國家圖書館典藏電子全文

Similar documents
<4D F736F F D DA451A447A67EB0EAA5C1B0F2A5BBB1D0A87CA74BB8D5A44ABEC7B657C342A4F1A7C7A4BDA5ADA9CAA4A7BDD7AD7A2D2D ADD72E646F63>

<4D F736F F D20B0EABBDAA7D6BBBC A5FEA4E55FB6C0ABD8BA615F2E646F63>

语篇中指代词的分布规律与心理机制*

语篇中指代词的分布规律与心理机制*

59 1 MSLQ 2. MSLQ 2. 1 被 试 Kuhl 1987 Corno & Kanfer 1993 D rnyei % 111 commitment control strategies 37% 65 21% % metac

全文6-1陳文獻.doc

精要

untitled

作 主 动 追 求 知 识 获 取 技 能, 在 心 理 和 生 理 上 都 非 常 积 极 的 个 体 (Zimmerman & Pons, 1986) 在 此 期 间, 自 我 效 能 感 (self-efficacy) 自 我 控 制 (self-control) 自 我 管 理 (self-

behaviors) (Chen et al. 2008; Coyle -Shapiro 2002; Kickul and Lester 2001; Morrison and Robinson 1997; Robinson and Morrison 1995; Turnley et al. 2003

基層地政人員工作壓力與離職傾向關係之研究-以臺北縣地政事務所為例

在学术界和理论界,对于我们所划分出的十个社会阶层,以及对于当前社会是否存在社会阶层,部分学者和理论家们有不同的看法,我们认为这也是正常现象,要判断哪一种观点更具有说服力,需要用数据资料来加以验证

<4D F736F F D20BDD7A4E5B6B0A455A555A658A8D6AAA95FA477A752B0A3A5BCB56FAAEDA4E5B3B E30372E30355F2E646F63>

小組工作定義 (Lee, 1999)

B240C management managers 1 scientific management approach2 general administrative theorists approach 3 human resources approach 4 quantitative approa

fiscal decentralization local financial managerial capability 2

林宜旻博論第二章.doc

Microsoft Word - wck.doc

语篇中指代词的分布规律与心理机制*

Microsoft Word ±q¾Ôª§¹q¼v.doc

untitled

國立中山大學學位論文典藏

Demsetz(1982) Bain ( ) : 4 6?? ( 2005) 2004~ (2000) : ; 7 ; ;? (Lenway and Rehbein1991) ( ) ( ) ( 2006) ( 2002) Bain(1956)

二 文 獻 探 討 在 第 二 章 節 中, 本 研 究 擬 先 就 工 會 的 形 成 組 織 的 態 度 與 組 織 內 部 衝 突 原 因 以 及 勞 資 談 判 的 方 法 定 義 結 構 作 為 深 入 的 探 討 2.1 工 會 活 動 的 興 起 1987 年 7 月 15 日, 由

同性戀的起源:天生抑或後天

國立中山大學學位論文典藏.PDF


<4D F736F F D20B169A7B1B4402EB1E4B3C7A6702EB169B061B0B7>

說 等 目 前 可 以 看 到 的 是 政 府 擬 訂 了 推 動 計 畫 與 目 標, 也 有 發 展 的 技 術 條 件, 但 電 子 書 的 內 容 卻 非 常 匱 乏 數 位 出 版 產 業 發 展 策 略 與 行 動 計 畫 這 項 計 畫 目 標 是 五 年 內 提 供 十 萬 本 電

<4D F736F F D DAAECA5F4A965A5F4A448ADFBC0B3A8E3B3C6A4A7AFE0A44F2DAED1A657ADB62E444F43>

Microsoft Word - 146專題-12 陳振盛.李麗雲.doc

SPSS

Vol. 16 No Λ1 1 1) 2;3) 4) 5;6) 6) Λ

Promotion and reduction factors of competitive anxiety among basketball players Hisamitsu Tsuda competitive anxiety basketball structural equation mod

Microsoft Word - 马奇文集序言.docx

(238) product price place promotionmarketing mix 4 4P Wells and Prensky, 1996; 2003; 2006; Armstrong and Kotler, Boone and Kurtz2005Kotler an

EJCUS1002_04.doc

<4D F736F F D DBED4B2A4A9D2A9DBA5CDB8EAB054A7B9BEE3AAA92DB3D5A468AF5A2E646F63>

TOPCO崇越論文大賞暨學術研討會論文格式說明

2. 文 獻 探 討 2.1 大 眾 運 輸 之 特 性 大 眾 運 輸 有 兩 項 營 運 目 的 : 第 一 是 減 少 使 用 私 人 運 輸 工 具, 以 抒 解 交 通 壅 塞 的 現 象 ; 第 二 是 藉 此 達 到 所 得 重 分 配 的 效 果 [2] 根 據 Lovelock [

辽宁石油化工大学市场营销本科专业综合评价简况表

(250) * ** 2007 SPSS for Windows 12.0 Mass Rapid Transit; MRT Taiwan High Speed Rail; THSR * **

金 鹏 等 体 育 锻 炼 缓 解 公 务 员 心 理 压 力 相 关 量 表 的 编 制 及 常 模 的 建 立 89 此, 本 文 从 探 索 性 研 究 入 手, 对 体 育 锻 炼 缓 解 公 务 员 心 理 压 力 展 开 研 究, 尝 试 编 制 一 个 基 于 本 土 化, 具 有 良

关于2007年硕士研究生培养方案修订几点要求的说明

壹、研究動機與目的:

從實驗教材到官方課程──小學社會科板橋模式教材與改編本教科書的發展

B2烏魚子

Ansell Gash ~ ~ Rhodes ~ H. Haken 20 90

1-2

,:, ;,, [2 ],,,,,,,,,,, 2, 2. 1 (career growt h) [ 18 ], 2. 3, Bedeian [ 3 ], chay, Aryee [4 ],,,,,,, Adams [5 ] Ellstrom [6 ],, Choy Savery,,,,,,,, [

Hwang Yang Kipnis Wong 1996 Wong & Salaff 1998 Wank 1996 Bian

Microsoft Word - 1.doc

具有多个输入 特别是多个输出的 部门 或 单位 ( 称为 决策单元 Decision Making Unit 简称 DMU) 间的相对有效 8 性 C2R 模型是 DEA 的个模型 也是 DEA 的基础 和重要模型 假设有 n 个决策单元 DMUj( j = n) 每个 DMU 有 m

穨report.PDF

Microsoft Word - concept-culture.doc

政府再造的基本精神:小而美或小而能?

The Council of State Governments, Bryson, stratego stratos armyego leader Olsen Eadie what it is, what it

S.M.Shirokogorroff Robert Park Alfred R. Radcliffe-Brown LSE LSE Raymond Firth Bronislaw Malinowski

行政院人事行政局95年度各國人事制度資料委託蒐集編譯

中国科技论文在线中文稿件模板

中國的科學與中國的公民:大陸研究在台灣的困境\\

Experimental design: 實驗設計:

i

Microsoft Word ªÀ°Ïµo®i-¤º¤å_12¸¹¦r_

Jul Journal of Chinese Women's Studies No. 4 Ser. No. 148 * CFPS 2010 C A Where does the Ti

Microsoft Word - 10柯江林08-400_new_.doc

警察人員教考用合一制度之研究

Microsoft Word - 128空间关系学.doc

損 益 表 結 構 :( 表 內 數 字 為 範 例 ) 成 氏 企 業 損 益 表 ( 簡 易 ) 99 年 度 (99 年 1 月 1 日 至 12 月 31 日 ) 銷 貨 淨 額 $45,000 銷 貨 成 本 25,000 銷 貨 毛 利 $20,000 營 業 費 用 6,000 營 業

2010, spring, v12, n1

Problem Solving 1991Gagne Kahney1993 Mayer

227次双周:柯荣柱提要和全文.doc

第二章 影響中共與越南關係發展的主要原因

國立中山大學學位論文典藏

1

ming.PDF

國家圖書館典藏電子全文

~ ~

2

第一章

赤門マネジメント・レビュー 10(12),

( 五 ) 重 要 日 期 : 開 放 投 稿 日 :2016 年 1 月 11 日 ( 星 期 一 ) 起 投 稿 截 止 日 : 延 後 至 2016 年 4 月 11 日 ( 星 期 一 ) 下 午 5 時 止 論 文 全 文 審 查 結 果 公 告 日 :2016 年 4 月 22 日 (

Microsoft Word - 试评卡尼曼经济心理学研究及其影响.docx

标题

國立中山大學學位論文典藏.PDF

ÄÚ²¿½»Á÷

陈 金 龙, 等 : 人 组 织 匹 配 与 员 工 个 体 绩 效 关 系 的 实 证 研 究 观 匹 配 之 外, 我 们 也 将 关 注 要 求 能 力 匹 配 和 需 求 供 应 匹 配 对 个 体 绩 效 的 影 响, 特 别 是 要 从 组 织 承 诺 与 心 理 资 本 的 角 度 深

黃月圓.doc

政府再造的基本精神:小而美或小而能?

中国的家族制度与企业组织

political-legal Max Weber Essays in Sociology

1. principal Hoyt and Schwer1998 Sturdivant and Cocanougher1973 Allmon and Grant1990 voice Hunt and stress analysis Vitell1986 HV Sayre, Jo

1. 前 言 2012 年 2 月 3 號 凌 晨, 於 北 市 街 頭 發 生 計 程 車 司 機 被 歐 事 件, 警 方 據 報 循 線 找 到 一 名 日 籍 男 子 友 寄 隆 輝, 該 男 子 表 示 因 為 酒 醉 和 司 機 有 了 爭 執 且 語 言 不 通, 才 衝 動 傷 人,

目 录

( 2000) M ( 2004) ( 2004) (Sturgeon2002) 2. ( 2007) ; ; 97

1988 Demo & Acock 1988 Demo & Acock Richard & Cynthia % 1996 Feigelman

Welch & Bishop, [Kalman60] [Maybeck79] [Sorenson70] [Gelb74, Grewal93, Maybeck79, Lewis86, Brown92, Jacobs93] x R n x k = Ax k 1 + Bu k 1 + w

van Dijk representation 2-2


<4D F736F F F696E74202D20C8EDBCFEBCDCB9B9CAA6D1D0D0DEBDB2D7F92E707074>

Transcription:

Smith, Organ and Near(1983) Chattopadhyay (1999) Organ 1988 Konovsky and Pugh 1994 Moorman, Blakely and Niehoff 1998 (Perceived Organizational Support,POS) - 1 -

Burns and Stalker(1961) (Organic) (Mechanistic) (Input) - 2 -

- 3 -

1.1 1.1-4 -

Smith Organ and Near(1983) (Moorman,1991 ; Wayne,Shore & Liden,1997) Chattopadyay(1999) Katz(1964) 1. - 5 -

2. 3. Bateman and Organ(1983) (Citizenship Behaviors) Smith Organ and Near(1983) Organ(1988) (Organizational Citizenship Behaviors OCBs) Smith, Organ and Near(1983) Brief and Motowidlo(1986) (Prosocial Organizational - 6 -

Behaviors) Organ(1990) Graham(1991) (1992) (1996) (Bateman & Organ, 1983) (Schnake, 1990 ; Williams & Anderson, 1991) - 7 -

(O'Reilly & Chatman, 1986 ; Williams & Anderson, 1991 ; McNeely & Meglino, 1994) (1996) (1997) Moorman and Blakely(1995) Williams and Anderson (1991) 2.1-8 -

2.1 Bateman & Organ (1983) 1. 2. Smith, Organ & Near (1983) 1. 2. Williams & Anderson (1991) 3. 1. 2. Graham (1991) 3. 1. 1. 2. Moorman & Blakely (1995) 3. 1. 2. 3. Podsakoff,Mackenzie,Moorman & Fetter(1990) 4. 5. 1. 2. 3. Van Dyne, Graham & Dienesch(1994) 4. 5. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (1992) 1. (1997) - 9 -

( ) ( ) Williams and Anderson(1991) 1. 2. 3. 1. 2. 3. - 10 -

(Scholl, Cooper & Mckenna, 1987 ; Organ and Konovsky, 1989 ; William & Anderson, 1991) Equity Fairness Justice (Greenberg, 1990) Adams(1963 ; 1965) (Equity Theory) Adams 2.2 Adams - 11 -

2.2 Adams O/I A < O/I B O/I A = O/I B O/I A > O/I B ( O/I A O/I B ) Robbins, Stephen P.(1996), "Table 6-1 Equity Theory", Organizational Behavior, Prentice Hall International Inc.,7 th.,p.227 Adams(1965) (Walster, 1978 ; Greenberg, 1990 ; Robbins, 1996) 1. ( ) 2. ( ) 3. ( ) 4. ( ) 5. ( ) 6. ( ) Adams (Scholl, Cooper, & McKenna, 1987) - 12 -

Greenberg(1990) (1) (Distributive Justice) (2) (Procedural Justice) (3) (Interactional Justice) Adams(1963) Leventhal 1980 Formal Justice Thibaut and Walker 1975 Leventhal 1980 Bies and Moag 1986-13 -

Interactional Justice Folger and Greenberg 1985 Greenberg 1987 1. (Reactive-Proactive Dimension) 2. (Process-Content Dimension) 2.3 2.3 (Content) (Process) (Reactive) (Proactive) Equity theory, Adams, 1965 Justice judgment theory, Leventhal, 1976a,1980 Procedural justice theory, Thibaut & Walter,1975 Allocation preference theory, Leventhal, Karuza, & Fry,1980 Greenberg, J. 1987, A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 12, p.10-14 -

Folger and Greenberg 1985 Thibaut and Walker 1975 Procedural Justice Theory Tyler and Bies 1989 Greenberg 1990 Bies & Moag,1986 Sheppard, Lewicki,& Minton,1992 Alexander and Ruderman 1987 Moorman 1991-15 -

Mahoney,1982 Wallace and Fay 1988 Process Equity (1999) 2.4 2.4 1. 2. Greenberg 1987 1. 2. 1. 2. 3. 1. 2. Folger & Greenberg 1985 Greenberg 1990 3. Alexander & Ruderman 4. 1987 5. 6. (1999) - 16 -

Greenberg 1990 Greenberg(1990) 1. 2. - 17 -

2.5-18 -

2.5 March and Simon(l958) Chandler(1962) Katz and Kahn(1966) Thompson(1967) Kast and Rosenzweig(1970) Child(1972) Salaman(1974) Peter(1974) Pradid(1977) Miles(1980) (1981) Fink,Jenks,and Wllits(1983) Gerloff(1985) Robey(1986) Robbins(1990) 1. (1992) - 19 -

Burns and Stalker(1961) 2.6 2.6 (Continuum) - 20 -

- 21-1. (Simple Structure) (Flat Organization) 2. (Functional Structure)

3. (Divisonal Structure) 4. (Sector Structure) (Strategic Business Unit) 5. (Conglomerate Structure) 6. (Matrix Structure) 7. (Project Structure) 8. (Committee Structure) - 22 -

9. (Free-Form Structure) (Task Force) Committee Structure Max Weber (1947) 1960 Aston Pugh, Hickson, Hinings and Turner(1968) - 23 -

1. (Structuring of activity) 2. (Concentration of authority) 3. (Line control of work flow) 4. (Size of support component) Pugh et al(1968) (1987) (1993) (1994) (1996) (1996) Sathe(1978) (1992) 2.7 2.8-24 -

2.7 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Hall 1963 v v v v v Blau 1967 v v v v Lawerence & Lorsch 1967 v v v v Hage & 1967 v v v v Aiken Pugh et al 1968 v v v Harvey 1968 v v v v Hickson 1969 v v v Samuel & 1970 v v v v Mannhein Duncan 1971 v v v v Child 1972 v v Hall 1972 v v v v v Negandhi & Reiman 1972 v v v Pennings 1973 v v v Reimann 1973 v v v Child 1975 v Pennings 1975 v v Evers et al 1976 v v v v v Pierce & Delbeco 1977 v v v v v Ford & 1977 v v v v Slocum Ford 1979 v v v Tung 1979 v v Schoonhoven 1981 v v Blackburn 1982 v v v Fredrickson 1986 v v v Miller 1987a v v v 1992-25 -

2.8 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P 1969 v v v 1981 v v v v v v 1981 v v 1982 v v v 1984 v v v v v v 1984 v v v 1985 v v 1987 v v v 1987 v v v 1989 v v v 1989 v v v 1991 v v v 1991 v v v v v v 1992 v v v 1993 v v v 1993 v v v 1994 v v v 1996 v v v v 1996 v v v A (Centralization) B (Specialization) C (Formalization) D (Impersonality) E (Tech-Qualification) F (Complexity) G I (Diversity) J (Stratification) K (Differentiation) L (Decentralization) M (Span of Control) N (Coordination) O (Departmentation) HP Sathe(1978) (1992) - 26 -

2.7 2.8 ( 44 40 90.90%) ( 44 32 72.72%) (Centralization) (Formalization) 1. 2. - 27 -

Organ(1988) (Blau, 1964) (Adams, 1965) (Scholl, Cooper & Mckenna, 1987 ; Organ and Konovsky, 1989 ; William & Anderson, 1991) Scholl, Cooper and Mckenna(1987) 161 Organ and Konovsky(1989) 369-28 -

( ) ( ) Williams and Anderson(1991) 127 Konovsky and Pugh 1994 Moorman, Blakely and Niehoff 1998 (Perceived Organizational Support,POS) Konovsky and Pugh 1994 Moorman, Blakely, and Niehoff(1998) 405 (Perceived Organizational Support,POS) - 29 -

Niehoff and Moorman(1993) Smith, Organ and Near(1983) Generalized Compliance Burns and Stalker(1961) - 30 -

Burns and Stalker(1961) Greenberg(1990) - 31 -

Williams and Anderson(1991) - 32 -

1. 2. 3. 4. - 33 -

3.1 H1 H2 H3 3.1-34 -

Burns and Stalker(1961) Greenberg(1990) - 35 -

1-1 1-2 1-3 Williams and Anderson(1991) - 36 -

2-1 2-2 2-3 - 37 -

3-38 -

64 1-14 15-34 35-55 56-64 Sathe(1978) (1992) 1 (Centralization) (1994) (1994) 9 Likert 1-4 (1 ) (5 ) 5-9 (1 ) (5 ) 1-4 2 (Formalization) (1994) - 39 -

(1994) 10-14 5 Likert (1 ) (5 ) Greenberg(1990) 1 Distributive Justice Floger and Greenberg 1985 Niehoff and Moorman(1993) 15-19 5 Likert (1 ) (5 ) 2 Procedure Justice Greenberg(1990) Niehoff and Moorman(1993) 20-25 6 Likert - 40 -

(1 ) (5 3 Interactional Justice Bies and Moag 1986 Niehoff and Moorman(1993) 26-34 9 Likert (1 ) (5 ) Williams and Anderson(1991) ( ) ( ( ) 1 (In-role Behaviors) Williams and Anderson(l991) Williams and Anderson(l991) 35-41 6 Likert (1 ) (5 40,41 2 (Organizational Citizenship Behavior-Individual) - 41 -

Williams and Anderson(l991) Williams and Anderson (l991) 42-48 7 Likert (1 ) (5 ) 3 (Organizational Citizenship Behavior-Organization) Williams and Anderson(l991) Williams and Anderson(l991) 49-55 7 Likert (1 ) (5 ) 51-53 56-64 9-42 -

30 21 50 29 50 STATISTICA Crobach's α 3.1 3.1 Cronbach s ( ) Cronbach's α 1 9 (9) 0.807 10-14 (5) 0.878 15-19 (5) 0.807 20-25 (6) 0.868 26-34 (9) 0.942 35-41 (7) 0.841 42-48 (7) 0.897 49-55 (7) 0.566 Wortzel(1979) Cronbach's α 0.7 0.98 Nunally(1978) Cronbach's α 0.7 0.35 Cronbach's α ( 0.807-0.942) STATISTICA 55 Cronbach's α - 43 -

0.566 0.618 55 50 4 19 ( ) 660 405 61.36% 3.2 3.2 20 10 50% 1-10 50 31 62% 11-41 50 31 62% 42-72 30 21 70% 73-93 50 29 57% 94-122 202 150 99 66% 123-221 50 34 68% 222-255 10 6 60% 256-261 30 18 60% 262-279 10 5 50% 280-284 10 6 60% 285-290 30 16 53.33% 291-306 NATO( ) 20 10 50% 307-316 30 16 53.33% 317-332 10 5 50% 333-337 10 5 50% 338-342 30 15 50% 343-357 50 37 74% 358-394 20 11 55% 395-405 19 660 405 61.36% 405-44 -

56 64 3.3 3.4 3.3 136 33.58% 269 66.42% 20 11 2.72% 21-25 68 16.79% 26-30 140 34.79% 31-35 76 18.76% 41-45 33 8.15% 46-50 3 0.74% 56-60 3 0.74% 199 49.14% 206 50.86% 1 61 15.06% 1-3 86 21.23% 4-6 58 14.32% 7-9 59 14.57% 10-12 34 8.40% 13-15 30 7.41% 16-18 23 5.68% 19 54 13.33% 12 2.96% ( ) 105 25.93% 190 46.91% 77 19.01% 21 5.19% - 45 -

3.4 209 51.60% 42 10.37% 49 12.10% 35 8.64% 11 2.72% 59 14.57% 172 42.47% 64 15.80% 63 15.56% 9 2.22% 5 1.24% 17 4.20% 2 0.49% 31 7.65% 38 9.38% 4 0.99% 3 35 8.64% 4-6 102 25.19% 7-9 71 17.53% 10-12 39 9.63% 13-15 12 2.96% 16-18 11 2.72% 19-21 9 2.22% 22-24 11 2.72% 25-27 2 0.49% 28 113 27.90% 10 22 5.43% 11-20 14 3.46% 21-40 67 16.54% 41-60 77 19.01% 61-80 19 4.69% 81-100 5 1.24% 101-150 2 0.49% 151-200 2 0.49% 201-300 60 14.82% 301 137 33.83% - 46 -

Trustworthiness Consistency Stability Cronbach s STATISTICA Cronbach s 3.5 3.5 Cronbach s ( ) Cronbach's α 1 9 (9) 0.821 10-14 (5) 0.846 15-19 (5) 0.876 20-25 (6) 0.848 26-34 (9) 0.950 35-41 (7) 0.839 42-48 (7) 0.903 49-54 (6) 0.672 3.1 3.5 Cronbach s Cronbach s - 47 -

0.942 0.950 Content Validity (Linear Structural Relationship Model LISREL) Confirmatory Factor Analysis Goodness of Fit 3.6 3.6 CFI GFI AGFI 0.933 0.95 0.93 0.86 0.866 0.901 0.96 0.94 0.90 0.878 0.933 0.897 0.96 0.95 0.91 0.842 0.692-48 -

3.6 Comparative Fit Index CFI 0.95 0.96 Goodness of Fit Index GFI 0.93 0.95 Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index AGFI 0.86 0.91 Composite Reliability CR 3.1 3.5 Cronbach s 3.5 3.6-49 -

(Correlation Analysis) (Factor Analysis) (MANOVA) (LISREL) 4.1 4.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 -- 3.35 4.6 1.45.61 -.49.50* -- 5.7.98.93 -.17.53*.73* -- 2.02 1.52 -.19.22*.16*.26* -- 2.43 1.66.12*.20*.25*.52* -- 1.59 -.09 -.03 -.03.35*.42* -- 1. 2. * (p<0.05) 3. 1 4.1-50 -

(Factor Score) (164 ) (241 ) T -1.018 0.693 t-value -31.153* p=0.001<0.05 4.2 4.2 T T-value P-level -1.018 0.693-31.153* 0.05-51 -

(MANOVA) T 4.3 4.3 P Wilks p-level 9.817 8.162 0.05 0.899* 0.05 10.061 9.033 0.05 13.951 12.344 0.05 1. * P 0.05(P<0.05) 2. 4.3 Wilks Lambda 0.899* p-level 0.001 0.05 T 1-1 1-3 1-2 - 52 -

(MANOVA) T 4.4 4.4 Wilks p-level P 15.274 15.261.958.960* 0.05 11.305 11.141.397 10.945 11.580 0.05 1. * P 0.05(P<0.05) 2. 4.4 Wilks Lambda 0.960* p-level 0.001 0.05 T 2-1 2-2 2-3 - 53 -

LISREL (Maximum Likelihood) (CFI) 0.90 (GFI) 0.87 (AGFI) 0.82 (Root Mean Square Residual ; RMR) 0.07 4.1 4.2 4.5 ( - ) ( - )* ( - )* ( - )* (+)* (+)* (+)* ( - )* ( - ) 4.1 : 1.. 2. : - 54 -

(+)* (+) ( - ) (+) (+) (+) (+) ( - ) ( - ) : 1. 4.2. 2. : 4.5 LISREL -0.08(-0.93) 0.15(2.35)* -0.20(-2.68)* 0.06(1.04) -0.10(-1.15) -0.02(-0.82) -0.84(-4.23)* -0.09(-0.82) -0.73(-3.90)* 0.03(0.32) -0.78(-3.25)* -0.05(-0.96) 1.33(4.99)* 0.20(1.80) 1.28(4.75)* 0.10(0.98) 1.07(3.36)* 0.03(0.76) 1. 2. * t 1.96 =0.05 3. (estimates) t-value 4.5-55 -

3-56 -

(MANOVA) (Scheffe Test) 4.6 4.6 F p-level F p-level F p-level 0.461 0.516 0.517 5.907 0.016* 2.293 0.131 0.511 0.484 0.487 1.921 0.167 20 0.535 0.476 0.706 21-25 0.462 0.562 0.546 26-30 0.514 0.489 0.511 31-35 0.527 0.521 0.477 1.554 0.137 2.242 0.024* 41-45 0.462 0.448 0.461 4.955 0.001* 46-50 0.457 0.425 0.410 51-55 0.439 0.443 0.356 56-60 0.685 0.602 0.655 0.493 0.507 0.527 0.017 0.898 1.333 0.249 0.496 0.483 0.469 8.103 0.005* 1 0.483 0.533 0.526 1-3 0.484 0.541 0.508 4-6 0.517 0.542 0.522 7-9 0.509 0.444 0.509 1.433 0.190 3.001 0.004* 10-12 0.538 0.478 0.492 1.870 0.073 13-15 0.453 0.456 0.524 16-18 0.567 0.421 0.452 19 0.452 0.445 0.414 0.557 0.512 0.477 ( ) 0.476 0.450 0.463 0.490 0.846 0.496 0.491 3.087 0.016* 0.524 1.820 0.124 0.516 0.556 0.476 0.520 0.511 0.518-57 -

4.6 F p-level F p-level F p-level 0.476 0.467 0.520 0.578 0.561 0.498 0.536 0.482 0.451 2.456 0.033* 2.692 0.021* 0.468 0.535 0.401 2.989 0.012* 0.486 0.448 0.438 0.485 0.541 0.525 0.494 0.446 0.501 0.460 0.503 0.517 0.528 0.527 0.476 0.476 0.547 0.450 0.455 0.540 0.299 0.528 0.854 2.654 0.005* 0.523 0.548 0.634 1.813 0.064 0.590 0.288 0.363 0.494 0.569 0.478 0.492 0.539 0.476 0.508 0.648 0.571 4.6 1. 0.511 0.461-58 -

2. 20 51-55 (Scheffe Test) 56-60 0.602 46-50 0.425 20 51-55 20 51-55 20 51-55 51-55 3. 0.527 0.469-59 -

4. 6 0.53 7 0.48 6 5. ( ) ( ) 6. 0.578 0.468-60 -

0.525 0.401 0.561 0.448 7. 0.648 0.288 ( ) ( ) - 61 -

5.1-62 -

5.1 1-1 1-2 1-3 2-1 2-2 2-3 3-63 -

- 64 -

(Continuum) - 65 -

1., 81, 2. 85,, 13, 3, 391-415, 85 3. 83 4. 83 5. 83 ( ) 6. 81 7. 82 8. 85 76 ( ) - 66 -

10. 88 11. 86 12. ( 80 ) 157-182 1. Adams, J.S. 1963, Wage Inequity, Productivity, and Work Quality., Industrial Relations, Vol. 3, pp. 9-16 2. Adams, J.S. 1965, Inequity in Social Exchange., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2, pp. 267-299, New York Academic Press 3. Alexander, S. & Ruderman, M. 1987, The Role of Procedural Justice and Distributive Justice in Organizational Behavior., Social Justice Research, Vol. 1, pp.197-204 4. Bateman, T.S. & Organ, D.W. 1983, Job Satisfaction and Good Soldier The Relationship between Affect and Employee Citizenship, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 587-595 5. Bies, R.J. & Moag,J.S. 1986, Interactional Justice - 67 -

Communication Criteria of Fairness., Research on Negotiation in Organizations, Vol. 1, pp. 43-55 6. Blau, P. 1964, Exchange and Power in Social Life, New York Wiley 7. Blau, G. 1986, Job Involvement and Organizational Commitment as Interactive Predictors of tardiness and Absenteeism, Journal of Management, Vol.12, pp.240-257 8. Brief, A. P. Motowidlo, S. J. 1986, Prosocial Organizational Behaviors., Academy of Management Journal, Vol.11, pp. 710-715 9. Burns, Tom & Stalker, G. M. (1961), The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock,pp.119-125 10. Chattopadhyay,Prithviraj(1999), Beyond direct and symmetrical effects the influence of demographic dissimilarity on organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42, pp. 273-287. 11. Chandler, A. D. (1962), Strategy and Structure, Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise, Cambridge, Mass :MIT Press. 12. Child, J. (1972), Organization Structure and Strategies of Control: A Replication of the Aston Study., Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 17, pp.163-177 13. Farh, J., Podsakoff, P. M. & Organ, D.W.(1990), Accounting for organizational citizenship behavior: Leader fairness and task scope - 68 -

versus satisfaction., Journal of Management, Vol.16, pp.705-722 14. Folger, R. Greenberg, J (1985), An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. In K. Rowland & G. Ferris(Eds), Research in personnel and human resources management, Vol.3, pp.141-183. Greenwich, CT:JAI Press. 15. Folger, R. Konovsky, M.A. 1989, Effects of Procedural Justice and Distributive on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.32, pp.115-130 16. Ford, J. & Slocum, J. (1977), Size, Technology, Environment, and the Structure of Organization Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, pp. 561-575 17. Graham, J. W. 1991, A Essay on Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Employee Responsibilities of Rights Journal, Vol. 4, pp.249-270 18. Greenberg, J. 1987, A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 12, pp.9-22 19. Greenberg, J. 1990, Organizational Justice Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow., Journal of Management, Vol. 16, pp.399-432 20. Hall, R. H. (1977), Organization: Structure and Process 2d ed.(englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall) 21. Katz, D. 1964, The Motivational Basis of Organizational Behavior. Behavioral Science, Vol.9, pp. 131-133 22. Katz Kahn 1966, The Social Psychology of Organizations., New - 69 -

York Wiley 23. Konovsky, Mary A. & Pugh, S. Douglas 1994, Citizenship Behavior and Social Exchange, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37, pp. 656-669 24. Lawerence, Paul R. & Lorsch, Jay (1967), Organization and environment,boston: Division of research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University Press. 25. Liden, R. C., and Graen, G. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 23, pp. 451-465. 26. Leventhal,G.S. 1980, What Should be Done with Equity Theory New Approaches to the Study of Fairness in Social Relationships., Social Exchange Advances in Theory and Research, New York Plenum 27. Mahoney, T. A. 1982, Compensation Functions., Human Resources Management-Perspectives and Issues., Baston Allyn and Bacon, Vol.23, pp.202-211 28. Max Weber (1947), The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, The Free Press,Glincoe.I11 29. McNeely,B. L., & Meglino, B. M(1994). The role of dispositional and situational antecedents in prosocial organizational behavior: An examination of the intended beneficiaries of prosocial behavior., Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 79, pp. 836-844 - 70 -

30. March, J. G. & Simon, H. A. 1958, Organization. New York Wiley 31. Miles, R. M.(1980),Macro-Organizational Behavior, Scott Foresmon and Company. p.18 32. Moorman, R. H. and Blakely, G. L. (1995). Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of organizational behavior, vol.16, pp.127-142. 33. Moorman, R. H., Blakely, G. L., and Niehoff, B. P. (1998). Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and organizational citizenship behavior? Academy of Management Journal, vol. 41, 351-357. 34. Moorman, Robert H. 1991, Relationship between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 76, pp. 845-855 35. Niehoff, B. P., and Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the citizenship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36, pp. 527-556. 36. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2 nd edition). New York: MacGraw-Hill. 37. Organ, D.W. 1977, A Reappraisal and Reinterpretation of the Satisfaction-Causes-Performance Hypothesis., Academy of Management Review, Vol. 2, pp.46-53 - 71 -

38. Organ, D.W. 1988, Organizational Citizenship Behavior The Good Soldier Syndrome., Lexington,MA Lexington Books. 39. Organ, D. W., and Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 74, pp. 157-164. 40. Organ, D.W. 1990, The Motivational Basis of Organizational Citizenship Behavior., In B. M. Staw & L.L. Cummings Eds., Research in Organizational Behavior., Greenwich, CT JAI Press. Vol. 12, pp.43-72 41. O Reilly, C. A., III, and Chatman, J. (1986) Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 3, pp. 492-499. 42. Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B. M, Moorman, R.H. & Fetter, R. 1990, Transformational Leader Behaviors and Their Effects of Followers Trust in Leader, Satisfaction, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 1, pp.107-142 43. Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., & Turner, C. (1968), Dimensions of Organizational Structure Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 13, pp. 65-105 44. Robbins, Stephen P. 1990, Organization Theory : Structure, Design, and Applications,N J.: Prentice-Hall,Inc.,p.176 45. Robbins, Stephen P. 1996, Equity Theory, Organizational - 72 -

Behavior, Prentice Hall International Inc., 7th., pp.332-336 46. Robinowitz, S. & Hall, D. 1977, Organizational Research on Job Involvement., Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 84, pp.265-288 47. Robinson, S. L. 1996, Trust and Breach of the Psychological Contract, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 41, pp.574-599 48. Sathe, V.(1978), Institutional Versus Questionaire Measurement of Organizational Structure, Academy of Management Review, pp.227-238 49. Schnake, M. 1990, Organizational Citizenship A Review,Proposed Model,and Research Agenda, Human Relations, Vol. 44, pp. 735-759 50. Scholl, R.W., Cooper, E.A. & McKenna, J.F. 1987, Referent Selection in Determining Equity Perceptions Differential Effects on Behavioral and Attitudinal Outcomes., Personnel Psychology, Vol. 40, pp. 113-124 51. Sheppard, B. H., Lewicki, R.J. & Minton,J.W. 1992, Organizational Justice The Search for Fairness in the Workplace., New York Lexington Books. 52. Smith, C. A., Organ, D.W. Near, J.P. 1983, Organizational Citizenship Behavior Its Nature and Antecedents., Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.68, pp. 653-663 53. Taibaut, J. & Walker, L. 1975, Procedural Justice A Psychological Analysis, Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates - 73 -

54. Tyler, T.R. & Bies, R.J. 1989, Beyond Formal Procedures The Interpersonal Context of Procedural Justice., In J. Carroll Eds., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Business Setting, pp.77-98 55. Van de Van, A. H. & Delbecq, A. I.(1970), A task Contingent Model of Work-Unit Structure, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 19, pp.383-395 56. Van Dyne, L., Graham, J., and Dienesch, R. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37, pp.765-802. 57. Wallce,M.J. & Fay,C.H. 1988, Compensation Theory and Practice., Baston PWS-KENT 58. Walster, E. & Berscheid, E. 1973 New Directions in Equity Research., Journal Of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 25, pp.151-176 59. Walster, E. & Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. 1978, Equity: theory and research, Boston: Allyn & Bacon. 60. Wayne, S., Shore, L., & Liden, R.(1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange A social exchange perspective.. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40, pp. 82-111. 61. Williams, L. J., and Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, Vol.17, pp. 601-617. - 74 -

62. Wortzel, R., (1979). New life style determinants of women s food shopping behavior. Journal of Marketing, Vol.43, pp.28-29. - 75 -

(02)22256963 0922-435397 97 29!........... - 76 -

10. 11. 12. 13. 14.! 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29.. 30.... - 77 -

31.... 32. 33.... 34.! 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. - 78 -

56. 57. 20 21 25 26 30 31 35 36 40 41 45 45 50 51 55 56 60 61 58. 59. 1 1 3 3 6 6 9 9 12 12 15 15 18 19 ( ) 60. 61. ( ) 62. ( ) 63. 3 4 6 7 9 10 12 13 15 16 18 19 21 22 24 25 27 28 64. ( ) 10 11 20 21 40 41 60 61 80 81 100 101 150 151 200 201 300 301-79 -