- PDF 免费下载

1 2 5

3 3.3.1 3.3.3 6

13 4

5 15

38 够够

6 7 p. 88-89 48

D. H. Feldman Du Terroil(1975)Housen(1987) Du Housen Housen D. H. 49

Feldman D. H. Feldman D. H. Feldman E.B. Feldman E.B. Feldman ( 2001pp. 77-93 ) (2001) E.B. Feldman(1970, 1981) (2001pp. 94-101) (decription) (analysis) (intepretation) (judgement) ( 7 50

E. B. 8 9 Perkins(1988) 52

5-6 5-6 5-6 ( ) ( ) (I) 5-6 ( ) (II) 53

Gardner ( ) ( ) Gardner Viktor Lowenfeld Read(1958) (creative) (The problem-centered) (Progressive naturalism) (Romantic naturalism)( J.J. Rousseau) ( J.Dewey) ( H. Read) ( V. Lowenfeld) 10 (Scribbling stage)( )2. (Preschematic stage) ( )3. (schematic stage) ( )4. (Dawning realism) ( )5. (Pseudorealistic stage) ( ) 54

55 11

12 6.1 56

Hirst& Peters(1970 & 1983) 58

(levels of learning outcome) (Approaches to learning) (Conceptions of learning) 61

Parsons(1998) DBAE ( visual thinking )(Arnheim, 1969) (Eisner, 1994) 67

1. 2. ( ) ( ) ( ) 70

75 ( )

78 13 6.2 14 (1997) 3.6

Airasian, P. W. (1994). Classroom assessment, 2nd Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. Amy, B. (1999). Traditional and modern concepts of validity, ERIC Identifier: ED435714. Andersen, W.E. (1973). Philosophy and the curriculum: An agenda, in P. Hughes (ed.). The teacher s role in curriculum design, Sydney: Angus & Robertson. Aoki, T.T. (1979). Toward curriculum inquiry in a new key. Curriculum, media & instruction occasional paper No.2, ERIC No. ED182808. Ariety, S. (1976). Creativity, New York: Basic Books Inc. Publishers. Arnheim, R. (1969), Visual thinking. Berkeley: Universiyt of California. Bernstein, B. (1990). Class, code & control; V.4: The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London; New York: Routledge. Biggs, J.B. and Collis, K.F. (1982). Evaluating the Quality of Learning. New York and Sydney: Academic Press. Biggs, J.B. (1992). A qualitative approach to grading students, HERDSA News, 14(3). Bloom, B.S.(1981). Evaluation to improve learning. New York: McGraw-Hill. Bloom, B.S. et al. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David Mckay. Broadfoot, P. (2001). Editorial: New wine in old bottles? The challenge of change for educational assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 8(2), 109-112. Burnaford, G., Aprill, A., Weiss, C. (eds.) (2001). Renaissance in the classroom: Arts integration and meaningful learning, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Chacko, I. (2002). An analysis of secondary school examination syllabus, public examination test items and statistical literacy level of the students, ICOTS6. Chacko, I. (2001a). Teacher domination and student retardation: East or South, the story is the same. Proceedings of the 7 th National Congress of the Association of Mathematics Education of South Africa (AMESA)(pp. 1-13. University of Wits. Chacko, I. (2001b). Under utilization of statistical concepts by students: strategy deficiency and missed targets. In Proceedings of 53 rd Session of the International Statistical Institute. Contributed papers Volume 2: (pp. 247-248). Seoul. Clark, R. (1997). Purposeful Uncertainty: Art Educaton in a Postmodernist World. In Irwin, R.L. & Grauer, K., Readings In Canadian Art Teacher Education. Boucherville, Quebec: Canadian Society of Educaton through Art. Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural Perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13-20. Daniels, H. & Bizar, M.(1998). Methods that matter: Six structures for best practice classrooms. New York, ME: Stenhouse Publishers. Darling-Hammond, L. & Snyder, J. (1992). Curriculum studies and the traditions of inquiry: The 89

scientific tradition. In P. W. Jackson(Ed.). Handbook of Research on Curriculum. New York: Macmillan. Davies, A. (1994). Identifying and working with student expectations of learning. In Gibbs (1994). Improving Student Learning Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Minton Balch and Company. Dewey, J. (1938). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan. Du Terroil, A. M. (1975). The aesthetic experience: An historical review and behavioral hierarchy. Washington, D.C.: The Office of Education Bureau of Research. ERIC: ED 129657. Earl, L. M.(2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. California: Corwin Press, Inc. Earl, L. M. & LeMahieu, P.G. (1997). Rethinking Assessment and accountability. In 1997 ASCD yearbook: Rethinking education change with heart and mind (pp.147-168). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Eisner, E.W. (1972). Educating artistic vision. New York & London: Macmillan Publishers. Eisner, E.W. (1979). The educational imagination. New York: Macmillan. Eisner, E.W. (1981). Mind as cultural achievement. Education Leadership 38(6): 466-471. Eisner, E.W. (1982). Cognition & the curriculum. New York: Longman. Eisner, E.W. (1983). On the relationship of conception to representation. Art Education 36(2), pp. 22-27. Eisner, E.W. (1985). Aesthetic modes of knowing 84 th yearbook of the National Society for the study of education. E.W., Eisner, & K.J., Rehage(Eds.). Learning and teaching the ways o knowing. The University of Chicago Press. Eisner, E.W. (1990). Alternative paradigms for practice. In G.G. Egon, The Paradigm Dialog, Newbury Park: Sage Publication. Eisner, E.W. (1993). Why Standards May Not Improve Schools? Educational Leadership, V.50, no.5. Eisner, E.W. (1994). The educational imagination. New York: Macmillan. Eisner, E., & Vallance, E. (1974). Five conceptions of curriculum: Their roots and implications for curriculum planning. In E., Eisner & E., Vallance (Eds.). Conflicting conceptions of curriculum, (pp.1-18). Berkeley: McCutchan. Embretson, S. (1983). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 179-197. Feldman, E. B. (1970). Becoming human through art: Aesthetic experience in the school. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Feldman, E. B. (1981). Varieties of visual experience. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Harry N. Abrams. Feldman, D. H. (1983). Development psychology and art education. Art Education, 36(2), 19-21. Feldman, D. H. (1985). The concept of non-universal developmental domains: Implications f0r 90

artistic development. Visual Arts Research, 11(1), 82-89. Feldman, D. H. (1987). Development psychology and art education: Two fields at the crossroads. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 21(2), 243-259. Feldman, D. H. (1994). Beyond universals in cognitive development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Flewellig, G. & Higginson, W. (2001). A Handbook on rich tasks. Ontario: Queen s University. Freedman, K. (2000). Social perspectives on art education in the U.S.: Teaching visual culture in a democracy. Studies in Art Education, 41(4), 314-329. Gardner, H. (1973). The Arts and human development: A psychological study of the artistic process. New York: Wiley and Sons. Gardner, H. (1980). Artful scribbles, New York: Basic Bookes, Inc., Publishers. Gardner, H. (1982). Art, mind, and brain, New York: Basic Bookes, Inc., Publishers. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligence. New York: Basic Books. Gardner, H., Winner, E. and Kircher, M. (1975). Children s conceptions of the arts. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 9, 66-67. Gibbs, G. (Ed.) (1995)Improving Student Learning - Through Assessment and Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development. Reproduced by Barry Jackson, Middlesex University Gibson, R. (1984). Structuralism and education. London: Hodder and Stoughton Ltd.(Chinese translation by Wu Nan Book Company, Ltd., 1995) Glaser, R. (1984). Education and thinking : The role of knowledge. American Psychologist, 39, 93-104. Goodlad, J.I. (1979b). The conceptual system for curriculum revisited. In Goodlad, J.I. et al., Curriculum Inquiry: The study of curriculum practice. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 343-364. Goodman, N. (1976). The languages of art. Indianapolis: Hackett. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill. Heap, J.L. (1995). The status of claims in qualitative educational research. Curriculum Enquriy, 25(3): 271-291. Herman, J. L. (1992). What research tells us about good assessment. Educational Leadership, 44 (8), 74-78. Hermanm, J.L., Aschbacher, P.R., & Winters, L. (1992). A practical guide to alternative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Hirst, P.H.(1983). Educational theory and its foundation disciplines. London and New York. Routledge & Kegan Paul. Hirst, P.H. & Peters, R. S. (1970 & 1983). The logic of education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Housen, A. (1987). Tyhree methods for understanding museum audiences. Museum Studies Journal, 2(4), 41-49. Jackson, B. (2004). Assessment practices in art and design: a contribution to Student learning? http://www.city.londonmet.ac.uk/deliberations/ocsd-pubs/islass-jackson. html. Kliebard, H. (1977). Curriculum theory: Give me a for instance. Curriculum Inquiry 6(4), pp. 91

257-269. Lenten, T., Darby, M., Miller, S., Sibbel, H. (1986). Praxis: A guide to Art/craft curriculum development. Secondary Art/Craft Standing Committee. Langer, S. (1953). Feeing and form - A theory of art, developed from philosophy in a new key. New York: Charles Scribner s Sons. Lawence-Lightfoot, S. & Davis, J.H. (1998). The art and science of portraiture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Linn, R.L. and Gronlund (1995). Measurement and assessment in teaching (7 th Ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Marton, F., Hounsell, D. and Entwhistle, N. (1984). The Experience of Learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press. Messick, S. (1996a). Standards-based score interpretation: Establishing valid grounds for valid inferences. Proceedings of the joint conference on standard setting for large scale assessments, Sponsored by National Assessment Governing Board and The National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Messick, S. (1996b). Validity of Performance Assessment. In Philips, G. (1996). Technical Issues in Large-Scale Performance Assessment. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics. Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in thevalidation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13-23. Messick, S. (1992). Validity of test interpretation and use. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Educational Research (6th ed., Vol. 4, pp.1487-1495). New York: Macmillan. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R.L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). New York: Macmillan. Moore, B.E.(1973). Adescription of children verbal responses to works of art In selected grades one through twelve. Studies in Art Educaton, 14(3), 27. Oliver, A.I. (1977). Curriculum improvement(2 nd Ed.). N.Y.: Harper & Row. Oliver, P.F. (1997). Developing the Curriculum (4 th edition). New York: Longman. Ornstein, A. C. & Hunkins, F.P. (1988). Curriculum: Foundations, Principles, and Issues. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Parsons, M. J. (1998). Integrated curriculum and our paradigm of cognition in the arts, Studies in Art Education, 39(2):103-116. Perkins, D. N. (1986). Thinking frames. Educational Leadership, 43, 4-10. Peters, R.S.(1967). Ethics and education. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company. QCA(2004). Public examinations: views on maintaining standard Read, H. (1958). Education through art (3rd revised edition). New York: Pantheon Books. Reber, A.S. (1985). The penguin dictionary of psychology. London: Penguin Books: 151. Reimer, B. (1992). What knowledge is of most worth in the arts? In B. Reimer, and R. Smith (Eds.), 92

The arts, education, and aesthetic knowing. The ninety-first yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Robertson, M. & Gerber, R. (2000). The child s world: Triggers for learning. Victoria: ACER Press. Rush, J.C. (1987). Interlocking images: The conceptual core of a discipline-based art lesson. Studies in Art Education. 28(4), 206-220. Saylor, J. G., Alexander, W.M. & Lewis, A. J. (1981). Curriculum planning for better teaching learning (4 th ed.). Tokyo, Japan: Holt-Saunders International Editions. Schubert, W. H. & Schubert, a. l. (1991). Curriculum inquiry: Alternative paradigms. In A. Lewy (Ed.). The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum, Oxford; New York: Pergamon Press, pp. 51-56. Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development. N.Y.: Harcourt, Brace & World. Tyler, L. L. (1991). Learning experiences. In A. Lewy (Ed.). The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum. Oxford: New York: Pergamon Press. Tyler, R.W. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Tyler, R.W. (1975). Specific approaches to Curriculum development. In J. Schaffarzick & D.H. Hampson (Eds.). Strategies for Curriculum Development(pp.17-33). Berkeley, California: McCutchan. Van Rossum, E.J. and Schenk, S.M. (1984). The relationship between learning conception, study strategy and learning outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 73-83. Wells, G. (1995). Language and the inquiry-oriented curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry 25(3): 233-269. Willower, D.J. (1994). Dewey s theory of inquiry and reflective administration, Journal of Educational Administration 32(1), pp. 5-22. White, J. (1973). Toward a Compulsory Curriculum. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Winner, E., Rosenstiel, A. & Gardner, H. (1976). The development of metaphoric understanding. Developmental Psychology, 12, 289-297. (1998a) ( ) (2002) (1994) (1993) 6 (1996)Reber, A.S. (1995) (1982) (1999) (1997) (2005) 93

94 http://www.yuntech.edu.tw/~yangyf/ver/ver007.html (1995) (2001)( ) (2005) http://www.naer.edu.tw/issue/j1/v13n3/1.htm (1999) 7(5) (1988) (1991) (1999) 3 (43) 15-20 (1993) () 21 (78-81) (2002) [ ](2001) () [ ](2003) 70-72 (2004) (1988) 63-90 (1999) ( ) (1992) (2002) 130 86-91 (1995) (1986) (2002)