untitled

Similar documents
227次双周:柯荣柱提要和全文.doc

GDP % See Jin Hehui Qian Yingyi B. R. Weingast Regional Decentralization and Fiscal incentiv

全球化与中国国内劳动力流动:新趋势与政策含义

untitled

World Bank World Bank 2000 Li Dong Torgler a 2010b 3 Huang 2002 GDP Blanchard Shleifer 2000 capture

2008 5,,,,,,,,,, (,2002),,,?,,,,,, 1994 : 1994,, ( GDP ),, (,2004),,,,,,, highly decentralized,, decentralization, ( ),,,, fiscal decentralization (re

Lewis

Kuznets 1979 Rodrik 2008 Clark,1940 Lewis,1954 Chenery, 1986 Schultz 1956,1975 Dennison YJA


引言

EJCUS1002_04.doc

:, ;,, Li Zhou (2005), Huang(2002) 1978,, ( GDP, FDI ),, ( ) ( ),,, (,, ),,,,, (,,1999),,????? :,,,,80, 1982 ( ),, 65, 80, 1982,Shleifer (19

<4D F736F F D20CBB6CABFD1D0BEBFC9FAC2DBCEC4B9E6B7B62E646F63>

2006 4,,,, TFP (,2003),, 90,,,, 2005,, ;,,,,,, (disembodied),,,, (,2003),,,,,, : y = Af ( k, l) : y, k, l, A, : = - -, ( ), ( ),,,,90,,,:,,,,,,,,,,,,,

JOURNAL OF NANJING UNIVERSITY OF FINANCE AND ECONOMICS Wild t % 50% 15% % 19 17%

股权结构对董事会结构的影响

PowerPoint 簡報

Microsoft Word Local government organization and finance in China.doc

學 界 將 台 灣 視 為 發 展 型 國 家 的 原 因, 在 於 台 灣 在 過 去 數 十 年 的 高 度 經 濟 成 長, 以 及 擁 有 良 好 的 政 府 技 術 官 僚 作 為 國 內 產 業 發 展 的 推 手 及 後 盾 (Amsden,1989 Wade,1990) 而 學 者

中国法学院的法律技能教育短缺

- -

目 錄 致 經 營 者 專 家 引 言 研 究 目 的 台 灣 銀 行 業 前 進 中 國 的 動 機 台 灣 銀 行 業 前 進 中 國 的 機 會 台 灣 銀 行 業 前 進 中 國 的 挑 戰 結 論 與 建 議 參 考 文 獻

<4D F736F F D20A661B0ECAE74B2A7AABAA4A4B0EAB941A7F8B0F2C2A6B1D0A87C2E646F63>

Rawski Nolanand Ash Caiand Li 2002 Stiglitz , 2 [1]


M 2 ΠGDP (1996) M2ΠGDP (2000) (2000) (2001) (2001) (2001) (2002) (2002) (2002) (2003) (2001) (2005) (2005) (2006) (2004) M2ΠGDP ; M2ΠGDP ; M2ΠG

Microsoft Word - 1.doc

2007 7,,, Faccio (2006) 47,,, Leuz Oberholzer2Gee (2006),,,,,,,,Fan Wong Zhang (2007a),,, Chen Li Su (2005),, ;, Fan Rui Zhao (2006) 23,,,,Fan Wong Zh

2008 7,,,,,,, Samuelson (1954),,,,,,,,,, ;,,,,,,, ;,,,,,,,,,,, :,, () :,;,, Samuelson (1954),, Tiebout (1956),,,, Buchanan Tullock (1962) Wicksel,,, -

:,,,,,,,,,, ; (1970) (Self 2 Control),,, ;,,, : (1), ; (2),, ; (3),,,,, (J. B. Watson,1913),,, (Hothersall and David,1995) ; ( ), ( ),,,,,, ( Kahneman

,,,???,,?,, 1, ( ),,, (),,, (),,:,,,,,, (),,,,,,,, 2,,, 3,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 1, [] :,,1997,13 2 :, ,,, See Edward L. Glaeser and Andrei Shlei

( 2012) ( 2007) ( 2011) 2010 (2009) BlanchardShleifer(2000) ( 2005) : : ( 2006) (2005) Rona-Tas(1994) (1995) : : 123

1 a benevolen governmen Baaglini Coae 005 Golosov 007 Berola 1993 Peroi 1993 Alesina Rodrik 1994 a self - ineresed governmen Besley Case 1995 Acemoglu

untitled

TVE.doc

1994 ~ % % 49% 2 GDP 1 2 Rawski GDP 1978 GDP 1978 =

穨抗戰前後國民政府國民營劃分原則與公營化台灣日資

Demsetz(1982) Bain ( ) : 4 6?? ( 2005) 2004~ (2000) : ; 7 ; ;? (Lenway and Rehbein1991) ( ) ( ) ( 2006) ( 2002) Bain(1956)

政治制度史研究的省思:以六朝隋唐為例

Microsoft Word Sun Tzu - Chinese translation.doc

Microsoft Word - 试评卡尼曼经济心理学研究及其影响.docx

Chen et al. 0 0 Xu0 008 GDP Li and Zhou005 Blanchard and Shleifer00 Enikolopov and Zhuravshaya007 GDP GDP

(,1999) ( 1) ( ) 1., : ( Gurr,1970) (Smelser,1962) (, 1995) (McCarthy & Zald,1977), : ; ( ) (context bounded rationality) (Victor Nee,1995 :10) :, ; (

第壹章 理論的探討

從實驗教材到官方課程──小學社會科板橋模式教材與改編本教科書的發展

<4D F736F F D20D6D0B9FABAEAB9DBBEADBCC3B7D6CEF6D3EBD4A4B2E2B1A8B8E6A3A C4EAB5DAD2BBBCBEB6C8A3A9B7D6B1A8B8E6CBC4A3BACED2B9FAD5FEB8AED7CAB2FAB8BAD5AEB1EDB3A4C6DAB7E7CFD5D3B0CFECD2F2CBD8B7D6CEF6A3A8B7EBBFA1D0C2A1A2C

中國的經濟改革模式與金融體制

( ) : ,,, 10 %,,, :,,,,, : (1) ; (2), ; (3), ; (4), ; (5) ( ), (2003),,,,,,, , 20,, ST,,,, :? ( ) 3 ( ) 77

: : : :1996,??,,,,,,,, :,,,,, Goldsmith (1969) 35,, Shaw(1973) Gurley Shaw(1960), Demirg c2 Kunt Levin (2001) 150 (1992)

中国金融体系运行效率分析(提纲)

Microsoft Word - Minority Education in Yunnan Book Chapter_condensed version_ doc

J. D. 17 Daniel J. Elazar, American Federalism: A View From the States (New York: Happer & Row, Publishers, 1984), p

Journal of Curriculum Studies September, 2013, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp From the Development Trend of University to Study High School Curriculum Refor

上 海 财 经 大 学 金 融 学 院

<4D F736F F D20D3C3BFB4B2BBBCFBB5C4CAD6D6CEC0EDCDA8D5CD332E646F63>

Hyman P. Minsky hedge - financed firm speculative - financed firm Ponzi firm Glass - Steagall Act of 1933 Banking Act of 193

長久以來,經濟學者最常利用國民生產毛額(Gross National Product, GNP)來作為一個國家或經濟社會福利水準高低之衡量標準

IPO

49 Schroeder & Aoki 2009 Li Bird & Ebel SSCI Journal of Public Economics Zhang & Zou DC cbe = + 2 DC be =

% %

跨 界 的 視 野 壹 緒 論 工 作 動 機 (Task motivation) 是 美 國 Harvard 大 學 教 授 Teresa M. Amabile, 歸 納 歷 年 研 究 所 建 構 之 創 造 力 成 份 模 式 (Componential Model of Creativity

Jul Journal of Chinese Women's Studies No. 4 Ser. No. 148 * CFPS 2010 C A Where does the Ti

Microsoft Word doc

国 国 国



4 5 / /8/21 R.A. Posner 2

Oliver Williamson Richard Levin Henry Rosovsky Board of Trustees Board of Regents 2 3 1Henry Rosovsky The University An O

後共產主義社會階層化機制之探討

越南政經改革與憲政制度之演變

中國的科學與中國的公民:大陸研究在台灣的困境\\

场 的 跨 越 式 赶 超, 推 进 资 本 市 场 法 制 的 现 代 化 进 程, 必 经 之 途 是 通 过 法 律 移 植 来 实 现 制 度 的 改 良 与 进 化 然 而, 法 律 移 植 并 非 普 适 性 的 经 验 法 则, 不 能 为 资 本 市 场 根 深 蒂 固 的 顽 疾

2004年臺灣人口學會年會應徵論文摘要

CHIPS Oaxaca - Blinder % Sicular et al CASS Becker & Chiswick ~ 2000 Becker & Chiswick 196

(),, 3,,, 4,, ;,,,, 5,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, (privilege), (rights),,, ,,,,,, ( ),,,,,,,, 7,,,, 8 :,, ;, 3, :, 4, 2003 (Licensing Act 2003) 1

HK_Christian_Poverty

Buroway 1978 p Przeworski and Wallerstein Zingales Rajan and Zingales 1998 Blair 2005 Blair and Stott

( ) : ( TFP) TFP, ( GDP) TFP ; OLS Panel Data Dynamic Panel Data ( GMM), : TFP, TFP, TFP TFP :,,, (TFP), Chow and Lin(2002) (

WTO GDP 9.4% GDP 8.1% , , % 15.7% ( 1999) (GATT)

% 5 CPI CPI PPI Benjamin et al Taylor 1993 Cukierman and Gerlach 2003 Ikeda 2013 Jonas and Mishkin

- 2 -

Microsoft Word - 學校及系組招生規定( _054014)-緬甸適用.docx

Alexander & Wyeth Dercon 1995 ECM - Johansen Goodwin 1992 VEC Asche 1999 Gonzalez 2001 ECM Goodwin

Myers Majluf 1984 Lu Putnam R&D R&D R&D R&D

我國公營事業民營化前後績效變化之研究

Chap3Chinese

,,,,,,, (1975) (,2004 : ) (1981) 20,, (,1987 :6) L ,, (,2005b),,, ;,,,,,, ( ) (,1989) :, :A,, ;B, ;C ;D, (,1987 : ) 16

% 50% 72. 7% 80% M = Katharina Pistor John Armour

untitled

(New Economics of Labor Migration NELM Taylor Martin (2001) ) NELM NELM 2 ( 2007; 2000) (1) 3 U=U(x wa x wm x wl ;x ha x hm x hl ) U'>0U''<0 (1) ( 200

07D5.FIT\)

<B0EAA467A4CEA4BDA640AA76B27A4E6F2E31332E706466>

Untitiled

投资者保护:理论综述

1 CAPM CAPM % % Wippern, aGebhardt Lee Swaminathan % 5.10% 4.18% 2 3 1Gebhardt Lee Swa

Schumpeter Mensch Freeman Clark Schumpeter Mensch 1975 technological stalemate 2000 Van Dujin 1977 OECD 1992 Freeman 1982 Van


2001 2,, (Devine & Kiefer, 1991), :, ;,,,,?, 300, 57 % ( Granovetter, 1974),, ( Fernan2 dez & Weinberg, 1997) :,, ( Granovetter, 1973),,,,,,,, (Lin, 1

FDI [] [ ] F832 A (FDI) FDI FDI FDI FDI 1991 FDI 0.2% % FDI 2002 FDI FDI FDI FDI FDI FDI H.Chenery A.M.Str

fiscal decentralization local financial managerial capability 2

Transcription:

No. C2005007 2005-10 Email xqping@ccer.pku.edu.cn No. C2005007 2005 10 12 1978 0

Email xqping@ccer.pku.edu.cn No. C2005007 2005 10 12 1978 1

...3...5...8...10 Adaptive Heuristics...13...14...16...18 2

1978 1970 25 9 25 25 Hausmann Rodrik 2003 Rodrik 2004 a 2004 b John williamson 1989 10 10 3 3

3 4 10 25 10 IMF 20 90 IMF S.Fischer 2001 20 Shleifer 2003 Murrell 1995 20 70 30 20 70 4

1989 10 10 2002 11 10 10 1989 10 16 10 16 10 2002 11 8 perato improvement 20 20 2005 25 3 22 FDI 2004 2003 540 610 960 780 FDI 20 70 5

1970 70 Shleifer 2003 IPE civic capital Landes 1989 Levine 1997 Alesina 1999 Engerman Sokoloff 2002 Acemoglu 2001 Putnam 1993 1867 1884 70 IPF 70 1978 12 20 Shavell 1979 80 30 1985 6

2005 Hausmann Rodrik 2003 20 FDI FDI 1954 1966 1980 1980 LloyD Ellis Bernhardt 2000 Gine Townsend 2004 7

25 20 1 25 1980 1980 Liu Qian Roland 2000 10 1990 8

1980 20 2 1980 20 2000 60 100 9

3 1980 1990 1990 1980 John McMillan 1997 Priorities Priorities n m m 20 1 1978 1984 10

2 70 3 4 1980 5 80 1 2 6 25 Blanchard Shleifer 2001 Blanchard Shleifer 11

Blanchard Shleifer 10 1970 10 1978 1988 10 1989 1999 agent market preserving 10 1999 Allen 2005 7 20 1980 1980 20 1 2 12

3 2010 Adaptive Heuristics 1970 7000 GDP 70 80 3 / CEO 1 Fulk Theorem of China 80 80 20 Optimality Rationality Efficiency 9 rule of thumb Aadaptive Adaptive Heuristics S.Hart, 2005 Heuristics Adaptive 5 S.Hart A.Mas-Colell 2000 2001 a 2001 b 2003 a 2003 b 13

20 20 1979 1984 5 14 90 Adaptive 80 90 2001 regret matching Hart Mascolell 2000 20 20 governed market governing the market 80 90 Johnson 1982 white 1988 wade 1990 1 FDI 15 30 80 14

2 80 90 3 Shleifer 2003 IPE 80 90 1997 4 90 2003 7 8 10 4400 2500 20 10 5 90 15

authoritarian 20 16

20 2003 19 20 20 IMF 2005 8 25 2005 10 9. 17

1. 1985 1995 2 349 353 2. 1978 1975 1982 1983 130 143 3. 1980 1975 1982 1983 280 302 4. 1884 21 1963 27 203 5. 2005, 2005 6. 2002 2005 192 242 7. 1867 1 23 1963 8. 2003 2005 243 265 9. Acemoglu, D., J. Simon, J. Robinson, (2001), The Colonial Origin of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation, American Economic Review, 91: 1369-1401. 10. Alesina, A., B. Reza, and E. William, (1999), Public Goods and Ethnic Divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114: 1243-1284. 11. Allen, F., J. Qian, and M. Qian. (2005), Law, Finance and Economic Growth in China, Journal of Financial Economics, 77: 57-116. 12. Blanchard, O., and A. Shleifer, (2001), Federalism with and without Political Centralization: China versus Russia. IMF staff papers, 48 (special issue): 171-179. 13. Chew, G., (1980), China Economy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 14. Diamond, J., (1997), Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. Norton, New York, NY. 15. Djankov, S., E.Glaeser, R. L. Porta, F. L. Silanes, and A.Shleifer, (2003), The New Comparative Economics, Journal of Comparative Economics, 31: 595-619. 16. Easterly, W., R. Levine, (1997), Africa s Growth Tragedy: Policies and Ethnic Divisions, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112: 1203-1250. 17. Engerman, S., K. Sokoloff, (2002), Factor Endownments, Inequality and paths of Development Among New World Economies, NBER working paper #9259, Cambridge, MA. 18. Fei, J. C., and G. Ranis, (1963), Innovation, Capital Accumulation and Economic Development, American Economic Review, June 1963. 19. Fischer, S., (2001), Ten Years of Transition: Looking Back and Looking Forward, IMF staff papers, 48(special issue): 1-8. 20. Gine, X., and R. Townsend, (2004), Evaluation of Financial Liberalization: A General Equilibrium Model with Constrained Occupation Choice. Journal of Development Economics, 74: 269-307. 21. Hart, S., (2005), Adaptive Heuristics. Econometrica 73 (5): 1401-1430. 18

22. Hart, S., and A. Mas-Colell, (2000), A Simple Adaptive Procedure Leading to Correlated Equilibrium. Econometrica, 68: 1127-1150. 23 --------(2001a), A General Class of Adaptive Strategies, Journal of Economic Theory, 98: 26-54. 24. --------(2001b), A Reinforcement Procedure leading to Correlated Equilibrium, In Economic Essay: A Festschrift for Werner Hidenbrand, ed. by G. Debreu, W. Neuefeind, and W. Trockel. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 181-200. 25. ---------(2003a), Regret-Based Dynamics, Games and Economic Behavior, 45: 375-394. 26. ---------(2003b), Uncoupled Dynamics Do Not Lead to Nash Equilibrium. American economic Review, 93: 1830-1836. 27. -------- (2004), Stochastic Uncoupled Dynamics and Nash Equilibrium, Mimeo, DP-371, Center for Rationality, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. 28. Hausmann, R. and D. Rodrik, (2003), Economic Development as Self-Discovery, Journal of Development Economics 72: 603-633. 29. Johnson, C., (1982), MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975. Stanford University Press, Stanford. 30. Landes, D., (1998), The Wealth and Poverty of Nation, Norton, New York, NY. 31. Lau, J. L, Y. Qian and G.Roland, (2000), Reform Without Losers: An Interpretation of China s Dual-Track Approach to Transition, Journal of Political Economy, 108(1): 120-143. 32. Lewis, A., (1954), Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labor. Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies. 28: 139-191. 33. Lloyd-Ellis, H., and D. Bernhrdt, (2000), Enterprise, Inequality and Economic Development. Review of Economic Studies, 67: 147-168. 34. McMillan, J., (1997), Markets in Transition, in Kreps, D., and K. F. Wallis (ed): Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Application, Cambridge University Press. Pp. 240-278. 35. Murrell, P. (1995), Transition according to Cambridge, Mass., Journal of Economic Literature. 33: 164-178. 36. Putnam, R., (1993), Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 37. Rodrik, D. (2004a), A Practical Approach to Formulating Growth Strategies, Unpublished Paper, Harvard University. 38. Rodrik, D. (2004b), Rethinking Growth Policies in the developing World, Unpublished Paper, Harvard University. 39. Shavell, S., (1979), Risk Sharing and Incentives in the Principaland agent Relationship, Bell Journal of Economics, 10: 55-73. 40. Wade, R., (1990), Governing the Market, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 41. White, G. (ed), (1988), Developmental States in East Asia. London: Macmillan. 42. William, John, (2003). From Reform Agenda to Damaged Brand Name, Finance & Development, Sept. 2003. 19