(domestic crime) (World Trade Organization, WTO) ( 94 89) (Washington Post) ( )

Similar documents
2

第一章  緒論

Microsoft Word - &#12300_&#39321_&#28207_&#22899_&#24615_&#24863_&#24773_&#29983_&#27963_&#21450_&#33287_&#20276_&#20406_&#38364_&#20418_&#12301_&#35519_&#26597_&#22577_&#21578_.doc

fiscal decentralization local financial managerial capability 2

Microsoft Word - wck.doc

國家圖書館典藏電子全文

「永續發展」議題.PDF

1 Randall Hansen and Patrick Weil, editors, Dual Nationality, Social Rights and Federal Citizenship in the U. S. and Europe, New York: Berghahn Books,

韩国与日本经济发展模式之比较



CIP / ISBN !. ". # $ %. &. D917 CIP HEISHEHUI XINGZHIFANZUI FANGZHIDUICE YANJIU

越南政經改革與憲政制度之演變

引言


瀞 22

Microsoft Word - 江陰之役1.37.doc

Microsoft Word ±q¾Ôª§¹q¼v.doc

Microsoft Word - 洪櫻芬本文0813.doc

001柯正峰.PDF

Problem Solving 1991Gagne Kahney1993 Mayer

政治制度史研究的省思:以六朝隋唐為例

必 修 环 节 5 学 分, 学 科 专 业 课 程 学 分 不 少 于 11 学 分 自 学 课 程 学 分 另 计 课 程 设 置 参 见 第 九 部 分 2 直 读 博 士 生 攻 读 博 士 学 位 期 间, 需 获 得 学 位 课 程 总 学 分 不 少 于 36 学 分 其 中 公 共

Microsoft Word - CMRO ????

J. D. 17 Daniel J. Elazar, American Federalism: A View From the States (New York: Happer & Row, Publishers, 1984), p

234 Y Keyboard

,,,,,, (William Parish) , 2865, : (1966 ) 20,,, 20, :,, :,, (Destratification) (Parish,1984 :84-120), 1983 (N = 1774) (Xie &Lin, 1986) 19

Microsoft Word - ICS-Oct08-Conf-paper-WangHu.doc

<4D F736F F D DBED4B2A4A9D2A9DBA5CDB8EAB054A7B9BEE3AAA92DB3D5A468AF5A2E646F63>

Course Code: CUS 512J Selected topics in Cultural Representation and Interpretation: Sexualities

第 7 卷 第 6 期 中 華 民 國 98 年 6 月 息 安 全, 促 進 社 會 主 義 精 神 文 明 和 物 質 文 明 建 設 1 ;2004 年 中 共 十 六 屆 四 中 全 會 中 共 中 央 關 於 加 強 黨 的 執 政 能 力 建 設 的 決 定, 則 以 傳 統 與 非 傳

<B169D2B12DB171A5C1B6A1AB48A5F52E706466>

Hesketh and Zhu Dreze and Khera 2000 Zhao 2003 Sen and Nair Das Gupta and Li 1999 Banister 2004 Hudson and Den Boer 20

從實驗教材到官方課程──小學社會科板橋模式教材與改編本教科書的發展

Experimental design: 實驗設計:

http / / www. un. org /zh /peacekeeping /resources /statistics /factsheet. shtml 09

Microsoft Word - 人民公社.doc

第二章:蘇維埃的政體與身體

,,, ( ),, :,,?,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ( Karl Jaspers),,, :,,,,,,, (A. E. Zimmern),, :,, 2008,, :, 3 : ( ),, 1989, 14,,,

2006 5,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, : ;,, ;,,,,,,,, : ( ) (Restorative Justice), 20 70,,, [ ] W :,, ; Howard Zehr, Changing Lenses : A New Focus fo

数量优势下的恐惧

博物館與休閒規劃:閒暇時間與自由感

我們的家庭沒有病:原住民「家庭功能」的另類思考

Microsoft Word - 文 献 综 述.doc

(Savantas Policy Institute) (Powersoft Consultancy Limited) ( Avant-garde Research Laboratory) Roundtable( ) : : D-

,, :,;, ;, ;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 21,,,,,,,,, ( ),,,,,( ),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, , 1300, 31 2,1200,466,, 2 (,2005 :4) 631

<4D F736F F D20A661B0ECAE74B2A7AABAA4A4B0EAB941A7F8B0F2C2A6B1D0A87C2E646F63>

Microsoft Word - 1.doc

p p a p b p p p p p p a p a p p p. 1


2001 2,, (Devine & Kiefer, 1991), :, ;,,,,?, 300, 57 % ( Granovetter, 1974),, ( Fernan2 dez & Weinberg, 1997) :,, ( Granovetter, 1973),,,,,,,, (Lin, 1

210 Y A B B A A sexual/gender politics Kate Millett Millett, K., : 37 political institutions

<4D F736F F D DA451A447A67EB0EAA5C1B0F2A5BBB1D0A87CA74BB8D5A44ABEC7B657C342A4F1A7C7A4BDA5ADA9CAA4A7BDD7AD7A2D2D ADD72E646F63>

<4D F736F F D20A8E2A9A4C3F6AB59BB50A8C8A4D3B1A1B6D52DB867C0D9C65BC2492D362D31392D E646F63>

001柯正峰.PDF

國立中山大學學位論文典藏.PDF


西方三大霸权的战略比较——兼论美国制度霸权的启示意义•

警察人員教考用合一制度之研究

Centre link Ernst Hass integration

小組工作定義 (Lee, 1999)

Microsoft Word - THS_Reading List.doc

Francis L. K. Hsu Under the Ancestors Shadow Francis Hsu, Under the Ancestors Shadow: Chinese Cultu

非暴力的公共政治:香港经验与中国模式

法律教育及培训常设委员会周年报告 2013

北京大学申报市级教学成果奖

untitled

(), (),,,,,,,,( ) ( ),,,,,, ;,,,;, ;,, (21),,,,,, :,, hegemony,,, 116

56

Microsoft Word - Wu suk yan.doc

New Institutionalism % % 74% J J

pdf

尊 敬 的 客 户 : 欢 迎 您 ( 指 被 保 险 人, 以 下 简 称 您 ) 加 入 中 美 联 泰 大 都 会 人 寿 保 险 有 限 公 司 ( 以 下 简 称 大 都 会 人 寿 )MetHealth 360 健 康 呵 护 管 理 服 务 计 划 MetHealth 360 健 康

嶺南地區的大開發時期始於宋代 當時 由於陸上絲路無法通行 朝廷特別注重南方 海上貿易發展 於廣州設 市舶司 管理 來華朝貢和貿易的蕃舶 北宋滅亡後 南宋 定都江左 大量北方漢人被迫逃往南方 有 朝廷官宦家眷沿贛江南下 或越過南嶺 定 居南雄地區 或沿北江直下廣州 在珠江三 角洲地區開基立業 繁衍後代

目 錄 一 報 告 內 容 2 二 參 考 文 獻 9 三 附 錄 : 已 蒐 集 之 民 國 時 期 中 小 學 教 科 書 ( 全 文 ) 目 錄 12 1

Microsoft Word - 大陸論文_繁_.doc

untitled

MEMO

研 究 的 信 念, 這 種 信 念 會 影 響 個 人 對 活 動 的 選 擇 繼 續 努 力 與 動 機 的 堅 持 度, 以 及 精 熟 的 表 現 水 準, 換 言 之, 影 響 為 出 現 的 因 素, 不 只 是 增 強 作 用 造 成 的, 還 包 括 個 人 的 自 我 知 覺 及

4 Peter Hall Kathy Pain %

59 1 MSLQ 2. MSLQ 2. 1 被 试 Kuhl 1987 Corno & Kanfer 1993 D rnyei % 111 commitment control strategies 37% 65 21% % metac

19 19

Microsoft Word - 6_蔡田木-_三校_.doc

,020 HRM HRM HRM 20

2

120 ( )

Microsoft Word - 柯惠鈴

142 1 empower

學 界 將 台 灣 視 為 發 展 型 國 家 的 原 因, 在 於 台 灣 在 過 去 數 十 年 的 高 度 經 濟 成 長, 以 及 擁 有 良 好 的 政 府 技 術 官 僚 作 為 國 內 產 業 發 展 的 推 手 及 後 盾 (Amsden,1989 Wade,1990) 而 學 者

2002 3,, 3000,,,,,,,,,,,,, ( ),, 1898, ;1904,,;, 2, 1980, , ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ),,,, ;,,,,, 2 ( 1974 )

Part VI: Sports Injuries, Treatment and Precautions – Learning Outcomes

Hwang Yang Kipnis Wong 1996 Wong & Salaff 1998 Wank 1996 Bian

~19 20~29 30~39 40~49 50~59 Count Row % Column % Count Row % Colum

(170) 2 Key Words: teacher evaluation, teacher professional development, formative evaluation

第一章 緒論

~ Jason Thompson, A History of Egypt: From Earliest Times to the Present, Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press, 2008, p

_01_96.indd

2

<4D F736F F D20B169A7B1B4402EB1E4B3C7A6702EB169B061B0B7>

60 教 育 資 料 集 刊 第 四 十 五 輯 2010 各 國 初 等 教 育 ( 含 幼 兒 教 育 ) The Centennial Change from Imitation to Innovation : A Strategic Adjustment in the Reform of C

Transcription:

5 1 2 1 3 ( ) 19 15 6 5 4 300 300 600 471 78.5% ( NSC 91-2414-H-015-009-SSS) 137

(domestic crime) 90 1 91 (World Trade Organization, WTO) ( 94 89) (Washington Post) 2001 12 31 1 1 15 2000 12 27 ( 90.1.1) 86 138

115 26 89 88 92 52 91 29 8 82 91 10 412 114 72.3%(298 ) ( 92) 89 1 10 139

3,647 1,150 31.5% 953 26.1% 866 23.8%( 90) 81.4% 953 1,432 ( ) 89 1 10 1,150 31.5% 953 26.1% 866 23.8% 322 8.8% 243 6.7% 104 2.8% 9.3% 3,647 100.0% 87 54.3 133.4 40.7% 595.4 886.6 67.2% 88 106.4 (87 54.3 ) 47.8% 828.8 (87 595.4 ) 68.2% 90 91 140

90 1 10 329 113 1 166 117 3 46 31 13 459 1 41 7 1 17 10 44 10 5 3 9 6 1,432 141

142 (2) (2) (1) (1/2) (1) (1/2) 87 54.3 133.4 40.7% 595.4 886.7 67.2% 88 50.8 106.4 47.8% 828.8 1215.1 68.2% 89 39.1 277.3 14.1% 477.6 836.2 57.1% 90 141.0 362.5 38.9% 395.8 1421.0 27.9% 91 168.4 601.6 28.0% 638.5 1317.9 48.5% 92 8 26

J. M. Martin A. T. Romano J. M. Martin A. T. Romano(1992) ( ) H. Abadinsky (2003) Martin Romano(1992) 143

( ) ( ) Martin, J. M., & Romano, A. T. (1992). Multinational crime. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications. Martin Romano(1992) 144

M. E. Beare M. E. Beare (push) (pull) (Beare, 1999) Beare ( ) Beare ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Beare ( ) (multiculturalism) 145

(kinship networks) ( ) Beare ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Ko-lin Chin Ko-lin Chin 1989 (National Institute of Justice) Chin 600 50 20 10 70 3 1996 (Chinatown Gangs) Chin(1996) Chin Chin 146

Chin 3 35,000 2 (Chin, 1996) Chin Chin 1999 300 Chin ( ) ( ) ( ) Chin (Chin, 1999) 147

148 1. 1. 1. 2. 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 5. Chin, Ko-lin (1999). Smuggled Chinese. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press. L. L. Shelley Shelley(1998) (Transnational Organized Crime in the United States) Shelley Shelley Shelley ( ) ( ) ( ) Shelley ( ) Shelley ( )

Martin Romano Beare Chin Chin Chin Shelley Shelley 149

(Content Analysis) (90 7 1 91 6 60 ) ( ) 19 15 6 5 19 15 6 5 45 150

( ) 92 2 60 812 374 604 317 604 300 317 300 300 300 600 600 471 78.5% ( ) 1. ( ) 151

152 2. 3. 4. 5.

153 6. 76 11 90 1 ( ) ( ) ( ) 1. ( ) ( ) KTV 2. 3.

154 4. ( KTV ) 5. ( ) 6.

155 ( ) ( ) 76 1. 2. ( )

3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 1. ( ) 2. 3. 4. 156

5. 6. 7. ( ) ( ) 471 229 48.6% 242 51.4% 20 116 (24.6%) 21~25 142 (30.1%) 26 30 98 (20.8%) 31 35 62 (13.2%) 36 40 34 (7.2%) 41 19 (4.0%) 30 21 (4.5%) 149 (31.6%) 211 (44.8%) 72 (15.3%) 7 (1.5%) 11 (2.3%) 281 (59.7%) 155 (32.9%) 18 (3.8%) 13 (2.8%) 1 (0.2%) 3 (0.6%) 46 (9.8%) 423 (89.8%) 2 (0.4%) 157

349 (74.1%) 122 (25.9%) 500 ( 500 ) 72 (20.6%) 501~1000 131 (37.5%) 1001~1500 78 (22.4%) 1501~2000 25 (7.2%) 2001~3000 21 (6.0%) 3001~5000 10 (2.9%) 5001 12 (3.4%) 1000 6.3% 3000 305 (64.8%) 55 (11.7%) 16 ( 3.4%) 15 (3.2%) 11 (2.3%) 9 (1.9%) 8 ( 1.7%) 28 (5.9%) 10 184 (39.1%) 11 30 79 (16.7%) 1 2 61 (12.5%) 2 3 34 (7.1%) 3 4 30 (6.1%) 4 6 27 (5.4%) 6 1 27 (5.4%) 1 2 21 (4.2%) 2 7 (1.5%) 30 158

( ) ( ) 229(48.6%) 305(64.8%) 242(51.4%) 55(11.7%) 16(3.4%) 20 116(24.6%) 16(3.4%) 21~25 142(30.1%) 15(3.2%) 26~30 98(20.8%) 11(2.3%) 31~35 62(13.2%) 9(1.9%) 36~40 34(7.2%) 8(1.7%) 41 19(4.0%) 8(1.7%) 28(5.9%) 21(4.5%) 149(31.6%) 500 72(20.6%) 211(44.8%) 501 1000 131(37.5%) 72(15.3%) 1001 1500 78(22.4%) 7(1.5%) 1501 2000 25(7.2%) 11(2.3%) 2001 3000 21(6.0%) 3001 5000 10(2.9%) 281(59.7%) 5001 12(3.4%) 155(32.9%) 18(3.8%) 10 184(39.1%) 13(2.8%) 11 30 79(16.7%) 1(0.2%) 1 2 61(12.5%) 3(0.6%) 2 3 34(7.1%) 3 4 30(6.1%) 46(9.8%) 4 6 27(5.4%) 423(89.8%) 6 1 27(5.4%) 2(0.4%) 1 2 21(4.2%) 2 7(1.5%) 349(74.1%) 1(0.2%) 122(25.9%) ( ) 25 26 159

( ) 501 1500 1000 52.1% 10 25.4% 10 21.9% 11 30 11.4% 11 30 20 12 (5.2%) 51 21~25 (22.3%) 61 26~30 (26.6%) 31 105 (45.9%) 229 13 (5.9%) 101 (46.1%) 86 (39.3%) 104 (43.0%) 91 (37.6%) 37 (15.3%) 10 (4.1%) 242 8 (3.3%) 48 (19.9%) 125 (51.9%) 116 (24.6%) 142 (30.1%) 98 (20.8%) 115 (24.4%) 471 (100.00%) 21 (4.6%) 149 (32.4%) 211 (45.9%) df=3 X 2 =168.36 p.001 df=3 X 2 =47.59 p.001 160

19 (8.7%) 219 223 (97.4%) 6 (2.6%) 229 85 (37.6%) 136 (60.2%) (2.2) 226 19 (8.4%) 208 (91.6%) 227 168 (73.4%) 61 (26.6%) 229 500 23 (14.1%) 501~1000 56 (34.4%) 1001~1500 51 (31.3%) ( ) 1501 33 (20.2%) 163 10 58 (25.4%) 26 11~30 (11.4%) 1~2 37 (16.2%) 60 (24.9%) 241 82 (33.9%) 160 (66.1%) 242 196 (81.3%) 19 (7.9%) 26 (10.8%) 241 27 (11.2%) 215 (88.8%) 242 181 (74.8%) 61 (25.2%) 242 48 (26.8%) 73 (40.8%) 25 (14.0%) 33 (18.4%) 179 126 (52.1%) 53 (21.9%) 24 (9.9%) 79 (17.2%) 460 305 (64.8%) 166 (35.2%) 471 281 (60.2%) 155 (33.2%) 31 (6.6%) 467 46 (9.8%) 423 (90.2%) 469 349 (74.1%) 122 (25.9%) 471 71 (20.8%) 129 (37.7%) 76 (22.2%) 66 (19.3%) 342 184 (39.1%) 79 (16.8%) 61 (13.0%) df=1 X 2 =207.85 p.001 df=2 X 2 =146.06 p.001 df=1 X 2 =1.03 p.05 df=1 X 2 =.13 p.05 df=3 X 2 =19.23 p=.001 df=6 X 2 =70.15 p.001 161

2~3 23 (10.1%) 3~4 20 (8.8%) 4~6 21 (9.2%) 6 43 (18.9%) 228 11 (4.5%) 10 (4.1%) 6 (2.5%) 12 (5.0%) 242 34 (7.2%) 30 (6.4%) 27 (5.7%) 55 (11.7%) 470 ( ) 211 191 402 (94.2%) (79.9%) (86.8%) 13 (5.8%) 224 28 (13.3%) (22.9%) 48 134 (63.8%) 210 48 (20.1%) 239 36 (18.6%) 64 (33.0%) 94 (48.5%) 194 61 (13.2%) 463 64 (15.8%) 112 (27.7%) 228 (56.4%) 404 df=1 X 2 =20.61 p.001 df=2 X 2 =9.69 p.01 ( ) 162

163 106 (46.5%) 82 (33.9%) 188 (40.0%) 122 (53.5%) 160 (66.1%) 282 (60.0%) 228 242 470 df=1 X 2 =7.77 p.01 53 (53%) 36 (28.3%) 89 (39.2%) 17 (17%) 17 (13.4%) 34 (15.0%) 5 (5%) 44 (34.6%) 49 (21.6%) 25 (25%) 30 (23.6%) 55 (24.2%) 100 127 227 df=3 X 2 =31.98 p.001 ( ) ( 39.3% 57.4%)

170 95 265 (72.4%) (39.3) (56.3%) 23 (10.0%) 36 (15.7%) 229 170 (77.6%) 18 (8.2%) 31 (14.2%) 219 23 (9.5%) 124 (51.2%) 242 135 (57.4%) 25 (10.6%) 75 (31.9%) 235 46 (9.8%) 160 34.0% 471 305 (67.2%) 43 (9.5%) 106 (23.3%) 454 df=2 X 2 =69.32 p.001 df=2 X 2 =22.89 p.001 ( ) 164

189 147 336 (83.6%) (60.7%) (71.8%) 37 (16.4%) 226 94 (41.8%) 131 (58.2%) 225 128 (57.9%) 93 (42.1%) 221 95 (39.3%) 242 204 (85.4%) 35 (14.6%) 239 100 (44.8%) 123 (55.2%) 223 132 (18.2%) 468 298 (64.2%) 166 (35.8%) 464 228 (51.4%) 216 (48.6) 444 df=1 X 2 =30.22 p.001 df=1 X 2 =95.79 p.001 df=1 X 2 =7.60 p.01 ( ) 1,500 78.5% 1,500 ( ) ( ) 7 5 5 3 165

218 176 394 (95.2%) (73.0%) (83.8%) 11 65 76 (4.8%) (27.0%) (16.2%) 229 241 470 1500 140 13 153 (61.7%) (5.4%) (32.6%) 1500 7 39 46 (3.1%) (16.1%) (9.8%) 6 62 65 (2.6%) (25.6%) (13.9%) 74 128 205 (32.6%) (52.9%) (43.7%) 227 242 469 6 19 25 (4.1%) (17.3%) (9.7%) 115 70 185 (78.2%) (63.6%) (72.0%) 26 21 47 (17.7%) (19.1%) (18.3%) 147 110 257 67 31 98 (47.2%) (24.6%) (36.6%) 75 95 170 (52.8%) (75.4%) (63.4%) 142 126 268 df=1 X 2 =42.57 p.001 df=3 X 2 =193.64 p.001 df=2 X 2 =13.18 p.01 df=1 X 2 =14.68 p.001 ( ) 20,001 40,000 40,000 4,000 166

4,000 20000 17 12 29 (7.6%) 5.7% (6.7%) 20001 40000 196 30 226 (87.9%) (14.4%) (52.3%) ( ) 40001 10 167 177 (4.5%) (79.9%) (41.0%) 223 209 432 182 38 220 (81.6%) (15.8%) (47.4%) 41 203 244 (18.4%) (84.2%) (52.6%) 223 241 464 4000 156 5 161 (86.7%) (13.9%) (74.5%) 4000 24 31 55 (13.3%) (86.1%) (25.5%) ( ) 180 36 216 df=2 X 2 =261.87 p.001 df=1 X 2 =201.42 p.001 df=1 X 2 =83.72 p.001 ( ) 18 ( ) 61.6% 63.9% ( ) 167

188 (82.1%) 41 (17.9%) 229 141 (61.6%) 88 (38.4%) 229 109 (47.6%) 120 (52.4%) 229 139 (57.9%) 101 (42.1%) 240 87 (36.1%) 154 (63.9%) 241 80 (33.2%) 161 (66.8%) 241 327 (69.7%) 142 (30.3%) 469 228 (48.5%) 242 51.5% 470 189 (40.2%) 281 (59.8%) 470 df=1 X 2 =201.42 p.001 df=1 X 2 =30.50 p.001 df=1 X 2 =10.13 p.01 ( ) 471 229 48.6% 242 51.4% 30 1,000 5 1 25 26 ( ) 501 1,500 1,000 168

52.1% 10 25.4% 10 21.9% 11 30 11.4% 11 30 9 5 1 8 5 3 ( ) 5 5 6 5 ( 39.3% 57.4%) 3 169

5 1 7 8 2 1% 9 5 1 6 3 1 1 43.5% 13.8% (n 199) 76.9%(n 153) 1 1,500 1 3 3 1,500 78.5% 1,500 ( ) 170

1 ( ) 7 5 1 5 3 1 7 5 ( ) 8 (8.3%) 4 8 10,000 30,000 3 40,000 50,000 6 3 3 4 7 2001 4000 20,001 40,000 40,000 4,000 4,000 3 ( ) 61.6% 63.9% ( ) 3 171

172 9 3 13.8% ( 94) (opportunity theory) (deterrence theory) ( )

3 (conservative approach) (liberal approach) (radical approach) ( 94 91 Schmalleger, 2002; Walker, 1998) 20 1930 1940 ( ) (social process, ) (Strain Theory) (Social Learning Theory) (economic institutions of a society) 1970 3 (crime control model) ( ) 173

( plea bargaining) (legal repression) ( ) 20 ( 94) 20 (dislocation) Vold Bernard(1986, p. 355) 1 ( ) ( ) 174

175 (Gilling, 1997) (Houston & Parsons, 1998) ( ) ( )

( ) Martin Romano (Martin & Romano, 1992) ( 91 88) ( ) 22% ( 100 ) (490,736 ) (8,545 ) ( ) (4,456,000 ) (4,851,600 ) 176

( ) 406,813 8.4 134,246 2.8 30,660 0.6 53,381 1.1 58,353 1.2 86,410 1.8 829,360 17.1 476,997 9.8 93,956 1.9 5,542 0.1 78,898 1.6 17,872 0.4 12,245 0.3 239,461 4.9 455,727 9.4 749,540 15.5 1,122,139 23.1 4,851,600 100.0 ( 2001 ) 177

(criminal cases known to the police) 490,736 8,545 4,456,000 4,851,600 ( 90 ) ( 2001 ) 178 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 3 ( ) ( ) ( KTV ) ( )

( ) 1 2 ( 5 20 ) 100 150 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 9 5 1 8 5 5 ( ) ( ) 8 2 6 ( ) 43.5% 13.8% 76.9% 1 1,500 ( ) 7 5 ( ) 179

8 (8.3%) ( ) 9 3 13.8% 9 ( ) ( ) ( ) 180

15 1 79 1 1 7 100 3 10 500 2 5 1,000 3 ( ) ( ) 衞 181

( ) 歩 ( 88) (2002) ( 2001 ) ( 90.1.1) 11 ( 86, 87, 88, 89) ( 94) ( 89) ( 91) ( 90, 92) 182

Abadinsky, H. (2003). Organized Crime. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Beare, M. E. (1999). Illegal Migration: Personal Tragedies, Social Problems, or National Security Threats? In P. Williams (Ed.), Illegal Immigration and Commercial Sex: The New Slave Trade (pp. 11-41). London, UK: Frank Cass Publishers. Chin, Ko-lin (1996). Chinatown Gangs. New York: Oxford University Press. Chin, Ko-lin (1999). Smuggled Chinese. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press Gilling, D. (1997). Crime Prevention: Theory, Policy and Politics. London, UK: UCL Press Limited. Houston, J. & Parsons, W. W. (1998). Criminal Justice and the Policy Process. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall Publishers. Martin, J. M. & Romano, A. T. (1992). Multinational Crime: Terrorism, Espionage, Drug & Arms Trafficking. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Muraskin, R. & Roberts, A. R. (1999). Vision for Change: Crime and Justice in the Twenty-First Century. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Schmalleger, F. (2002). Criminology Today. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Shelley, L. L. (1998). Transnational Organized Crime in the United States. Kobe University Law Review, 32(1), 77-91. Vold, G. B. & Bernard, T. J. (1986). Theoretical Criminology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Walker, S. (1998). Sense and Nonsense about Crime and Drugs. Belmont, CA: West/Wadsworth Publishing Company. 183