202 9 2 6 3 4 8 5 3 6 7 2 3 4 5 6 7 200 8 2007 2008 3 2008 2007 5 2006 6 200 6 6

202 9 D6 D63 A 0257-5833 202 09-005- 36005 20 90 5 202-03-07 200 5

202 9 2 6 3 4 8 5 3 6 7 2 3 4 5 6 7 200 8 2007 2008 3 2008 2007 5 2006 6 200 6 6

202 9. 2 G. P. 3 2. 2 3 W. 200 78 C. 2008 5 2007 9 7

202 9 5 37 83 5 35 Karen M. Hult Charles Walcott. Governing Public Organization. Pacific Grove Calif. Brooks /Cole Publishing Company 990. 8

202 9 MPA MPA MPA 600 500 487 487 45. 6% 54. 2% 0 85. 6% 23. 4% 42. 5% 30. 8% 3. % % 222 45. 6 264 54. 2 0. 2 5 247 50. 7 6 0 70 34. 9 20 63 2. 9 2 30 3 0. 6 4 0. 8 4 23. 4 207 42. 5 50 30. 8 5 3. 0. 2 88 8. 6 2. 5 24 25. 5 45 9. 2 42 8. 6 55. 3 30 6. 2 42 8. 6 9

202 9 64. 7% 24%. 3% MPA. 20 40 60 20 90 2 2. 4% 2. 4% 28. % 28. %. 3%. 3% 25. 9% 25. 9% 6. 8% 83. 2% 60. 4% 88. 5% 5. 7% 63% 62% 87. 9% 6. 2% 99. 4% 0. 9% 99. 4% 35. 6% 98. 6%. 9% 99. 8% 0. 6% 00% 0. 6% 00%. 4% 00% 0. 2% 00% 2 8 99. 4% 99. 8% 99. 4% 98. 6% H. 2005 4 20

202 9 2. 3 3. % 3. % 8. 9% 8. 9% 22. 8% 22. 8% 3. % 3. % 60. 3% 9. 4% 55. 8% 74. 7% 52. 7% 75. 5% 56. 2% 87. 3% 8% 99. 4% 25. % 99. 8% 2. 4% 96. 9% 2. % 99. 4% 0. 6% 00% 0. 2% 00% 3. % 00% 0. 6% 00% 3 9. 4% 74. 7% 75. 5% 87. 3% 3. 2 2 2008 48 I. 2007 57 2

202 9 2 4 3. 9% 3. 9% 32. 3% 32. 3% 3. 8% 3. 8% 28. 6% 28. 6% 20% 20% 55. 3% 87. 2% 47. 5% 79. 8% 6. % 74. 9% 58. 2% 86. 8% 52. 9% 72. 9%. 8% 99. 0% 9. 6% 99. 4% 23. 9% 98. 8% 3% 99. 8% 26. 5% 99. 4% % 00% 0. 6% 00%. 2% 00% 0. 2% 00% 0. 6% 00% 4 99% 99. 4% 98. 8% - 99. 8% 99. 4% SPSS 75. 5% 4. 5 77. 2% 73% 2 2005 95 2007 93 22

202 9 5 26. 9% 26. 9% 5. 7% 5. 7% 50. 3% 77. 2% 57. 3% 73. 0% 9. 9% 97. % 24. 5% 97. 5% 2. 9% 00% 2. 5% 00% 5. 20 5 6. 609. 82. 268. 607. 67. 245. 574. 63. 220. 259. 509. 297. 70. 46. 47. 404. 427. 69. 5. 580. 249. 22. 550. 272. 536. 38. 20. 4. 23. 99. 554. 02. 470. 205. 9. 423. 55. 309. 225. 400 -. 27 -. 29 -. 696 -. 65 -. 47 SPSS KMO Kaiser - Meyer - Olkin measure of sampling adequacy 0. 878 Bartlett 0. 000 0. 05 6 6 6 23

202 9 24 2007 2 20

202 9 Construction of Institution and Organizational Behavior: Analysis of Affect Factor on Non - leadership Public Servant Perform ance Assessm ent Li Xue Abstract: As a management instrument, performance assessment can improve the effectiveness of public organization, which is very important to construct the modern public servant institution. The current public servant law confirms the public servant performance assessment regulations, which lays the preliminary foundation for it. On the contrary, the effectiveness of its institution is still an open question. This research program employs the questionnaire as major research method, based on the factor analysis as quantitative analysis, analyzes all kinds of non - leadership public servant performance factor from empirical perspective. The research found the performance assessment index subjective, the unfairness of progress, the political behavior in organization, which all have significant impacts on performance assessment s satisfactory of performance assessment. This research program can help construct reasonable and fairly public servant performance assessment institution, which also can do some favor on how to make reasonable research on public organization performance. Keywords: Organizational Behavior; Institution; Performance Assessment; Public Servant; Factor Analysis 25