01朱柔若、吳柳嬌_多元對話：台灣婚姻暴力研究之檢討.doc

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "01朱柔若、吳柳嬌_多元對話：台灣婚姻暴力研究之檢討.doc"

市马
7 years ago
Views:

1 Gelles & Loseke , a 1992b 1993

2 a 1992b a 2000b actor 1998

3 b battered women syndrome, BWS Walker attachment level PTSD a 1992b a 1992b a 2001b PTSD PTSD Arrroyo & Eth a 1992b a 1992b

4 4 Dominant Paternalism Glick & Fiske 1996 / meta-analysis

6 6 motherhood parenthood discourse silencing self empower

7 7 Safilios-Rothschild

8 a 2000b a 2000b

9 crime fighter

10 Bell and Mosher marital rape Social Work Competence

11 11 empower Hirschi

12 12 Hagan & Simpson 1978 Rankin 1976 Wiatrowski et al a b

13 (2) a b (11) a b

14 a b Arroyo, W. & Eth, S. (1995). Assessment Following Violence-Witnessing Trauma. In E. Plede., P. G. Jaffe & J. Edleson (Eds.), Ending the Cycle of Violence: Community Response to Children of Battered Women. Calif.: Sage.

15 15 Barnett, O.W. & Miller - Perrin, C.L. & Perrin, R.D. (1997). Family Violence Across the Lifespan: An Introduction. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Bell, M. & Janet M. (1998). (Re) fashioning Medicine s Respone to Wife Abuse. In Sherwin, Susan (Ed.) The Politics of Women s Health. Philadelphia: Temple University. Blood, R. O., & Wolfe D. M (1960). Husbands and Wives: T he D ynamics of Married Living. New York: Free Press. Campbell, J. C. (1991). A Review of Nursing Research on Battering. In C.M. Sampselle (Ed.).Violence Against Women: Nursing Research, Education and Practice Issues. New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation. Dobash, R. E.,& Dobash, R. P. (Eds.) (1998). Rethinking Violence Against Women. London: Sage Publications. Gelles, R. J. & Loseke D. R. (Eds.) (1993). Current Controversies on Family Violence. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications. Glick, P., & S. Fiske (1996).The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3): Hagan, John & J. Simpson & A.R. Gillis (1978).The Sexual Stratification of Social Control: A Gender-Based Perspective on Crime and Deliquency. British Journal of Sociology, 30(1): Hirschi, T.(1969). Causes of Delinquency. The University of California Press. Hirschi, T.(1979).Separate and Unequal is Better. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 10: Hirschi, T. ( 1989). Exploring Alternatives to Integrated Theory. In Steven Messner, Marvin Krohn, and Allen Liska (Eds.), Theoretical Integration in the Study of Deviance and Crime. Albany: Suny Press. Rankin, J. (1976). Investigating the Interrelations Among Social Control Variables and Conformity. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 67: Safilios-Rothschild, Constantina (1969). amily Sociology or Wives Family Sociology? A Cross-Cultural Examination of Decision-Making. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 31: Safilios-Rothschild, Constantina (1970). The Study of Family Power Structure: A Review Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32(4): Safilios-Rothschild, Constantina (1976). A Macro- and Micro-Examination of Family Power and Love. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37 (May): Schmidt, J. D. & Sherman, L. W. (1993). Does Arrest Deter Domestic Violence? American Behavioral Scientist, 36(5): Walker, L. A.(1993).The Battered Woman Syndrome is a Psychological Consequence of Abuse. In R.J. Gelles & D.R.Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications. Wiatrowski, M. D. & Griswold, D. B. & Roberts M. K. (1981). Social Control Theory and Delinquency. American Sociological Review, 46: Yllo, K. A. & Straus M. A. (1990). Partiarchy and Violence Against Wives. In Murry A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptations to Violence in 8,145 Families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers

16 16 A Multi-dimensional Dialogue among Activism, Feminism, Sociology, and Social Work Practicum: An Examination of Research on Spousal Violence in Taiwan Jou -Juo Chu Department of Labor Relations, National Chung-Cheng University Liou -Chiao Wu Department of Child Care, Fooyin University Abstract There has been a relatively abundant amount of studies related to spousal violence in Taiwan. They can be divided into four categories which include perspectives from Activism, Feminism, soci ology, and social work practicum. In regard with perspectives of Activism, the factors and influence of domestic violence are discussed from the micro viewpoint of an actor. The studies of this category focus on the personalities of the perpetrators and victims as well as the mental and physical impact experienced after an assault. Studies adopting Feminist perspectives explore conflicts between a husband and wife as well as the influences from the struggle of gender and power in Feminist Social Constructivism. As for studies concerning sociological perspectives, they study the factors that influence conflicts between a husband and a wife based on social and cultural structures. From resource theory, the tangible and intangible resources that influence the patterns of dealing with a couple s conflicts are examined. In regards to social work practicum, prevention of domestic violence and a professional network staff s perceptions of the Anti-domestic Violence Law are discussed as well. In Taiwan, spousal violence, studied from different perspectives, reflects a multi-dimensional dialogue, which helps us understand our domestic violence very well. Lastly, based on the characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of Taiwan s research on domestic violence, this study suggests that further empirical research be conducted from the viewpoints of Social Control Theory, and Resource Theory-based Multiple Theory paradigms. And in order to discuss the authority structure of the family of origin of domestic violence, this study suggests that further research can integrate the concept of gender stratification of power control theory with social control theory. Reconstructing a social control theory model compare to resource theory model in order to localize our spousal violence theory. Key words: Spousal Violence; Activism, Feminism, Sociological perspective, Social Work Practicum

56

bianhm@swufe.edu.cn 1. 2. 55 56 5 12 1 2 3 5 12 5 12 5 12 2008 5 1143 11 183 949 57 empowerment Perkins & Zimmerman, 1995 (Pinderhuges, 1993) (Chesler, 1991; Gartner & Riessman, 1998; Mok, 2001;, 2005)