435456 435 * * CY03511-
436
435456 437 * 1988 1950 Piano Music of Native Chinese Composers, with Particular Focus on the Piano Works Since 1950 NSC86-2417-H-152-002 *
438 Grading The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition to arrange in steps or degree scale M. Dewey 1876 Decimal System of Classification
439 88 5 S. Butler Grading is indeed hazardous. 1973 1950 Guide to the Best in Contemporary Piano Music An Annotated List of Graded Solo Piano Music Published Since 1950 M. Hinson 1987 Guide to the
440 Pianist s Repretoire 1700 easy Intermediate Moderately Difficult Difficult using the guide for general indications of technical and interpretative difficulties J. Magrath 1995 The Pianist s Guide to Standard Teaching and Performance Literature Works are graded a tremendous help for anyone guiding their students or themselves to performing excellence leveling reference comparison a factual grading 1 2 3. 4. 5.
441 87 88 69 69 32 1 1 1 No. 1 12 12 Beyer No. 13 22 10 Op. 599Czerny.. J.F. Burgmuller No. 23 32 10 sonatina
442 counterpoint 1 2 1 1-4 2 1-4
443 75 2 2 I II 599 599 III 4 5 I II 38 299 299 1 299 6 9 740 740 740 2 75 10
444 2 2 J. S. Bach's WTC sonata 740 2 2 13 87 85 Level ILevel IILevel IIILevel III IVLevel IVLevel V Level VI 3
445 3 Level I Level I Level II Level II Level III Level III Level III IV Level IV Level IV Level V Level V Level VI Level VI 3 18 C 2 1 1-8 2 unite 2 9-18 3 9-10 Level I
446 3 9-12 Level VI 45 A 1-8 B 9-31 26-28 4 2 A 34-45 Level VI 299 4 26-28 Level III Level Level III
447 near-beginners advanced intermediate level advanced level Level 1 D. Kabalevsky, Song Twenty-four Little Pieces, Op. 39 Level 2 B. Bartók, Sorrow Song of the Tramp For Children, Vol. 2 Level 3 Teasing Song Level 4 V. Rebikov, Children Skating Silhouettes Op. 31 Level 5 C E. Satie, Gymnopédie in C Level 6 D. Shostakovich, Fantastic Dance, Op. 1, No. 1 Level 7 M. Ravel, Pavane pour une Infante défunte Level 8 C. T. Griffes, The White Peacock Four Roman Sketches, Op. 7 87 28 19 599 27
448 5 4 4 6 5 5 5 18-21 4 4 1. No. 63 2. No. 69 3. 4. No. 70 5. A No. 70 6. B 7. A 8. B 599 No. 61 9. 599 No. 43 10. 599 No. 44 11. A 599 No. 45 12. B 13. A 599 No. 47 14. B 15. 599 No. 51 16. 599 No. 59 17. 18.
449 19. 20. 21. 22. 599 No. 71 599 No. 76 599 No. 92 1 No. 2 5 5 A B C D E F G H 5 39 6 1911 1965 45 1938 1999 479
450 A B C D E F G H 6 No.1, 2, Bastien 3 25 Brum No.1, 2 No.1, 2, 3, 4, 6, Heller 9 No. 6, 8 25 No. 1 No. 1-20 No. 3. 4 MacDowell No. 21-30 Moszkowsky No. 2 No. 31-40 60 No. 6 Chopin Liszt No. 1, 2, 4 Rachmaninoff Debussy No. 3, 5 6 42
451 87 NSC88-2411-H-152-001
452 69 4 A. H. Soukhanov, The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition, p. 785. 88 21 88 8 88 72 S. Butler, Guide to the Best in Contemporary Piano Music, Vol. I, ix. 45 23 M. Hinson, Guide to the Pianist's Repertoire, xvi. J. Magrath, The Pianist s Guide to Standard Teaching and Performance Literature, vi 69 5 75 10 87 vii viii 87 6 88 75 88
453 69 87 87 Butler S.(1973). Guide to the Best in Contemporary Piano Music, Vol. I & II. N.J. : The Scarecrow Press, Inc.,. Hinson, M.(1987. Guide to the Pianist's Repertoire. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Magrath, J.(1995). The Pianist s Guide to Standard Teaching and Performance Literature. CA: Alfred Publishing Co., Inc.,. Soukhanov, A. H.(1996). The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
454
Journal of National Taipei Teachers College, Vol.XIII(June 2000)435 456 NATIONAL TAIPEI TEACHERS COLLEGE 455 The Development of Grading Taiwanese Solo Piano Works Shu-mei Yang* ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to establish a grading system for Taiwanese solo piano works. The origin and development of grading musical works in Taiwan was reviewed. Grading is a highly subjective process in which all major music works are first collected, analyzed, and compared. After that, a comprehensive set of grades spanning levels from the easiest to the most difficult is then set up. The criteria in grading were based on consideration of two important things the music itself, and the piano techniques. The result of this system can assist the music learners in piano pedagogy and in selecting suitable piano works. Few literature on grading of native piano works have been found. Among them five published books are reviewed. They have three key elements in common (except the book by this author) : They are all arranged from easy to difficult. Most, but not all of them, use etudes of Western composers to acompany Taiwanese solo piano works. The authors all have some rudimentary, yet incomplete or unsystematic, concepts of grading. Key words: grading, piano literature, Taiwanese solo piano music *Shu-mei Yang: Professor, Department of Music Education
456 Journal of National Taipei Teachers College Vol. XIII