2008 3 9 2008 2 74 2007 6 2010 2 2 2009 4 4 4 2011 11
70 2012 regulatory impact analysis OECD RIA OECD 4 4 OECD 1 2 3 4 5 6 1995 18 1996 2003 2002 1986 OECD 1995 1993 12866 1996 2003 1997 2011 13563 2005 OECD 2000 2002 2008 OMB OIRA 2009 A - 4 Circular A 2009 2006-4 Regulatory Analysis - 2012 COM SEC considered justified where net benefits can produce the benefits of the intended regulation justify its costs be expected from the intervention benefits that justify costs 199-208 8 P. 64 computable
5 71 general equilibrium models CGE cectoral models microsimulation models macro - econometric models social impact assessment models environmental impact assessment models - projects and programmes 2-5 2-5 2012 4 9 1. 1 2. 1 20 13 28
72 2012 1 10 1998 12 1999 8 1 1997 2011 2004 2005 5 5 1 2 2 2-3 1 166 3 1 48 29. 0% 2 88 53. 0% 3 114 68. 6% 3 5 26 15. 6% 5 10 20 12. 0% 10 6 3. 6% 14 1 /331. 3% 2010 4
5 73 5 2005 1998 2005 1 2 3 4 6 6 2008 5 35 42 200710 36 142 2008 522 76 83 19 2007 6 5 133 1 81 2006 97 3. 11
74 2012 6 6
5 75 GDP% CPI PPI - GDP 1 2007 7 8 2008 8 2 8 2008 3 OECD 3 2012 2008 1 4 2008 6 5Eric A. PosnerControlling Agencies with Cost Benefit Analysis A Positive Political Theory PerspectiveThe U- niversity of Chicago Law Review 2011 Vol. 68No. 4. 9 2012 4 28 5 10 2010 4 11 6 1992 3 2008 2