40 16 28 30 1918 11 11 143

2018 4 1921 1 52% 2 38. 86 2 700 75% 1931 3 192 3 69% 31% 14% 9% 5% 2% 1% 4 1939 3 500 21 1941 6 1944 7 5 1945 3 2 200 31. 17 4 /5 98% 1946 2 393 6 1 /3 1918 7 1 1772 1793 1795 1918 1939 2 См. Бухарин Н. И. Российско - польские отношения 90 - е годы XX века - начало XXI века. - М. Наука 2007. С. 21. 3 2015 54 4 Nowy atlas od pradziejów do wspó czesnoci historii Polski Warszawa 2016. s. 122. 5 1952 6 G ówny Urzd Statystyczny. Rocznik Demograficzny 2016 Warszawa 2016. s. 76. 7 Norman Davies God s Playground A History of Poland Volume II 1795 to the Present Oxford University Press 2013. s. 365. 144

1950 60 70 1 1980 3 830 2 50 1980 1988 1989 2 4 8 1990 12 3 1950 2 500. 8 960. 5 38. 4% 1960 2 977. 6 1 420. 6 47. 7% 1970 3 264. 2 1 706. 4 52. 3% 1978 3 506. 1 1980 3 573. 5 2097. 9 58. 7% 1 2 3 2006 523 2007 364 1989 12 29 145

2018 4 1989 3 800 3798. 8 2 338. 4 61. 6% 1 40 1 400 1999 3 12 2004 5 1 2007 12 21 16 28 1992 2 2004 2009 1. 7% 3 2011 4% 4 1989 1996 1 G ówny Urzd Statystyczny. Rocznik Demograficzny 2016 Warszawa 2016. s. 76 78. 2 См. Искра Баева. Проблемы стран Восточного блока в период трансформации в начале XXI века. / /Bulgarian Historical Review. N1-2 2015. С. 115-116. 3 10 25 2016 180 4 20 2013 271 146

30. 6 1997 2002 3 830 2007 3 811. 6 1 2008 ~ 2011 2012 ~ 2016 2016 3 843. 3 2 1989 44. 5 2011 3 853. 8 20 3 1989 50 2014 60. 3 24. 3 36 4 2015 239. 7 7. 7 5 1946 1 2 G ówny Urzd Statystyczny. Rocznik Demograficzny 2016 Warszawa 2016. s. 78. G ówny Urzd Statystyczny. Ludno. Stan i struktura oraz ruch naturalny w przekroju terytorialnym w 2016 r. Warszawa 2017 s. 30. 3 Подробнее о болгарском демографическом кризисе посмотрите Ван Сяоцзюй. Крупные перемены и демографический кризис в Болгарии формы проявления и анализ причин. / /Bulgarian Historical Review. - 2 2015. 4 Main directions of emigration and immigration in the years 1966-2014 migration for permanent residence. 5 G ówny Urzd Statystyczny. Ludno. Stan i struktura oraz ruch naturalny w przekroju terytorialnym w 2016 r. Warszawa 2017 s. 43. 147

2018 4 1961 1 1989 2002 19. 3% 12. 5% 8. 5% 2 2008 6 4 2009 20 3 2015 240 80 2004 5 2006 10 4 1 1961 ~ 1989 400 170 1989 2 Польша в XX веке. Очерки политической истории /Ред. Г. Ф. Матвеев А. Ф. Носкова отв. ред. Л. С. Лыкошина. М. Индрик 2012. С. 882. 3 Боженко В. В. Демографический фактор расширения Европейского Союза. - М. Экон - информ 2011. С. 45. 4 2013 972 148

2005 450 2006 2 307 2007 2 089 1 2007 12 2011 190 80% 2 17 18 1848 1849 3 400 1 Main directions of emigration and immigration in the years 1966-2014 migration for permanent residence. 2 См. Синицина Ирина Сергеевна. Итоги системной трансформации в Польше 1989-2012. / /Свободная мысль международный общественный журнал. - 2013. - 4. С. 71. 3 2001 445 149

2018 4 2008 182 65 49 18 8. 8 110 20 70 1 /5 1990 2007 2016 4 400 1 2004 5 2006 10 51. 1 30 2016 2 900 2 80 86% 3 2016 6 15 1 G ówny Urzd Statystyczny. Ludno. Stan i struktura oraz ruch naturalny w przekroju terytorialnym w 2016 r. Warszawa 2017 s. 43. 2 Ibid. 3 2016 6 150

1 300 1918 1993 1 000 800 2 1 000 17 20 1924 150 3 1959 11. 84 1989 9. 46 4 21 2002 1 444 2 366 3 Под общ. ред. А. В. Торкунова А. Д. Ротфельда. Белые пятна - черные пятна Сложные вопросы в российско - польских отношениях. М. 2010. С. 121. 4 Отв. ред. В. Б. Жиромская Н. А. Араловец. Население России в ХХ веке. Исторические очерки. В 3 - х т. Т. 3. Кн. 2. 1980-1990 гг. М. РОССПЭН 2011. С. 110. 151

2018 4 2010 7. 3 4. 7 1 2014 6 000 19 20 7 000 1904 ~ 1905 2013 9 2016 6 2016 3 300 1 900 2 20 20 1 См. Российский статистический ежегодник. 2015 Стат. сб. /Росстат. М. 2015. С. 69 79. 2 G ówny Urzd Statystyczny. Ludno. Stan i struktura oraz ruch naturalny w przekroju terytorialnym w 2016 r. Warszawa 2017 s. 43. 152

2014 27. 17 8. 93 1 2050 3 485. 6 2014 315 8. 3% 65 31. 5% 2014 510 2 2015 2015 7 73 10% 59. 8% 2030 2050 21 2050 3 300 21 2100 2 200 3 19 2015 10 2007 2015 1 2 http / /www. mofcom. gov. cn /article /i /jyjl /m /201601 /20160101233496. shtml 3 Котыньский Ю. Структурные изменения и турбулентности в мире как вызов развитию польской и европейской экономик. Мир перемен. 2016. 1. С. 27. 153

2018 4 2016 2 500 + 1 2016 4 1 500 + 500 850 18 800 1 200 500 + 6 000 2016 170 278 380 18 55% 2 500 + 500 + 500 + 1 http / /pl. mofcom. gov. cn /article /ztdy /201603 /20160301 282682. shtml 2 http / /www. mofcom. gov. cn /article /i /jyjl /m /201702 /20 170202520092. shtml 154

1993 1 7 20 2016 9 23 240 170 10 3 10 6 90% 2015 155

2018 4 the price of bulk commodities is sluggish and a financing gap appears in Russia. How sovereign wealth funds can live and give back to the society with limited investment is an urgent problem in the next phase Evaluation on the Level of Europeanization in Romania Based on the Analysis of Normative and Cognitive Elements Ju Hao and Miao Tingting Europeanization is a prevalent concept which generates a lot of theoretical discussions. But in empirical studies few scholars take it as a concept that can be operationalized and thus propose the criteria of assessment on the level of Europeanization. Based on the theory of Sociological Institutionalism this paper divides the intension of Europeanization into two dimensions the normative element and cognitive element and thus analyze the level of Europeanization of Romania. The conclusion is as follows the Europeanization of Romania is still at a low level. The core norm and value of EU has entered the domestic politics and society but not yet become a social and commonly shared rule. The public identity with EU and Europeanization is not stable as it is based on a low level of information and highly depends upon the interest output of EU. The Union and Division of the Southern Slavs under the Rise and Fall of the First Yugoslavia Written on the Occasion of the 100th Anniversary of the First Yugoslavia Xu Gang After the end of World War I in 1918 the South Slavs established the first United Nations. For the first time in history the southern Slavs collectively got rid of the rule and oppression of foreigners stepped into the new development track as a common country and occupied a position in the international system. However the first Yugoslavia was rushed to be established lacking meticulous preparation and design. Under the guidance of the Great Serbia - ism it soon went into dictatorship. The complex relations between different people were not effectively integrated. On the contrary they became increasingly tense and eventually parted. On the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the first Yugoslavia we observed that the discrete years of the southern Slavic people are much longer. The integration and separation of the three Yugoslav regimes are by no means accidental. The intertwined ethnic relations have always been the Sword of Damocles hanging on the common country. After the disintegration the countries of the former Yugoslavia chose to return to Europe and achieve another way of connection. But its real effect is largely determined by each nation s historical memory about their mutual relations and how they handle the memory. The Demographic Situation and Immigration Trend in Poland after the Drastic Changes in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe Wang Xiaoju The drastic changes in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe have had a significant impact on the demographic situation in Poland. On the whole the Polish population has entered the period of quasi - platform after the 40 - year increase in the communist era. At the same time influenced by many factors such as geography history economy religion diplomacy etc. the migration scope of the Polish is clearly concentrated in the two major immigration circles Western Europe and North America. With the implementation of the Belt and Road Initiative China - Poland labor cooperation and immigration will create increasing space for development. Since the fall of communism the population of Poland has fluctuated and increased slightly behind which a population crisis is lurking. Encouraging fertility and attracting immigrants to stimulate population growth should be a long - term and important national policy of the Polish government. 158