* - - 100872 D815 A 1006-9550 2012 03-0004 - 16 * 10JJDGJW018 4
2012 3 1 10% 2 1 2 20 2007 2004 5
1988 2008 1-2011 1 2001 2003 2001 6
2012 3 20 Vikings - military /political power - 1 / / / 1-2011 - 2011 5 40-57 7
- 1 27 1 /3 20% 2 1 2 176 1997 1964 2011 8
2012 3 industrial /market power 80% 1 /3 1 /5 15% 1 2005 2 1-2011 - 2011 5 41-42 2 2011 5 58-72 9
civilian power civilian power military power civilian civil society civil society 10
2012 3 civilian power GDP 20 20 civilizing power 1 1 civilian power civilizing power 178-181 11
normative power Joseph S. Nye smart power 12
2012 3 1 gentle power 2 conceptual power Jean Bodin 1 2 177 13
sovereignty 1 Rome Club 20 60 90 2 3 4 Susan Strange 1 5 Barry Buzan 2 Johan Galtung 3 Copenhagen School 1 2 3 2006 2003 2010 14
2012 3 Nodic Pattern 6 1 7 Oslo Process 8 SIPRI - development - security nexus 9 20 70 10 Edward Carr Raymond Aron 1 13 2011 5 15
regional power 1 1 2008 634-672 16
2012 3 Mario Telo - 1 1 180 17
1-1 2010 17 18
2012 3-21 21 2012-01 -15 2012-02 -13 19
World Economics and Politics No. 3 2012 Abstracts European Intervention A Multi - perspective Analysis Wang Yizhou 4 Abstract Europe and the U. S. are the main sources of international intervention and mediation by leading powers. However compared with the U. S. intervention European ones are more complex with multiple elements and processes cultivated by European history and realities. Focusing on contemporary international relations and global trends the author tries to analyze the causes of European intervention from six perspectives 1 military /political tradition 2 industrial /market profits 3 civilian process 4 international norm promotion 5 conceptual power and 6 regional integration model. The author argued that these six factors are mutually dependent and functioned in different fields but they must be viewed comprehensively when talking about the term European intervention. Key Words military /political power industrial /market strength civilian process international norm promotion conceptual power regional integration. Author Wang Yizhou Professor School of International Studies SIS Peking university Senior Research Fellow in Centre for European Studies of China Renmin University. On the relationship between Shanghai Cooperation Organization and Eurasian Economic Community Wang Shuchun Wan Qingsong 20 Abstract This paper explores the relationship between the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and Eurasian Economic Community. It argues that the overlap of most members of the two organizations the crossing of the large geographical area and the partial overlap of the functions lead to some degree of competition. Nevertheless the two organizations show a certain degree of willingness to cooperate and started the process of cooperation. Such cooperative relationship depends on the cooperation of two leading nations the pressure posed by the United States on China and Russia and the common task the two organizations face in achieving regional economic integration. Therefore the relationship between the two or- 156