東吳大學 - PDF 免费下载

律律論論療行 The Study on Medical Practice and Coercion 林年

律律論論療行 The Study on Medical Practice and Coercion 林年 i

讀臨療留館讀臨律六礪讀不冷療臨年裡歷練禮更老林了更臨不吝麗老劉老論諸見了年金歷了年來勵蘭女歷福 ii

年易例療行類療行行落理度行療行行理便利年行理不年療療行療行療度療行療復行療行療行療行說理療不列療不立行療行行聯不療行療行療 iii

Abstract The Taiwan High Court s criminal judgment No. 96-Shangyi-2020 is the first case where a doctor proactively rescued the patient but was prosecuted for coercion. The main objective of this paper is to discuss the definition and types of medical practice. After all, medical practice is performed on the bodies of the patients, from which the jurisprudence of informed consent is derived accordingly. This paper would like to answer what degree of informed consent fault or violation would be considered as committing the crime of coercion. This paper holds that the current definition of medical practice is defined only for administrative convenience, and the 1992 Administrative Interpretation is insufficient in this kind of cases. Moreover, with improvement in medical technology over the last two decades, medical practice has become more complicated and varied. The medical practice should be defined clearly in the Medical Care Act and modified appropriately as follows: Medical practice shall be referred to the collective act of a doctor, based on medical guidelines, to perform invasive and inherently risky examination, diagnosis, prevention, treatment and management, with the goal of patient s health recovery, on a patient who is suffering from disease, injury, or deformity. Medical practice is to improve the health of the patients. It would be appropriate to adopt the theory of non-maleficence when assessing such conduct in the Criminal Code. The jurisprudence of informed consent is to protect patients autonomy, not to prevent the patients from being harmed. Therefore, informed consent shall be listed as one part of the medical guidelines but not an independent justification (Rechtfertigungsgrund) against offenses, so as to prevent any improper interpretation of the due course provided in Article 22 of the Criminal iv

Code. When the performance of medical practice may possibly be considered as committing the crime of coercion due to the fault or violation of informed consent, we should use relevant provisions as the German law into consideration before making a determination on the illegality of the relationship between the mean and purpose, in order to exclude conducts which conform to the provision but having justification. Keywords medical practice, patients autonomy, informed consent, medical guidelines, coercion v

錄論... 1... 1... 1... 2... 4 療行... 5 療行... 5 療行類... 11 療行... 14 療行律... 19 療行... 22 療行說... 23 療行... 28 療行... 31 療行... 40... 41 念... 43 行利行... 44 行聯... 47... 48 療行例... 52 例... 53... 56 論... 59 論... 59... 60... 61 參... 63 vi

論年來療量療療更來療療療療律更療年隆行療殺年易例例療切療行臨年律律讀臨療療行不了療行類律行療行 1

例療療行不立療行見療行切療行連論理療行例論療力不療力不行療行療行行療理行年療行療療療行療行年來療行了行不療行不療類行療行療行論不 2

行不療行說說不論療行說療行療行兩論療行行了理臨識不力狀立療契行力力不數見諾理力力療行論量療行度來利論列論療療不行療例行行切不不復療不行療行更降不療行立暴行不不行聯立 3

不不行療行年不療療念年易例療行行狀 4

療行療行老年率降率降不療不論年來立立理來行療路露療療不療行療療行療行理量行年療療療行年年更兩療行療行行療療療 5

行療行歷年來見療行療行行兩療行不不理量見理療行行狀例例論療行療領離療參療行數療行療行療療行療行行行論療療行療不療率療療度降度例行雷來切度了臨累臨年年論律療行年療行令年行不見不見都行療狀 6

拉雷行行療行療行不療不列療行療療行若療識療療行復理療類行療行療類療療療行療行來復識療行療療行行療行例行類療類行律不不行療行行行理不列療行行療行療行令行律療行不行論療行律年論療行例年 7

略律不行療行療行了行理行療行不療行行療行數年來療療行切缝力刺療療行行年行年祥療立館年 8

刺尿雷復刺理刺療刺拉雷刺療隆金度療療療療療歷療行若療行不列療理行療行 9

療行量療行療療行行行療行療療行狀行療行流行療行不療行刺洞刺行老力力車罹刺例不理療行行理理不便理不理行不療行例復識 10

復不療理不易不見療行療行念行律不不療行理狀量離療漏療行療類行不療行療行療復行療行療行類療行不切不讀量療行理不易行量療行療臨療行療行療療理論行療療行見療行類療行療行療行療論理 11

療行例行狀年療行療行刺切來療行不療行不療行例復類度切類療行行療行力流兩例不立行立行療行兩療行理量行療行療療療行類療行療療行年理論立年 12

療療行療行療療行復療來療行療療行不復例療療療流卵卵類療論行復不療行若療惡例量數度異落療行療行不類不列療行類療療類行量參見行流行療行不療年臨若度度度若惡類易糖尿狀 13

行療來類不療行療不臨療行療行不療療療行療療行論療行療行行練離兩年裡理老狀便林類列理識了狀路冷切類年理理理臨見見臨理復年練更異年練例兩年年 14

泌女不女泌尿練年練療行行參療練療行切練力倫理六 1. 行 2. 3. 療 4. 不不 5. 6. 15

療量理療療行念類歷行類倫理律念數律倫理度療行療行律讀療行不見療行說說了不念療行復療行理行理切行不利療行療行療行行諾諾不說見療行說說不療療論說年 16

行理行了來更不療行利不論不不行療療療行不療量不數說見療行說療行來說不論療行列療不量倫理行律類殺行林療諾年林論年論療力律論年亮行復年不率率說數都都率更肋都都說行來說不律不林例車行理論都 17

療行理行療行行律不切律行律倫理度令不療不療療不力療度淪立療行狀年不理歷療行念療理療行行行度療行了復狀例糖尿狀便逸療行行年例行更 18

療數療類率狀療理不律療行律不理論力力療療行不行不論行不療不療療行論行不行療行律療了倫裡量力療行律論療裡倫理不律念量療療來說療療療行療行令年 19

說療臨療療理見療臨療理療行療療療療行療臨療療倫理療行療倫理列行不六療行倫理雷律了療行倫理若塞律裡漏不不力立療不更類不療行療不療行諾狀療律論療行年 20

論論療不律念行不律念見不說說說更度療行立利不律不力不不療療行不不療論麗療例年 21

療行論倫理療律療行理尿宅說行便論不殺說類兩狀更療行年來年識了療行論說療行論了了理論倫理律療行了了量利不不行療行說律療利不療利療兩不說論論年李年說年療說理律年 22

說療行說療療理說率療療理說不療理療不良療不良療行療行類例說了切說說例說行療療說理年林 23

說療不療說療復率療說理療行行不不療行說不說度療不說不來說不說理說理說療行理類理說理說狀說理參見年參見年年倫理律理論落年 24

說說說理說數理說了不度冷度療行說不見不見利不療不療理說說理療療行說療不讀療行行落說說說不療說了理不理念說年療說年論年論年 25

說理說說參臨療療率不率兩狀度不療不療更度更理連不不療療行療力異狀若率狀了不不率了不若率不不不說療行量說療療不說不說例不療論說年參見年度切療療行見不不療療行見林 26

立療不療立療不理利例療不利療量留療例了殺度療見不說不療行療行了不療說念療見例車來不路狀不都說說復不 27

療行療療行說了療行說療行立行識療切療療行療不說療療行來來理律度度說度律行諾療行路不立了良論立狀療律淪洞易療更不療行倫理不療行參力來不論療行行論年說年 28

不立來療不療利量療行行來說度律度論不不療裡諾量不行療療行理說諾不諾數說論諾諾數說見諾來說力療療若年理說不行力識力識力行力識力力例年若行力識力療行不療林療例說年林 29

行力療行識力說療療行療行諾療療便說律諾率例療行說理不例行療行律例類類行離療類狀例路不狀不來說說來年類類亂拉類流行流行痢痢類癩淋流行類行類行類類類 30

若令療行不利療行療倫理療行療療行行說行行不不行念說說說了行療理類行諾療行不行行諾理行令療行了療療行療療行倫理理論行契說說行療說說行不療行療行療 31

行說療行來說療不若說療惡說不來臨療臨行例理理理見不諾療臨行力年留不說療年行力例理說說療例療理例參見年度年年度行 32

療療行理理臨見不狀理療理狀奈若療療行立理臨見見識狀行療行復說類寧例若理類見量臨論年 33

行不行療行見見不理行理理立不了療療利理療離利理濫量力不立行行療行歷更不路來療車路量度利度療療行類療療行類療量療年林療年 34

療行論諾諾諾律利行療行憐療聯說不療行狀見狀不數說理說說療行行論療行若論理療行神不見療論狀不見不不不戀識量離來更不數了都切不不了說不狀療行 35

療行說不理度諾療行諾療行不行諾諾不例不度療不良療離療行良諾了臨行行論兩暴療行了了不來不樂見參見年不不療行療林 36

說諾不諾不療行諾暴了行行療行度論療見切來切例量切例切不療行離論療若療異療行不論若療療行論 37

說療行行療行療行說療行療行說療行說療行療行療行了行行行不度不狀了療不論殺不療行論療行不良療行利行行療律說律論年療諾年療行行年利療行金行療療行療行不 38

療量療度不理行不理療行不不不療不滑落療療不利倫理說不易不易易例量來律更不律度療利不療浪療論麗療律年說年 39

療行療行不良療度行不樂見來行行行行療力療領療行不良行立療立行行不論療療流不療行連論倫理律理療行不良聯逸履行療履行療識年療年年盧年 40

療療行論兩狀療行行率療行行療切兩狀論不論論暴療行度論療行若療暴行行利年金行行類立更類若林論年 41

立理行來臨來力力不說不暴行行行利不行行利不暴惡理力量來惡理暴行行利暴行度行不若暴狀理理暴論論年林論年 42

念類論車車行行不行暴暴力念不暴例暴度更暴臨療屢見不說不了了療利行療來惡療例行療療見若烈療力行暴論療行行行論力療益年易北論療例年盧年 43

暴刺類療療度裡度尿尿流流葉療裂不療練狀不更來論行羅行利行行暴行行行利行行利不不不行例狀行不行不不律行行行 44

立律行行行行立行行利律不利不利行利行利不不行若行行利論行行利行行立理療行行行利論療療臨療兩復良療立療療不復不例曆不曆論年 45

立離鈴行量不歷異不不度不療寧例療療來狀若念見不不行行利殺行不說說療行力兩兩量例糖尿塞不易力臨狀量切度律療倫理說行 46

聯不行行聯識暴念行行利利論論行不不行例車車更異不行聯行倫理量行理理論療行行若療不立理不行倫理立行倫理不行歷倫理來行年林六年 47

暴樓不行念理狀行不療老率率易理論療暴療行療行理練來不狀療行行理論聯來暴惡不年金六年行暴行惡行年暴 48

立不行行說理不更不不律立切不律不立暴念更輪廓行行切不行立識不說說不聯年年 49

說邏類行便行狀了聯理論行說論理論不不不不理論理論理論行不行識聯不行理論說行龍理論論年 50

不行不行不來行來行說說論律利狀聯度度濫行聯聯行力若聯例若不行行不例車行利量若行不行行行不若行行行龍 51

行殺不理論理論不行理便利兩念理論說聯立若若行不若若行邏行若落邏療行例行論殺論 302 行 304 52

不度 28 年度 3650 例暴度論 304 行暴行行利暴行暴行行利行暴切力理力行不不暴力暴力例連行行連行參見年例行行律行行利暴復行度立不論年例行不暴行行行利論年度行益行參見年度易暴力行不力烈不行行不暴 53

不立暴兩律倫理不行行行行不倫理不行立例行行不立若暴力惡行林龍立連連理論暴兩律倫理便行不說不行念參見年度易 54

律行行了行量見連年立隆臨行療說見狀行度隆年易不年易殺例參識不行利行利行理行療理行立論參見林年度易 55

量例聯不年立不行例說聯理論療行例說療行說療行例更論療行論量療療行療行行率臨療行療療不異療療例龍 56

療行理療不療來數數見臨路練行臨見例來若歷不易狀類例理來漏狀不療狀量療奈狀率理臨狀療說見說療行狀狀說來不行說療年年 57

不度狀狀療量狀見便行療行倫理度不度若不寧例利說不不若不若不行殺兩狀療隆年易年六年度易論益年 58

論論療行療利行療療行療復行療行療療療行不療療行行兩不說說說理說諾行療療行理行聯不行聯不 59

論數論年行律若不論列參療利行度度落不不療行行療療立療濫療不理了療見理療行車度立療度療便利理露度療參度說力度力說理度力 60

療類不狀行切療行例不切療年來療行了惡療離療淪療異年良不年不不離理來來累年理不年不理論理來力不惡劣療不了療療度量 61

療行不療行復不了類復狀療行行率療不不寧療 62

參論論年立劉麗祥療年林療年林論年林六年論年年年年年年臨例療律年論年論蘆年論年 63

療行年療諾年療律論療行年療年年六年度易論益年療年論說年論療行行論年療隆年易年療論說年年李年 64

論療理律年來說說來年臨論年論論年年念年行年林論年林療年林療諾年林療例說年林見不來年林療年度年 65

林論療行說律年療說年律說律論年療說理律年療說理年療說理年龍理論論年療療行行年療療行行年療年說年說年說年 66

麗療例年麗療律年論律療行年論律療行年療律年論療行律年論療行例年療年年立療行療令行年立療行年療論立令年說年論年論年 67

論論年倫理律理論落年理論立年療行令年逸療行令年逸行不令年逸療療療論年逸履行療履行療識年逸履行療履行療識年逸履行療履行療識年逸療行行年年 68

劉療行年療療行律年年盧年盧年盧良兩療行律年療行令年說年論療行立律論年療律立律論年李臨度療立律論年李療理立北論年林論療立律論年 69

林論療律理律論年療立律論年論諾力立律論年論療力立律論年論療行臨來立律論年 70