16 1 2017 3 2016 361005 C919 A 1671-7287201701-0073-11 100 21 2016 12 16-19 1 20 70 2017-02-16 1979-73

2 3 4 5 74 2016

NEP 6-14 2006 2012 NEP NEP NEP NEP 2013 H 20 90 75

20 90 41 8 1994 1994 UNEP 76 2016

77

CO PX PX PX 20 70 1 20 90 / PX PX PX PX 1 Not In My Backyard H 2 S NH 3 NO x HCl CH 3 OH 78 2016

15-20 1. NGO 31 79

1995 2013 / GDP EKC S S 2. NGO 80 2016

M M 1 81

2007. 6. M. 1998. 7. M 1999. 8. M - / 2002. 9. NEP J. 20065 71-92. 10. NEP J. 20071 55-63. 11. M. 2010. 12. M. 2012. 13. NEP J. 20124 8-13. 14. CGSS2010 J. 20144 49-72. 15. J. 20044 1-7. 1. J. J. 20104 83-87. 20154 5-16. 2. J. 20121 174-196. M. 18. J 2001. 3. 19. J. 20065 26-28. 16. 17. 20144 83-91. J. 2014 4. 3 49-58. M. 2010. 20. J 5. 20166 86-93. M. 82 2016

EnvironmentSociety and Green Development A Review on the Fifth China Environmental Sociology Symposium 2016 GONG WenjuanLIANG Di Department of Sociology and Social WorkXiamen UniversityXiamen 361005China AbstractChina's environmental sociology has already stepped onto an express lane and accelerated development. In this contextthe fifth China environmental sociology symposium was held to explore ideasbehaviors and governance mechanisms impacting China's green development. The theme of the symposium is " green development and environmental sociology". The research achievements present the following characteristicslocalization and globalizationmultidisciplinary integration issues and methods diversification. More criticalreflective and constructive fundamental theory-researches and method-researches are essential in the future study. Participants reach an agreement with " to deal with and governance China's environmental problemswe need social multiple subjects to participate and make a green development path". Multiple subjects how to participate and make sustainable development are the key to deal with the relationships among environment social and green development. Key wordsenvironment and societygreen developmentenvironmental sociology 櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄櫄 60 Extractivism and NeoextractivismTwo Sides of the Same Curse Alberto Acosta 1 Translated by WANG Congcong 2 1.Latin American Social Sciences FacultyQuito 999165 Ecuador 2.School of MarxismBeijing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsBeijing 100083 China AbstractAlthough with abundance of natural resourceslatin American countries failed to establish a development mode that would enable them to escape from the traps of poverty and authoritarianism due to the existence of extractivism and neoextractivism. As a mode of accumulationextractivism distorts the structure of economy and allocation among production sectorsas well as aggravating disbalance of renenues and payments. Despite the fact that several Latin American countries with progressive government have become aware of the disease and have made some vital changes to certain elements of extractivismneoextractivism maintains and reproduces key elements of the extractivism that dates back to colonial times. Thereforeone of the most complex tasks is to design and implement a strategy that will lead to a post-extractivist economyto offer an alternatives to development an option that is radically different to current development ideas. Key wordsextractivism neoextractivism alternatives to developmentparadox of plentynatural resources environmental politics 83