1998 L o u i s 2 Pierre Althusser A l t h u s s e r, Hans Abbing A b b i n g, 2002 Jesse Helms 1989 N E A Robert Mapplethorpe S o u t h e

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "1998 L o u i s 2 Pierre Althusser A l t h u s s e r, Hans Abbing A b b i n g, 2002 Jesse Helms 1989 N E A Robert Mapplethorpe S o u t h e"

晏委培夏
7 years ago
Views:

1 s o c i a l e n t e r p r i s e Baumol and Bowen, 1966; Moore, 1968; Peacock, 1969; Heilbrun and Gray, 2001 Council of Museums I C O M Haag, 1979; Banfield, 1984; Abbing, 2002 I n t e r n a t i o n a l 1 mishardo17@gmail.com 47

2 1998 L o u i s 2 Pierre Althusser A l t h u s s e r, Hans Abbing A b b i n g, 2002 Jesse Helms 1989 N E A Robert Mapplethorpe S o u t h e a s t e r n Center for Contemporary Art N E A N E A Heilbrun and Gray, 2001; Miller and Yùdice, 2002 Antonio Gramsci /08/ /08/16 48

3 c u l t u r a l reproduction P. Bourdieu D i s t i n c t i o n purveyor of truth cultural capital venerated cultural t a s t e a u t h o r i t y Harrison, 1994: G e o rges-henri Riviè re 1980 Bourdieu, 1990; 1998 Sandell, 2002: e m p o w e r m e n t Bourdieu, 1990 A. Darbel high art R. Sandell V. D. Haag T. Adam Smith B e n n e t t

4 J. Heilbrun C. M. Gray Heilbrun and G r a y, 2001 A. C. P i g o u imagined communities soft power 1971 e ff i c i e n c y e q u i t y e x t e r n a l i t i e s e x t e r n a l b e n e f i t s Haag, 1979 J. Pick Pick, 1988 W. J. Baumol 1995: 107 W. G. Bowen Baumol and Bowen, 1966 We i l, Heilbrun and Gray, 2001; Throsby, ; Travers and Glaister, 2004 J. Myerscough 10 3 M y e r s c o u g h, 1988 DCMS, 2005 Heilbrun and Gray, 2001 Lorente, 1996; Santagata, 2002; 50

5 M o n t g o m e r y, 2003; Evans, 2005 Guggenheim Museum Tate Modern 4 W. S a n t a g a t a Heilbrun and Gray, 2001; S a n t a g a t a, Abbing, Heilbrun and Gray, 2001 A b b i n g, E. Hooper- G r e e n h i l l Haag, 1979 ; Abbing, 2002 H o o p e r- Greenhill, 1994 S. E. We i l T h r o s b y, 2001 Weil, 1990 Weil, 1990 Heilbrun and Gray,

6 merit goods Heilbrun and Gray, 2001 D Baumol and Bowen, 1966 P 1 cost disease 5 Q 1 d e c r e a s i n g P 2 cost industry Heilbrun and Gray, 2001 Q A D O C M C P 2 = M C Franz Joseph Haydn 52

7 equality of opportunity p r i n c i p l e 27 Jürg e n H a b e r m a s Heilbrun and Gray, 2001 N. Merriman F. We b s t e r Merriman, 1991 House of Commons, 1989; O Hagan, 1995; Bailey et al., 1997, L. Gibson R. H a b e r m a s, L e v i t t We b s t e r, Culture and Creativity in 2007 Robert Hewison1 987 DCMS, a c c e s s i b i l i t y social inclusion

8 J. D. Harrison 1980 m u s e u m e v e n t s B. Frey Harrison, 1994 F r e y, 1998 E. Baker B a k e r, Wi t t l i n, 1970 Y. N. Lin I PA Importance- Performance Analysis of Arts Museum Services b l o c k b u s t e r 54

9 Lin, e ff e c t i v e l y e ff i c i e n t l y

10 M L A G u i d e s t a r 7 top-down approach b o t t o m - u p C. Scott S c o t t, 2009 Holden, 2004 S c o t t, /03/1 56

11 Jenks, C Pick, J (3): Strinati, D Pigou, A. C Picard, R. G Webster, F B a e k e r, C Abbing, H Abbing, H., Why Are Artists Poor? The Exceptional Economy of the Arts. Amsterdam : Amsterdam University Press. B a i l e y, S. et al., Charging for admission to museums and galleries: Arguments and evidence. Museum Management and Curatorship, 16(4): Bailey, S. J. and Falconer, P., Charging for admission to museums and galleries: A framework for analyzing the impact on access. Journal of Cultural Economics, 22: Banfield, E. C., The Democratic Muse. New York: Basic. Barker, E., Exhibiting the canon: The blockbuster show. In: Barker, E. (Ed.), 1999, Contemporary Cultures of Display, pp The Open University Press. Baumol, W. J. and Bowen, W. G., Performing Arts: The Economic Dilemma. New York : Twentieth Century Fund. Bennett, T., Cultural capital, social inequality and cultural policy. The International Forum for Cultural Policy and Capitals of Culture, 26th-27th, April. Taipei: National Cultural Association. Bourdieu, P., Distinction: A Social Critique for the Judgement of Ta s t e. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Bourdieu, P., Artistic taste and cultural capital. In: Alexander, J. C. and Seidman, S. (Ed.), 1990, Culture and Society: Contemporary Debates, pp Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press. Bourdieu, P. and Darbel, A. et al., The Love of Art: European Art Museums and Their 57

12 Public. Cambridge: Polity Press. Department for Culture, Media and Sport, Understanding the Future: Museums and 21st Century Life-The Value of Museums, pp. 3. London: DCMS., Culture and Creativity in London: DCMS. Evans, G., Measure for measure: Evaluating the evidence of culture s contribution to regeneration. Urban Studies, 42(5/6): Frey, B., Superstar museums: An economic analysis. Journal of Cultural Economics, 22(203): Gibson, L., In defence of instrumentality. Cultural Trends, 17(4): Haag, V. D., Should the government subsidize the arts? Policy Review, 10: Harrison, J. D., Ideas of museums in the 1990s. Museum Management and Curatorship, 13(2): Heilbrun, J. and Gray, C. M., The Economics of Art and Culture, 2nd ed. UK: Cambridge University Press. Holden, J., Capturing Cultural Value: Howe Culture Has Become a Tool of Government Policy. London: DEMOS. Hooper-Greenhill, E., Museums and Their Visitors. London: Routledge. House of Commons, Certain museums and galleries: Policies on charging for admission, minutes of evidence. Education, Science and Arts Committee, House of Commons, Session , 27th June. London: HMSO. Levitt, R., The political and intellectual landscape of instrumental museum policy. Cultural Trends, 17(4): Lin, Y. N., Importance-performance analysis of the Taipei Fine Arts Museum s service. Museum Management and Curatorship, 24(2): Lorente, P. (Ed.), The Role of Museums and the Arts in the Regeneration of Liverpool. Leicester: University of Leicester. Merriman, N., Beyond the Glass Case: The Past, the Heritage and the Public in Britain. Leicester: Leicester University Press. Miller, T. and Yùdice, G., Cultural Policy. London: Sage. M o n t g o m e r y, J., Cultural quarters as mechanisms for urban regeneration. Part 1: Conceptualising cultural quarters. Planning, Practice and Research, 18(4): Moore, T., Reasons for subsidizing american theater. In: Blaug, M. (Ed.), 1968, The Economics of the Arts. London: Martin Robertson. Myerscough, J. et al., The Economic Importance of the Arts in Britain. London: Policy Studies Institute. O Hagan, W. J., National museums: To charge or not to charge? Journal of Cultural Economics, 19: Peacock, A. T., Welfare economics and public subsidies to the Arts. I n: Blaug, M. (Ed.), 1976, The Economics of the Arts, pp London: Martin Robertson and Company. Sandell, R. (Ed.), Museums and the Combating of Social Inequality: Roles, Responsibilities, Resistance. London: Routledge. 58

13 Santagata, W., Cultural districts, prooerty rights and sustainable economic growth. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 269(1): Scott, C., Exploring the evidence base for museum value. International Museum Management and Curatorship, 24(3): Throsby, D., Economics and Culture. Cambridge University Press. Travers, T. and Glaister, S., Valuing Museums: Impact and Innovation among National Museums. UK: National Museum Directors Conference. Weil, S. E., Rethinking the Museum: And Other Meditations. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. Weil, S. E., A Cabinet of Curiosities: Inquiries into Museums and Their Prospects. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. Wittlin, A., A twelve point program for museum renewal. I n: Anderson, G. (Ed.), 2004, Reinventing the Museum: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on the Paradigm Shift. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc

14 60

15 To Subsidize or Not to Subsidize? Reflections and Debates on the Issue of Museum Subsidies Wen-Ling Lin* Abstract The museum of the day is facing financial difficulties due to government grant cuts and decentralization. Most museums need to raise funds for their operation / survival. This paper discusses museum subsidy issue by examining the arguments on both positive and negative sides and rethinks the responsibility and value of museums to the society, so as to ponder how the subsidy mechanism was formed. Finally, the study indicates that a subsidy will help a museum display its public benefit and keep it from financial pressure, so that the museum can concentrate on its functions like research, collection, education and promotion as well as on displaying its cultural diversity. Sound subsidy mechanism and active responses from museums will lead to create dialogues among government, citizen and museum. Keywords: policy of subsidy, cultural policy, museum * Ph D. Student, Graduate School of Art-Culture Policy and Management, National Taiwan University of Arts; mishardo17@gmail.com 61

16 62

收費或不收費？國立博物館門票政策探究

收費或不收費？國立博物館門票政策探究 2001 2008 27 55 Merriman 1991 Bailey 1997; 1998 House of Commons 1989a O, Hagan 1995 Anderson 1998 House of Commons 1989b 1997 Department of Culture, Media and Sport, DCMS 2001 2008 6 18 1 2008 1 23 2