: ( ), ( ),,,,,, 20 20 30, 20 30,,, 20 70,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, (feudalism), :, ( ) 3, 1997,2003 2 146 3
, ( ) ;,,,,,,,,,, feudalism (),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, :,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, :,,, ; :, 23 :,,, : :,,, :, ( ),, 1944 ( ) (, 1946 3 ), :,, 147
2004 3,,,,,,, :,,,?,,,,, ;,,,,,,, :,,,,,, ; :,,,,, 20 :,, (, ) :,,, () [ ],, 19 :,!,,, 23,,,, 5, 18,, ( ),,,, ;,,, 148 : :,,, (,, 2000, 139 140 ),,,,
,,,,,, ( ) feudalism feudalism,,,, feudalism,, feudalism,,,, feudalism, 16,, (LiAri Feudorum) 18 19,,, feudalism, feudalism, ;, 19,,,, 20 30,,,,,,,,,, feudalism ( ),,,,,, :,, 1997 :,,,,,,,,, ( 2000 2 ) 149
,,, feudalism, 1899, ;, ( ), feudalism ;,,, feudalism, feudalism 1901 ( ), feudalism, 1903 ( ), feudalism,,,, ( ),,,,,,,,,,,,,, feudalism, feudalism feudalism,,,,,, ;,,,, ;,,,,,,,,,, :, 17 26 (1899 6 8 9 5 ) ; (feudlism ) feudlism,,, 1981 150 (1991 6 ),, feudlism feudlism,, 1903, feudlism,
,,,,,,,,, ( ), feudalism,,,, 20,,,,, (), feudalism, feudalism, ;,,,,, 1915 1 1 :,,,,?,, 4 3 (1918 3 15 ), (1897 ) ( ) 1902 1903 11,,,,, ( ),,, :,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ( ), 2 4 (1916 12 ) 151
,,, :,,,,,,,,,,,,, 1919 5 6 5, :,, 1921,,,,, 1922, 1922 1 15,,,,,,,,? 1922 6 15,,,,,, 1922 7, :,, 1919,, 152, 2 6 :,,,,,, ( ),, ( ),,,,,,,, :,,,,,,,,
,,,, 1912 7,, 1920 7 26,,,, 1922 1,,, ( ),,,,,,,,,,,,, 1923,,,,,,,,, 1927,,,, :,, ; ; (, 2,, 1960, 426 ) 4, 335 1 4 :,,,,,,, 2001 2, :, (1, 39 ) :, 1925 1927,, (,, 1936 ) 153
,,, : (), ; (), ; (),, ;,,,,,,,,,,, 20 20 30,,,, 1937, :,,,,,,, (),,,,,,, 1928 10,,,,,,,, 1981, 3,, 31 : :, 1,, 1993, 186 154,, ; ( ),,,, ( ) [ ],,, : () () (), () () ( ),,
,,,, (1931 4 ),, 8 1933 4,,,,,,,?, 1937, 1937, 20 20 1937, 1 A, A, A,,, 1929, A A,,,, 1932 A,, A, A,,, A, 1 2 (1928 10 1 ),,,,3 1 155
1 A : A : A, (Mir) A 19 A B, B,, 1 B,,, B, 10, 1, 2 11 B B,, 1929 B ; B,, B,,, 3 =, 4,, 1936 B ( 4 10 11 13 ) B B,, 1933 156
1 B,,, 1 B, B,, 3 C,,, 1930 C, 1 D,,, D,, 3, 1 3 A,,, A A, A, A,, 1928, 1984 6, 3 2 (1935 ) (1923 ) ; (193? ), 5 6 (1930 11 ) A 157
1 A, 5 5 (1937 3 ) A,,, 1 4 A,, B, ;, B, B,, 1 1 ;, 2 9, 3,,, 1936 B,, 1936 C, ;, A, B : 11,, ; 21 ; 31 : 20,, 30, 30,, 1935,,, 2 A B C D 14 15 2 2 33 24 20 3 2 49 158
3 A1 B1 C1 D1,, () (),,, :,, ;,,,,, ;,,,, (),,,, ;,, ;,,,,,,, ; : (),,,,,, 3 4,,, 3 2 (1930 2 1 ) 159
,,,,, (, ),? : (),, ;, ;,,,,,,,,,,,? :,,,,,,, : 11 50 % 70 %; 21 ; 31 ; 41 ; 51 70,,,,,,, :,1 :,3,, 1 ;, 1935 3 4 :, (1) (, 1936 ) 112 113 2 (3 2 3, 160 ; (2), ; (3), ;, 4 5, 1930 3 15, 5 15 ), ( 1 ), (490 ), (), 38 840 ), (1935 3 4 ), (4) :
,,,,,,,, 1930,, :,,,,,,, :, 9 13,,, 18,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, :,,,? ( ) (),,,,, : (), () () () () () (),,, 3 2 3, 4 5 :, 1997 1 :,3 :=,4,, 1936, 91 :,, 1937 161
,,,?, 30,,,,,,,?,,,, :,,,,, :,,?,, ; :,,,,?,, :,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, :,2 3 4 ),, (3, 58 59 ) :,,, 1930 162?,,,,,,, (
,,,,,,,?,,, ;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, (),,,, ;,,, : : :,,,, :,,,,,,,, 1934,,, 4 5 163
,,,,, ( ) ( ),, ( ),,,,,,,,, 1928,, : 11 ; 21 ; 31,, :,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 30, :,,, 1984 6, 164 :,,, 3 66 110 1928 12,, 1933, :,, :,, 1997 4
, 1934 4,, :,,,,,,, :,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ;,, ;,,,, :,,,,,,,,,,,,, 1934,,,,,,,,, ;, ( ) ( (1934 4 15 ) 1 3 (1935 ) :, 3 2 (1935 ) :,,, 1963,, 165
) ( ), ( ),, 1939,, 2,,,,,,,,,,,, ;, 1939,,,,,, ;,, ( ),,,,, (),, 30,,, 1, 30, 1935,,,? :,,, ;,,, ; :,3 4 (1935 5 ) 2 (, 1941 ) 29 31 1934 4 4, 166,,, ;,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 1938, 3,,, 1946 1,, ;,, 1948,, :,,,,,,,,,,,, 1954,,,, : 11,,,,,,, 21,, 31, ( ),,,,,,,,,, 1936, 108,, 1935, 2, 167
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 1979 1949,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 168,,, (, :, 1995, 242 ),,,, (),,,,,,, (, ),?,,,?? (,, 1936, 378 )
20, 20 20 30,,,,,?,,,,,?,,, : :,, ; :,,,,, feudalism,,,,,,, feudalism 20 20 30,,,,,,,, :,, feudal, feudlism,, (,, 2000 ) ( 21,, 2003 ) :,,,,,,,,,,,,,,?,,,?,,, (),,,? 169
, (),,,, feudalism,,,,,,,,, :,,,,,, ;,,,,, feudalism,,,,,,,,,,,,,,? :,,,,,,,,,!, feudlism,,(5),, 1986 170 feudlism,,, ;, feudlism,, 20 40,,, feudlism,, (2,, 1950, 3 4,, 40 ) 90, feudlism,, feudlism,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ;,,,?,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 1921, :,,,,, :,, ;,, ;, 30,,,,,,,,, 9 4 (1921 8 1 ) 171
,,,,,,,,?,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ;,,,, (),,,,,,,,,, 20,,,,,, ;,,,,,,,,!, 100836 ( : ) 172
CON TEN TS the major reasons why China was able to make an atomic bomb within ten short years. On the other hand, wit h Khrushchevπs deep2seated dist rust of Mao Zedong, particularly wit h t he deepening Sino2 Soviet disagreement s in atomic st rategy, atomic policy and international affairs, t he U SSR t ried to limit and restrict its atomic aid. When the first signs of a split in Sino2Soviet relations emerged, the first thing to go was the USSRπs atomic aid to China. Discussion and Review Exploring Japanese Pan2Asianism : A Discussion with Mr. Sheng Banghe Qi Qizhang (132) Pan2Asianism is a significant topic for in2dept h st udies in modern Sino2J apanese relations. It is not correct to associate the notion with the exclusionism of the late shogunate period and the Meiji idea of a stronger Asia and thereby to prove that it had objective and progressive elements. Japanese Pan2Asianism took form after t he 189421895 Sino2J apanese War. As a product of J apanπs march to2 wards imperialism, it provided t he count ry wit h a t heoretical foundation for invasion which under2 pinned its strategy and tactics of counterbalancing the Western powers in Asia, particularly in China. Review Essays The Evolution of the Concept of Fengjian ( ) in China and the Formation of the Theory on the System of Fengjia n Landlords Li Genpan (146) Research N otes Why Did Emperor Xuanzong of the Tang Dynasty Appointed Suzong instead of Shouwang as His Successor? Ren Shiying (173) Journal of Weng Tonghe : A Comparison bet ween the Manuscripts and the Publ ished Version Kong Xiangji Yujiro Muratu (180) New Books A broad Brett Sheehan : Tr ust i n Troubled Times : Money, B a nks, a nd State2Society Relations i n Republi2 can Tianjin Tao Jiyi (188) 192