1 - PDF 免费下载

2003

iii v 1 2 3 4 6 12 52 54 56 60 iii

1. 2001 8 28 1 143,400 2 489,800 633,200 9.5% 1,152,200 55% Deegan and Brooks, 1985; Fine and Asch, 1988; Morris, 1989, 1991; Lonsdale, 1990; Begum, 1992; Ling, 1998; 2000; 2002 2002 6 2003 2 1 (i) ( / ) (ii) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) 2 1

2. Ling, 1998; 2000; 2002 1998 8 2

3. 3

4. 4.1 (Marriage Market) 1998 4.2 1 2 3 (Greengross, 1976) 4.3 (Utilitarian Marriage) (Intrinsic Marriage) 1998 (Housekeeper Role) (Provider Role) (Child-care Role) (Child Socialization Role) (Sexual Role) (Kinship Role) (Recreational Role) (Therapeutic Role) (Benokraitis, 2002) 4

4.4 (Strong, Devault & Sayad, 1998) (Benokraitis, 2002) (Benokraitis, 2002) (Strong, Devault & Sayad, 1998) 4.5 (Dual Career Marriage) 1998 4.6 1998 5

5. (Quantitative Data) (Qualitative Data) 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 5.1 5.1.1 40 34 33 (Close-end Question) 34 (Open-end Question) (Content Validity) (Pilot Test) 1777 550 31% (Facility Analysis) 20% 6

33 30 (Facilitating) 98.4% ( 13.3 + 47.1 + 11.8 + 24.4 + 1.8 = 98.4 ) 20% 29 31 32 (Facilitating) 5.1.2 25.1% 22.2% 13.3% 9.6% 9.5% 9.3% 8.7% 2% 7

16-21 8.7% 22-25 8.2% 26-30 13.1% 31-35 12% 36-40 14.9% 41-45 17.5% 46-50 9.8% 51-60 10.9% 61 3.5% 57.3% 28.2% 7.1% 8

61.3% 25.6% 24.4% 18%/ 17.6% 16.6% 9

5.1.3 (Chi-square) Pearson (Pearson Chi-square) (Likelihood Ratio Chi-square) p (p Value)<0.05 (Statistically Significant Related) 5.2 1 2 3 9 2002 6 2003 2 64 3 1 2 1 2 1 4 6 9 8 3 4 9 4 9 4 8 6 24 8 7 4 17 4 10

5.3 11

6. 6.1 6.1.1 (61.3%) (57.7%) (56.2%) 12

(Chi-square) Pearson (Pearson Chi-square), p < 0.01 (51.1%) 13

6.1.2 14

( ) 16

( ) ( ) ( ) 17

( ) ( ) 18

6. 2 6.2.1 (70.5%) (67.5%) (26.6%) 19

(54.2%) (Chi-square) (Likelihood Ratio Chi-square), p < 0.01 16 35 35 (Chi-square) Pearson (Pearson Chi-square), p < 0.01 20

(48.2%) (18%) / 21

6.2.2 22

( ) 23

6. 3 6.3.1 Taleporos & McCabe(2001) (56%) (11.5%) 25

(67.6%) (52.5%) 26

(52.2%) 36.8% 41.5% 5% 27

6.3.2 ( ) 28

( ) 29

( ) 30

6. 4 6.4.1 (43.3%) (26.4%) 36.8% 44.4% 8% 31

44.2% 35.3% 9% 29 ( 165 ( 108 ( 5 ( 58 ( 185 ( (Chi-square) (Pearson Chi-square), p<0.01 32

6.4.2 33

( ) 36

6.5 6.5.1 Cherry (1998) (78.2%) (Chi-square) ( Likelihood Ratio Chi-square), p < 0.05 37

(53.5%) (56.2%) 38

6.5.2 ( ) 39

6.6 6.6.1 (48.5%) (51.1%) Pearson Chi-square, p < 0.01 40

(65.7%) 96 41

Kent 2002 Kent Ehlers-Flint 2002 42

6.6.2 ( ) ( ) 43

6.3 44

X 46

6.7 6.7.1 (Aesthetic) (Function) (Gill, 1996) (Gill, 1996) (Taleporos & McCabe, 2001) 47

Gill(1996) Giver Sympathy-giving Gill(1996) / 48

( ) 291 229 163 148 137 123 101 67 59 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 ( ) 187 186 153 122 118 116 67 52 51 41 32 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 49

6.7.2 50

7. 7.1 7.2 52

7.3 53

8. 54

: ( ) 10 2337 0826 : ( ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 56

15. / 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. : 1.? ( ) : 2.? ( ) : 57

3. : : : 16-21 22-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 51-60 61 : : : : 58

: : : ( ) ( ) ( ) 59

(2001) (1998) Begum, N. (1992) Disabled Women and the Feminist Agenda, Feminist Review, 40, Spring, pp.70-84. Benokraitis, N.V. (2002) Marriages and Families: Changes, Choices and Constraints. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Cherry, R. (1998) Rational Choice and the Price of Marriage, Feminist Economics, 4(1), pp. 27-49. Deegan, M. and Brooks, N. (eds.) (1985) Women and Disability: The double handicap. New Brunswick: Transaction Books. Ehlers-Flirt, M.L. (2002) Parenting Perceptions and Social Supports of Mothers with Cognitive Disabilities, Sexuality and Disability, 20(1), pp. 29-51. Fine, M. and Asch, A. (eds.) (1988) Women with Disabilities: Essays in psychology, culture and politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Gill, C.J. (1996) Dating and Relationship Issues, in D.M. Kortoski, M.A. Nosek and M.A. Turk (eds) Women with Physical Disabilities. Achieving and Maintaining Health and Well-being. Baltimore: Paul H. Brokes Publishing Co. Greengross, W. (1976) Entitled to Love: The Sexual and Emotional Needs of the Handicapped. London: Malaby. Kent, D. (2002) Beyond Expectations: Being Blind and Becoming a Mother, Sexuality and Disability, 20(1), pp. 81-88. Ling, K. (1998) Survey on Women with Disability in Hong Kong. Paper presented in the 11 th Asia/Pacific Regional Conference, RI held in Hong Kong. Ling, K. (2000) Breaking the Silence The Experiences of Disabled Women in a Chinese Society. Unpublished, Ph.D Thesis. 60

Ling, K. (2002) Marriage and Women with Disability. Paper presented in Seminar on Disabled Women and Empowerment, held in Taiwan. Lonsdale, S. (1990) Women and Disability. London: Macmillan. Morris, J. (1989) Able Lives: Women s experience of paralysis. London: The Women s Press. Morris, J. (1991) Pride Against Prejudice. London: The Women s Press. Strong, B., DeVault, C & Sayad, B.W. (1998) The Marriage and Family Experience: Intimate Relationships in a Changing Society. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company. Taleporos, G. & McCabe, M.P. (2001) Physical Disability and Sexual Esteem, Sexuality and Disability, 19(2), pp. 131-148. 61

c 2003 962-86198-2-9 Report on Disabled Women and Marriage Research Association of Women with Disabilities Hong Kong Rehabilitation Alliance Hong Kong Room 12-13 & 16-17, G/F, Wang Hau House, Wang Tau Hom Estate, Kowloon, Hong Kong. Telephone: 2337 0826 Fax: 2337 1549 E-mail Address: women@rehaballiance.org.hk Web site: www.rehaballiance.org.hk c Rehabilitation Alliance Hong Kong 2003 ISBN 962-86198-2-9 62